Modelling land use/cover change to assess future urban sprawl in Romania

References

• Abebe GA. 2013. Quantifying urban growth pattern in developing countries using remote sensing and spatial metrics: A case study in Kampala, Uganda [Ph.D. Thesis]. The Netherlands: ITC Enschede. Retrieved from https://www.itc.nl/library/papers_2013/msc/upm/abebe.pdf, 108 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed B, Ahmed R, Zhu X. 2013. Evaluation of model validation techniques in land cover dynamics. SPRS Int J Geo-Inform. 2(3):577–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen J, Lu K. 2003. Modeling and prediction of future urban growth in the Charleston region of South Carolina: a GIS-based integrated approach. Conserv Ecol. 8(2) https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol8/iss2/art2/inline.html.
   Google Scholar
• Antrop M. 2004. Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landsc Urban Plan. 67(1–4):9–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsanjani JJ, Helbich M, Kainz W, Boloorani AD. 2013. Integration of logistic regression, Markov chain and cellular automata models to simulate urban expansion. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform. 21:265–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes KB, Morgan JM, III, Roberge MC, Lowe S. 2001. Sprawl development: its patterns, consequences, and measurement. Towson: Towson University; p. 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bălteanu D, Mitrică B, Mocanu I, Sima M, Popescu C. 2016. Caracterizarea geografică a regiunilor de dezvoltare. In: Bălteanu D, Dumitraşcu M, Geacu S, Mitrică B, Sima M, editors. Romania. Natură și Societate. Romania: The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy; p. 621–652 (in Romanian).
   Google Scholar
• Bălteanu D, Sima M, Jurchescu M, Chendeș V, Micu M, Sandu M. 2016. Hazardele naturale și tehnologice. In: Bălteanu D, Dumitraşcu M, Geacu S, Mitrică B, Sima M, editors. Romania. Natură și Societate. Romania: The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy; p. 563–592 (in Romanian).
   Google Scholar
• Berling-Woff S, Wu J. 2004. Modeling urban landscape dynamics: a case study in Phoenix, USA. Urban Ecosyst. 7(3):215–240.
   Google Scholar
• Bičík I, Jeleček L. 2009. Land use and landscape changes in Czechia during the period of transition 1990–2007. Geografie – Sbornik ČGS. 114(4):263–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Masser I. 2003. Urban growth pattern modeling: a case study of Wuhan city, PR China. Landsc Urban Plan. 62(4):199–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocheci M. 2014. Environmental impact assessment of urban sprawl in the Brașov Metropolitan Area. Urban Arhitect Constr. 5(2):21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Cocheci V, Mitrea A. 2016. Youthification in the Metropolitan Area of Cluj, Urbanism. Arhitectură. Construcţii. 9(2):121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scale. Educ Psychol Measur. 20(1):37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corodescu E, Cîmpianu C. 2014. Assessing the spatial differences among some urban expansion driving forces in constanta metropolitan area (Romania), Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii "Al. I. Cuza. Geography Series. LX(2):77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Degórska B. 2004. Spatial conflicts between the shaping of open spaces and the socio-economic development in the metropolitan area of Warsaw. In: Kovacs, AD, editors, New aspects of regional transformation and the urban-rural relationship. Pecs, Hungary: Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. http://discussionpapers.rkk.hu/index.php/DP/article/viewFile/2221/4137.
   Google Scholar
• Degórska B. 2012. Spatial growth of urbanised land within the Warsaw Metropolitan Area in the first decade of the 21st century. Geogr Pol. 85(3):77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Dumitrache L, Zamfir D, Nae M, Simion G, Stoica V. 2016. The urban nexus: Contradictions and dilemmas of (Post) communist (Sub) urbanization in Romania. Hum Geograph. 10(1):39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dumitraşcu M, Mocanu I, Mitrică B, Dragotă CS, Grigorescu I, Dumitrică C. 2018. The assessment of socio-economic vulnerability to drought in Southern Romania (Oltenia Plain). Int J Disaster Risk. 27:142–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumitrescu (Mitrică) B. 2008. Oraşele monoindustriale din România, între industrializare forţatǎ şi declin economic, Edit. Universitarǎ, Bucureşti; 301 pp. (in Romanian).
   Google Scholar
• Duwal S. 2013. Modeling urban growth in Kathmandu Valley [Ph.D. Thesis]. The Netherlands: University of Twente, Enschede; p. 89, Retrieved from https://www.itc.nl/library/papers_2013/msc/upm/duwal.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. 2004. Corine land cover 2000: Mapping a decade of change. European Environmental Agency, Brochure no 4/2004 https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/brochure_2006_0306_103624.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. 2006. Urban sprawl in Europe, The ignored challenge. European Environmental Agency, no. 10/2006, Directorate General Joint Research Centre, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. 2011. Analysing and managing urban sprawl, European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen, 22 https://www.eea.europa.eu/articles/analysing-and-managing-urban-growth.
   Google Scholar
• © European Union, Copernicus Land Monitoring Service, 2017. CORINE Land Cover, European Environment Agency (EEA).
   Google Scholar
• © European Union, Copernicus Land Monitoring Service, 2017. EU-Hydro River Network, European Environment Agency (EEA).
   Google Scholar
• Epstein J, Payne K, Kramer E. 2002. Techniques for mapping suburban sprawl. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing. 68(9):913–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdeli G, Simion G. 2006. Local decentralization and extended suburbanization: a geographical approach of the metropolisation process in Romania. Buletinul Societăţii de Geografie din România, XII (XXCII), p. 107–120.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2016. Urban Europe — statistics on cities, towns and suburbs — patterns of urban and city developments, Cat. No: KS-01-16-691-EN-N http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Urban_Europe_%E2%80%94_statistics_on_cities,_towns_and_suburbs.
   Google Scholar
• Gavrilidis AA. 2017. Roiecția expansiunii și dinamicii urbane asupra peisajului. Studiu de caz: Municipiul Ploiești, Editura Etnologică, București; p. 127 (in Romanian).
   Google Scholar
• Grădinaru S, Iojă CI, Onose A, Gavrilidis AA, Pătru-Stupariu I, Kienast F, Hersperger A. 2015. Land abandonment as a precursor of built-up development at the sprawling periphery of former socialist cities. Ecol Indic. 57:305–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorescu I, Mitrică B, Mocanu I, Ticana N. 2012. Urban sprawl and residential development in the Romanian metropolitan areas. Rom J Geograph. 56(1):43–59.
   Google Scholar
• Grigorescu I, Kucsicsa G, Mitrică B. 2015a. Assessing spatio-temporal dynamics of urban sprawl in the Bucharest Metropolitan area over the last century. In: Bicik I, Himiyama Y, Feranec J, Kupkova L, editors. Land use/cover changes in selected regions in the world. Prague: Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, vol. X; p. 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Grigorescu I, Mitrică B, Mocanu I. 2015b. Assessing urban sprawl-related housing dynamics in the Romanian Metropolitan Areas. Stud Obsz Wiej. 38:145–164.
   Google Scholar
• Grigorescu, Kucsicsa G. 2017. Spatial and temporal dynamics of urban sprawl in the Romanian Plain over the last century. Revue Roumaine de Géographie/Rom J Gepgraph. 61(2):109–123.
   Google Scholar
• Guran-Nica L, Sofer M. 2012. Migration dynamics in Romania and the counter-urbanisation process: a case study of Bucharest’s rural-urban fringe. In: Hedberg C, do Carmo RM, editors. Translocal ruralism: mobility and connectivity in European rural space, vol. 103; p. 87–102.
   Google Scholar
• Guran-Nica L, Sofer M, Bistriceanu-Pantelimon C. 2016. From urbanization to metropolization: a case study of Romania. Proc Econ Bus Admin. 3(1):106–113.
   Google Scholar
• Guran-Nica L, Sofer M, Ştefan N. 2011. New rural-urban relationships in Romania. Issues at the Rural-Urban Fringe of Bucharest. Stud Univer Babes-Bolyai, Geograph. 1:127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt S. 2007. Suburbanizing Sofia: characteristics of post-socialist peri-urban change. Urban Geograph. 28(8):755–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huzui E, Abdelkader A, Patru-Stupariu I. 2013. Analysing urban dynamics using multi-temporal satellite images in the case of a mountain area, Sinaia (Romania). Int J Digital Earth. 6(6):563–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ianoş I, Cercleux AL, Pintilii RD. 2010. Remarks on identity building of rural and urban communities in the Bucharest Metropolitan Area. Analele Universităţii Din Oradea – Seria Geografie. XX(2):173–183.
   Google Scholar
• Ianoş I, Peptenatu D, Drăghici C, Pintilii RD. 2012. Management elements of the emergent metropolitan areas in a transition country. Romania, as case-study. J Urban Regional Anal. IV(2):149–172.
   Google Scholar
• Iațu C, Munteanu A, Boghinciuc M, Cernescu R, Ibănescu B. 2011. The effects of transportation system on the urban sprawl process for the city of Iași. Romania, Urban Transport XVII: Urban Transport and the Environment in the 21st Century. 116:291–302.
   Google Scholar
• Iațu C, Eva M. 2016. Spatial profile of the evolution of urban sprawl pressure on the surroundings of Romanian cities (2000-2013). Carpath J Earth Environ Sci. 11(1):79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INS. 2011. Recensământul Populaţiei şi Locuinţelor (Population and Housing Census). Bucureşti: INS.
   Google Scholar
• INS. 2012. Anuarul Statistic al României (Romanian Statistical Yearbook). Bucureşti: INS.
   Google Scholar
• Iojă C, Onose D, Nită M, Vanău G, Pătroescu M ,Gavrilidis A, Saghin I, Zarea R. 2011. The conversion of agricultural lands into built surfaces in Romania. Recent researches in Urban Sustainability and Green Development, USCUDAR Proceedings; Prague, Czech Republic: WSEAS Press. p. 115–120.
   Google Scholar
• Iojă CI, Niţă MR, Vânău GO, Onose DA, Gavrilidis AA. 2014. Using multi-criteria analysis for the identification of spatial land-use conflicts in the Bucharest Metropolitan Area. Ecol Indic. 42:112–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Istrate MI. 2015. Urban sprawl and demographic dynamics in Suceava Metropolitan Area. J Community Posit Pract. 15(2):43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Jat MK, Garg PK, Khare D. 2008. Monitoring and modelling of urban sprawl using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform. 10(1):26–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok H, Kovacs Z. 1999. The process of suburbanization in the agglomeration of Budapest. Neth J Housing Built Environ. 14(2):119–141.
   Google Scholar
• Kucsicsa G, Grigorescu I. 2018. Urban growth related to distance explanatory factors in Bucharest Metropolitan Area. Spatial and temporal assessment using logistic regression. J Urban Plann Develop, ASCE Library. 144(1). http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29UP.1943-5444.0000415.
   Google Scholar
• Lisowski A. 2004. Social aspects of the suburbanisation stage in the agglomeration of Warsaw. Dela. 21:531–541.
   Google Scholar
• Mihai B, Nistor C, Simion G. 2015. Post-socialist urban growth of Bucharest, Romania-a change detection analysis on LANDSAT imagery (1984-2010). Acta Geographica Slovenica. 55(2):225–234.
   Google Scholar
• Mitrică B, Grigorescu I, Urucu V. 2006. Urban development and the metropolitan areas. In: Bălteanu D, Dumitraşcu M, Geacu S, Mitrică B, Sima, M, editors. Romania. Natură și Societate. Romania: The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy; p. 250–291 (in Romanian).
   Google Scholar
• Mocanu I, Dumitrascu M, Dumitrescu B, Popovici A. 2011. The drinking water infrastructure in the oltenia plain over the last decade. Territorial characteristics and quantitative aspects of production and consumption. Forum Geograph. 10(2):364–371.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolae I. 2002. Suburbanismul, ca fenomen geografic în România, Edit. Meronia, Bucureşti p. 397 p (in Romanian).
   Google Scholar
• Niculescu G. 2016. Unitățile de relief. In: Bălteanu D, Dumitraşcu M, Geacu S, Mitrică B, Sima M, editors. Romania. Natură și Societate. Romania: The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy; p. 67–101.
   Google Scholar
• Niculiţă L, Iojă C, Tudor A, Pavelescu G, Iojă A. 2011. Evaluation of environmental impact caused by new residential areas in the Bucharest Metropolitan Area. Proc USCUDAR. 35:130–135.
   Google Scholar
• Oueslati W, Alvanides S, Garrod G. 2015. Determinants of urban sprawl in European cities. Urban Stud. 52(9):1594–1614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overmars KP, Verburg PH. 2005. Analysis of land use drivers at the watershed and household level: linking two paradigms at the Philippine forest fringe. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 19(2):125–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patacchini E, Zenou Y. 2009. Urban sprawl in Europe. In: Brookings-Wharton papers on urban affairs; p. 125–149.
   Google Scholar
• Pătroescu M, Vânău G, Niţă M, Iojă C, Iojă A. 2011. Land use change in the Bucharest metropolitan area and its impacts on the quality of the environment in residential developments. Forum Geograph. X(1):177–186.
   Google Scholar
• Petrişor AI. 2012. Land cover and land use analysis of urban growth in Romania. Human Geographies – J Stud Res Human Geograph. 6(1):47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Pocol CB, Jitea IM. 2013. The residential function of the countryside and the development of the peri-urban area of Cluj Napoca City. Bull Univ Agricult Sci Vet Med Cluj-Napoca, Horticulture. 70(2):368–373.
   Google Scholar
• Pontius RG, Jr, Schneider LC. 2001. Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 85(1–3):239–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu C, Mitrică B, Mocanu I. 2016. Dezvoltarea regională pre- și postaderare la Uniurea Europeană. In: Bălteanu D, Dumitraşcu M, Geacu S, Mitrică B, Sima M, editors. Romania. Natură și Societate. Romania: The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy; p. 613–620.
   Google Scholar
• Popovici EA, Bălteanu D, Kucsicsa G. 2013. Assessment of changes in land-use and land-cover pattern in Romania using Corine Land Cover Database. Carpathian J Earth Environ Sci. 8(4):195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman A, Aggarwal SP, Netzband M, Fazal S. 2011. Monitoring urban sprawl using remote sensing and GIS techniques of a fast growing urban centre, India. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens. 4(1):56–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano B, Zullo F. 2013. Models of urban land use in Europe: assessment tools and criticalities. Int J Agric Environ Inform Syst. 4(3):80–97.
   Google Scholar
• Săgeată R, Popescu C. 2016. Regiunile de dezvoltare și politica de dezvoltare regională, In: Bălteanu D, Dumitraşcu M, Geacu S, Mitrică B, Sima M, editors. Romania. Natură și Societate. The Romania: Publishing House of the Romanian Academy; p. 604–608 (in Romanian).
   Google Scholar
• Șandric I, Mihai B, Savulescu I, Suditu B, Chitu Z. 2007. Change detection analysis for urban development in Bucharest-Romania, using high resolution satellite imagery, 2007 Urban Remote Sensing Joint Event IEEE; p. 1–8. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4234447
   Google Scholar
• Sârbu C. 2012. Urban expansion – Urban shrinking considerations on Brașov agglomeration urban dynamics. Hum Geograph J Stud Res Hum Geograph. 6(1):53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Schaldach R, Priess JA. 2008. Integrated models of the land system: a review of modelling approaches on the regional to global scale. Living Rev Landscape Res. 2(1):1863–7329.
   Google Scholar
• Shahraki SZ, Sauri D, Serra P, Modugno S, Seifolddini F, Pourahmad A. 2011. Urban sprawl pattern and land-use change detection in Yazd, Iran. Habitat Int. 35(4):521–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu B, Zhang H, Li Y, Qu Y, Chen L. 2014. Spatiotemporal variation analysis of driving forces of urban land spatial expansion using logistic regression: a case study of port towns in Taicang City, China. Habitat Int. 43:181–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simion G. 2010. The spatial changes of land use in the Bucharest Metropolitan Area 1970s–2000s. Human Geograph. 4(2):115–123.
   Google Scholar
• Soós G, Ignits G. 2003. Suburbanization and its consequences in the Budapest metropolitan area. In: 3rd EuroConference "The European City in Transition, The City and the Region", Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Germany, Supported by the European Commission https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11871881.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Špačková P, Ouředníček M. 2012. Spinning the web: new social contacts of Prague’s suburbanites. Cities. 29(5):341–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanilov K, Hirt S. 2014. Sprawling Sofia. Postsocialist suburban growth in the Bulgarian capital. In: Stanilov K, Sýkora L, editors. Confronting suburbanization: urban decentralization in postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe. John Wiley and Sons; p. 163–191.
   Google Scholar
• Sudhira HS, Ramachandra TV, Jagadish KS. 2004. Urban sprawl: metrics, dynamics and modelling using GIS. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinformat. 5(1):29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Suditu B, Ginavar A, Muică A, Iordăchescu C, Vârdol A, Ghinea B. 2010. Urban sprawl characteristics and typologies in Romania. J Stud Res Human Geograph. 4(2):79–87.
   Google Scholar
• Sýkora L, Ourednicek M. 2007. Sprawling post-communist metropolis: commercial and residential suburbanisation in Prague and Brno, the Czech Republic. In: Razin E, Dijst M, Vázquez C, editors. Employment deconcentration in European metropolitan areas. Netherlands: Springer. Vol. 91, p. 209–233.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens PM. 2008. A toolkit for measuring sprawl. Appl Spatial Anal Policy. 1(1):5–36.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens PM, Alberti M. 2000. Measuring Sprawl. Working Paper No. 27, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, London. http://www.casa.ac.uk/working_papers/.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg L, Drewett R, Klaasen LH, Rossi A, Vijverberg CH. 1982. Urban Europe: a study of growth and decline. Oxford: Pergamon Press; p. 184.
   Google Scholar
• Verburg PH, de Koning G, Kok K, Veldkamp A, Bouma JA. 1999. Spatial explicit allocation procedure for modelling the pattern of land use change based upon actual land use. Ecol Model. 116(1):45–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verburg PH, Soepboer W, Veldkamp A, Limpiada R, Espaldon V, Mastura SS. 2002. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: the CLUE-S model. Environ Manag. 30(3):391–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verburg PH, Schot PP, Dijst MJ, Veldkamp A. 2004. Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal. 61(4):309–324.
   Google Scholar
• Verburg PH, Overmars KP. 2009. Combining top-down and bottom-up dynamics in land use modeling: exploring the future of abandoned farmlands in Europe with the Dyna-CLUE model. Landscape Ecol. 24(9):1167–1181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlădeanu MG, Petrea CG. 2013. Dynamics of the functional profile of the urban-rural interface of Târgovişte. Urban Arhitect Construcţ. 4:25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Xu L, Li Z, Song H, Yin H. 2013. Land-use planning for urban sprawl based on the clue-s model: a case study of Guangzhou, China. Entropy. 15(12):3490–3506.
   Google Scholar
• Yue W, Liu Y, Fan P. 2013. Measuring urban sprawl and its drivers in large Chinese cities: the case of Hangzhou. Land Use Policy. 31:358–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson EH, Hurd JD, Civco DL, Prisloe MP, Arnold C. 2003. Development of a geospatial model to quantify, describe and map urban growth. Remote Sens Environ. 86(3):275–285.http://hot.openstreetmap.org/ Accessed 23.08.2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar