A new method to detect targets in hyperspectral images based on principal component analysis

References

• Bahrampour S, Ray A, Sarkar S, Damarla T, Nasrabadi NM. 2013. Performance comparison of feature extraction algorithms for target detection and classification. Pattern Recog Lett. 34(16):2126–2134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian G, et al. 2007. Band selection using support vector machines for improving target detection in hyperspectral images. 9th Biennial Conference of the Australian Pattern Recognition Society on Digital Image Computing Techniques and Applications (DICTA 2007), IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett MS. 1998. Face image analysis by unsupervised learning and redundancy reduction. San Diego: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Beck R. 2003. EO-1 user guide v. 2.3. Cincinnati (OH): Department of Geography University of Cincinnati.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard K, Tarabalka Y, Angulo J, Chanussot J, Benediktsson JA. 2012. Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral data based on a stochastic minimum spanning forest approach. IEEE Trans Image Process. 21(4):2008–2021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, et al. 2014. An unsupervised band selection based on band similarity for hyperspectral image target detection. Proceedings of International Conference on Internet Multimedia Computing and Service, ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chang C-I, Wang S. 2006. Constrained band selection for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 44(6):1575–1585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C-I, et al. 1998. Least squares subspace projection approach to mixed pixel classification for hyperspectral images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 36(3):898–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Yang B, Wang B. 2018. A preprocessing method for hyperspectral target detection based on tensor principal component analysis. Remote Sens. 10(7):1033.
   Google Scholar
• Diani M, et al. 2008. A new band selection strategy for target detection in hyperspectral images. International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Du P-j, Tan K, Su H-j. 2009. Feature extraction for target identification and image classification of OMIS hyperspectral image. Min Sci Technol (China). 19(6):835–841.
   Google Scholar
• Du Q, et al. 2012. Hyperspectral band selection using a collaborative sparse model. 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Geng X, et al. 2014. CEM: more bands, better performance. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 11(11):1876–1880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng X, Sun K, Ji L. 2014. Band selection for target detection in hyperspectral imagery using sparse CEM. Remote Sens Lett. 5(12):1022–1031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. 2002. Digital image processing. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC, Chang C-I. 1994. Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: An orthogonal subspace projection approach. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 32(4):779–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartigan JA, Wong MA. 1979. Algorithm AS 136: A k-means clustering algorithm. J Royal Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat). 28(1):100–108.
   Google Scholar
• Hashjin SS, et al. 2018. Selecting optimal bands for sub-pixel target detection in hyperspectral images based on implanting synthetic targets. IET Image Proc. 13(2):323–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvärinen A, Oja E. 2000. Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Netw. 13(4–5):411–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia X, Richards JA. 1999. Segmented principal components transformation for efficient hyperspectral remote-sensing image display and classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 37(1):538–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe I. 2011. Principal component analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Keshava N. 2004. Distance metrics and band selection in hyperspectral processing with applications to material identification and spectral libraries. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 42(7):1552–1565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khazai S, Homayouni S, Safari A, Mojaradi B. 2011. Anomaly detection in hyperspectral images based on an adaptive support vector method. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 8(4):646–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B, Landgrebe DA. 1991. Hierarchical classifier design in high-dimensional numerous class cases. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 29(4):518–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon H, et al. 2005. Target classification using adaptive feature extraction and subspace projection for hyperspectral imagery. In: Computer vision beyond the visible spectrum. London: Springer; p. 115–140.
   Google Scholar
• Li S, Wu H, Wan D, Zhu J. 2011. An effective feature selection method for hyperspectral image classification based on genetic algorithm and support vector machine. Knowledge-Based Syst. 24(1):40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Gao G, Gu Y. 2017. Tensor matched subspace detector for hyperspectral target detection. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 55(4):1967–1974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manolakis D, et al. 2003. Hyperspectral image processing for automatic target detection applications. Lincoln Lab J. 14(1):79–116.
   Google Scholar
• Minet J, Taboury J, Goudail F, Péalat M, Roux N, Lonnoy J, Ferrec Y. 2011. Influence of band selection and target estimation error on the performance of the matched filter in hyperspectral imaging. Appl Opt. 50(22):4276–4285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuenschwander AL, Crawford MM, Ringrose S. 2005. Results from the EO‐1 experiment—A comparative study of Earth Observing‐1 Advanced Land Imager (ALI) and Landsat ETM + data for land cover mapping in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Int J Remote Sens. 26(19):4321–4337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Liao L, Maybank SJ, Zhang Y, Liu X. 2017. Hyperspectral image spectral-spatial feature extraction via tensor principal component analysis. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 14(9):1431–1435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renard N, Bourennane S, Blanc-Talon J. 2008. Denoising and dimensionality reduction using multilinear tools for hyperspectral images. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 5(2):138–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saipullah KM, Kim D-H. 2012. Target detection of hyperspectral images based on their Fourier spectral features. Opt Eng. 51(11):111704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharifi Hashjin S, et al. 2016. A band selection method for sub-pixel target detection in hyperspectral images. J Geomatics Sci Technol. 6(1):129–139.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder D, et al. 2008. Development of a web-based application to evaluate target finding algorithms. IGARSS 2008-2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Strang G. 1993. The fundamental theorem of linear algebra. Am Math Mon. 100(9):848–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun K, et al. 2014. A new sparsity-based band selection method for target detection of hyperspectral image. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 12(2):329–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tax DM, Müller K-R. 2003. Feature extraction for one-class classification. In: Artificial neural networks and neural information processing—ICANN/ICONIP 2003. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. 342–349.
   Google Scholar
• Uddin M, et al. 2017a. Improved feature extraction using segmented FPCA for hyperspectral image classification. 2017 2nd International Conference on Electrical & Electronic Engineering (ICEEE), IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Uddin M, et al. 2017b. Segmented FPCA for hyperspectral image classification. 2017 3rd International Conference on Electrical Information and Communication Technology (EICT), IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Uddin MP, Mamun MA, Hossain MA. 2019. Effective feature extraction through segmentation-based folded-PCA for hyperspectral image classification. Int J Remote Sens. 40(18):7190–7220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin MP, Mamun MA, Hossain MA. 2020. PCA-based feature reduction for hyperspectral remote sensing image classification. IETE Tech Rev. :1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02564602.2020.1740615
   Google Scholar
• Veganzones MA, Cohen JE, Cabral Farias R, Chanussot J, Comon P. 2016. Nonnegative tensor CP decomposition of hyperspectral data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 54(5):2577–2588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, et al. 2006. Target detection for hyperspectral images using ICA-based feature extraction. 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Huang S, Liu D, Wang B. 2013. A new band removed selection method for target detection in hyperspectral image. J Opt. 42(3):208–213.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Du Q, Younan NH. 2017. Particle swarm optimization-based band selection for hyperspectral target detection. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 14(4):554–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Zhang D, Frangi AF, Yang J-y. 2004. Two-dimensional PCA: a new approach to appearance-based face representation and recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 26(1):131–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabalza J, Ren J, Yang M, Zhang Y, Wang J, Marshall S, Han J. 2014. Novel folded-PCA for improved feature extraction and data reduction with hyperspectral imaging and SAR in remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 93:112–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Cao Y, Zhuo L, Wang C, Zhou Q. 2015. Improved band similarity-based hyperspectral imagery band selection for target detection. J Appl Remote Sens. 9(1):95091.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Wang M, Yang S, Jiao L. 2018. Spatial–spectral-graph-regularized low-rank tensor decomposition for multispectral and hyperspectral image fusion. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens. 11(4):1030–1040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar