Simulation of peri-urban growth dynamics using weights of evidence approach

References

• Agterberg FP, Bonham-Carter GF. 1990. Deriving weights of evidence from geoscience contour maps for the prediction of discrete events. XXII Int Symp AP-COM. 2:381–395.
   Google Scholar
• Akın A, Clarke KC, Berberoglu S. 2014. The impact of historical exclusion on the calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 27:156–168.10.1016/j.jag.2013.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JR, et al. 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. USGS Professional Paper 964; 39 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Bell EJ, Hinojosa RC. 1977. Markov analysis of land use change: continuous time and stationary processes. Socio-Econ Planning Sci. 11:13–17.10.1016/0038-0121(77)90041-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonham-Carter. 1994. Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modeling with GIS. New York (NY): Pergamon; 396 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri G, Clarke KC. 2013. Temporal accuracy in urban growth forecasting: a study using the SLEUTH model. Trans GIS. 18:302–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke KC, Gaydos LJ. 1998. Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. Int J Geog Inf Sci. 12:699–714.10.1080/136588198241617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton RG, Green K. 1999. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. FL: CRC Press; 160 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza R. 1989. Model goodness of fit: a multiple resolution procedure. Ecol Model Syst Ecol. 47:199–215.10.1016/0304-3800(89)90001-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford A, Clarke KC, Raines G. 2009. Modeling settlement patterns of the late classic Maya civilization with Bayesian methods and geographic information systems. Annu Assoc Am Geographers. 99:496–520.10.1080/00045600902931785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi IS, Suresh MV. 2012. Prediction of urban sprawl in Hyderabad city using spatial model, remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int J Sci Res. 1:2277–8179.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen A. 2003. Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps. Int J Geog Inf Sci. 17:235–249.10.1080/13658810210157822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudalah D, Firman T. 2012. Beyond property: industrial estates and post-suburban transformation in Jakarta metropolitan region. Cities. 29:40–48.10.1016/j.cities.2011.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafarnezhad J, Salmanmahiny A, Sakieh Y. 2015. Subjectivity versus objectivity: comparative study between brute force method and genetic algorithm for calibrating the SLEUTH urban growth model. Urban Planning Dev. 142. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000307.
   Google Scholar
• Jat MK, Garg PK, Khare D. 2008. Monitoring and modelling of urban sprawl using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 10:26–43.10.1016/j.jag.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatibi A, Pourebrahim S, Danehkar A. 2015. Application of genetic algorithm for simulation of land use and land cover changes; case of Karaj city, Iran. J Tethys. 3:286–296.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Sun R, Yang Q, Su G, Qi W. 2012. Simulating urban expansion using an improved SLEUTH model. J Appl Remote Sens. 6:061709.10.1117/1.JRS.6.061709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, He C, Wu J. 2016. General spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization: an examination of 16 world cities. Sustainability. 8:41.10.3390/su8010041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahiny AS, Clarke KC. 2012. Guiding SLEUTH land-use/land-cover change modeling using multicriteria evaluation: towards dynamic sustainable land-use planning. Environ Planning B: Planning Des. 39:925–944.10.1068/b37092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maithani S. 2014. Neural networks-based simulation of land cover scenarios in Doon valley, India. Geocarto Int. 30:163–185. doi:10.1080/10106049.2014.927535.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbrot BB. 1983. The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco (CA): Freeman; 497 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Mas JF, Filho SF, Pontius RG, Gutierrez MF, Rodrigues H. 2013. A suite of tools for ROC analysis of spatial models. ISPRS Int J Geo-inf. 2:869–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mas J-F, Kolb M, Paegelow M, Olmedo MTC. 2014. Inductive pattern-based land use/cover change models: a comparison of four software packages. Environ Model Softw. 51:94–111.10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather PM. 1999. Computer processing of remotely sensed images: an introduction. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 262 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Moghadam HS, Helbich M. 2013. Spatiotemporal urbanization processes in the megacity of Mumbai, India: a Markov chains-cellular automata urban growth model. Appl Geogr. 40:140–149.10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munshi T, Zuidgeestb M, Brussel M, Maarseveen MV. 2014. Logistic regression and cellular automata-based modelling of retail, commercial and residential development in the city of Ahmedabad, India. Cities. 39:68–86.10.1016/j.cities.2014.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijanowski CB, Pithadia S, Shellito AB, Alexandridis K. 2005. Calibrating a neural network-based urban change model for two metropolitan areas of the Upper Midwest of the United States. Int J Geog Inf Sci. 19:197–215.10.1080/13658810410001713416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius RG Jr. 2000. Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogrammetric Eng Remote Sens. 66:1011–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius RG Jr. 2002. Statistical methods to partition effects of quantity and location during comparison of categorical maps at multiple resolutions. Photogrammetric Eng Remote Sens. 68:1041–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power C, Simms A, White R. 2001. Hierarchical fuzzy pattern matching for the regional comparison of land use maps. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 15:77–100.10.1080/136588100750058715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran R. 1991. Urbanization and urban systems in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 364 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Rienow A, Goetzke R. 2014. Supporting SLEUTH Enhancing a cellular automata with support vector machines for urban growth modeling. Comput Environ Urban Syst. [cited 2017 Jan]. 49:66–81. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakieh Y, Amiri BJ, Danekar A, Feghhi J, Dezhkam S. 2014. Simulating urban expansion and scenario prediction using a cellular automata urban growth model, SLEUTH, through a case study of Karaj city, Iran. Hous Built Environ. 30:591–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakieh Y, Amiri BJ, Danekar A, Feghhi J, Dezhkam S. 2015. Simulating urban expansion and scenario prediction using a cellular automata urban growth model, SLEUTH, through a case study of Karaj city, Iran. Hous Built Environ. 30:591–611.10.1007/s10901-014-9432-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakieh Y, Salmanmahiny A, Jafarnezhad J, Mehri A, Kamyab H, Galdavi S. 2015. Evaluating the strategy of decentralized urban land-use planning in a developing region. Land Use Policy. 48:534–551.10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakieh Y, Salmanmahiny A, Mirkarimi SH. 2016. Rules versus layers: which side wins the battle of model calibration? Environ Monit Assess. 188:633. doi:10.1007/s10661-016-5643-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares-Filho BS, Cerqueira GC, Pennachin CL. 2002. Dinamica—a stochastic cellular automata model designed to simulate the landscape dynamics in an Amazonian colonization frontier. Ecol Model. 154:217–235.10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00059-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares-Filho BS, Rodrigues HO, Costa WL. 2009. Modelling environmental dynamics with Dinimica EGO. Belo Horizonte. 116 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Soares-Filho BS, Rodrigues HO, Follador M. 2013. A hybrid analytical-heuristic method for calibrating land use change models. Environ Model Softw. 43:80–87.10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takada T, Miyamoto A, Hasegawa SF. 2010. Derivation of a yearly transition probability matrix for land-use dynamics and its applications. Landscape Ecol. 25:561–572.10.1007/s10980-009-9433-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapa RB, Murayama Y. 2010. Drivers of urban growth in the Kathmandu valley, Nepal: examining the efficacy of the analytic hierarchy process. Appl Geogr. 30:70–83.10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapa RB, Murayama Y. 2011. Urban growth modeling of Kathmandu metropolitan region, Nepal. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 35:25–34.10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolias YA, Panas SM, Tsoukalas LH. 2001. Generalized fuzzy indices for similarity matching. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 74:217–223.
   Google Scholar
• Verburg PH, Soepboer W, Veldkamp A, Limpiada R, Espaldon V, Mastura SSA. 2002. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: the CLUE-S model. J Environ Manage. 30:391–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JG. 2014. Urban ecology and sustainability: the state-of-the-science and future directions. Landscape Urban Planning. 125:209–221.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young AF. 2013. Urban expansion and environmental risk in the São Paulo metropolitan area. Clim Res. 57:73–80.10.3354/cr01161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar