Mining spatiotemporal growth pattern of volunteered data using a contributor-based approach

References

• Abdullahi S, Schardt M, Pretzsch H. 2017. An unsupervised two-stage clustering approach for forest structure classification based on X-band InSAR data: A case study in complex temperate forest stands. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 57:36–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal P, Skupin A. 2008. Self-organising maps: applications in geographic information science. England: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Arsanjani JJ, Vaz E. 2015. An assessment of a collaborative mapping approach for exploring land use patterns for several European metropolises. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 35:329–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsanjani JJ, Helbich M, Bakillah M, Loos L. 2015a. The emergence and evolution of OpenStreetMap: a cellular automata approach. Int J Digital Earth. 8(1):76–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsanjani JJ, Mooney P, Helbich M, Zipf A. 2015b. An exploration of future patterns of the contributions to OpenStreetMap and development of a contribution index. Trans GIS. 19(6):896–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backfrieder C, Mecklenbrauker CF, Ostermayer G. 2013. TraffSim–A Traffic Simulator for Investigating Benefits Ensuing from Intelligent Traffic Management, 2013 European Modelling Symposium (EMS), p. 451–456.
   Google Scholar
• Barron C, Neis P, Zipf A. 2014. A comprehensive framework for intrinsic OpenStreetMap quality analysis. Trans GIS. 18(6):877–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basse RM, Omrani H, Charif O, Gerber P, Bódis K. 2014. Land use changes modelling using advanced methods: Cellular automata and artificial neural networks. The spatial and explicit representation of land cover dynamics at the cross-border region scale. Appl Geogr. 53:160–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berberoğlu S, Akın A, Clarke KC. 2016. Cellular automata modeling approaches to forecast urban growth for Adana, Turkey: a comparative approach. Landscape Urban Plann. 153:11–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimonte S, Boucelma O, Machabert O, Sellami S. 2014. A new spatial OLAP approach for the analysis of volunteered geographic information. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 48:111–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budhathoki NR. 2010. Participants' motivations to contribute geographic information in an online community [dissertation]. Urbana (IL): University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Budhathoki NR, Haythornthwaite C. 2013. Motivation for open collaboration: crowd and community models and the case of OpenStreetMap. Am Behav Sci. 57(5):548–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran P, Mooney P, Bertolotto M. 2013. Analysing the growth of OpenStreetMap networks. Spatial Stat. 3:21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couclelis H. 1985. Cellular worlds: a framework for modeling micro—macro dynamics. Environ Plan A. 17(5):585–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallmeyer J, Lattner AD, Timm IJ. 2014. GIS-based traffic simulation using OSM. In: Data mining for geoinformatics. New York (NY): Springer; p. 65–82.
   Google Scholar
• Fonte CC, Bastin L, See L, Foody G, Lupia F. 2015. Usability of VGI for validation of land cover maps. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. 29(7):1269–1291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild MF. 2007. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal. 69(4):211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild MF, Li L. 2012. Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spatial Stat. 1:110–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gröchenig S, Brunauer R, Rehrl K. 2014. Digging into the history of VGI data-sets: results from a worldwide study on OpenStreetMap mapping activity. J Locat Based Serv. 8(3):198–210.
   Google Scholar
• Hagenauer J, Helbich M. 2012. Mining urban land-use patterns from volunteered geographic information by means of genetic algorithms and artificial neural networks. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. 26(6):963–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay M, Weber P. 2008. Openstreetmap: user-generated street maps. Pervasive Computing. IEEE. 7(4):12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay M(M), Basiouka S, Antoniou V, Ather A. 2010. How many volunteers does it take to map an area well? The validity of Linus’ law to volunteered geographic information. Cartogr J. 47(4):315–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbich M, Amelunxen C, Neis P, Zipf A. 2012. Comparative spatial analysis of positional accuracy of OpenStreetMap and proprietary geodata. Proceedings of GI_Forum; Salzburg, Austria. p. 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hu X, Weng Q. 2009. Estimating impervious surfaces from medium spatial resolution imagery using the self-organizing map and multi-layer perceptron neural networks. Remote Sens Environ. 113(10):2089–2102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Harrie L. 2004. Selection of Streets from a Network Using Self‐Organizing Maps. Trans GIS. 8(3):335–350.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson BA, Iizuka K, Bragais MA, Endo I, Magcale-Macandog DB. 2017. Employing crowdsourced geographic data and multi-temporal/multi-sensor satellite imagery to monitor land cover change: a case study in an urbanizing region of the Philippines. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 64:184–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. 1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 39(1):31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaklanis N, Votis K, Tzovaras D. 2013. Open Touch/Sound Maps: a system to convey street data through haptic and auditory feedback. Comput Geosci. 57:59–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalteh AM, Hjorth P, Berndtsson R. 2008. Review of the self-organizing map (SOM) approach in water resources: Analysis, modelling and application. Environ Model Softw. 23(7):835–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohonen T. 1982. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol Cybern. 43(1):59–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohonen T. 2001. Self-organizing maps. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kohonen T. 2013. Essentials of the self-organizing map. Neural Netw. 37:52–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koukoletsos T, Haklay M, Ellul C. 2012. Assessing data completeness of VGI through an automated matching procedure for linear data. Trans GIS. 16(4):477–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leichtle T, Geiß C, Lakes T, Taubenböck H. 2017. Class imbalance in unsupervised change detection: a diagnostic analysis from urban remote sensing. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 60:83–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Yeh AG. O 2002. Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. 16(4):323–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Weisberg RH. 2011. A review of self-organizing map applications in meteorology and oceanography. In: Mwasiagi JI, editor. Self organizing maps-applications and novel algorithm design. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; p. 253–272.
   Google Scholar
• MacQueen J. 1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. California: University of California Press; p. 281–297.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire S, Tomko M. 2017. Ripe for the picking? Dataset maturity assessment based on temporal dynamics of feature definitions. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. 31(7):1334–1358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi N, Malek M. 2015. Artificial intelligence-based solution to estimate the spatial accuracy of volunteered geographic data. J Spat Sci. 60(1):119–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi N, Sedaghat A. 2019. A framework for classification of volunteered geographic data based on user’s need. Geocarto Int. 1–16.doi:10.1080/10106049.2019.1641562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney P, Corcoran P. 2012a. The annotation process in OpenStreetMap. Trans GIS. 16(4):561–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney P, Corcoran P. 2012b. Characteristics of heavily edited objects in OpenStreetMap. Future Int. 4(1):285–305.
   Google Scholar
• Neis P, Zielstra D. 2014. Recent developments and future trends in volunteered geographic information research: the case of OpenStreetMap. Future Int. 6(1):76–106.
   Google Scholar
• Neis P, Zielstra D, Zipf A. 2013. Comparison of volunteered geographic information data contributions and community development for selected world regions. Future Int. 5(2):282–300.
   Google Scholar
• Neis P, Zipf A. 2012. Analyzing the contributor activity of a volunteered geographic information project: the case of OpenStreetMap. IJGI. 1(2):146–165.
   Google Scholar
• Ogie RI, Clarke RJ, Forehead H, Perez P. 2019. Crowdsourced social media data for disaster management: lessons from the PetaJakarta.org project. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 73:108–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsu N. 1979. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern. 9(1):62–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinzio MD, Castellarin A, Toth E. 2011. Data-driven catchment classification: application to the pub problem. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 15(6):1921–1935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramm F, Topf J, Chilton S. 2011. OpenStreetMap: Using and enhancing the free map of the world. Cambridge: UIT Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Shafizadeh-Moghadam H. 2019. Improving spatial accuracy of urban growth simulation models using ensemble forecasting approaches. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 76:91–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesanto J, Alhoniemi E. 2000. Clustering of the self-organizing map. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 11(3):586–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram S. 1984. Cellular automata as models of complexity. Nature. 311(5985):419–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu T, Gao J. 2019. Directional multi-scale analysis and simulation of urban expansion in Auckland, New Zealand using logistic cellular automata. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 78:101390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu T, Gao J, Coco G. 2019. Simulation of urban expansion via integrating artificial neural network with Markov chain–cellular automata. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. 33(10):1960–1983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Gong J, Tang W, Liu C. 2020. Patch-based cellular automata model of urban growth simulation: Integrating feedback between quantitative composition and spatial configuration. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 79:101402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielstra D, Zipf A. 2010. Quantitative studies on the data quality of OpenStreetMap in Germany. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Geographic Information Science, GIScience, Zurich, Switzerland, p. 20–26.
   Google Scholar