Application of two-dimensional hydraulic modelling in flood risk mapping. A case of the urban area of Zaio, Morocco

References

• Ahmadisharaf E, Tajrishy M, Alamdari N. 2016b. Integrating flood hazard into site selection of detention basins using spatial multi-criteria decision-making. J Plann Manag. 59(8):1397–1417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amarjouf N. 2018. Interaction between flood, runoff and development of territory on the slopes north of the peninsula of Guelaaya: case of Melilla Beni Ansar Bay and Betoya Bay. (North East Morocco). Doctoral thesis. Specialty applied Geosciences, Faculty of sciences, University Mohamed first, Oujda. 349 p.
   Google Scholar
• Amarjouf N, Oujidi M, Da Costa Lomba AM, Douzi Y. 2017. Contribution of hydraulic modelling in flood hazard mapping: box of torrential wadis in Beni Ansar city, Oujda (Morocco). Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Approximation Method and Numerical Modeling in Environment and Natural Resources; p. 97–103.
   Google Scholar
• Apel H, Aronica GT, Kreibich H, Thieken AH. 2009. Flood risk analyses – how detailed do we need to be? Nat Hazards. 49(1):79–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apel H, Merz B, Thieken AH. 2008. Influence of dike breaches on flood frequency estimation. Comput Geosci. 35(5):907–923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apel H, Thieken AH, Merz B, Bl€oschl G. 2004. Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 4(2):295–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronica G, Bates PD, Horritt MS. 2002. Assessing the uncertainty in distributed model predictions using binary information within GLUE pattern observed. Hydrol Process. 16(10):2001–2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becknell BR, Imhoff JC, Kittle JL, Donigian AS, Johanson RC. 1993. Hydrological simulation program: FORTRAN. User's manual for release 10 (No. PB-94-114865/XAB). Mountain View (CA): AQUA TERRA Consultants.
   Google Scholar
• Beffa C. 1998. Two-dimensional modelling of flood hazards in urban areas. In: Kolz KP, editor. 3rd International Conference on Hydroscience and Engineering; 1998 August 31–September 3; Cottbus/Berlin: Brandenbur University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Beffa c. 2000. A statistical approach for spatial analysis of flood prone areas. In: Toensmann F, Koch M, editors. International Symposium on Flood Defence; 2000 September 20–23; Kassel: Herkules Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Beven KJ. 2000. Rainfall – Runoff Modelling. The Primer. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Blade E, Cea L, Corestein G, Escolano E, Puertas J, Vázquez-Cendon E, Dolz J, Coll A. 2014. Iber: Tool of simulation numerica del flow in rios. Rev Int Methods Numer Para Calculated Diseño Ingeniería. 30(1):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blin P, Leclerc M, Secreta Y, Morse B. 2005. Mapping of the unit risk (flood) damage by floods for single-family residences in Quebec. J Sci Water. 18(4):427–451.
   Google Scholar
• Buchele B, Kreibich H, Kron A, Thieken A, Ihringer J, Oberle P, Merz B, and Nestmann F, et al. 2006. Flood-risk mapping: contributions towards an enhanced assessment of extreme events and associated risks. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 6:485–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camarasa AM, López-García MJ, Soriano J. 2011. Mapping temporally variable exposure to flooding in small Mediterranean basins using land-use indicators. Appl Geogr. 31:136–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chastan B, Gaza O, Givone P, Oberlin G. 1995. Food for thought for taking better into account the risk of flooding. Engineering-EAT. (2):13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Hill AA, Urbano LD. 2009. A GIS-based model for urban flood inundation. J Hydrol. 373(1-2):184–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole GD, Shutt JW. 1976. SWMM as a predictive model for runoff. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Urban Hydrology, Hydraulics and Sediment Control. Lexington (KY): Univ. Kentucky, pp. 193–201.
   Google Scholar
• Corestein G, Blade E, Lara A, Cea L, Escolano E, Coll A. 2010. Iber, a river dynamics simulation tool. In: Pasenau M, Escolano E, Suit J, Coll A, Melendo A, Monros A, editors. GiD 2010. 5th Conference on Advances and Applications of GID. Monografia CIMNE M118. Barcelona: International Center for Numerical Methods and Engineering, p. 87.
   Google Scholar
• Dawod GM, Mirza MN, Al-Ghamdi KA. 2012. GIS-based estimation of flood hazard impacts on road network in Makkah city, Saudi Arabia. Environ Earth Sci. 67(8):2205–2215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirkesen AC, Evrendilek F, Berberoglu S, Kilic S. 2007. Coastal flood risk analysis using Landsat-7 ETM+ imagery and SRTM DEM: a case study of Izmir, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess. 131(1–3):293–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diakakis M. 2011. A method for flood hazard mapping based on basin morphometry: Application in two catchments in Greece. Nat Hazards. 56(3):803–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drbal K, Štěpánková P, Levitus V, Říha J, Dráb A, Satrapa L, Horský M, Valenta P, Valentová J, Friedmannová L. 2009. Metodika tvorby map povodňového nebezpečí a povodňových rizik [Methodology for creating maps of flood hazard and flood risk]. Brno: VÚV TGM.
   Google Scholar
• Emberger L. 1955. A biogeographical classification of climates. Rec Trav Bot Lab Geol Zoo Coll Sci Montpellier Ser Bot. 7:3–43.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández DS, Lutz MA. 2010. Urban flood hazard zoning in Tucumán Province, Argentina, using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Eng Geol. 111(1-4):90–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foudi S, Osés-Eraso N, Tamayo I. 2015. Integrated spatial flood risk assessment: the case of Zaragoza. Land Use Policy. 42:278–292.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes Miguez M, Peres Battemarco B, Martins De Sousa M, Moura Rezende O, Pires Veról A, Gusmaroli G. 2017. Urban flood simulation using MODCEL—an alternative quasi-2D conceptual model. Water. 9(6):445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazlinger M. 2008. Použitie modelu hec-ras při modelovaní povodňovej hrozby v povodí stupávky [Using of “HEC-RAS” model for estimating of flood hazard in the Stupavka river basin]. In: Horák J, editor. Sympozium GIS Ostrava; 2008 January 27_30; Ostrava: V_SB.
   Google Scholar
• Heidari A. 2014. Flood vulnerability of the Karun river system and short-term mitigation measures. Flood J Flood Risk Manage. 7:65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horritt MS, Mason DC, Luckman AJ. 2001. Flood boundary delineation from synthetic aperture radar imagery using a statistical active contour model. Int J Remote Sens. 22(13):2489–2507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horritt MS, Bates PD. 2002. Assessment of 1 d and 2D numerical models for predicting river *flod Horison. J Hydrol. 268(1–4):87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hostache R. 2006. Analysis of satellite images of floods for three-dimensional characterization of hazard and hydraulic modeling support. Thesis of doctorate, specialty water Sciences, UMR territories, environment, remote sensing and Information space, Cemagref, ENGREF/CIRAD, Montpellier, France, 197 p.
   Google Scholar
• IBER. 2010a. Hydraulic Reference Manual for IBER v1.0. [Online] Available at: http://IBERaula.es/modelo-IBER/descarga [Accessed 20 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• IBER. 2010b. Tutorial; Tossa. [Online] Available at: http://IBERaula.es/modelo-IBER/descarga [Accessed 20 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Jousseaume V, Mercier D. 2009. Evaluate the architectural vulnerability of floodplain habitat: the example of the Nantes Val, risk and environment: interdisciplinary research on the vulnerability of societies. L'Harmattan. 199–214.
   Google Scholar
• Kohnová S, Kriegerová I, Podolinská J, Szolgay J, Hlavčová K. 2005. Regional methods for design flood computation in Slovakia (review and comparison). In: Nachtnebel HP, editor. Ninth International Symposium on Water Management and Hydraulic Engineering; 2005 September 4–7; Ottenstein: BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Kourgialas NN, Karatzas GP. 2011. Flood management and a GIS modelling method to assess flood-hazard areas—a case study. Hydrol Sci J. 56(2):212–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclerc M, Secretan Y, Heniche M, Ouarda TBMJ, Marion J. 2003. A predictive method unbiased and georeferenced to residential flood damage estimate. Can J Civil Eng. 30(5):914–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leone RM, Vinet F. 2010. Natural hazards and management of the risques.1ere edition. 284p.
   Google Scholar
• Luca P. 1984. Evidence of indigeneity of the chaotic unit of the Kebdana (East Morocco), oriental equivalent of the Olistrostromeprerifain. C R Acad Sci Paris. 299(II):331–336.
   Google Scholar
• Maantay J, Maroko A. 2009. Mapping urban risk: flood hazard, race and environmental justice in New York. Appl Geogr. 28:111–124.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand M, Buurman J, Pribadi A, Kurniawan A. 2009. Damage and casualties modelling as part of a vulnerability assessment for tsunami hazards: a case study from Aceh, Indonesia. Flood Risk Manag. 2(2):120–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masood M, Takeuchi K. 2012. Assessment of flood hazard, vulnerability and risk of mid-eastern Dhaka using DEM and 1D hydrodynamic model. Nat Hazards. 61(2):757–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz B, Thieken AH. 2009. Flood risk curves and uncertainty bounds. Nat Hazards. 51(3):437–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitková V, Kohnová S, Pekárová P. 2004. Porovnanie odhadov maximálnych sezónnych prietokov v profile Dunaj Bratislava [Comparison of the estimates of seasonal maximum discharges on Danube River in Bratislava]. Acta Hydrol Slovaca. 5:34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR. 1991. Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications. Hydrol Process. 5(1):3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrland J. 2014. Two-dimensional hydraulic modeling for flood assessment of the Rio Rocha. Cochabamba, Bolivia: Uppsala University; p. 45.
   Google Scholar
• Pageon J. 2008. Methodology for assessing the vulnerability of a CRM against essential resources. Montréal: Université de Montréal; p. 107.
   Google Scholar
• Penning-Rowsell E, Fordham M. 1994. Floods across Europe. Hazard assessment, modelling and management. London: Middlesex University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poulin J, Chokmani K, Tanguy M, Bernier M. 2012. Dynamic mapping of the risk of floods in urban areas. Canada: National Institute of Scientific Research. Center Water Earth Environment Quebec (Quebec); p. 71.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Youssef A. 2011. A 100-year maximum flood susceptibility mapping using integrated hydrological and hydrodynamic models: Kelantan River Corridor, Malaysia. Flood Risk Manag. 4(3):189–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provitolo D. 2002. Urban risk, disaster and Mediterranean cities. PhD thesis, University of NiceSophia, Antipolis, 365 p.
   Google Scholar
• Říha J, Kratochvíl J, Sleyinger M, Dráb A, Dumbrovský M, Golík P, Jandora J, Julínek T, Korytárová J, Koutková H, et al. 2005. Riziková analýza záplavových území - kolektiv autorů [Risk analysis of flood-prone areas]. Brno: CERM.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter P. 2000. International methods of risk analysis, damage evaluation and social impact studies concerning dam break accidents. Seinjaoki: International seminar on the RESCDAM project; p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Ruellan A. 1971. Contribution to the knowledge of the soils of the Mediterranean regions: soils with differentiated limestone profile of the plains of the lower Moulouya (Eastern Morocco), O.R.S.T.O.M.N ° 54 memory. 295p.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders BF. 2007. Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modeling. Adv Water Resour. 30(8):1831–1843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders R, Shaw F, MacKay H, Galy H, Foote M. 2005. National flood modelling for insurance purposes: using IFSAR for flood risk estimation in Europe. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 9(4):449–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayers PB, Gouldby BP, Simm JD, Meadowcroft J, Hall J. 2003. Risk, performance and uncertainty in flood and costal defence – a review. Wallingford: DEFRA/Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Tanguy M, Chokmani K, et al. 2012. Caractérisation de la vulnérabilité des populations aux inondations en milieu urbain. Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Tanguy M, Chokmani K. 2012. Characterization of the vulnerability of populations to floods in urban areas. Quebec.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor J, Lai KM, Davies M, Clifton D, Ridley I, Biddulph P. 2011. Flood management: prediction of microbial contamination in large scale floods in urban environments. Environ Int. 37(5):1019–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torterotot JP. 1993. The cost of flood damage: Estimation and uncertainty analysis PhD Thesis, specialization in Environmental Science and Technology, National School of Roads and Bridges, Paris, France, 284 p.
   Google Scholar
• Vojtek M. 2014. Estimation of N-year maximum discharges for the Vyčoma stream (Hájovňa Slače Profile). In: Hudec M, Csáky A, editors. Scientia iuvenis: Book of Scientific Papers. Nitra: CPU; p. 279–288.
   Google Scholar
• Vorogushyn S, Lindenschmidt KE, Kreibich H, Apel H, Merz B. 2012. Analysis of a detention basin impact on dike failure probabilities and flood risk for a channel-dike-floodplain system along the river Elbe, Germany. J Hydrol. 436:120–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Yang X, Yao T. 2012. Evaluation of ASTER GDEM and SRTM and their suitability in hydraulic modelling of a glacial lake outburst flood in southeast Tibet. Hydrol Process. 26(2):213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner M. 2001. Impact of grid size in GIS based flood extent mapping using 1D flow model. Phys Chem Earth. 26(7–8):517–522.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles JJ, Levine NS. 2002. A combined GIS and HEC model for the analysis of the effect of urbanization on flooding; the Swan Creek watershed, Ohio. Environ Eng Geosci. 8(1):47–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I. 2004. At risk: natural hazards people’s vulnerability and disaster. London: Routledge; p. 134.
   Google Scholar