Catchment specific evaluation of Aphrodite’s and TRMM derived gridded precipitation data products for predicting runoff in a semi gauged watershed of Tropical India

References

• Abera W, Formetta G, Borga M, Rigon R. 2017. Estimating the water budget components and their variability in a pre-alpine basin with JGrass-NewAGE. Adv Water Res. 104:37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asokan SM, Dutta D. 2008. Analysis of water resources in the Mahanadi River Basin, India under projected climate conditions. Hydrol Process. 22(18):3589–3603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanssen WGM, Harshadeep NR. 2005. Managing scarce water resources in Asia: The nature of the problem and can remote sensing help? Irrig Drainage Syst. 19(3–4):269–284.
   Google Scholar
• Bell VA, Moore RJ. 1998. A grid-based distributed flood forecasting model for use with weather radar data: Part 2. Case studies. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2(2/3):283–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berolo W. 2007. ARC HYDRO: GIS for water resources [Online]. Centre for Research in Water Resources. [Accessed Dec 15]. http://www.hydroeurope.org/jahia/webdav/site/hydroeurope/shared/Exercices/GIS%20-%20Hydro%20Models/Watershed%20and%20Stream%20Network%20Delineation_Tutorial.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bharati L, Smakhtin VU, Anand BK. 2009. Modeling water supply and demand scenarios: the Godavari-Krishna inter-basin transfer India. Water Policy. 11(S1):140–153.
   Google Scholar
• Bhowmik AK, Costa AC. 2015. Representativeness impacts on accuracy and precision of climate spatial interpolation in data‐scarce regions. Met Apps. 22(3):368–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs EM, Atkinson PM. 2011. A comparison of gauge and radar precipitation data for simulating an extreme hydrological event in the Severn Uplands, UK. Hydrol Process. 25(5):795–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrera-Hernández JJ, Gaskin SJ. 2007. Spatio temporal analysis of daily precipitation and temperature in the Basin of Mexico. J Hydrol. 336(3-4):231–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charley WJ. 1988. The estimation of rainfall for flood forecasting using radar and rain gauge data. In Technical Paper, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, CA, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Chavez PS. 1988. An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data. Remote Sens Environ. 24(3):459–479. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(88)90019-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LT. 1988. Applied Hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chung WH, Wang IT, Wang RY. 2010. Theory-based SCS-CN method and its applications. J Hydrol Eng. 15(12):1045–1058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coskun M, Musaoglu N. 2004. Investigation of rainfall-runoff modelling of the Van Lake catchment by using remote senisng and GIS integration. In International Archives of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing Commission VII, XXth ISPRS Congress, Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Gjertsen U, Salek M, Michelson DB. 2004. Gauge adjustment of radar-based precipitation estimated in Europe. Paper presented at the Proceedings of ERAD 2002, Delft, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Golding BW. 2000. Quantitative precipitation forecasting in the UK. J Hydrol. 239(1–4):286–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goovaerts P. 2000. Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall. J Hydrol. 228(1–2):113–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling SN, Arnell NW. 2011. Simulating current global river runoff with a global hydrological model: model revisions, validation, and sensitivity analysis. Hydrol Process. 25(7):1129–1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitson BC, Crane RG. 2005. Gridded Area-Averaged Daily Precipitation via Conditional Interpolation. J Climate. 18(1):41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffeldt A, Wetterhall F, Pappenberger F, Salamon P, Thielen J. 2016. Technical review of large-scale hydrological models for implementation in operational flood forecasting schemes on continental level. Environ Model Soft. 75:68–76. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause P, Boyle DP, Bäse F. 2005. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv Geosci. 5:89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Koshy JP. 2009. “Exceptionally low rainfall in last decade [Accessed April 5, 2011] http://www.livemint.com/2009/08/23221018/Exceptionally-low-rainfall-in.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni AA, Aggarwal SP, Das KK. 2004. Estimation of surface runoff using rainfall-runoff modeling of Warasgaon Dam Catchment: A geospatial approach. In International Conference on Geospatial Methodologies. New Delhi, India: Map India.
   Google Scholar
• Legates DR, McCabe GJ. 1999. Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res. 35(1):233–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levina WH, Seizarwati W, Vernimmen R. 2016. Comparison of TRMM satellite rainfall and APHRODITE for drought analysis in the Pemali-comal River Basin. Procedia Environ Sci. 33:187–195. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2016.03.069.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis HW, Harrison DL. 2007. Assessment of radar data quality in upland catchments. Met Apps. 14(4):441–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel C, Andréassian V, Perrin C. 2005. Soil conservation services curve number method: How to mend a wrong soil moisture accounting procedure? Water Resour Res. 41(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay C. 1987. An appraisal of the irrigation system in West Bengal. Indian Rev Water Res. 2(3):73–81.
   Google Scholar
• Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – A discussion of principles. J Hydrol. 10(3):282–290.
   Google Scholar
• Ponce VM, Hawkins RH. 1996. Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity? J Hydrol. 1(1):11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Revilla-Romero B, Beck HE, Burek P, Salamon P, Roo AD, Thielen J. 2015. Filling the gaps: Calibrating a rainfall-runoff model using satellite-derived surface water extent. Remote Sens Environ. 171:118–131. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2015.10.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santra Mitra S, Wright J, Santra A, Ghosh AR. 2015. An integrated water balance model for assessing water scarcity in a data-sparse interfluve in eastern India. Hydrol Sci J. 60(10):1813–1827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCS national engineering handbook. 1956, 1964, 1971, 1985, 1993. Hydrology, Soil Consevation Services, USDA. Washington, DC: USDA.
   Google Scholar
• Soulis KX, Valiantzas JD, Dercas N, Londra PA. 2009. Investigation of the direct runoff generation mechanism for the analysis of the SCS-CN method applicability to a partial area experimental watershed. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 13(5):605–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanya K. 2008. Engineering Hydrology. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tabios GQ, Salas JD. 1985. A comparative analysis of techniques for spatial interpolation of precipitation. J Am Water Res Assoc. 21(3):365–380.
   Google Scholar
• Vehviliainen B, Cauwenberghs MK, Cheze JL, Jurczyk A, Moore RJ, Olsson J, Salek M, Szture J. 2004. Evaluation of operational flow forecasting sustems that use weather radar. [Accessed March 25]. http://www.smhi.se/cost717/doc/WDD012004081.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Velasco-Forero CA, Sempere-Torres D, Cassiraga EF, Gómez-Hernández JJ. 2009. A non-parametric automatic blending methodology to estimate rainfall fields from rain gauge and radar data. Adv Water Res. 32(7):986–1002. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Xie Q, Lu Y, Hu B. 2017. Hydrologic evaluation of TRMM multisatellite precipitation analysis for Nanliu River Basin in humid Southwestern China. Sci Rep. 7(1):2470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar