Analysing performance of SLEUTH model calibration using brute force and genetic algorithm–based methods

References

• Akin A, Clarke KC, Berberoglu S. 2014. The impact of historical exclusion on the calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform. 27:156–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anurag SA, Pradhan B. 2018. Land use/land cover change modelling: issues and challenges. J Rural Develop. 37(2):413–424.
   Google Scholar
• Balling RJ, Taber JT, Brown MR, Day K. 1999. Multi objective urban planning using genetic algorithm. J Urban Plan Develop. 125(2):86–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty M. 2005. Agents, cells, and cities: new representational models for simulating multiscale urban dynamics. Environ Plan A. 37(8):1373–1394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty M. 2009. Urban modeling. International encyclopedia of human geography. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatta B. 2010. Causes and consequences of urban growth and sprawl. In: Analysis of urban growth and sprawl from remote sensing data (pp. 17–36). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Bockstael NE. 1996. Modeling economics and ecology: the importance of a spatial perspective. Am J Agricult Econ. 78(5):1168–1180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown DG, Pijanowski BC, Duh JD. 2000. Modeling the relationships between land use and land cover on private lands in the Upper Midwest, USA. J Environ Manage. 59(4):247–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brueckner JK, Helsley RW. 2011. Sprawl and blight. J Urban Economics. 69(2):205–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candau JT. 2002. Temporal calibration sensitivity of the SLEUTH urban growth model. Santa Barbara: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson D, Haurie AB, Leizarowitz A. 2012. Infinite horizon optimal control: deterministic and stochastic systems. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri G, Clarke K. 2013. The SLEUTH land use change model: A review. Environ Resources Res. 1(1):88–105.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Masser I. 2003. Urban growth pattern modeling: a case study of Wuhan city, PR China. Landsc Urban Plan. 62(4):199–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomitz K, Gray AD. 1995. Roads, lands, markets, and deforestation (Vol. 1444). Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke KC. 1997. Land transition modeling with deltatrons. Department of Geography. Santa Barbara: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke KC. 2008. Mapping and modeling land use change: an application of the SLEUTH model. In: Landscape Analysis and Visualisation (pp. 353–366). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke KC. 2014. Why simulate cities? GeoJournal. 79(2):129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke KC. 2017. Land use change modeling with SLEUTH: Improving calibration with a genetic algorithm. In: Geomatic Approaches for Modeling Land Change Scenarios (pp. 139–161). Springer: Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke KC, Gaydos LJ. 1998. Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. Int J Geograph Info Sci. 12(7):699–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke KC, Gazulis N, Dietzel C, Goldstein NC. 2007. A decade of SLEUTHing: Lessons learned from applications of a cellular automaton land use change model. Classics in IJGIS: twenty Years of the International Journal of Geographical Information Science and Systems. 413–427.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke KC, McLafferty SL, Tempalski BJ. 1996. On epidemiology and geographic information systems: a review and discussion of future directions. Emerg Infect Dis. 2(2):85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke-Lauer MD, Clarke KC. 2011. Evolving simulation modeling: Calibrating SLEUTH using a genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on GeoComputation, London, UK (Vol. 2022). July 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Couclelis H. 1997. From cellular automata to urban models: new principles for model development and implementation. Environ Plann B. 24(2):165–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietzel C, Clarke KC. 2007. Toward optimal calibration of the SLEUTH land use change model. Trans GIS. 11(1):29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Estoque RC, Murayama Y. 2012. Introducing new measures of accuracy for land-use/cover change modeling. Tsukuba Geoenviron Sci. 8:3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Feng Y. 2017. Modeling dynamic urban land-use change with geographical cellular automata and generalized pattern search-optimized rules. Int J Geograph Info Sci. 31(6):1198–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Liu Y. 2016. Scenario prediction of emerging coastal city using CA modeling under different environmental conditions: a case study of Lingang New City, China. Environ Monit Assess. 188(9):540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Tong X. 2018. Dynamic land use change simulation using cellular automata with spatially nonstationary transition rules. GISci Remote Sensing. 55(5):678–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi SI, Suresh VM. 2012. Prediction of urban sprawl in Hyderabad city using spatial model, remote sensing and GIS techniques geography. Int J Sci Res. 1(2):80–82.
   Google Scholar
• Gazulis N, Clarke KC. 2006. Exploring the DNA of our regions: Classification of outputs from the SLEUTH model. In: International Conference on Cellular Automata (pp. 462–471). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gimblett, H. R. (Ed.). 2002. Integrating geographic information systems and agent-based modeling techniques for simulating social and ecological processes. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein NC. 2004. Brains vs. Brawn: Comparative strategies for the calibration of a cellular automata-based urban growth model.” In GeoDynamics, Edited by: Atkinson, P., Foody, G., Darby, S. and Wu, F. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein NC, Dietzel C, Clarke KC. 2005. Don’t stop ‘til you get enough–sensitivity testing of Monte Carlo iterations for model calibration. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on GeoComputation (pp. 1–3). University of Michigan, United States of America, 31 July – 3 August 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Guan Q, Clarke KC. 2010. A general-purpose parallel raster processing programming library test application using a geographic cellular automata model. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 24(5):695–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatna E, Benenson I. 2012. The Schelling model of ethnic residential dynamics: Beyond the integrated-segregated dichotomy of patterns. JASSS. 15(1):6.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin EG, Bockstael NE. 2002. Interacting agents, spatial externalities and the evolution of residential land use patterns. J Econ Geography. 2(1):31–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafarnezhad J, Salmanmahiny A, Sakieh Y. 2015. Subjectivity versus objectivity: comparative study between brute force method and genetic algorithm for calibrating the SLEUTH urban growth model. J Urban Plann Dev. 142(3):05015015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantz CA, Goetz SJ. 2005. Analysis of scale dependencies in an urban land‐use‐change model. Int J Geograp Inform Sci. 19(2):217–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantz CA, Goetz SJ, Donato D, Claggett P. 2010. Designing and implementing a regional urban modeling system using the SLEUTH cellular urban model. Computers, Environ Urban Syst. 34(1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantz CA, Goetz SJ, Shelley MK. 2004. Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area. Environ Plann B Plann Des. 31(2):251–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jat MK, Choudhary M, Saxena A. 2017. Urban growth assessment and prediction using RS, GIS and SLEUTH model for a heterogeneous urban fringe. Egyptian J Remote Sens Space Sci. 20(2):223–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jat MK, Garg PK, Khare D. 2008. Modeling of urban growth using spatial analysis techniques: a case study of Ajmer city India. Int J Remote Sens. 29(2):543–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanta Kumar LN, Sawant NG, Kumar S. 2011. Forecasting urban growth based on GIS, RS and SLEUTH model in Pune metropolitan area. Int J Geomatics Geosci. 2(2):568.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Yeh AGO. 2002. Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. 16(4):323–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Feng Y, Pontius RG. 2014. Spatially-explicit simulation of urban growth through self-adaptive genetic algorithm and cellular automata modeling. Land. 3(3):719–738.
   Google Scholar
• Niazi M, Hussain A. 2011. Agent-based computing from multi-agent systems to agent-based models: a visual survey. Scientometrics. 89(2):479–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson GC, Hellerstein D. 1997. Do roads cause deforestation? Using satellite images in econometric analysis of land use. Am J Agricult Econ. 79(1):80–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newburn DA, Berck P. 2011. Growth management policies for exurban and suburban development: theory and an application to Sonoma County, California. Agricult Res Econ. 40:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Onsted J, Clarke KC. 2012. The inclusion of differentially assessed lands in urban growth model calibration: a comparison of two approaches using SLEUTH. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 26(5):881–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathiranage ISS, Kantakumar LN, Sundaramoorthy S. 2018. Remote sensing data and SLEUTH urban growth model: as decision support tools for urban planning. Chin Geogr Sci. 28(2):274–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena A, Jat MK. 2018. An integrated approach for natural resources monitoring using geo-informatics and CA. JRD. 37(2):341–354.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena A, Jat MK, Choudhary M. 2016. Analysis of Urban Growth using Geospatial Techniques. Int J Earth Sci Eng. 9(6):2855–2861.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling TC. 1971. Dynamic models of segregation. J Mathemat Soc. 1(2):143–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan J, Alkheder S, Wang J. 2008. Genetic algorithms for the calibration of cellular automata urban growth modeling. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing. 74(10):1267–1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sietchiping R. 2004. A geographic information systems and cellular automata-based model of informal settlement growth (Doctoral dissertation). Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Silva EA, Clarke KC. 2002. Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal. Computers, Environ Urban Syst. 26(6):525–552.
   Google Scholar
• Towe CA, Nickerson CJ, Bockstael N. 2008. An empirical examination of the timing of land conversions in the presence of farmland preservation programs. Am J Agricultural Economics. 90(3):613–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Werf E, Peterson S. 2009. Modeling linkages between climate policy and land use: an overview. Agricult Econ. 40(5):507–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meijl JCM, van Tongeren FW. 2001. Multilateral trade liberalisation and developing countries: A North-South perspective on agriculture and processing sectors (No. 6.01. 07). Wageningen, Netherlands: Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI).
   Google Scholar
• Verburg PH, Neumann K, Nol L. 2011. Challenges in using land use and land cover data for global change studies. Global Change Biol. 17(2):974–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White R, Engelen G. 1993. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environ Plan A. 25(8):1175–1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram S. 1984. Cellular automata as models of complexity. Nature. 311(5985):419–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram S. 1986. Theory and applications of cellular automata (Vol. 1, pp. 560). Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Wrenn DH, Irwin EG. 2012. How do land use policies influence fragmentation? An econometric model of land development with spatial simulation. Environ Econ, 3, 82–96.
   Google Scholar
• Wu F, Webster CJ. 1998. Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multi-criteria evaluation. Environ Plann B. 25(1):103–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar