Dimension reduction methods applied to coastline extraction on hyperspectral imagery

References

• Akyürek Ö. 2012. A Comparative Analysis of Dimension Reduction Methods in Hyperspectral Images (in Turkish) [master’s thesis]. Kocaeli, Turkey: Kocaeli University.
   Google Scholar
• Arslan O, Akyürek Ö, Kaya Ş. 2017. A comparative analysis of classification methods for hyperspectral images generated with conventional dimension reduction methods. Turk J Elec Eng Comp Sci. 25:58–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burges CJC. 2005. Geometric methods for feature selection and dimensional reduction: a guided tour. In: Maimon O, Rokach L, editors. Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook: a complete guide for practitioners and researchers. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; p. 53–82.
   Google Scholar
• Burgers K, Fessehatsion Y, Rahmani S, Seo JY. 2009. A comparative analysis of dimension reduction algorithms on hyperspectral data. The UCLA: Lambda Group, Technical Report. [accessed 2018 September 18]. http://www.math.ucla.edu/∼wittman/reu2009/IPreports/DR/FinalPaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cattell RB. 1966. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res. 1(2):245–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountanas L. 1993. Principal components based techniques for hyperspectral image data [master’s thesis]. Monterey (CA): Hellenic Naval Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Gens R. 2010. Remote sensing of coastlines: detection, extraction and monitoring. Int J Remote Sens. 31(7):1819–1836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon C. 2000. A generalization of the maximum noise fraction transform. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 38(1):608–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hongtao D, Hairong Q, Xiaoling W, Rajeev R, Snyder WE. 2003. Band selection using independent component analysis for hyperspectral image processing. Proceedings of the 32nd Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop AIPR’03; Washington, DC: IEEE;, p. 93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu PH, Tseng YH, Gong P. 2002. Dimension reduction of hyperspectral images for classification applications. Geogr Inf Sci. 8(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Junying S, Ning S. 2008. A dimensionality reduction algorithm of hyper spectral image based on Fract analysis. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII, Part B7; Beijing, China; p. 297–302.
   Google Scholar
• Kim DH, Finkel LH. 2003. Hyperspectral image processing using locally linear embedding. Proceedings of the 1st International IEEE EMBS, Conference on Neural Engineering; Capri Island, Italy: IEEE; p. 316–319.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JA, Verleysen M. 2007. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon M, Mercier G, Mouchot MC, Hubert-Moy L. 2001. Independent Component Analysis as a tool for the dimensionality reduction and the representation of hyperspectral images. IGARSS: Sydney, Australia; p. 2893–2895.
   Google Scholar
• Liu H, Jezek KC. 2004. Automated extraction of coastline from satellite imagery by integrating Canny edge detection and locally adaptive thresholding methods. Int J Remote Sens. 25(5):937–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkook C. 2009. Nonlinear dimension reduction using ISOMap based on class information. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks; Atlanta (GA): IEEE; p. 566–570.
   Google Scholar
• Pai-Hui H, Yi-Hsing T, Peng G. 2002. Dimension reduction of hyperspectral images for classification applications. Ann GIS. 8(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Plaza A, Martinez P, Plaza J, Perez RM. 2005. Dimensionality reduction and classification of hyperspectral image data using sequences of extended morphological transformations. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 43(3):466–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RSI. 2008. ENVI Version 4.8 Computer Software. Research Systems Inc. Broomfield, CO: Harris Geospatial Solutions.
   Google Scholar
• Roweis ST, Saul LK. 2000. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science. 290(5500):2323–2326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saul LK, Weinberger KQ, Ham JH, Sha F, Lee DD. 2006. Spectral methods for dimensionality reduction in Semisupervised Learning. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sekovski I, Stecchi F, Mancini F, Del Rio L. 2014. Image classification methods applied to shoreline extraction on very high-resolution multispectral imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 35(10):3556–3578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen-En Q, Guangyi C. 2007. A new nonlinear dimensionality reduction method with application to hyperspectral image analysis. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium; July 23–27; Barcelona, Spain: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum JB, Silva V, Langford JC. 2000. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science. 290(5500):2319–2323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USGS [United States Geological Survey]. 2017. EarthExplorer [accessed 2018 September 18]. https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/
   Google Scholar
• van der Maaten LJP, Postma E, van den Herik J. 2009. Dimensionality reduction: a comparative review. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University, TiCC TR 2009-005.
   Google Scholar
• van der Maaten LJP. 2007. An introduction to dimensionality reduction using Matlab. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Maastricht University; Technical Report No: 7.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Chang C. 2006. Independent component analysis-based dimensionality reduction with applications in hyperspectral image analysis. IEEE T Geosci Remote. 44(6):1586–1600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xijun L, Jun L. 2009. An adaptive band selection algorithm for dimension reduction of hyperspectral images. IEEE International Conference on Image Analysis and Signal Processing; April 11–12; Linhai, China: IEEE.
   Google Scholar