Spatial biodiversity modeling using high-performance computing cluster: A case study to access biological richness in Indian landscape

References

• Alonso K, Espinoza-Molina D, Datcu M. 2017a. Multilayer architecture for heterogeneous geospatial data analytics: Querying and understanding EO archives. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens. 10:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambastha KR, Hussain SA, Badola R, Roy PS. 2010. Spatial analysis of anthropogenic disturbances in mangrove forests of Bhitarkanika Conservation Area, India. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 38(1):67–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin L. 2010. Local indicators of spatial analysis–LISA. Geogr Anal. 27(2):93–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astsatryan H, Hayrapetyan A, Narsisian W, Saribekyan A, Asmaryan S, Saghatelyan A, Muradyan V, Guigoz Y, Giuliani G, Ray N, et al. 2015. An interoperable web portal for parallel geoprocessing of satellite image vegetation indices. Earth Sci Inform. 8(2):453–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera MD, Roy PS. 2010. Assessment and validation of biological richness at landscape level in part of the Himalayas and Indo-Burma hotspots using Geospatial Modeling Approach. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 38(3):415–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontemps S, Bogaert P, Titeux N, Defourny P. 2008. An object-based change detection method accounting for temporal dependences in time series with medium to coarse spatial resolution. Remote Sens Environ. 112(6):3181–3191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brovelli MA, Minghini M, Zamboni G. 2015. Public participation GIS: A FOSS architecture enabling field-data collection. Int J Digital Earth. 8(5):345–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpen-Amarie A, Hunold S, Träff JL. 2017. On expected and observed communication performance with MPI derived datatypes. Parallel Comput. 69:98–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castain RH, Woodall TS, Daniel DJ, Squyres JM, Barrett B, Fagg GE. 2008. The Open Run-Time Environment (OpenRTE): A transparent multicluster environment for high-performance computing. Future Gener Comput Syst. 24(2):153–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Yu J, Khan S. 2010. Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environ Modell Software. 25(12):1582–1591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craglia M, de Bie K, Jackson D, Pesaresi M, Remetey-Fülöpp G, Wang C, Annoni A, Bian L, Campbell F, Ehlers M, et al. 2012. Digital Earth 2020: Towards the vision for the next decade. Int J Digital Earth. 5(1):4–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran-Limon HA, Flores-Contreras J, Parlavantzas N, Zhao M, Meulenert-Peña A. 2016. Efficient execution of the WRF model and other HPC applications in the cloud. Earth Sci Inform. 9(3):365–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edinger EN, Jompa J, Limmon GV, Widjatmoko W, Risk MJ. 1998. Reef degradation and coral biodiversity in Indonesia: Effects of land-based pollution, destructive fishing practices and changes over time. Mar Pollut Bull. 36(8):617–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eugster MJA, Knaus J, Porzelius C, Schmidberger M, Vicedo E. 2011. Hands-on tutorial for parallel computing with R. Comput Stat. 26(2):219–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan C, Myint S. 2014. A comparison of spatial autocorrelation indices and landscape metrics in measuring urban landscape fragmentation. Landsc Urban Plan. 121:117–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fick SE, Hijmans RJ. 2017. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 37(12):4302–4315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galić Z, Mešković E, Osmanović D. 2017. Distributed processing of big mobility data as spatio-temporal data streams. Geoinformatica. 21(2):263–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giachetta R. 2015. A framework for processing large scale geospatial and remote sensing data in MapReduce environment. Comput. Graphics (Pergamon). 49:37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartung C, Anokwa Y, Brunette W, Lerer A, Tseng C, Borriello G. 2010. Open Data Kit: Tools to build information services for developing regions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development; Dec 13–16; London.
   Google Scholar
• Hawick KA, Coddington PD, James HA. 2003. Distributed frameworks and parallel algorithms for processing large-scale geographic data. Parallel Comput. 29(10):1233–1297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoefler T, Dinan J, Buntinas D, Balaji P, Barrett B, Brightwell R, Gropp W, Kale V, Thakur R. 2013. MPI + MPI: A new hybrid approach to parallel programming with MPI plus shared memory. Comput. 95(12):1121–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innocenti E, Silvani X, Muzy A, Hill DRC. 2009. A software framework for fine grain parallelization of cellular models with OpenMP: Application to fire spread. Environ Modell Software. 24(7):819–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang SJ, Lee SY, Lee KM. 2015. Performance comparison of OpenMP, MPI, and MapReduce in practical problems. Adv. Multimedia. 2015:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnatak HC, Saran S, Bhatia K, Roy PS. 2007. Multicriteria spatial decision analysis in web GIS environment. Geoinformatica. 11(4):407–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnatak H, Saran S, Bhatia K, Roy PS. 2010. Geospatial database organization and spatial decision analysis for biodiversity databases in Web GIS environment. Geocarto Int. 25(1):3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnatak H, Pandey K, Oberai K. 2014. Geospatial data sharing, online spatial analysis and processing of Indian biodiversity data in internet GIS domain - A case study for raster based online geo-processing. Int Archiv Photogrammetr Remote Sens Spatial Info Sci - ISPRS Archives. XL-8:1133–1137.
   Google Scholar
• Kidner DB, Rallings PJ, Ware JA. 1997. Parallel processing for terrain analysis in GIS : Visibility as a Case Study. Geoinformatica. 1(2):183–207.
   Google Scholar
• Lee D, Minton J, Pryce G. 2015. Bayesian inference for the dissimilarity index in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Spat Stat. 11:81–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Chen L, Liu P, Lu K. 2016. Parallel programing templates for remote sensing image processing on GPU architectures: design and implementation. Comput. 98(1–2):7–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Wu H, Wang L, Huang B, Ranjan R, Zomaya A, Jie W. 2015. Remote sensing big data computing : Challenges and opportunities. Future Gener Comput Syst. 51:47–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malczewski J. 2006. GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 20(7):703–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martellozzo F, Amato F, Murgante B, Clarke KC. 2018. Modelling the impact of urban growth on agriculture and natural land in Italy to 2030. Appl Geogr. 91:156–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massad R-S, Tuzet A, Loubet B, Perrier A, Cellier P. 2010. Model of stomatal ammonia compensation point (STAMP) in relation to the plant nitrogen and carbon metabolisms and environmental conditions. Ecol Modell. 221(3):479–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenney M, Frye R, Dellamano M, Anderson K, Harris J. 2017. Multi-core parallelism for plane sweep algorithms as a foundation for GIS operations. Geoinformatica. 21(1):151–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran P. 1948. The interpretation of statistical maps. J R Stat Soc Series B (Methodological). 10(2):243–251.
   Google Scholar
• Murguía DI, Bringezu S, Schaldach R. 2016. Global direct pressures on biodiversity by large-scale metal mining: Spatial distribution and implications for conservation. J Environ Manage. 180:409–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muttil N, Liong SY, Nesterov O. 2007. A parallel shuffled complex evolution model calibrating algorithm to reduce computational time. Modsim 2007: International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: Land, Water and Environmental Management: Integrated Systems for Sustainability 1940-1946.
   Google Scholar
• Noss RF. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity - a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol. 4(4):355–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padalia H, Bahuguna U. 2017. Spatial modelling of congruence of native biodiversity and potential hotspots of forest invasive species (FIS) in central Indian landscape. J Nat Conserv. 36:29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad PRC, Rajan KS, Dutt CBS, Roy PS. 2010. A conceptual framework to analyse the land-use/land-cover changes and its impact on phytodiversity: A case study of North Andaman Islands, India. Biodivers Conserv. 19(11):3073–3087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R, Development Core. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rahn K-H, Klatt S, Haas E, Butterbach-Bahl K. 2013. Improving efficiency of a statistical analysis of complex ecological models, when using the statistical software R by parallelising tasks with Rmpi. Ecol Inf. 15:53–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy CS, Saranya KRL, Jha CS. 2017. Earth observation data for habitat monitoring in protected areas of India. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ. 8:114–125.
   Google Scholar
• Reuther A, Byun C, Arcand W, Bestor D, Bergeron B, Hubbell M, Jones M, Michaleas P, Prout A, Rosa A, et al. 2018. Scalable system scheduling for HPC and big data. J Parallel Distrib Comput. 111:76–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei A, Mueller F, Hargrove P, Roman E. 2017. DINO: Divergent node cloning for sustained redundancy in HPC. J Parallel Distrib Comput. 109:350–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roldán VA, Baldi R, Valle HD, Deutschman D. 2017. Living on the edge: Heterogeneity in vegetation type cover as key factor of the habitat occupied by Dolichotis patagonum at landscape scale. J Arid Environ. 140:42–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy PS, Murthy MSR, Roy A, Kushwaha SPS, Singh S, Jha CS, Behera MD, Joshi PK, Jagannathan C, Karnatak HC, et al. 2013. Forest fragmentation in India Forest fragmentation in India. Curr Sci. 105:774–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy PS, Roy A, Karnatak H. 2012. Contemporary tools for identification, assessment and monitoring biodiversity. Trop Ecol. 53:261–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1990. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res. 48(1):9–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 2013. Fundamentals of the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL, Vargas L. 2006. The analytic network process. In: Decision making with the analytic network process. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidberger M, Morgan M, Edddelbuettel D. 2009. State of the art in parallel computing with R. J Stat Software. 31:1–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafi A, Carpenter B, Baker M. 2009. Nested parallelism for multi-core HPC systems using Java. J Parallel Distrib Comput. 69(6):532–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi X, Nellis MD. 2014. Semantic Web and service computation in GIScience applications: A perspective and prospective. Geocarto Int. 29(4):400–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh H, Garg RD, Karnatak HC, Roy A. 2018. Spatial landscape model to characterize biological diversity using R statistical computing environment. J Environ Manage. 206:1211–1223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh H, Karnatak HC, Garg RD. 2019. An automated and optimized approach for online spatial biodiversity model: a case study of OGC web processing service. Geocarto Int. 34(2):194–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somasundaram TS, Govindarajan K. 2014. CLOUDRB: A framework for scheduling and managing High-Performance Computing (HPC) applications in science cloud. Future Gener Comput Syst. 34:47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steve A, Weston MS. 2017. Package “doMPI” Foreach Parallel Adaptor for the Rmpi Package Version. doMPI: Foreach Parallel Adaptor for the Rmpi Package version 0.2.2.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Li T, Sun L, Chen J. 2013. Parallelization of a hydrological model using the message passing interface. Environ Modell Software. 43:124–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao G, Hu Y, Li N, Yang D. 2018. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of monitoring data of heavy metals in rice in China. Food Control. 89:32–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu AH. 2017. Interface (Wrapper) to MPI (Message-Passing Interface. ). Rmpi: interface (wrapper) to MPI (Message-Passing Interface). R Package version :0.6–6.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Padmanabhan A, Wang S. 2013. A parallel computing approach to viewshed analysis of large terrain data using graphics processing units. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 27(2):363–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar