Evaluation of aquifer vulnerability using PCA technique and various clustering methods

References

• Abonyi J, Feil B. 2007. Cluster analysis for data mining and system identification. Berlin (Germany): Springer Science & Business.
   Google Scholar
• Aller L, Bennet T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hachet G. 1987. DRASTIC: a standardised system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings (EPA 600/2-00). Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency Report, Tucson, 622.
   Google Scholar
• Alizadeh MJ, Kavianpour MR, Kisi O, Nourani V. 2017. A new approach for simulating and forecasting the rainfall-runoff process within the next two months. J Hydrol. 548:588–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arezoomand OLM, KHashei SA, Javadi S, Hashemi S. 2015. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment by the use of DRASTIC-NW modified model (Case Study: Kuchesfehan-Astane Plain). Ain Shams Eng J. 7(1):11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Asadi P, Ataie-Ashtiani B, Beheshti A. 2017. Vulnerability assessment of urban groundwater resources to nitrate: the case study of Mashhad, Iran. Environ Earth Sci. 76(1):41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Zabet T. 2002. Evaluation of aquifer vulnerability to contamination potential using the DRASTIC method. Environ Geol. 43(1–2):203–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babiker IS, Mohamed MA, Hiyama T, Kato K. 2005. A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan. Sci Total Environ. 345(1–3):127–140. ‏
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balazs F. 2006. Fuzzy clustering in process of data mining (PhD thesis). Department of Process Engineering, University of Veszprem Hungry, p. 157.
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo C, Parisi A. 2005. Principal component analysis applied to crash data on multilane roads. Proceedings of Third International SIIV Congress. http://www.sed.siiv.scelta.com/bari2005/080.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chang F-J, Huang C-W, Cheng S-T, Chang L-C. 2017. Conservation of groundwater from over-exploitation—scientific analyses for groundwater resources management. Sci Total Environ. 598:828–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choubin B, Solaimani K, Roshan MH, Malekian A. 2017. Watershed classification by remote sensing indices: a fuzzy c-means clustering approach. J Mt Sci. 14(10):2053–2063. ‏
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies DL, Bouldin DW. 1979. A cluster separation measure. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1(2):224–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash, Rajashree, Rasmita Dash, and Debahuti Mishra. “A hybridized rough-PCA approach of attribute reduction for high dimensional data set.” European Journal of Scientific Research 44, no. 1 (2010): 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Denny SC, Allen DM, Journeay JM. 2007. DRASTIC-Fm: a modified vulnerability mapping method for structurally controlled aquifers in the southern Gulf Islands, British Columbia, Canada. Hydrogeol J. 15(3):483. ‏
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feil B. 2006. Fuzzy clustering in process of data mining (PhD thesis). Department of Process Engineering, University of Veszprem Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Cano A. 2016. A methodological critique of the PISA evaluations. Relieve 22(1):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Fijani E, Nadiri AA, Moghaddam AA, Tsai FT-C, Dixon B. 2013. Optimization of DRASTIC method by supervised committee machine artificial intelligence to assess groundwater vulnerability for Maragheh–Bonab plain aquifer, Iran. J Hydrol. 503:89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Dubey SK. 2013. Comparative analysis of k-means and fuzzy c-means algorithms. IJACSA. 4(4).
   Google Scholar
• Gogu RC, Hallet V, Dassargues A. 2003. Comparison of aquifer vulnerability assessment techniques. Application to the Néblon river basin (Belgium). Environ Geol. 44(8):881–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güler C, Kurt MA, Alpaslan M, Akbulut C. 2012. Assessment of the impact of anthropogenic activities on the groundwater hydrology and chemistry in Tarsus coastal plain (Mersin, SE Turkey) using fuzzy clustering, multivariate statistics and GIS techniques. J Hydrol.414–415:435–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao, J., Zhang, Y., Jia, Y., Wang, H., Niu, C., Gan, Y. and Gong, Y., 2017. Assessing groundwater vulnerability and its inconsistency with groundwater quality, based on a modified DRASTIC model: a case study in Chaoyang District of Beijing City. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10(6), p.144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemy, SM. and Monem, MJ. 2012. Facilitation of operation and maintenance activities of irrigation networks using ak-means clustering method: case study of the ghazvin irrigation network. Irrigation and drainage, 61(1), pp.31–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter W. 2001. Assessing vulnerability of groundwater. Agriculture and Natural Resources. Publication 3497.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal J, Gorai A, Tirkey P, Pathak G. 2012. Approaches to groundwater vulnerability to pollution: a literature review. Asian J Water Environ Pollut. 9(1):105–115.
   Google Scholar
• Javadi S, Kavehkar N, Mousavizadeh MH, Mohammadi K. 2011. Modification of DRASTIC model to map groundwater vulnerability to pollution using nitrate measurements in agricultural areas. J Agric Sci Technol. 13:239–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javadi S, Hashemy SM, Mohammadi K, Howard K, Neshat A. 2017. Classification of aquifer vulnerability using K-means cluster analysis. J Hydrol. 549:27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javadi S, Hashemy SM. 2016. Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability using data mining technique in Hashtgerd plain. J Earth Space Phys. 42(4):35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe I. 2011. Principal component analysis: international encyclopedia of statistical science. Berlin (Germany): Springer. p. 1094–1096.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson RA, Wichern DW. 1982. Applied multivariate statistics. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kim DW, Lee KH, Lee D. 2004. On cluster validity index for estimation of the optimal number of fuzzy clusters. J Pattern Recog Soc. 37:209–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihumba AM, Vanclooster M, Longo JN. 2017. Assessing groundwater vulnerability in the Kinshasa region, DR Congo, using a calibrated DRASTIC model. J Afr Earth Sci. 126:13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Pham BT, Chapi K, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Revhaug I, Prakash I, Bui DT. 2018. A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz watershed, northern Iran. Sci Total Environ. 627:744–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, DC., Kim, EY., Ryu, JS. and Ko, KS. 2009. Factors controlling groundwater chemistry in an agricultural area with complex topographic and land use patterns in mid-western South Korea. Hydrological processes, 23(20):2915–2928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Sun L, Jia J, Cai Y, Wang X. 2016. Risk assessment of water pollution sources based on an integrated k-means clustering and set pair analysis method in the region of Shiyan, China. Sci Total Environ. 557:307–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Zhu J, Deng X, Zhao Y, Li S. 2018. Assessment and uncertainty analysis of groundwater risk. Environ Res. 160:140–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe M, Hurlow HA, Matyjasik M. 2003. The Weber River basin aquifer storage and recovery project, Utah Geological Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Machiwal D, Jha MK, Singh VP, Mohan C. 2018. Assessment and mapping of groundwater vulnerability to pollution: current status and challenges. Earth-Sci Rev. 185:901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtari HR, Espahbod MR. 2009. The investigation of hydrodynamic parameters potentiality of the Varamin plain regarding the variation of salinity gradient. J Earth. 4(2):27–47.
   Google Scholar
• Monem, M. J., & Hashemy, S. M. (2010). Extracting physical homogeneous regions out of irrigation networks using fuzzy clustering method: a case study for the Ghazvin canal irrigation network. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 13(4), 652–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadiri AA, Sedghi Z, Khatibi R, Sadeghfam S. 2018. Mapping specific vulnerability of multiple confined and unconfined aquifers by using artificial intelligence to learn from multiple DRASTIC frameworks. J Environ Manag. 227:415–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neshat A, Pradhan B, Pirasteh S, Shafri HZM. 2014. Estimating groundwater vulnerability to pollution using a modified DRASTIC model in the Kerman agricultural area, Iran. Environ Earth Sci. 71(7):3119–3131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourzadeh, M., Hashemy, SM., Rodriguez Martin, JA., Bahrami, HA. and Moshashaei, S. 2013. Using fuzzy clustering algorithms to describe the distribution of trace elements in arable calcareous soils in northwest Iran. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 59(3):435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco F, Martins L, Quininha M, Oliveira AS, Fernandes LS. 2018. Modification to the DRASTIC framework to assess groundwater contaminant risk in rural mountainous catchments. J Hydrol. 566:175–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrikaki O, Kazakis N, Voudouris K. 2012. Vulnerability map: a useful tool for groundwater protection: an example from Mouriki basin, north Greece. Fresenius Environ Bull. 21(8c):2516–2521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razandi Y, Pourghasemi HR, Neisani NS, Rahmati O. 2015. Application of analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio, and certainty factor models for groundwater potential mapping using GIS. Earth Sci Inform. 8(4):867–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro L, Pindo JC, Dominguez-Granda L. 2017. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in the Daule aquif Ecuador, using the susceptibility index method. Science of the Total Environment. 574:1674–1683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy DK, Datta B. 2017. Fuzzy C-mean clustering based inference system for saltwater intrusion processes prediction in coastal aquifers. Water Resour Manage. 31(1):355–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldarriaga JF, Gallego JL, López JE, Aguado R, Olazar M. 2019. Selecting monitoring variables in the manual composting of municipal solid waste based on principal component analysis. Waste Biomass Valor.Valorization10(7):1811–1819. ‏
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See EG, Ketchen DJ, Jr., Shook CL. 1996. The application of cluster analysis in Strategic Management Research: An analysis and critique. Strat Mgmt J. Journal. 17(6):441–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghfam S, Hassanzadeh Y, Nadiri AA, Zarghami M. 2016. Localization of groundwater vulnerability assessment using catastrophe theory. Water Resour Manage. 30(13):4585–4601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun CZ, Zuo HJ, Luan TX. 2007. Research on groundwater vulnerability assessment of the lower Liaohe River Plain. J Jilin Univ (Earth Sci Ed). 5:943–948.
   Google Scholar
• Stigter T, Ribeiro L, Dill AC. 2006. Evaluation of an intrinsic and a specific vulnerability assessment method in comparison with groundwater salinisation and nitrate contamination levels in two agricultural regions in the south of Portugal. Hydrogeol J. 14(1–2):79–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh KP, Malik A, Mohan D, Sinha S. 2004. Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of Gomti River (India)—a case study. Water Res. 38(18):3980–3992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha S, Kafle R, Pandey VP. 2017. Evaluation of index-overlay methods for groundwater vulnerability and risk assessment in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Sci Total Environ. 575:779–790. ‏
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Xiaosi, Wenzhen Yuan, Wei Xu, and Shanghai Du. 2015. “A groundwater vulnerability assessment method for organic pollution: a validation case in the Hun River basin, Northeastern China.” Environmental earth sciences 73(1):467–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente de Oliveira J, Pedrycz W. 2007. Advances in fuzzy clustering and its applications. London (UK): John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vias J, Andreo B, Perles M, Carrasco F. 2005. A comparative study of four schemes for groundwater vulnerability mapping in a diffuse flow carbonate aquifer under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Environ Geol. 47(4):586–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrba, J. and Zaporozec, A., 1994. Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. Heise.
   Google Scholar
• Wang XJ, Feng GM, Wang LN. 2015. Groundwater vulnerability assessment in plain area of Hainan Province. South-to-North Water Transf Water Sci Technol. 3:548–552.
   Google Scholar
• Xu H, Ma C, Lian J, Xu K, Chaima E. 2018. Urban flooding risk assessment based on an integrated k-means cluster algorithm and improved entropy weight method in the region of Haikou, China. J Hydrol. 563:975–986. ‏
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaosi, Wenzhen Yuan, Wei Xu, and Shanghai Du. 2015. “A groundwater vulnerability assessment method for organic pollution: a validation case in the Hun River basin, Northeastern China.” Environmental earth sciences 73(1):467–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehtabian, GR., Hamedi, SR, and Amiraslani, F. 2005. The study of northern and southern parts of varamin plain based on the role of elements on production potential and fertility.
   Google Scholar