Novel ensemble machine learning models in flood susceptibility mapping

References

• Ahmadlou M, Al‐Fugara AK, Al‐Shabeeb AR, Arora A, Al‐Adamat R, Pham QB, Al‐Ansari N, Linh NTT, Sajedi H. 2021. Flood susceptibility mapping and assessment using a novel deep learning model  combining multilayer perceptron and autoencoder neural networks. J Flood Risk Manage. 14(1):12683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadlou M, Karimi M, Alizadeh S, Shirzadi A, Parvinnejhad D, Shahabi H, Panahi M. 2019. Flood susceptibility assessment using integration of adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and biogeography-based optimization (BBO) and BAT algorithms (BA). Geocarto Int. 34(11):1252–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2018.1474276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Abadi AM. 2018. Mapping flood susceptibility in an arid region of southern Iraq using ensemble machine learning classifiers: a comparative study. Arab J Geosci. 11(9):218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfaro E, Gámez M, Garcia N. 2013. adabag: an R package for classification with boosting and bagging. J Stat Soft. 54(2):1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alotaibi NN, Sasi S. 2016. Tree-based ensemble models for predicting the ICU transfer of stroke in-patients. In 2016 International Conference on Data Science and Engineering (ICDSE); Aug 23–25; Cochin, India: IEEE United States. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Amiri M, Pourghasemi HR, Ghanbarian GA, Afzali SF. 2019. Assessment of the importance of gully erosion effective factors using Boruta algorithm and its spatial modeling and mapping using three machine learning algorithms. Geoderma. 340:55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Asadi Nalivan O, Saha S, Roy J, Pradhan B, Tiefenbacher JP, Thi Ngo PT. 2020a. Novel ensemble approaches of machine learning techniques in modeling the gully erosion susceptibility. Remote Sensing. 12(11):1890. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Pradhan B, Rezaei K. 2019. Gully erosion zonation mapping using integrated geographically weighted regression with certainty factor and random forest models in GIS. J Environ Manage. 232:928–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Saha S, Roy J, Tiefenbacher JP, Cerda A, Biggs T, Pradhan B, Ngo PTT, Collins AL. 2020b. A novel ensemble computational intelligence approach for the spatial prediction of land subsidence susceptibility. Sci Total Environ. 726:138595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora A, Arabameri A, Pandey M, Siddiqui MA, Shukla UK, Bui DT, Mishra VN, Bhardwaj A. 2021. Optimization of state-of-the-art fuzzy-metaheuristic ANFIS-based machine learning models for flood susceptibility prediction mapping in the Middle Ganga Plain, India. Sci Total Environ. 750:141565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora A, Pandey M, Siddiqui MA, Hong H, Mishra VN. 2019. Spatial flood susceptibility prediction in Middle Ganga Plain: comparison of frequency ratio and Shannon’s entropy models. Geocarto Int. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1687594.
   Google Scholar
• Armaş I. 2012. Weights of evidence method for landslide susceptibility mapping Prahova subcarpathians. Nat Hazards. 60(3):937–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benediktsson JA, Swain PH, Ersoy OK. 1990. Neural network approaches versus statistical methods in classification of multisource remote sensing data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 28(4):540–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracken LJ, Cox NJ, Shannon J. 2008. The relationship between rainfall inputs and flood generation in south–east Spain. Hydrol Process. 22(5):683–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlee J. 2014. Machine learning mastery. [Last accessed 2020 Aug 10]. http://machinelearningmastery.com/discover-feature-engineering-howtoengineer-features-and-how-to-getgood-at-it.
   Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Khosravi K, Li S, Shahabi H, Panahi M, Singh VP, Chapi K, Shirzadi A, Panahi S, Chen W, et al. 2018b. New hybrids of anfis with several optimization algorithms for flood susceptibility modeling. Water. 10(9):1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Panahi M, Shahabi H, Singh VP, Shirzadi A, Chapi K, Khosravi K, Chen W, Panahi S, Li S, et al. 2018a. Novel hybrid evolutionary algorithms for spatial prediction of floods. Sci Rep. 8(1):1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bui DT, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Chapi K, Omidavr E, Pham BT, Talebpour Asl D, Khaledian H, Pradhan B, Panahi M, et al. 2019c. A novel ensemble artificial intelligence approach for gully erosion mapping in a semi-arid watershed (Iran). Sensors. 19(11):2444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Geertsema M, Omidvar E, Clague J, Thai Pham B, Dou J, Talebpour Asl D, Bin Ahmad B, et al. 2019a. New ensemble models for shallow landslide susceptibility modeling in a semi-arid watershed. Forests. 10(9):743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Tsangaratos P, Ngo PTT, Pham TD, Pham BT. 2019b. Flash flood susceptibility modeling using an optimized fuzzy rule based feature selection technique and tree based ensemble methods. Sci Total Environ. 668:1038–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao C, Xu P, Wang Y, Chen J, Zheng L, Niu C. 2016. Flash flood hazard susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and statistical index methods in coalmine subsidence areas. Sustainability. 8(9):948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapi K, Singh VP, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Bui DT, Pham BT, Khosravi K. 2017. A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach for flood susceptibility assessment. Environ Model Software. 95:229–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Li H, Hou E, Wang S, Wang G, Panahi M, Li T, Peng T, Guo C, Niu C, et al. 2018. GIS-based groundwater potential analysis using novel ensemble weights-of-evidence with logistic regression and functional tree models. Sci Total Environ. 634:853–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choubin B, Moradi E, Golshan M, Adamowski J, Sajedi-Hosseini F, Mosavi A. 2019. An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines. Sci Total Environ. 651(Pt 2):2087–2096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R. 2019a. Flash-flood Potential Index mapping using weights of evidence, decision Trees models and their novel hybrid integration. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 33(7):1375–1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R. 2019b. Flash-flood potential assessment in the upper and middle sector of Prahova river catchment (Romania). A comparative approach between four hybrid models. Sci Total Environ. 659:1115–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R, Bui DT. 2019. Spatial prediction of flood potential using new ensembles of bivariate statistics and artificial intelligence: a case study at the Putna river catchment of Romania. Sci Total Environ. 691:1098–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R, Bui DT. 2020. Identification of areas prone to flash-flood phenomena using multiple-criteria decision-making, bivariate statistics, machine learning and their ensembles. Sci Total Environ. 712:136492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R, Hong H, Pham QB. 2020a. Comparative assessment of the flash-flood potential within small mountain catchments using bivariate statistics and their novel hybrid integration with machine learning models. Sci Total Environ. 711:134514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R, Ngo PTT, Bui DT. 2020b. Novel ensembles of deep learning neural network and statistical learning for flash-flood susceptibility mapping. Water. 12(6):1549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabney AR. 2005. Classification of microarrays to nearest centroids. Bioinformatics. 21(22):4148–4154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das S. 2018. Geographic information system and AHP-based flood hazard zonation of Vaitarna basin, Maharashtra, India. Arab J Geosci. 11(19):576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das S. 2019. Geospatial mapping of flood susceptibility and hydro-geomorphic response to the floods in Ulhas basin, India. Remote Sens Appl: Soc Environ. 14:60–74.
   Google Scholar
• Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T. 2008. A working guide to boosted regression trees. J Anim Ecol. 77(4):802–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsafi SH. 2014. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) for flood forecasting at Dongola Station in the River Nile, Sudan. Alexandria Eng J. 53(3):655–662.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. 2000. Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting (with discussion and a rejoinder by the authors). Ann Statist. 28(2):337–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq M, Akhtar M, Muhammad S, Paras S, Rahmatullah J. 2012. Techniques of remote sensing and GIS for flood monitoring and damage assessment: a case study of Sindh province, Pakistan. Egyptian J Remote Sens Space Sci. 15(2):135–141.
   Google Scholar
• Hong H, Liu J, Bui DT, Pradhan B, Acharya TD, Pham BT, Zhu AX, Chen W, Ahmad BB. 2018a. Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, bagging and rotation forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China). Catena. 163:399–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Panahi M, Shirzadi A, Ma T, Liu J, Zhu AX, Chen W, Kougias I, Kazakis N. 2018b. Flood susceptibility assessment in Hengfeng area coupling adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with genetic algorithm and differential evolution. Sci Total Environ. 621:1124–1141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Pradhan B, Xu C, Bui DT. 2015. Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the Yihuang area (China) using two-class kernel logistic regression, alternating decision tree and support vector machines. Catena. 133:266–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Tsangaratos P, Ilia I, Liu J, Zhu AX, Chen W. 2018c. Application of fuzzy weight of evidence and data mining techniques in construction of flood susceptibility map of Poyang County, China. Sci Total Environ. 625:575–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kale VS. 2003. Geomorphic effects of monsoon floods on Indian rivers. In: Mirza MMQ, Dixit A, Nishat A, editors. Flood problem and management in South Asia. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 65–84.
   Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Nohani E, Maroufinia E, Pourghasemi HR. 2016a. A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making technique. Nat Hazards. 83(2):947–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Pham BT, Chapi K, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Revhaug I, Prakash I, Bui DT. 2018. A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz watershed, northern Iran. Sci Total Environ. 627:744–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Pourghasemi HR, Chapi K, Bahri M. 2016b. Flash flood susceptibility analysis and its mapping using different bivariate models in Iran: a comparison between Shannon's entropy, statistical index, and weighting factor models. Environ Monit Assess. 188(12):656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kordestani MD, Naghibi SA, Hashemi H, Ahmadi K, Kalantar B, Pradhan B. 2019. Groundwater potential mapping using a novel data-mining ensemble model. Hydrogeol J. 27(1):211–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourgialas NN, Karatzas GP. 2017. A national scale flood hazard mapping methodology: the case of Greece–protection and adaptation policy approaches. Sci Total Environ. 601–602:441–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Singh R, Gautam H, Pandey MK. 2018. Flood hazard assessment of August 20, 2016 floods in Satna district, Madhya Pradesh, India. Remote Sens Appl: Soc Environ. 11:104–118.
   Google Scholar
• Kuncheva LI. 2014. Combining pattern classifiers: methods and algorithms. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kursa MB, Rudnicki WR. 2010. Feature selection with the Boruta package. J Stat Softw. 36(11):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu K, Li Z, Yao C, Chen J, Zhang K, Saifullah M. 2016. Coupling the k-nearest neighbor procedure with the Kalman filter for real-time updating of the hydraulic model in flood forecasting. Int J Sediment Res. 31(2):149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Qin XS, Xie YJ. 2016. An integrated statistical and data-driven framework for supporting flood risk analysis under climate change. J Hydrol. 533:28–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud SH, Gan TY. 2018. Multi-criteria approach to develop flood susceptibility maps in arid regions of Middle East. J Cleaner Prod. 196:216–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason SJ, Baddour O. 2008. Statistical modelling. In: Troccoli A, Harrison M, Anderson DLT, Mason SJ, editors. Seasonal climate: forecasting and managing risk. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 163–201.
   Google Scholar
• Merz B, Thieken AH, Gocht M. 2007. Flood risk mapping at the local scale: concepts and challenges. In: Begum S, Stive MJF, Hall JW, editors. Flood risk management in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 231–251.
   Google Scholar
• Miller JR, Ritter DF, Kochel CR. 1990. Morphometric assessment of lithologic controls on drainage basin evolution in the crawford upland, south-central Indiana. Am J Sci. 290(5):569–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojaddadi H, Pradhan B, Nampak H, Ahmad N, Ghazali AHB. 2017. Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multi-sensor remote-sensing data and GIS. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 8(2):1080–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore ID, Grayson RB. 1991. Terrain‐based catchment partitioning and runoff prediction using vector elevation data. Water Resour Res. 27(6):1177–1191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR. 1991. Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process. 5(1):3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosavi A, Hosseini FS, Choubin B, Goodarzi M, Dineva AA. 2020. Groundwater salinity susceptibility mapping using classifier ensemble and Bayesian machine learning models. IEEE Access. 8:145564–145576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandi A, Mandal A, Wilson M, Smith D. 2016. Flood hazard mapping in Jamaica using principal component analysis and logistic regression. Environ Earth Sci. 75(6):465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghibi SA, Dolatkordestani M, Rezaei A, Amouzegari P, Heravi MT, Kalantar B, Pradhan B. 2019. Application of rotation forest with decision trees as base classifier and a novel ensemble model in spatial modeling of groundwater potential. Environ Monit Assess. 191(4):248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghibi SA, Ahmadi K, Daneshi A. 2017. Application of support vector machine, random forest, and genetic algorithm optimized random forest models in groundwater potential mapping. Water Resour Manage. 31(9):2761–2775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo PTT, Hoang ND, Pradhan B, Nguyen QK, Tran XT, Nguyen QM, Nguyen VN, Samui P, Tien Bui D. 2018. A novel hybrid swarm optimized multilayer neural network for spatial prediction of flash floods in tropical areas using sentinel-1 SAR imagery and geospatial data. Sensors. 18(11):3704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen QK, Tien Bui D, Hoang ND, Trinh PT, Nguyen VH, Yilmaz I. 2017. A novel hybrid approach based on instance based learning classifier and rotation forest ensemble for spatial prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides using GIS. Sustainability. 9(5):813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh HJ, Syifa M, Lee CW, Lee S. 2019. Land subsidence susceptibility mapping using bayesian, functional, and meta-ensemble machine learning models. Appl Sci. 9(6):1248.
   Google Scholar
• Pardo M, Sberveglieri G. 2008. Random forests and nearest shrunken centroids for the classification of sensor array data. Sens Actuators B. 131(1):93–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Lee S. 2010. Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environ Model Softw. 25(6):747–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad P, Loveson VJ, Kotha M, Yadav R. 2020. Application of machine learning techniques in groundwater potential mapping along the west coast of India. GIScience Remote Sensing. 57(6):735–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvirenti L, Pierdicca N, Chini M, Guerriero L. 2011. An algorithm for operational flood mapping from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data based on the fuzzy logic. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 11(2):529–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR. 2017. Identification of critical flood prone areas in data-scarce and ungauged regions: a comparison of three data mining models. Water Resour Manage. 31(5):1473–1487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR, Zeinivand H. 2016. Flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models in the Golastan Province, Iran. Geocarto Int. 31(1):42–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley SJ, DeGloria SD, Elliot R. 1999. Index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermountain J Sci. 5(1–4):23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez JJ, Kuncheva LI, Alonso CJ. 2006. Rotation forest: a new classifier ensemble method. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 28(10):1619–1630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodposhti MS, Safarrad T, Shahabi H. 2017. Drought sensitivity mapping using two one-class support vector machine algorithms. Atmos Res. 193:73–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahana M, Patel PP. 2019. A comparison of frequency ratio and fuzzy logic models for flood susceptibility assessment of the lower Kosi River Basin in India. Environ Earth Sci. 78(10):289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo GB, Schladow SG, Reuter JE. 2009. Forecasting stream water temperature using regression analysis, artificial neural network, and chaotic non-linear dynamic models. J Hydrol. 378(3–4):325–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Asghari A, Tayyebi A, Taleai M. 2017. Coupling machine learning, tree-based and statistical models with cellular automata to simulate urban growth. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 64:297–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Valavi R, Shahabi H, Chapi K, Shirzadi A. 2018. Novel forecasting approaches using combination of machine learning and statistical models for flood susceptibility mapping. J Environ Manage. 217:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Ghaderi K, Omidvar E, Al-Ansari N, Clague JJ, Geertsema M, Khosravi K, Amini A, Bahrami S, et al. 2020. Flood detection and susceptibility mapping using Sentinel-1 remote sensing data and a machine learning approach: hybrid intelligence of bagging ensemble based on K-nearest neighbor classifier. Remote Sensing. 12(2):266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Lee MJ, Pradhan B, Jebur MN, Lee S. 2014b. Flood susceptibility mapping using integrated bivariate and multivariate statistical models. Environ Earth Sci. 72(10):4001–4015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN. 2013. Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS. J Hydrol. 504:69–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN. 2014a. Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. J Hydrol. 512:332–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN. 2015. Flood susceptibility analysis and its verification using a novel ensemble support vector machine and frequency ratio method. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 29(4):1149–1165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeh SVR, Kornejady A, Pourghasemi HR, Keesstra S. 2018. Flood susceptibility mapping using novel ensembles of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic algorithms. Sci Total Environ. 615:438–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibshirani R, Hastie T, Narasimhan B, Chu G. 2003. Class prediction by nearest shrunken centroids, with applications to DNA microarrays. Statist Sci. 18(1):104–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Zhu J. 2007. Improved centroids estimation for the nearest shrunken centroid classifier. Bioinformatics. 23(8):972–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H. 2006. Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 27(14):3025–3033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Hassan AM. 2011. Flash flood risk estimation along the St. Katherine road, southern Sinai, Egypt using GIS based morphometry and satellite imagery. Environ Earth Sci. 62(3):611–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Dong Q, Chen J. 2019. Comparison of ensemble models for drought prediction based on climate indexes. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 33(2):593–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao G, Pang B, Xu Z, Yue J, Tu T. 2018. Mapping flood susceptibility in mountainous areas on a national scale in China. Sci Total Environ. 615:1133–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar