A decision framework to assess urban fire vulnerability in cities of developing nations: empirical evidence from Mumbai

References

• Bistinas I, Oom D, Sá ACL, Harrison SP, Prentice IC, Pereira JMC. 2013. Relationships between human population density and burned area at continental and global scales. Jiang B (ed) PLoS One. 8(12):e81188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning. 45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Indian Standards. 2016. National Building Code of India 2016 (Volume 2). [accessed 2019 December 6]. https://www.academia.edu/37343763/india-national-building-code-nbc-2016-vol-2.pdf?auto=download.
   Google Scholar
• Buyantuyev A, Wu J. 2010. Urban heat islands and landscape heterogeneity: linking spatiotemporal variations in surface temperatures to land-cover and socioeconomic patterns. Landscape Ecol. 25(1):17–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čeh M, Kilibarda M, Lisec A, Bajat B. 2018. Estimating the performance of random forest versus multiple regression for predicting prices of the apartments. IJGI. 7(5):168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson PD. 1982. Variable selection in multiple regression. Iowa State University. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/8338.
   Google Scholar
• Degel D, Wiesche L, Rachuba S, Werners B. 2015. Time-dependent ambulance allocation considering data-driven empirically required coverage. Health Care Manag Sci. 18(4):444–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demographia. 2019. Demographia World Urban Areas. Annual Edition: 201904 15. [accessed 2019 November 8]. http://www.demographia.com/db-worldua.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FICCI and Pinkerton. 2017. India Risk Survey 2017 Report. FICCI. [accessed 2019 December 4]. http://ficci.in/Sedocument/20416/India-Risk-Survey-2017-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Georganos S, Grippa T, Niang Gadiaga A, Linard C, Lennert M, Vanhuysse S, Mboga N, Wolff E, Kalogirou S. 2019. Geographical random forests: a spatial extension of the random forest algorithm to address spatial heterogeneity in remote sensing and population modelling. Geocarto Int:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasso N, Lingua AM, Musci MA, Noardo F, Piras M. 2018. An INSPIRE-compliant open-source GIS for fire-fighting management. Nat Hazards. 90(2):623–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldåker N, Hallin P-O. 2014. Spatio-temporal patterns of intentional fires, social stress and socio-economic determinants: A case study of Malmö, Sweden. Fire Safety J. 70:71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie C, Searle R. 2016. Socio-economic and demographic predictors of accidental dwelling fire rates. Fire Safety J. 84:50–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imada A. 2014. A literature review: forest management with neural network and artificial intelligence. In: Golovko V, and Imada A, editors. Neural networks and artificial intelligence. Cham: Springer International Publishing, p. 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasiri HB, Purushothaman CS, Vennila A. 2013. Quantitative analysis of plastic debris on recreational beaches in Mumbai, India. Marine Pollution Bull. 77(1–2):107–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings CR. 1999. Socioeconomic characteristics and their relationship to fire incidence: a review of the literature. Fire Technol. 35(1):7–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings CR. 2013. Social and economic characteristics as determinants of residential fire risk in urban neighborhoods: A review of the literature. Fire Safety J. 62:13–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotharkar R, Bahadure P, Sarda N. 2014. Measuring compact urban form: A case of Nagpur City, India. Sustainability. 6(7):4246–4272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Ramamritham K, Jana A. 2019. Resource allocation for handling emergencies considering dynamic variations and urban spaces: fire fighting in Mumbai. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development - ICTDX ‘19, Ahmedabad, India, 2019, pp. 1–11. ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Kim J-C, Jung H-S, Lee MJ, Lee S. 2017. Spatial prediction of flood susceptibility using random-forest and boosted-tree models in Seoul metropolitan city, Korea. Geomatics, Nat Hazard Risk. 8(2):1185–1203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCGM and MFB. 2005. Fire hazard response & mitigation plan. 1. Mumbai: Muumbai Fire Brigade. [accessed 2019 November 7]. http://www.mahafireservice.gov.in/Site/PDFs/NewsEvents/FireHazardResponseMitigationPlan/MillenniumCityMitigationPlan/mumbai_mitigation_plan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Home Affairs and RMSI. 2011. Fire Hazard and Risk Analysis in the Country for Revamping the Fire Services in the Country. December. Noida, India. [accessed 2019 October 5]. https://dgfscdhg.gov.in/sites/default/files/Delhi.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mutanga O, Adam E, Cho MA. 2012. High density biomass estimation for wetland vegetation using WorldView-2 imagery and random forest regression algorithm. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform. 18:399–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira S, Oehler F, San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Camia A, Pereira JMC. 2012. Modeling spatial patterns of fire occurrence in Mediterranean Europe using multiple regression and random forest. Forest Ecol Manage. 275:117–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parente J, Pereira MG, Amraoui M, Tedim F. 2018. Negligent and intentional fires in Portugal: Spatial distribution characterization. Sci Total Environ. 624:424–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song C, Kwan M-P, Song W, Zhu J. 2017. A comparison between spatial econometric models and random forest for modeling fire occurrence. Sustainability. 9(5):819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Špatenková O, Virrantaus K. 2013. Discovering spatio-temporal relationships in the distribution of building fires. Fire Safety J. 62:49–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taridala S, Yudono A, Ramli MI, Akil A. 2017. Expert system development for urban fire hazard assessment. Study case: Kendari City, Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 79:012035.
   Google Scholar
• Town and Country Planning Organisation. 2016. Model building bye laws-2016. Ministry of Urban Development. [accessed 2019 May 12]. http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/MODEL%20BUILDING%20BYE%20LAWS-2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Turner SL, Johnson RD, Weightman AL, Rodgers SE, Arthur G, Bailey R, Lyons RA. 2017. Risk factors associated with unintentional house fire incidents, injuries and deaths in high-income countries: a systematic review. Inj Prev. 23(2):131–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viedma O, Moreno JM, Güngöroglu C, Cosgun U, Kavgacı A. 2017. Recent land-use and land-cover changes and its driving factors in a fire-prone area of southwestern Turkey. J Environ Manage. 197:719–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Du S, Wen J, Zhang M, Gu H, Shi Y, Xu H. 2017. Analyzing explanatory factors of urban pluvial floods in Shanghai using geographically weighted regression. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 31(7):1777–1790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Yao J, Sila-Nowicka K. 2018. Exploring spatiotemporal dynamics of urban fires: A case of Nanjing, China. IJGI. 7(1):7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Han S, Zhao J, Zhang Z, Qu C, Ke Y, Chen X. 2009. Image based forest fire detection using dynamic characteristics with artificial neural networks. In 2009 International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Hainan Island, China, April 2009, pp. 290–293. IEEE.
   Google Scholar