Assessment of Nigeriasat-1 satellite data for urban land use/land cover analysis using object-based image analysis in Abuja, Nigeria

References

• Anderson JR, Hardy HE, Roach JT, Witmar RE. 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. Washington (DC): United States Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ayeni B. 1981. Lagos. In: Pacione M, editor. Problems and Planning in third world cities. London: Croom Helm; p. 127–155.
   Google Scholar
• Ayeni OO, Uluocha NO, Saka DN. 2004. Potential of Nigeriasat-1 for the development of tourism in Nigeria: a case study of parts of Southwest Nigeria. National Workshop on Satellite Remote Sensing (Nigeriasat-1) and GIS: A Solution to Sustainable National Development Challenges. Held 2004 Jun 15–17 at Le Meridien Hotel, Abuja.
   Google Scholar
• Babamaaji RA, Lee J. 2014. Land use/land cover classification of the vicinity of Lake Chad using NigeriaSat-1 and Landsat data. Environ Earth Sci. 71:4309–4317.10.1007/s12665-013-2825-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnsley MJ, Barr SL. 2000. Monitoring urban land use by earth observation. Surveys in Geophysics. 21:269–289.
   Google Scholar
• Benz UC, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M. 2004. Multi resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens. 58:239–258.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2003.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke T. 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens. 65:2–16.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke T, Strobl J. 2001. What’s wrong with pixels? Some recent developments interfacing remote sensing and GIS. GIS-Zeitschrift Für Geoinformationssysteme. 14:12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke T, Lang S, Lorup E, Strobl J, and Zeil P, editors. 2000. Environmental information for planning, politics and the public object-oriented image processing in an integrated GIS/remote sensing environment and perspectives for environmental applications. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Congalton RG. 2001. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed and other spatial information. Int J Wildfire. 10:321–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton RG, Green K. 1999. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Definiens. 2006. Definiens professional 5 user guides. Munich: Definiens AG.
   Google Scholar
• Foody GM. 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens Environ. 80:185–201.10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00295-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foody GM. 2008. Harshness in image classification accuracy assessment. Int J Remote Sens. 29:3137–3158. Foody (2002).10.1080/01431160701442120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank N, White S, Peng Z, Harris K, Sanders W, editors. 2000. Association of collegiate schools of planning, Atlanta ‘Exploring sprawl: findings of a comprehensive review of the literature related to “Sprawl” or what do we really know?’ Held 2000 Nov 2–5 at Atlanta, Georgia O’Meara 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim MH. editor, 2004. Validation of Nigeriasat-1 imageries with focus on the water sector: a case study of kano area and envions, Proceedings of National Workshop on Satellite Remote Sensing (NigeriaSat-1) and GIS: a solution to sustainable National Development Challenges; 2004 Jun 15–17; Abuja, Nigeria.
   Google Scholar
• Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW, Chipman J. 2008. Remote sensing and image interpretation. 6th ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Maktav D, Erbek FS. 2005. Analysis of urban growth using multi-temporal satellite data in Istanbul, Turkey. Int J Remote Sens. 26:797–810.10.1080/01431160512331316784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather PM. 1999. Land cover classification revisited. In: Atkinson PM, Tate NJ, editors. Advances in Remote Sensing and GIS. New York (NY): Wiley, p. 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• O’Meara M. 1999. Reinventing cities for people and the planet. Washington: Worldwatch Institute. Paper No. 147.
   Google Scholar
• Ojo AG, Adesina FA. 2010. An assessment of the efficiency of Landsat, Nigeriasat-1 and spot images for landuse/landcover analyses in Ekiti West area of Nigeria. In: Wagner W, Székely B, editors. ISPRS TC VII Symposium – 100 years ISPRS; 2010 Jul 5–7; Vienna, Austria: IAPRS; Vol. XXXVIII, Part 7b.
   Google Scholar
• Olaleye JB, Sangodina JO, Hamid-Mosaku AI, editors. 2004. ‘Mapping transportation networks in part of South–Western Nigeria using Nigeriasat-1 image’ National Workshop on Satellite Remote Sensing (Nigeriasat-1) and GIS: a solution to sustainable development challenges. Held 2004 Jun 15–17 at Le Meridien Hotel, Abuja.
   Google Scholar
• Omojola A. 2004. Urban and rural land use mapping of parts of Ekiti State using Nigeriasat-1 imagery, proceedings of National Workshop on Satellite Remote Sensing (NigeriaSat-1) and GIS: a solution to sustainable National Development Challenges; 2004 Jun 15–17; Abuja, Nigeria.
   Google Scholar
• Oyesiku K. 2010. New Cities in Urban and Regional Development Planning. Lagos: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Oyinloye RO, Agbo BF, Aliyu ZO. 2004. Application of NigeriaSat-1 data for landuse/landcover mapping, proceedings of National Workshop on Satellite Remote Sensing (NigeriaSat-1) and GIS: a solution to sustainable National Development Challenges; 2004 Jun 15–17; Abuja, Nigeria.
   Google Scholar
• Pacione M. 2009. Urban Geography. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl C, Van Genderen JL. 1998. Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: concepts, methods and applications. Int J Remote Sens. 19:823–854.10.1080/014311698215748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd. 2016. [accessed 2016 Sep 23]; Available from: http://www.sstl.co.uk/Constellations
   Google Scholar
• Taubenbock H, Esch T, Roth A, editors. 2006. ‘An urban classification approach based on an object oriented analysis of high resolution satellite imagery for a spatial structuring within urban areas’ 1st EARLseL Workshop of the SIG Urban Remote Sensing. Held 2006 Mar 2–3 at Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• UNFPA. 2011. State of the world population 2011: people and possibilities in a 7 Billion world. New York (NY): United Nations Population Fund.
   Google Scholar
• UNFPA. 2015. State of the world population 2015: shelter from the storm. New York (NY): United Nations Population Fund.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. 2014. The state of African cities 2014:re-imagining sustainable urban transitions. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2011. World Population Prospects, 2010 Revision. 2011 Jun 28 ed. New York (NY): Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, Population Estimates and Projections Section.
   Google Scholar
• Weih RC, Jr., Riggan ND, Jr. 2010. Object-based classification vs. pixel-based classification: comparitive importance of multi-resolution imagery. Proceedings of GEOBIA 2010: Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis; 2010 Jun 29–Jul 2; Ghent, Belgium; Vol. 38, Part 4/C7, p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Welch R. 1982. Spatial resolution requirements for urban studies. Int J Remote Sens. 3:136–146.
   Google Scholar