Urban flood susceptibility zonation mapping using evidential belief function, frequency ratio and fuzzy gamma operator models in GIS: a case study of Greater Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

References

• Ahmadisharaf E, Tajrishy M, Alamdari N. 2016. Integrating flood hazard into site selection of detention basins using spatial multi-criteria decision-making. J Environ Plann Manage. 59(8):1397–1417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Juaidi AEM, Nassar AM, Al-Juaidi OEM. 2018. Evaluation of flood susceptibility mapping using logistic regression and GIS conditioning factors. Arab J Geosci. 11(24):765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbalagan R, Kumar R, Lakshmanan K, Parida S, Neethu S. 2015. Landslide hazard zonation mapping using frequency ratio and fuzzy logic approach, a case study of Lachung Valley, Sikkim. Geoenviron Disasters. 2(1):6.
   Google Scholar
• Arnoldus HMJ. 1980. An approximation of the rainfall factor in the universal soil loss equation. In: De Boodt M, Gabriels D, editors. Assessment of erosion. Chichester: Wiley; p 127–132.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurugan G, Ramesh V, Touthang M. 2016. Landslide susceptibility zonation mapping using frequency ratio and fuzzy gamma operator models in part of NH-39, Manipur, India. Nat Hazards. 84(1):465–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti SS, Tripathi NK. 2014. Built-up area extraction using Landsat 8 OLI imagery. GISci Remote Sens. 51(4):445–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonham-Carter GF. 1994. Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modeling with GIS. In: Bonham-Carter F, editor. Computer methods in the geosciences.Oxford: Pergamon; p. 398.
   Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Khosravi K, Shahabi H, Daggupati P, Adamowski JF, Melesse AM, Pham BT, Pourghasemi HR, Mahmoudi M, Bahrami S, et al. 2019. Flood spatial modeling in Northern Iran using remote sensing and GIS: a comparison between Evidential Belief Functions and its ensemble with a multivariate logistic regression model. Remote Sens. 11:1589.
   Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB. 2012. Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Hoa Binh province (Vietnam): a comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models. Catena. 96:28–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao C, Xu P, Wang Y, Chen J, Zheng L, Niu C. 2016. Flash flood hazard susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and statistical index methods in coalmine subsidence areas. Sustainability. 8(9):948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Ito Y, Sawamukai M, Tokunaga T. 2015. Flood hazard assessment in the Kujukuri Plain of Chiba Prefecture, Japan, based on GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Nat Hazards. 78(1):105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choubin B, Moradi E, Golshan M, Adamowski J, Sajedi-Hosseini F, Mosavi A. 2019. An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines. Sci Total Environ. 651(2):2087–2096.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dempster AP. 1967. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann Math Statist. 38(2):325–339.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster AP. 1968. A generalization of Bayesian inference. J R Stat Soc. 2:205–247.
   Google Scholar
• Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carre G, Marquez JRG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitao PJ, et al. 2013. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography. 36(1):27–046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essel P, Glover ET, Yeboah S, Adjei-Kyereme Y, Yawo IND, Nyarku M, Asumadu-Sakyi GS, Gbeddy GK, Agyiri YA, Ameho EM, et al. 2016. Rainfall erosivity index for the Ghana Atomic Energy Commission Site. SpringerPlus. 5(1):465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Furl C, Yousefi S, Mirzaee S, Keesstra S, Surian N, Pourghasemi HR, Zakizadeh HR, Tabibian S. 2018. Effects of an extreme flood on river morphology (case study: Karoon River, Iran). Geomorphology. 304:30–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriels D. 2006. Assessing the modified Fournier index and the precipitation concentration index for some European countries. In: Boardman J, Poesen J, editors. Soil erosion in Europe. New York City (NY): Wiley; p. 675–684.
   Google Scholar
• Gao B-C. 1996. NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sens Environ. 58(3):257–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guhathakurta P, Sreejith OP, Menon PA. 2011. Impact of climate change on extreme rainfall events and flood risk in India. J Earth Syst Sci. 120(3):359–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gujarati DN. 2004. Basic econometrics. 4th ed. New York City (NY): The MacGraw Hill Company; p. 1002.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta K. 2007. Urban flood resilience planning and management and lessons for the future: a case study of Mumbai, India. Urban Water J. 4(3):183–194.
   Google Scholar
• Haghizadeh A, Siahkamari S, Haghiabi AH, Rahmati O. 2017. Forecasting flood-prone areas using Shannon’s entropy model. J Earth Syst Sci. 126(3):39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jothibasu A, Anbazhagan S. 2016. Flood susceptibility appraisal in Ponnaiyar River Basin, India using Frequency Ratio (FR) and Shannon’s Entropy (SE) models. IJARSG. 5(10):1946–1962.
   Google Scholar
• Kayastha P, Bijukchhen SM, Dhital MR, Smedt FD. 2013. GIS based landslide susceptibilty mapping using a fuzzy logic approach: a case study from Ghurmi-Dhad Khola, Eastern Nepal. J GEOL SOC INDIA. 82:249–261.
   Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Nohani E, Maroufinia E, Pourghasemi HR. 2016. A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making technique. Nat Hazards. 83(2):947–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Shahabi H, Pham BT, Adamowski J, Shirzadi A, Pradhan B, Dou J, Ly H-B, Grof G, Ho HL, et al. 2019. A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using multi-criteria decision-making analysis and machine learning methods. J Hydrol. 573:311–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kia MB, Pirasteh S, Pradhan B, Mahmud AR, Sulaiman WNA, Moradi A. 2012. An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River Basin, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci. 67(1):251–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourgialas N, Karatzas G. 2018. A national scale flood hazard mapping methodology: the case of Greece – Protection and adaptation policy approaches. Sci Total Environ. 601–602:441–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourgialas NN, Karatzas GP. 2011. Flood management and a GIS modelling method to assess flood-hazard areas—a case study. Hydrol Sci J. 56(2):212–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni AT, Eldho TI, Rao EP, Mohan BK. 2014a. An integrated flood inundation model for coastal urban watershed of Navi Mumbai, India. Nat Hazards. 73(2):403–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni AT, Mohanty J, Eldho TI, Rao EP, Mohan BK. 2014b. A web GIS based integrated flood assessment modeling tool for coastal urban watersheds. Comput Geosci. 64:7–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee M-J, Kang JE, Kim G. 2015. Application of fuzzy combination operators to flood vulnerability assessments in Seoul, Korea. Geocarto Int. 30(9):1052–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YB, De Smedt F. 2005. Flood modeling for complex terrain using GIS and remote sensed information. Water Resour Manage. 19(5):605–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjanovic M, Caha J. 2011. Fuzzy approach to landslide susceptibility zonation. In: Snasel V, Pokorny J, Richta K, editors. Proceedings of the Dateso. Annual International Workshop on DAtabases, Texts, Specifications and Objects. Pisek, Czech Republic. p. 181–195.
   Google Scholar
• Meraj G, Romshoo SA, Yousuf AR, Altaf S, Altaf F. 2015. Assessing the influence of watershed characteristics on the flood vulnerability of Jhelum basin in Kashmir Himalaya. Nat Hazards. 77(1):153–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra BB. 2016. Indian system of soil classification: a way forward. Agric Res Technol. 3(2):555606.
   Google Scholar
• Mojaddadi H, Pradhan B, Nampak H, Ahmad N, Ghazali AHB. 2017. Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multisensor remote-sensing data and GIS. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 8(2):1080–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemir A, Altural T. 2013. A comparative study of frequency ratio, weights of evidence and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping: Sultan Mountains, SW Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci. 64:180–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C. 2012. Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Nat Hazards. 63(2):965–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan AMS, Kim Y-T. 2017. Spatial data analysis and application of evidential belief functions to shallow landslide susceptibility mapping at Mt. Umyeon, Seoul, Korea. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 76(4):1263–1279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Youssef A. 2011. A 100-year maximum flood susceptibility mapping using integrated hydrological and hydrodynamic models: Kelantan River Corridor, Malaysia. J Flood Risk Manage. 4(3):189–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR. 2017. Identification of critical flood prone areas in data-scarce and ungauged regions: a comparison of three data mining models. Water Resour Manage. 31(5):1473–1487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR, Zeinivand H. 2016. Flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models in the Golastan Province, Iran. Geocarto Int. 31(1):42–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh V, Anbazhagan S. 2015. Landslide susceptibility mapping along Kolli hills Ghat road section (India) using frequency ratio, relative effect, and fuzzy logic models. Environ Earth Sci. 73(12):8009–8021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh V, Phamei T, Baskar M, Anbazhagan S. 2016. Application of fuzzy gamma operator in landslide susceptibility mapping along Yercaud Ghat Road section, Tamil Nadu, India. In: Janardhana Raju N, editor. Geostatistical and geospatial approaches for the characterization of natural resources in the environment. Capital Publishing Company, Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; p. 545–553.
   Google Scholar
• Reshma R-P, Deepankar C. 2015. Vulnerability Mapping for Disaster Assessment using ArcGIS Tools and techniques for Mumbai City, India. 16th ESRI India User Conference. http://www.esri.in/∼/media/esri-india/files/pdfs/events/uc2015/proceedings/papers/UCP062.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Samanta S, Pal DK, Palsamanta B. 2018. Flood susceptibility analysis through remote sensing, GIS and frequency ratio model. Appl Water Sci. 8(2):66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafer G. 1976. A Mathematical theory of evidence. Vol. 1. New Jersey (NJ): Princetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shahapure SS, Eldho TI, Rao EP. 2011. Flood simulation in an urban catchment of Navi Mumbai city with detention pond and tidal effects using FEM, GIS, and remote sensing. J Waterway Port Coastal Ocean Eng. 137(6):286–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava V, Srivastava H, Lakhera R.C. 2010. Fuzzy gamma based geomatic modeling for landslide hazard susceptibility in a part of Tons river valley, northwest Himalaya, India. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 1(3):225–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulafa HE. 2014. Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) for flood forecasting at Dongola Station in the River Nile, Sudan. Alex Eng J. 53(3):655–662.
   Google Scholar
• Tangestani MH. 2004. Landslide susceptibility mapping using the fuzzy gamma approach in a GIS, Kakan catchment area, southwest Iran. Aust J Earth Sci. 51(3):439–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Jones S, Shabani F. 2019. Identifying the essential flood conditioning factors for flood prone area mapping using machine learning techniques. Catena. 175:174–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Kumar L. 2018. The application of a Dempster–Shafer-based evidential belief function in flood susceptibility mapping and comparison with frequency ratio and logistic regression methods. Environ Earth Sci. 77(13):490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Lee M-J, Pradhan B, Jebur MN, Lee S. 2014a. Flood susceptibility mapping using integrated bivariate and multivariate statistical models. Environ Earth Sci. 72(10):4001–4015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN. 2014b. Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. J Hydrol. 512:332–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN. 2015. Flood susceptibility analysis and its verification using a novel ensemble support vector machine and frequency ratio method. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 29(4):1149–1165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Shabani F, Jebur MN, Hong H, Chen W, Xie X. 2017. GIS-based spatial prediction of flood prone areas using standalone frequency ratio, logistic regression, weight of evidence and their ensemble techniques. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 8(2):1538–1561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeh SVR, Kornejady A, Poughasemi HR, Keesstra S. 2018. Flood susceptibility mapping using novel ensembles of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic algorithms. Sci Total Environ. 615:438–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiam AK. 2005. An evidential reasoning approach to land degradation evaluation: Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence. Trans GIS. 9(4):507–520.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari MK, Chatterjee C. 2010. Uncertainty assessment and ensemble flood forecasting using bootstrap based artificial neural networks (BANNs). J Hydrol. 382(1–4):20–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Li W, Wu Y, Pei Y, Xing M, Yang D. 2016. A Comparative study on the landslide susceptibility mapping using evidential belief function and weights of evidence models. J Earth Syst Sci. 125(3):645–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H. 2006. Modification of normalized difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 27(14):3025–3033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H. 2008. A new index for delineating built-up land features in satellite imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 29(14):4269–4276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Sefry SA. 2016. Flash flood susceptibility assessment in Jeddah city (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) using bivariate and multivariate statistical models. Environ Earth Sci. 75(1):12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh LA. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control. 8(3):338–353.
   Google Scholar
• Zha Y, Gao J, Ni S. 2003. Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 24(3):583–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman HJ. 1996. Fuzzy set theory and it applications. Norwell (MA): Kluwer Academic Publishers; p. 435.
   Google Scholar
• Zope PE, Eldho TI, Jothiprakash V. 2015. Impacts of urbanization on flooding of a coastal urban catchment: a case study of Mumbai City, India. Nat Hazards. 75(1):887–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zope PE, Eldho TI, Jothiprakash V. 2017. Hydrological impacts of land use–land cover change and detention basins on urban flood hazard: a case study of Poisar River basin, Mumbai, India. Nat Hazards. 87(3):1267–1283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar