Mapping urban grey and green structures for liveable cities using a 3D enhanced OBIA approach and vital statistics

References

• Ahvenniemi H, Huovila A, Pinto-Seppä I, Airaksinen M. 2017. What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities. 60:234–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apouey BH. 2016. Child physical development in the UK: the imprint of time and socioeconomic status. Public Health. 141:255–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baatz M, Schäpe A. 2000. Multiresolution segmentation – an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. In: Strobl J. editor. Angewandte geographische informationsverarbeitung XII. Heidelberg, Germany: Wichmann; p. 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Banzhaf E, Kabisch S, Knapp S, Rink D, Wolff M, Kindler A. 2017. Integrated research on land-use changes in the face of urban transformations – an analytic framework for further studies. Land Use Policy. 60:403–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banzhaf E, Höfer R. 2008. Monitoring urban structure types as spatial indicators with CIR aerial photographs for a more effective urban environmental management. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obser Rem Sens. 1(2):129–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banzhaf E, Kollai H. 2015. Monitoring the Urban Tree Cover for Urban Ecosystem Services – The Case of Leipzig, Germany. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL-7-W3. [accessed 2018 January 12]:[5 p.]. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-7-W3-301-2015.
   Google Scholar
• Batty M, Axhausen KW, Giannotti F, Pozdnoukhov A, Bazzani A, Wachowicz M, Ouzounis G, Portugali Y. 2012. Smart cities of the future. Eur Phys J Spec Top. 214(1):481–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatta B. 2009. Analysis of urban growth pattern using remote sensing and GIS: a case study of Kolkata, India. Int. J. Remote Sens. 30(18):4733–4746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke T, Lang S, Hay G. 2008. editors. Object-based image analysis: spatial concepts for knowledge-driven remote sensing applications. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit [BMUB]. 2007. editor. Leipzig Charta für nachhaltige europäische Städte. Berlin: BMUB.
   Google Scholar
• BMUB, Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety, 2007. editors. Leipzig charter on sustainable European cities. Berlin: BMUB. German.
   Google Scholar
• Cetin H, Levandowski W. 1991. Interactive classification and mapping of multi-dimensional remotely sensed data using n-dimensional probability density functions (nPDF). Photogram Eng Rem Sens. 57(12):1579–1587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen LC, Huang CY, Teo TA. 2012. Multi-type change detection of building models by integrating spatial and spectral information. Int J Remote Sens. 33(6):1655–1681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Conservation Fund. 2004. Green infrastructure. [accessed 2017 July 05]. https://www.conservationfund.org/our-work/strategic-conservation-planning.
   Google Scholar
• De Araujo Barbosa CC, Atkinson PM, Dearing JA. 2015. Remote sensing of ecosystem services: a systematic review. Ecol Ind. 52:430–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Freitas MWD, Dos Santos JR, Alves DS. 2013. Land use and land cover change processes in the Upper Uruguay Basin: linking environmental and socioeconomic variables. Landscape Ecol. 28(2):311–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong M, Joss S, Schraven D, Zhan C, Weijnen M. 2015. Sustainable-smart-resilient-low carbon-eco-knowledge cities: making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. J Clean Product. 109:25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derkzen ML, Teeffelen AJ, Verburg PH. 2015. Quantifying urban ecosystem services based on high‐resolution data of urban green space: an assessment for Rotterdam, the Netherlands. J Appl Ecol. 52(4):1020–1032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endreny T, Santagata R, Perna A, Stefano CD, Rallo RF, Ulgiati S. 2017. Implementing and managing urban forests: a much needed conservation strategy to increase ecosystem services and urban wellbeing. Ecol. Model. 360:328–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Environmental Agency [EEA]. EUNIS categories. Habitat Types Key Navigation. Category: (G) Woodland, forest and other wooded land. [accessed 2018 January 12]. http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/habitats-key.jsp?level=2&idQuestionLink=–%3E&pageCode=G.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Building a green infrastructure for Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. [accessed 2017 July 05]:[24 p.].http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/ecosystems/docs/green_infrastructure_broc.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• City of Leipzig, Office of Statistics and Elections, editor. 2012. Quarterly Report IV/2012. German.
   Google Scholar
• City of Leipzig, Office of Statistics and Elections, editor. 2013a. Quarterly Report II/2013. German.
   Google Scholar
• City of Leipzig, Office of Statistics and Elections, editor. 2013c. Statistical Yearbook 2013. German.
   Google Scholar
• City of Leipzig, Office of Statistics and Elections. editor. 2017. Quarterly Report IV/2017. German.
   Google Scholar
• City of Leipzig [date unknown]. Community allotments online. German. [accessed 2018 January 18]. https://www.leipzig.de/freizeit-kultur-und-tourismus/parks-waelder-und-friedhoefe/kleingartenanlagen/
   Google Scholar
• Goetz SJ, Wright RK, Smith AJ, Zinecker E, Schaub E. 2003. IKONOS imagery for resource management: tree cover, impervious surfaces, and riparian buffer analyses in the mid-Atlantic region. Rem Sens Environ. 88(1-2):195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grippa T, Lennert M, Beaumont B, Vanhuysse S, Stephenne N, Wolff E. 2017. An open-source semi-automated processing chain for urban object-based classification. Remote Sens. 9(4):358–2018. http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/9/4/358.
   Google Scholar
• Grunewald K, Richter B, Meinel G, Herold H, Syrbe R-U. 2017. Proposal of indicators regarding the provision and accessibility of green spaces for assessing the ecosystem service “recreation in the city” in Germany. Int J Biodiv Sci Ecosys Serv Manag. 13(2):26–39.
   Google Scholar
• Gstach D, Berding U. 2016. Dual development of inner city planning – rediscovering a former principle under difficult conditions. Informationen Zur Raumentwicklung. 66:61–673.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen R, Pauleit S. 2014. From multifunctionality to multiple ecosystem services? A conceptual framework for multifunctionality in green infrastructure planning for urban areas. Ambio. 43(4):516–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hese S, Behrendt F. 2017. Multiseasonal tree crown structure mapping with point clouds from OTS quadrocopter systems. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. XLII-2/W6:141–143.
   Google Scholar
• Horwood K. 2011. Green infrastructure: reconciling urban green space and regional economic development: lessons learnt from experience in England’s north-west region. Local Environ. 16(10):963–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane K, Connors JP, Galletti CS. 2014. Beyond fragmentation at the fringe: a path-dependent, high-resolution analysis of urban land cover in Phoenix, Arizona. Appl Geogr. 52:123–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramers A, Höjer M, Lövehagen N, Wangel J. 2014. Smart sustainable cities-exploring ICT solutions for reduced energy use in cities. Environ Model Softw. 56:52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauf S, Haase D, Kleinschmit B. 2016. The effects of growth, shrinkage, population aging and preference shifts on urban development – a spatial scenario analysis of Berlin, Germany. Land Use Policy. 52:240–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebourgeois V, Dupuy S, Vintrou E, Ameline M, Butler S, Bégué A. 2017. A combined random forest and OBIA classification scheme for mapping smallholder agriculture at different nomenclature levels using multisource data (simulated sentinel-2 time series, VHRS and DEM). Remote Sens. 9(3):259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JS. 1981. Speckle analysis and smoothing of synthetic aperture radar images. Comput Graph Image Process. 17(1):24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch BA, Agunwamba A, Wilson PM, Kumar S, Jacobson RM, Phelan S, Cristiani V, Fan C, Finney Rutten LJ. 2016. Adverse family experiences and obesity in children and adolescents in the United States. Prev Med. 90:148–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maimaitijiang M, Ghulam A, Sandoval JSO, Maimaitiyiming M. 2015. Drivers of land cover and land use changes in St. Louis metropolitan area over the past 40 years characterized by remote sensing and census population data. Int J Appl Earth Obser Geoinfor. 35:161–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsal-Llacuna ML, Colomer-Llinàs J, Meléndez-Frigola J. 2015. Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the smart cities initiatives. Technol Forecast Social Change. 90:611–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesimäki M, Hauru K, Kotze DJ, Lehvävirta S. 2017. Neo-spaces for urban livability? Urbanites’ versatile mental images of green roofs in the Helsinki metropolitan area, Finland. Land Use Policy. 61:587–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neil-Dunne J, MacFaden S, Royar A. 2014. A versatile, production-oriented approach to high-resolution tree-canopy mapping in urban and suburban landscapes using GEOBIA and data fusion. Remote Sens. 6(12):12837–12865.
   Google Scholar
• Onnom W, Tripathi N, Nitivattananon V, Ninsawat S. 2018. Development of a liveable city index (LCI) using multi criteria geospatial modelling for medium class cities in developing countries. Sustainability. 10(2):520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onojeghuo AO, Onojeghuo AR. 2017. Object-based habitat mapping using very high spatial resolution multispectral and hyperspectral imagery with LiDAR data. Int J Appl Earth Obser Geoinfor. 59:79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordnance Survey of the State of Saxony, Germany. 2012. Acquisition and processing of the data sets digital orthophotos DOP, digital elevation model DEM and digital surface model DSM. (© Staatsbetrieb Geobasisinformation und Vermessung Sachsen). German.
   Google Scholar
• Staatsbetrieb G. 2018. und Vermessung Sachsen (GeoSN). 2012. Orthophotos DOP, Digitales Höhenmodell DGM. Digitales Oberflächenmodell DOM. [accessed Jan 18, 2018].http://www.landesvermessung.sachsen.de/
   Google Scholar
• Puissant A, Rougier S, Stumpf A. 2014. Object-oriented mapping of urban trees using Random Forest classifiers. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 26:235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashed T, Weeks JR, Stow D, Fugate D. 2005. Measuring temporal compositions of urban morphology through spectral mixture analysis: toward a soft approach to change analysis in crowded cities. Int J Remote Sens. 26(4):699–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutzinger M, Höfle B, Pfeifer N. 2007. Detection of high urban vegetation with airborne laser scanning data. Proceedings forestsat. Montpellier, France: Digital Media, November, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ryznar RM, Wagner TW. 2001. Using remotely sensed imagery to detect urban change. Viewing Detroit from space. APA J. 67(3):327–336.
   Google Scholar
• Secord J, Zakhor A. 2007. Tree detection in urban regions using aerial LiDAR and image data. IEEE Geosci Rem Sens Lett. 4(2):196–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southworth M. 2016. Learning to make liveable cities. J Urban Design. 21(5):570–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadt Leipzig, Amt für Statistik und Wahlen, editor. 2012. Statistischer Quartalsbericht IV/2012.
   Google Scholar
• Stadt Leipzig, Amt für Statistik und Wahlen, editor. 2013a. Statistischer Quartalsbericht II/2013.
   Google Scholar
• Stadt Leipzig, Amt für Statistik und Wahlen, editor. 2013b. Statistisches Jahrbuch 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Stadt Leipzig, Amt für Statistik und Wahlen. 2014. Ortsteilkatalog 2014. City of Leipzig, Authority of Statistics and Elections, editor. Official catalogue of local districts. 2014. German.
   Google Scholar
• Stadt Leipzig, Amt für Statistik und Wahlen. editor. 2017. Statistischer Quartalsbericht IV/2017.
   Google Scholar
• Stadt Leipzig. [date unknown]. Kleingartenanlagen online. [accessed 2018 January 18]. https://www.leipzig.de/freizeit-kultur-und-tourismus/parks-waelder-und-friedhoefe/kleingartenanlagen/
   Google Scholar
• Tole L. 2008. Changes in the built vs. non-built environment in a rapidly urbanizing region: A case study of the Greater Toronto Area. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 32:355–364.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2014. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division. 2015a. World Urbanization Prospects: The Revision. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Viitanen J, Kingston R. 2014. Smart cities and green growth: outsourcing democratic and environmental resilience to the global technology sector. Environ. Environ Plan A. 46(4):803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs [UN]. 2015b. Sustainable development goals. 17 goals to transform our world. [accessed 2018 July 26]. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Banzhaf E. 2017. Derive an understanding of Green Infrastructure for the quality of life in cities by means of integrated RS mapping tools. 2017 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event (JURSE). IEEE – Conference Publications. [accessed 2018 January 19]:[4 p.].http://www.ieeeexplore.ws/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?filter%3DAND%28p_IS_Number%3A7924526%29&refinements=4223095840&pageNumber=1&resultAction=REFINE.
   Google Scholar
• Weber T, Sloan A, Wolf J. 2006. Maryland’s green infrastructure assessment: development of a comprehensive approach to land conservation. Landscape Urban Plan. 77(1-2):94–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [WHO]. 2000. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series 894. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Yan WY, Shaker A, El-Ashmawy N. 2015. Urban land cover classification using airborne LiDAR data: A review. Remot Sens Environ. 158:295–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yigitcanlar T. 2015. Smart cities: an effective urban development and management model? Aus Plan. 52(1):27–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar