Flash-flood susceptibility mapping based on XGBoost, random forest and boosted regression trees

References

• Ali SA, Parvin F, Pham QB, Vojtek M, Vojteková J, Costache R, Linh NTT, Nguyen HQ, Ahmad A, Ghorbani MA. 2020. GIS-based comparative assessment of flood susceptibility mapping using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach, naïve Bayes tree, bivariate statistics and logistic regression: a case of Topľa basin, Slovakia. Ecol Indic. 117:106620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anquetin S, Braud I, Vannier O, Viallet P, Boudevillain B, Creutin JD, Manus C. 2010. Sensitivity of the hydrological response to the variability of rainfall fields and soils for the Gard 2002 flash-flood event. J Hydrol . 394(1–2):134–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Saha S, Chen W, Roy J, Pradhan B, Bui DT. 2020. Flash flood susceptibility modelling using functional tree and hybrid ensemble techniques. J Hydrol. 587:125007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezak N, Mikoš M. 2019. Investigation of Trends, Temporal Changes in Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) Curves and Extreme Rainfall Events Clustering at Regional Scale Using 5 min Rainfall Data. Water. 11:2167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehmke B, Greenwell BM. 2019. Hands-on machine learning with R. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Vol. 432. Belmont (CA): Wad sworth International Group; p. 151–166.
   Google Scholar
• Brewster J. 2010. Development of the flash flood potential index (FFPI) for central NY & Northeast PA. Presented at the Eastern Region Flash Flood Conference. Maryland, USA: NOAA’s National Weather Service. p. 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Hoang N-D, Martínez-Álvarez F, Ngo P-TT, Hoa PV, Pham TD, Samui P, Costache R. 2020. A novel deep learning neural network approach for predicting flash flood susceptibility: a case study at a high frequency tropical storm area. Sci Total Environ. 701:134413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Pradhan B, Revhaug I, Tran CT. 2014. A comparative assessment between the application of fuzzy unordered rules induction algorithm and J48 decision tree models in spatial prediction of shallow landslides at Lang Son City. Vietnam, in: remote sensing applications in environmental research. Berlin, Germany: Springer, p. 87–111.
   Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Tsangaratos P, Ngo PTT, Pham TD, Pham BT. 2019. Flash flood susceptibility modeling using an optimized fuzzy rule based feature selection technique and tree based ensemble methods. Sci Total Environ. 668:1038–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buston PM, Elith J. 2011. Determinants of reproductive success in dominant pairs of clownfish: a boosted regression tree analysis. J Anim Ecol. 80:528–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao C, Xu P, Wang Y, Chen J, Zheng L, Niu C. 2016. Flash flood hazard susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and statistical index methods in coalmine subsidence areas. Sustainability. 8(9):948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey SK, Woo M. 2001. Slope runoff processes and flow generation in a subarctic, subalpine catchment. J Hydrol. 253(1–4):110–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapi K, Singh VP, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Bui DT, Pham BT, Khosravi K. 2017. A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach for flood susceptibility assessment. Environ Modell Softw. 95:229–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Li Y, Xue W, Shahabi H, Li S, Hong H, Wang X, Bian H, Zhang S, Pradhan B. 2020. Modeling flood susceptibility using data-driven approaches of naïve bayes tree, alternating decision tree, and random forest methods. Sci Total Environ. 701:134979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choubin B, Moradi E, Golshan M, Adamowski J, Sajedi-Hosseini F, Mosavi A. 2019. An Ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines. Sci Total Environ. 651:2087–2096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R. 2019. Flood susceptibility assessment by using bivariate statistics and machine learning models-A useful tool for flood risk management. Water Resour Manage. 33(9):3239–3256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R, Hong H, Pham QB. 2020. Comparative assessment of the flash-flood potential within small mountain catchments using bivariate statistics and their novel hybrid integration with machine learning models. Sci Total Environ. 711:134514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R, Pham QB, Sharifi E, Linh NTT, Abba S, Vojtek M, Vojteková J, Nhi PTT, Khoi DN. 2020. Flash-flood susceptibility assessment using multi-criteria decision making and machine learning supported by remote sensing and GIS techniques. Remot Sens. 12(1):106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R, Popa MC, Bui DT, Diaconu DC, Ciubotaru N, Minea G, Pham QB. 2020. Spatial predicting of flood potential areas using novel hybridizations of fuzzy decision-making, bivariate statistics, and machine learning. J Hydrol. 585:124808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rosa P, Fredduzzi A, Cencetti C. 2019. Stream power determination in GIS: an index to evaluate the most’ sensitive’ points of a river. Water 11(6):1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron B, Tibshirani R. 1986. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Statist Sci. 1(1):54–75.
   Google Scholar
• Elkhrachy I. 2015. Flash flood hazard mapping using satellite images and GIS tools: a case study of Najran City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci. 18(2):261–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Kar SK. 2018. Application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for flood risk assessment: a case study in Malda district of West Bengal. Nat Hazard. 94(1):349–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz JN, Guthrie RH, Brenning A. 2011. Integrating physical and empirical landslide susceptibility models using generalized additive models. Geomorphology 129(3–4):376–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Chen W, Xu C, Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Tien Bui D. 2016. Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment at the Chongren area (China) using frequency ratio, certainty factor, and index of entropy. Geocarto Int. 32:1–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini FS, Choubin B, Mosavi A, Nabipour N, Shamshirband S, Darabi H, Haghighi AT. 2020. Flash-flood hazard assessment using ensembles and Bayesian-based machine learning models: application of the simulated annealing feature selection method. Sci Total Environ. 711:135161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain P, Coogan SC, Subramanian SG, Crowley M, Taylor S, Flannigan MD. 2020. A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and management. Environ Rev. 28(4):478–505.
   Google Scholar
• James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. 2013. An introduction to statistical learning. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Janitza S, Strobl C, Boulesteix AL. 2013. An AUC-based permutation variable importance measure for random forests. BMC Bioinf. 14(1):11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Janizadeh S, Avand M, Jaafari A, Phong TV, Bayat M, Ahmadisharaf E, Prakash I, Pham BT, Lee S. 2019. Prediction success of machine learning methods for flash flood susceptibility mapping in the Tafresh Watershed, Iran. Sustainability 11(19):5426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MA, Brown CH, Wells SJ. 2002. Using classification and regression trees (CART) to support worker decision making. Soc Work Res. 26(1):19–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Pourghasemi HR, Chapi K, Bahri M. 2016. Flash flood susceptibility analysis and its mapping using different bivariate models in Iran: a comparison between Shannon’s entropy, statistical index, and weighting factor models. Environ Monit Assess. 188:656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Shahabi H, Pham BT, Adamowski J, Shirzadi A, Pradhan B, Dou J, Ly HB, Gróf G, Ho HL, et al. 2019. A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using multi-criteria decision-making analysis and machine learning methods. J Hydrol. 573:311–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruzdlo R, Ceru J. 2010. Flash flood potential index for WFO mount holly/Philadelphia. Presented at the Eastern Region Flash Flood Conference, Poster Session. Maryland, USA: NOAA’s National Weather Service. p. 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn M. 2008. Building predictive models in R using the caret package. J Stat Soft. 28(5):1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leathwick J, Elith J, Francis M, Hastie T, Taylor P. 2006. Variation in demersal fish species richness in the oceans surrounding New Zealand: an analysis using boosted regression trees. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 321:267–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Kim JC, Jung HS, Lee MJ, Lee S. 2017. Spatial prediction of flood susceptibility using random-forest and boosted-tree models in Seoul metropolitan city, Korea. Geomatics Nat Hazard Risk. 8(2):1185–1203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minea G. 2013. Assessment of the flash flood potential of Bâsca River Catchment (Romania) based on physiographic factors. Open Geosci. 5(3):344–353.
   Google Scholar
• Mu W, Yu F, Li C, Xie Y, Tian J, Liu J, Zhao N. 2015. Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on runoff and soil moisture content on different growing stages of spring maize. Water. 7(12):2990–3008.
   Google Scholar
• Pei T, Qin CZ, Zhu AX, Yang L, Luo M, Li B, Zhou C. 2010. Mapping soil organic matter using the topographic wetness index: a comparative study based on different flow-direction algorithms and kriging methods. Ecol Indic. 10(3):610–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popa MC, Peptenatu D, Drăghici CC, Diaconu DC. 2019. Flood hazard mapping using the flood and flash-flood potential index in the Buzău river catchment, Romania. Water. 11(10):2116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prăvălie R, Costache R. 2014. The analysis of the susceptibility of the flash-floods’ genesis in the area of the hydrographical basin of Bāsca Chiojdului river/Analiza susceptibilitatii genezei viiturilor īn aria bazinului hidrografic al rāului Bāsca Chiojdului. Forum Geografic. 13:39–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.5775/fg.2067-4635.2014.089.i.
   Google Scholar
• Saghafian B, Julien PY, Rajaie H. 2002. Runoff hydrograph simulation based on time variable isochrone technique. J Hydrol. 261(1–4):193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillaci C, Acutis M, Lombardo L, Lipani A, Fantappie M, Märker M, Saia S. 2017. Spatio-temporal topsoil organic carbon mapping of a semi-arid Mediterranean region: the role of land use, soil texture, topographic indices and the influence of remote sensing data to modelling. Sci Total Environ. 601–602:821–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Valavi R, Shahabi H, Chapi K, Shirzadi A. 2018. Novel forecasting approaches using combination of machine learning and statistical models for flood susceptibility mapping. J Environ Manage. 217:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skentos A. 2017. Topographic position index based landform analysis of Messaria (Ikaria Island, Greece. Acta Geobalcan. 4(1):7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Smith G. 2003. Flash flood potential: Determining the hydrologic response of FFMP basins to heavy rain by analyzing their physiographic characteristics. A white paper available from the NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center web site at http://www.cbrfc.noaa.gov/papers/ffp_wpap.
   Google Scholar
• Souissi D, Zouhri L, Hammami S, Msaddek MH, Zghibi A, Dlala M. 2020. GIS-based MCDM-AHP modeling for flood susceptibility mapping of arid areas, southeastern Tunisia. Geocarto Int. 35(9):991–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi R, Schmidt K, Amirian-Chakan A, Rentschler T, Zeraatpisheh M, Sarmadian F, Valavi R, Davatgar N, Behrens T, Scholten T. 2020. Improving the spatial prediction of soil organic carbon content in two contrasting climatic regions by stacking machine learning models and rescanning covariate space. Remot Sens. 12(7):1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN. 2014. Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. J Hydrol. 512:332–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Mansor S, Ahmad N. 2015. Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types. Catena. 125:91–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Khosravi K, Shahabi H, Daggupati P, Adamowski JF, M.Melesse A, Thai Pham B, Pourghasemi HR, Mahmoudi M, Bahrami S, et al. 2019. Flood spatial modeling in northern Iran using remote sensing and Gis: a comparison between evidential belief functions and its ensemble with a multivariate logistic regression model. Remot Sens. 11(13):1589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Hong H, Chen W, Li S, Panahi M, Khosravi K, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Panahi S, Costache R. 2019. Flood susceptibility mapping in Dingnan County (China) using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with biogeography based optimization and imperialistic competitive algorithm. J Environ Manage. 247:712–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yariyan P, Janizadeh S, Van Phong T, Nguyen HD, Costache R, Van Le H, Pham BT, Pradhan B, Tiefenbacher JP. 2020. Improvement of best first decision trees using bagging and dagging ensembles for flood probability mapping. Water Resour Manage. 34(9):3037–3053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef AM, Sefry SA, Pradhan B, Alfadail EA. 2016. Analysis on causes of flash flood in Jeddah city (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) of 2009 and 2011 using multi-sensor remote sensing data and GIS. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 7(3):1018–1042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaharia L, Costache R, Prăvălie R, Minea G. 2015. Assessment and mapping of flood potential in the Slănic catchment in Romania. J Earth Syst Sci. 124(6):1311–1324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao G, Pang B, Xu Z, Peng D, Xu L. 2019. Assessment of urban flood susceptibility using semi-supervised machine learning model. Sci Total Environ. 659:940–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar