Deep learning and boosting framework for piping erosion susceptibility modeling: spatial evaluation of agricultural areas in the semi-arid region

References

• Agharazi H, Davoudirad AA, Khosrobagi S, Shadfar S, Nikchah S, Najimi A. 2017. Gully erosion Sufficiency mapping at Robatturk Watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model. Int J Comput Sci Netw Secur. 17(4):14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albaradeyia I, Hani A, Shahrour I. 2011. WEPP and ANN models for simulating soil loss and runoff in a semi-arid Mediterranean region. Environ Monit Assess. 180(1–4):537–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angileri SE, Conoscenti C, Hochschild V, Märker M, Rotigliano E, Agnesi V. 2016. Water erosion susceptibility mapping by applying stochastic gradient treeboost to the Imera Meridionale river basin (Sicily, Italy). Geomorphology. 262:61–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Cerda A, Pradhan B, Tiefenbacher JP, Lombardo L, Bui DT. 2020. A methodological comparison of head-cut based gully erosion susceptibility models: combined use of statistical and artificial intelligence. Geomorphology. 359:107136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Cerda A, Rodrigo CJ, Pradhan B, Sohrabi M, Blaschke T, Tien BD. 2019. Proposing a novel predictive technique for gully erosion susceptibility mapping in arid and semi-arid regions (Iran). Remote Sens. 11(21):2577.
   Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Chen W, Loche M, Zhao X, Li Y, Lombardo L, Cerda A, Pradhan B, Bui DT. 2019. Comparison of machine learning models for gully erosion susceptibility mapping. Geosci Front. 11(5):1609–1620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Pourghasemi HR. 2019. Spatial modeling of gully erosion using linear and quadratic discriminant analyses in GIS and R. In: Spat Model GIS R Earth Environ Sci. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 299–321.
   Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Pradhan B, Rezaei K. 2019. Gully erosion zonation mapping using integrated geographically weighted regression with certainty factor and random forest models in GIS. J Environ Manage. 232:928–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR. 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development 1. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 34(1):73–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avand M, Janizadeh S, Naghibi SA, Pourghasemi HR, Khosrobeigi BS, Blaschke T. 2019. A comparative assessment of random forest and k-nearest neighbor classifiers for gully erosion susceptibility mapping. Water. 11(10):2076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azareh A, Rahmati O, Rafiei-Sardooi E, Sankey JB, Lee S, Shahabi H, Ahmad BB. 2019. Modelling gully-erosion susceptibility in a semi-arid region, Iran: investigation of applicability of certainty factor and maximum entropy models. Sci Tot Environ. 655:684–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Band SS, Janizadeh S, Chandra Pal S, Saha A, Chakrabortty R, Shokri M, Mosavi A. 2020. Novel ensemble approach of deep learning neural network (DLNN) model and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm for prediction of gully erosion susceptibility. Sensors. 20(19):5609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barendregt RW, Ongley ED. 1977. Piping in the Milk River Canyon, southeastern Alberta; a contemporary dryland geomorphic process. IAHS-AISH Publ Paris. 122:233–243.
   Google Scholar
• Bernatek-Jakiel A, Poesen J. 2018. Subsurface erosion by soil piping: significance and research needs. Earth Sci Rev. 185:1107–1128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya RK, Chatterjee ND, Das K. 2021. Land use and land cover change and its resultant erosion susceptible level: an appraisal using RUSLE and logistic regression in a tropical plateau basin of West Bengal. Environ Dev Sustain. 23(2):1411–1436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair TC. 1987. Sedimentary processes, vertical stratification sequences, and geomorphology of the Roaring River alluvial fan, Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. J Sediment Res. 57(1):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bonelli S, Brivois O, Borghi R, Benahmed N. 2006. On the modelling of piping erosion. Comptes Rendus Mécanique. 334(8–9):555–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botschek J, Krause S, Abel T, Skowronek A. 2002. Hydrological parameterization of piping in loess-rich soils in the Bergisches Land, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany. Zeitschrift Für Pflanzenernährung Und Bodenkunde. 165(4):506–510.
   Google Scholar
• Bou-Hamad I, Anouze AL, Larocque D. 2017. An integrated approach of data envelopment analysis and boosted generalized linear mixed models for efficiency assessment. Ann Oper Res. 253(1):77–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher SC. 1990. Field tunnel erosion, its characteristics and amelioration. Victoria, Australia: Dept. of Conservation and Environment, Land Protection Division.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 1998. Arcing classifier (with discussion and a rejoinder by the author). Ann Stat. 26(3):801–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Buchen T, Wohlrabe K. 2011. Forecasting with many predictors: is boosting a viable alternative? Econ Lett. 113(1):16–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui Q-T, Nguyen Q-H, Nguyen XL, Pham VD, Nguyen HD, Pham V-M. 2020. Verification of novel integrations of swarm intelligence algorithms into deep learning neural network for flood susceptibility mapping. J Hydrol. 581:124379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cama M, Conoscenti C, Lombardo L, Rotigliano E. 2016. Exploring relationships between grid cell size and accuracy for debris-flow susceptibility models: a test in the Giampilieri catchment (Sicily, Italy). Environ Earth Sci. 75(3):238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey SK, Woo M-K. 2000. The role of soil pipes as a slope runoff mechanism, Subarctic Yukon, Canada. J Hydrol. 233(1–4):206–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerdà A. 1999. Seasonal and spatial variations in infiltration rates in badland surfaces under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Water Resour Res. 35(1):319–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerdà A, García-Fayos P. 1997. The influence of slope angle on sediment, water and seed losses on badland landscapes. Geomorphology. 18(2):77–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SH, Su HB, Tian J, Zhang RH, Xia J. 2011. Estimating soil erosion using MODIS and TM images based on support vector machine and à trous wavelet. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinform. 13(4):626–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choubin B, Rahmati O, Tahmasebipour N, Feizizadeh B, Pourghasemi HR. 2019. Application of fuzzy analytical network process model for analyzing the gully erosion susceptibility. In: Nat Hazards GIS-Based Spat Model Using Data Min Tech. Berlin: Springer; p. 105–125.
   Google Scholar
• Chung Y-S. 2013. Factor complexity of crash occurrence: an empirical demonstration using boosted regression trees. Accid Anal Prev. 61:107–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conoscenti C, Angileri S, Cappadonia C, Rotigliano E, Agnesi V, Märker M. 2014. Gully erosion susceptibility assessment by means of GIS-based logistic regression: a case of Sicily (Italy). Geomorphology. 204:399–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conoscenti C, Ciaccio M, Caraballo-Arias NA, Gómez-Gutiérrez Á, Rotigliano E, Agnesi V. 2015. Assessment of susceptibility to earth-flow landslide using logistic regression and multivariate adaptive regression splines: a case of the Belice River basin (western Sicily, Italy). Geomorphology. 242:49–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes C, Mohri M, Syed U. 2014. Deep boosting.
   Google Scholar
• Romero Díaz A, Marín Sanleandro P, Sánchez Soriano A, Belmonte Serrato F, Faulkner H. 2007. The causes of piping in a set of abandoned agricultural terraces in southeast Spain. Catena. 69(3):282–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dao DV, Jaafari A, Bayat M, Mafi-Gholami D, Qi C, Moayedi H, Phong TV, Ly H-B, Le T-T, Trinh PT, et al. 2020. A spatially explicit deep learning neural network model for the prediction of landslide susceptibility. Catena. 188:104451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darabi H, Choubin B, Rahmati O, Haghighi AT, Pradhan B, Kløve B. 2019. Urban flood risk mapping using the GARP and QUEST models: a comparative study of machine learning techniques. J Hydrol. 569:142–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debanshi S, Pal S. 2020. Assessing gully erosion susceptibility in Mayurakshi river basin of eastern India. Environ Dev Sustain. 22(2):883–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng QC, Zhang B, Luo J, Shu CQ, Qin FC, Luo ML, Lin YB. 2014. Types and controlling factors of piping landform in Yuanmou dry-hot valley. J Arid L Resour Environ. 28(8):138–144.
   Google Scholar
• Dodangeh E, Choubin B, Eigdir AN, Nabipour N, Panahi M, Shamshirband S, Mosavi A. 2020. Integrated machine learning methods with resampling algorithms for flood susceptibility prediction. Sci Tot Environ. 705:135983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas I, Bidin K, Balamurugan G, Chappell NA, Walsh RPD, Greer T, Sinun W. 1999. The role of extreme events in the impacts of selective tropical forestry on erosion during harvesting and recovery phases at Danum Valley, Sabah. In: Chang Disturb Trop Rainfor South-East Asia. Singapore: World Scientific; p. 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Du G, Zhang Y, Iqbal J, Yang Z, Yao X. 2017. Landslide susceptibility mapping using an integrated model of information value method and logistic regression in the Bailongjiang watershed, Gansu Province. J Mt Sci. 14(2):249–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Swaify SA, Dangler EW, Armstrong CL. 1982. Soil erosion by water in the tropics.
   Google Scholar
• Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T. 2008. A working guide to boosted regression trees. J Anim Ecol. 77(4):802–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmali Ouri A, Golshan M, Janizadeh S, Cerdà A, Melesse AM. 2020. Soil erosion susceptibility mapping in Kozetopraghi catchment, Iran: a mixed approach using rainfall simulator and data mining techniques. Land. 9(10):368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farifteh J, Soeters R. 1999. Factors underlying piping in the Basilicata region, southern Italy. Geomorphology. 26(4):239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner H. 2013. Badlands in marl lithologies: a field guide to soil dispersion, subsurface erosion and piping-origin gullies. Catena. 106:42–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell R, Wan CF, Cyganiewicz J, Foster M. 2003. Time for development of internal erosion and piping in embankment dams. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 129(4):307–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan DC, Gilley JE, Franti TG. 2007. Water erosion prediction project (WEPP): development history, model capabilities, and future enhancements. Trans ASABE. 50(5):1603–1612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox GA, Wilson GV. 2010. The role of subsurface flow in hillslope and stream bank erosion: a review. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 74(3):717–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox GA, Wilson GV, Simon A, Langendoen EJ, Akay O, Fuchs JW. 2007. Measuring streambank erosion due to ground water seepage: correlation to bank pore water pressure, precipitation and stream stage. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 32(10):1558–1573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frattini P, Crosta G, Carrara A. 2010. Techniques for evaluating the performance of landslide susceptibility models. Eng Geol. 111(1–4):62–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund RM, Grigas P, Mazumder R, o. 2017. A new perspective on boosting in linear regression via subgradient optimization and relatives. Ann Statist. 45(6):2328–2364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund Y, Schapire RE, et al. 1996. Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In: International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). Vol. 96; p. 148–156.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R, et al. 2000. Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting (with discussion and a rejoinder by the authors). Ann Statist. 28(2):337–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman JH. 2001. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Statist. 29(5):1189–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda S, De Baets B, Waegeman W, Verwaeren J, Mouton AM. 2013. Habitat prediction and knowledge extraction for spawning European grayling (Thymallus thymallus L.) using a broad range of species distribution models. Environ Model Softw. 47:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Ruiz JM, Lasanta T, Alberto F. 1997. Soil erosion by piping in irrigated fields. Geomorphology. 20(3–4):269–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayen A, Pourghasemi HR, Saha S, Keesstra S, Bai S. 2019. Gully erosion susceptibility assessment and management of hazard-prone areas in India using different machine learning algorithms. Sci Tot Environ. 668:124–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George CM, Anu VV. 2018. Predicting piping erosion susceptibility by statistical and artificial intelligence approaches: a review. Int Res J Eng Technol. 5:239–243.
   Google Scholar
• Ghasemain B, Asl DT, Pham BT, Avand M, Nguyen HD, Janizadeh S. 2020. Shallow landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between classification and regression tree and reduced error pruning tree algorithms. Vietnam J Earth Sci. 3(2020):208–227.
   Google Scholar
• Gholami V, Booij MJ, Tehrani EN, Hadian MA. 2018. Spatial soil erosion estimation using an artificial neural network (ANN) and field plot data. Catena. 163:210–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh O, Blaschke T, Gholamnia K, Meena SR, Tiede D, Aryal J. 2019. Evaluation of different machine learning methods and deep-learning convolutional neural networks for landslide detection. Remote Sens. 11(2):196.
   Google Scholar
• Gu H, Wang J, Ma L, Shang Z, Zhang Q. 2019. Insights into the BRT (Boosted Regression Trees) method in the study of the climate–growth relationship of Masson pine in subtropical China. Forests. 10(3):228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez M, Sancho C, Benito G, Sirvent J, Desir G. 1997. Quantitative study of piping processes in badland areas of the Ebro Basin, NE Spain. Geomorphology. 20(3–4):237–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, et al. 1998. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hao M, Wang Y, Bryant SH. 2014. An efficient algorithm coupled with synthetic minority over-sampling technique to classify imbalanced PubChem BioAssay data. Anal Chim Acta. 806:117–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hembram TK, Paul GC, Saha S. 2020. Modelling of gully erosion risk using new ensemble of conditional probability and index of entropy in Jainti River basin of Chotanagpur Plateau Fringe Area, India. Appl Geomat. 12(3):337–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden J, Burt TP. 2002. Piping and pipeflow in a deep peat catchment. Catena. 48(3):163–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Pradhan B, Bui DT, Xu C, Youssef AM, Chen W. 2017. Comparison of four kernel functions used in support vector machines for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study at Suichuan area (China). Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 8(2):544–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hongliang J. 2004. Studies on incremental learning sequence algorithm of Naive Bayesian classifier. Comput Eng Appl. 14: 57–59.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseinalizadeh M, Kariminejad N, Alinejad M. 2018. An application of different summary statistics for modelling piping collapses and gully headcuts to evaluate their geomorphological interactions in Golestan Province, Iran. Catena. 171:613–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinalizadeh M, Kariminejad N, Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Alinejad M, Behbahani AM, Tiefenbacher JP. 2019. Gully headcut susceptibility modeling using functional trees, na{\"\i}ve Bayes tree, and random forest models. Geoderma. 342:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinalizadeh M, Kariminejad N, Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Alinejad M, Mohammadian Behbahani A, Tiefenbacher JP. 2019. Spatial modelling of gully headcuts using UAV data and four best-first decision classifier ensembles (BFTree, Bag-BFTree, RS-BFTree, and RF-BFTree). Geomorphology. 329:184–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinalizadeh M, Kariminejad N, Rahmati O, Keesstra S, Alinejad M, Behbahani AM. 2019. How can statistical and artificial intelligence approaches predict piping erosion susceptibility? Sci Tot Environ. 646:1554–1566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini FS, Choubin B, Mosavi A, Nabipour N, Shamshirband S, Darabi H, Haghighi AT. 2020. Flash-flood hazard assessment using ensembles and Bayesian-based machine learning models: application of the simulated annealing feature selection method. Sci Tot Environ. 711:135161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javidan N, Kavian A, Pourghasemi HR, Conoscenti C, Jafarian Z. 2019. Gully erosion susceptibility mapping using multivariate adaptive regression splines—replications and sample size scenarios. Water. 11(11):2319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks GF. 1967. The data model concept in statistical mapping. Int Yearb Cartogr. 7:186–190.
   Google Scholar
• Jones JAA. 1981. The nature of soil piping: a review of research. BGRG Res Monogr.
   Google Scholar
• Jones JAA, Cottrell CI. 2007. Long-term changes in stream bank soil pipes and the effects of afforestation. J Geophys Res Earth Surf. 112:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JAA, Richardson JM, Jacob HJ. 1997. Factors controlling the distribution of piping in Britain: a reconnaissance. Geomorphology. 20(3–4):289–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachouri S, Achour H, Abida H, Bouaziz S. 2015. Soil erosion hazard mapping using Analytic Hierarchy Process and logistic regression: a case study of Haffouz watershed, central Tunisia. Arab J Geosci. 8(6):4257–4268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantar B, Pradhan B, Naghibi SA, Motevalli A, Mansor S. 2018. Assessment of the effects of training data selection on the landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural networks (ANN). Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 9(1):49–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantar B, Ueda N, Saeidi V, Ahmadi K, Halin AA, Shabani F. 2020. Landslide susceptibility mapping: Machine and ensemble learning based on remote sensing big data. Remote Sens. 12(11):1737.
   Google Scholar
• Kariminejad N, Hosseinalizadeh M, Pourghasemi HR, Bernatek-Jakiel A, Alinejad M. 2019. GIS-based susceptibility assessment of the occurrence of gully headcuts and pipe collapses in a semi-arid environment: Golestan Province, NE Iran. Land Degrad Dev. 30(18):2211–2225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kariminejad N, Hosseinalizadeh M, Pourghasemi HR, Bernatek-Jakiel A, Campetella G, Ownegh M. 2019. Evaluation of factors affecting gully headcut location using summary statistics and the maximum entropy model: Golestan Province, NE Iran. Sci Tot Environ. 677:281–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J-C, Lee S, Jung H-S, Lee S. 2018. Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest and boosted tree models in Pyeong-Chang, Korea. Geocarto Int. 33(9):1000–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Kim J-C, Jung H-S, Lee MJ, Lee S. 2017. Spatial prediction of flood susceptibility using random-forest and boosted-tree models in Seoul metropolitan city, Korea. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 8(2):1185–1203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei X, Chen W, Avand M, Janizadeh S, Kariminejad N, Shahabi H, Costache R, Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Mosavi A. 2020. GIS-based machine learning algorithms for gully erosion susceptibility mapping in a semi-arid region of Iran. Remote Sens. 12(15):2478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y-F, Xie M, Goh T-N. 2010. Adaptive ridge regression system for software cost estimating on multi-collinear datasets. J Syst Softw. 83(11):2332–2343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin W, Wu Y, Mao D. 2007. Region assessment of soil erosion based on naive bayes. In: 2007 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS 2007). p. 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Löffler E. 1974. Piping and pseudokarst features in the tropical lowlands of New Guinea (Röhrenerosion und Pseudokarsterscheinungen im tropischen Tiefland von Neuguinea). 28(1):13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo L, Cama M, Conoscenti C, Märker M, Rotigliano E. 2015. Binary logistic regression versus stochastic gradient boosted decision trees in assessing landslide susceptibility for multiple-occurring landslide events: application to the 2009 storm event in Messina (Sicily, Southern Italy). Nat Hazards. 79(3):1621–1648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucà F, Conforti M, Robustelli G. 2011. Geomorphology comparison of GIS-based gullying susceptibility mapping using bivariate and multivariate statistics: Northern Calabria, South Italy. Geomorphology. 134(3–4):297–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao D, Zeng Z, Wang C, Lin W. 2007. Support vector machines with PSO algorithm for soil erosion evaluation and prediction. In: Third Int Conf Nat Comput (ICNC 2007). Vol 1: 656–660.
   Google Scholar
• Masannat YM. 1980. Development of piping erosion conditions in the Benson area, Arizona, USA. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol. 13(1):53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoodi A, Majdzadeh Tabatabai MR, Noorzad A, Samadi A. 2017. Effects of soil physico-chemical properties on stream bank erosion induced by seepage in northeastern Iran. Hydrol Sci J. 62(16):2597–2613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massanat YM. 1972. Evaluation of factors contributing to piping erosion near Benson, Cochise County, Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch CE, Neuhaus JM. 2011. Prediction of random effects in linear and generalized linear models under model misspecification. Biometrics. 67(1):270–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster R. 1997. In Memoriam: George F. Jenks (1916–1996). Cartogr Geogr Inf Syst. 24(1):56–59.
   Google Scholar
• Midi H, Sarkar SK, Rana S. 2010. Collinearity diagnostics of binary logistic regression model. J Interdiscip Math. 13(3):253–267.
   Google Scholar
• Milchevski A, Rozza A, Taskovski D. 2015. Multimodal affective analysis combining regularized linear regression and boosted regression trees. In: Proc 5th Int Work Audio/Visual Emot Chall.; p. 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Moradi HR, Avand MT, Janizadeh S. 2019. Landslide susceptibility survey using modeling methods. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 259–276.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan RPC, Quinton JN, Smith RE, Govers G, Poesen JWA, Auerswald K, Chisci G, Torri D, Styczen ME. 1998. The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM): a dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 23(6):527–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosavi A, Golshan M, Janizadeh S, Choubin B, Melesse AM, Dineva AA. 2020. Ensemble models of GLM, FDA, MARS, and RF for flood and erosion susceptibility mapping: a priority assessment of sub-basins. Geocarto Int. 35:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadal-Romero E, Verachtert E, Maes R, Poesen J. 2011. Quantitative assessment of the piping erosion susceptibility of loess-derived soil horizons using the pinhole test. Geomorphology. 135(1–2):66–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghibi SA, Pourghasemi HR, Dixon B. 2016. GIS-based groundwater potential mapping using boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and random forest machine learning models in Iran. Environ Monit Assess. 188(1):44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nhu V-H, Janizadeh S, Avand M, Chen W, Farzin M, Omidvar E, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, J. Clague J, Jaafari A, et al. 2020. GIS-based gully erosion susceptibility mapping: a comparison of computational ensemble data mining models. Appl Sci. 10(6):2039.
   Google Scholar
• Ojha CSP, Singh VP, Adrian DD. 2003. Determination of critical head in soil piping. J Hydraul Eng. 129(7):511–518.
   Google Scholar
• Pal SC, Chakrabortty R. 2019. Simulating the impact of climate change on soil erosion in sub-tropical monsoon dominated watershed based on RUSLE, SCS runoff and MIROC5 climatic model. Adv Sp Res. 64(2):352–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker AP. 2005. Assessment and extension of an analytical formulation for prediction of residual stress in autofrettaged thick cylinders. In: ASME 2005 Press Vessel Pip Conf. p. 67–71.
   Google Scholar
• Parker GG. 1964. Piping: a geomorphic agent in landform development of the drylands. International Association of Scientific Hydrology. 65:103–113.
   Google Scholar
• Parzen M, Ghosh S, Lipsitz S, Sinha D, Fitzmaurice GM, Mallick BK, Ibrahim JG. 2011. A generalized linear mixed model for longitudinal binary data with a marginal logit link function. Ann Appl Stat. 5(1):449–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul SS, Li J, Li Y, Shen L. 2019. Assessing land use–land cover change and soil erosion potential using a combined approach through remote sensing, RUSLE and random forest algorithm. Geocarto Int. 34:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng Z, Lin L, Zhang R, Xu J. 2014. Deep boosting: layered feature mining for general image classification. In: 2014 IEEE Int Conf Multimed Expo. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Pereyra MA, Fernández DS, Marcial ER, Puchulu ME. 2020. Agricultural land degradation by piping erosion in Chaco Plain, Northwestern Argentina. Catena. 185:104295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham QB, Mukherjee K, Norouzi A, Linh NTT, Janizadeh S, Ahmadi K, Cerdà A, Doan TNC, Anh DT. 2020. Head-cut gully erosion susceptibility modelling based on ensemble Random Forest with oblique decision trees in Fareghan watershed, Iran. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 11(1):2385–2410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phinzi K, Ngetar NS, Ebhuoma O. 2020. Soil erosion risk assessment in the Umzintlava catchment (T32E), Eastern Cape, South Africa, using RUSLE and random forest algorithm. S Afr Geogr J. 102:1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike AC, Mueller TG, Schörgendorfer A, Shearer SA, Karathanasis AD. 2009. Erosion index derived from terrain attributes using logistic regression and neural networks. Agron J. 101(5):1068–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati O, Tahmasebipour N, Haghizadeh A, Pourghasemi HR, Feizizadeh B. 2017. Evaluation of different machine learning models for predicting and mapping the susceptibility of gully erosion. Geomorphology. 298:118–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renard KG. 1997. Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). United States Government Printing. United States Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Rotunno AF, Callari C, Froiio F. 2017. Computational modeling of backward erosion piping. In: Model simulation, Exp issues Struct Mech. Berlin: Springer; p. 225–234.
   Google Scholar
• Roy J, Saha S. 2019. GIS-based gully erosion susceptibility evaluation using frequency ratio, cosine amplitude and logistic regression ensembled with fuzzy logic in Hinglo River Basin, India. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ. 15:100247.
   Google Scholar
• Sajedi-Hosseini F, Choubin B, Solaimani K, Cerdà A, Kavian A. 2018. Spatial prediction of soil erosion susceptibility using a fuzzy analytical network process: application of the fuzzy decision making trial and evaluation laboratory approach. Land Degrad Dev. 29(9):3092–3103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samadi M, Jabbari E, Azamathulla HM, Mojallal M. 2015. Estimation of scour depth below free overfall spillways using multivariate adaptive regression splines and artificial neural networks. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech. 9(1):291–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samani AN, Ahmadi H, Jafari M, Boggs G, Ghoddousi J, Malekian A. 2009. Geomorphic threshold conditions for gully erosion in Southwestern Iran (Boushehr–Samal watershed). J Asian Earth Sci. 35(2):180–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar T, Mishra M. 2018. Soil erosion susceptibility mapping with the application of logistic regression and artificial neural network. J Geovisualization Spat Anal. 2(1):8.
   Google Scholar
• Schweckendiek T, Kanning W, Jonkman SN. 2014. Advances in reliability analysis of the piping failure mechanism of flood defences in the Netherlands. Heron. 59(2/3):101.
   Google Scholar
• Shadman Roodposhti M, Aryal J, Shahabi H, Safarrad T. 2016. Fuzzy Shannon entropy: a hybrid GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping method. Entropy. 18(10):343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahabi H, Hashim M. 2015. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based statistical models and Remote sensing data in tropical environment. Sci Rep. 5(1):9899–9815.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sirvent J, Desir G, Gutierrez M, Sancho C, Benito G. 1997. Erosion rates in badland areas recorded by collectors, erosion pins and profilometer techniques (Ebro Basin, NE-Spain). Geomorphology. 18(2):61–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soufi M, Bayat R, Davudirad A, Zanjanijam M, Esaei H. 2020. Topographic threshold of gully erosion in Iran: a case study of Fars, Zanjan, Markazi and Golestan Provinces. In: Gully Eros Stud from India Surround Reg. Berlin: Springer. p. 381–392.
   Google Scholar
• Sudakov O, Burnaev E, Koroteev D. 2019. Driving digital rock towards machine learning: predicting permeability with gradient boosting and deep neural networks. Comput Geosci. 127:91–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swets JA. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science. 240(4857):1285–1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therneau T, Atkinson B, Ripley B. 2015. rpart: recursive partitioning and regression trees. R Packag Version. 4:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Tutz G, Groll A. 2010. Generalized linear mixed models based on boosting. In: Stat Model Regres Struct. Berlin: Springer; p. 197–215.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenboer K, Celette F, Bezuijen A. 2019. The effect of sudden critical and supercritical hydraulic loads on backward erosion piping: small-scale experiments. Acta Geotech. 14(3):783–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verachtert E, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Martínez-Murillo JF, Nadal-Romero E, Poesen J, Devoldere S, Wijnants N, Deckers J. 2013. Impact of soil characteristics and land use on pipe erosion in a temperate humid climate: field studies in Belgium. Geomorphology. 192:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verachtert E, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Poesen J, Deckers J. 2010. Factors controlling the spatial distribution of soil piping erosion on loess-derived soils: a case study from central Belgium. Geomorphology. 118(3–4):339–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verachtert E, Maetens W, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Poesen J, Deckers J. 2011. Soil loss rates due to piping erosion. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 36(13):1715–1725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Zou B, Liu Y, Tang Y, Zhang X, Yang P. 2014. Erosion–creep–collapse mechanism of underground soil loss for the karst rocky desertification in Chenqi village, Puding county, Guizhou, China. Environ Earth Sci. 72(8):2751–2764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson GV, Rigby JR, Dabney SM. 2015. Soil pipe collapses in a loess pasture of Goodwin Creek watershed, Mississippi: role of soil properties and past land use. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 40(11):1448–1463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wischmeier WH, Smith DD. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning. Maryland: Department of Agriculture, Science and Education Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Yesilnacar E, Topal T. 2005. Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Eng Geol. 79(3–4):251–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesilnacar EK. 2005. The application of computational intelligence to landslide susceptibility mapping in Turkey. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne, Department. p. 200.
   Google Scholar