Applicability of spatial prediction models for landslide susceptibility in land-use zoning instruments: a guideline in a coastal settlement in South-Central Chile

References

• Aleotti P, Chowdhury R. 1999. Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 58(1):21–44.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson PM, Massari R. 1998. Generalised linear modelling of susceptibility to landsliding in the central Apennines, Italy. Comput Geosci. 24(4):373–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayalew L, Yamagishi H. 2005. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology. 65(1–2):15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordoni M, Galanti Y, Bartelletti C, Persichillo MG, Barsanti M, Giannecchini R, Avanzi GD, Cevasco A, Brandolini P, Galve JP, et al. 2020. The influence of the inventory on the determination of the rainfall-induced shallow landslides susceptibility using generalized additive models. Catena. 193:104630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenning A. 2005. Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 5(6):853–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenning A. 2012. Spatial cross-validation and bootstrap for the assessment of prediction rules in remote sensing: the R package sperrorest. Int Geosci Remote Sens Symp. 5372–5375.
   Google Scholar
• Brenning A, Schwinn M, Ruiz-Páez AP, Muenchow J. 2015. Landslide susceptibility near highways is increased by 1 order of magnitude in the Andes of southern Ecuador, Loja province. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 15(1):45–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock J, Schratz P, Petschko H, Muenchow J, Micu M, Brenning A. 2020. The performance of landslide susceptibility models critically depends on the quality of digital elevations models. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 11(1):1075–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budimir MEA, Atkinson PM, Lewis HG. 2015. A systematic review of landslide probability mapping using logistic regression. Landslides. 12(3):419–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrara A, Cardinali M, Detti R, Guzzetti F, Pasqui V, Reichenbach P. 1991. GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 16(5):427–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrara A, Pike RJ. 2008. GIS technology and models for assessing landslide hazard and risk. Geomorphology. 94(3–4):257–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascini L. 2008. Applicability of landslide susceptibility and hazard zoning at different scales. Eng Geol. 102(3–4):164–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascini L, Bonnard C, Corominas J, Jibson R, Montero-Olarte J. 2005. Landslide hazard and risk zoning for urban planning and development. In: Landslide risk management. 1st ed. Vancouver (Canada): Taylor & Francis Group plc.; p. 209–246.
   Google Scholar
• Chang K-T, Merghadi A, Yunus AP, Pham BT, Dou J. 2019. Evaluating scale effects of topographic variables in landslide susceptibility models using GIS-based machine learning techniques. Sci Rep. 9(1):1–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Panahi M, Kornejady A, Wang J, Xie X, Cao S. 2017. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system combined with frequency ratio, generalized additive model, and support vector machine techniques. Geomorphology. 297:69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Zhang S, Li R, Shahabi H. 2018. Performance evaluation of the GIS-based data mining techniques of best-first decision tree, random forest, and naïve Bayes tree for landslide susceptibility modeling. Sci Total Environ. 644:1006–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung C-J, Fabbri AG. 2008. Predicting landslides for risk analysis—Spatial models tested by a cross-validation technique. Geomorphology. 94(3–4):438–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corominas J, Moya J. 2008. A review of assessing landslide frequency for hazard zoning purposes. Eng Geol. 102(3–4):193–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai FC, Lee CF. 2001. Frequency–volume relation and prediction of rainfall-induced landslides. Eng Geol. 59(3–4):253–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY. 2002. Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Eng Geol. 64(1):65–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devynck J. 1970. Contribución al estudio de la circulación atmosférica en Chile y el clima de la región de BíoBío [Contribution to the study of atmospheric circulation in Chile and the climate of the Bíobío region]. Concepción, Chile: Universidad de Concepción. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Dragićević S, Lai T, Balram S. 2015. GIS-based multicriteria evaluation with multiscale analysis to characterize urban landslide susceptibility in data-scarce environments. Habitat Int. 45:114–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinoza C. 2013. Propuesta metodológica para establecer áreas de riesgo por remoción en masa, Chile [A methodological proposal for the establishment of areas at risk for landslides in Chile]. Cuad Geogr Rev Colomb Geogr. 22(2):145–169. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage W. 2008. Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Eng Geol. 102(3–4):85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galli C. 1967. Geología urbana y suelos de fundación de Concepción y Talcahuano, Chile. Concepción, Chile [Urban geology and foundation soils of Concepción and Talcahuano, Chile]. Concepción (Chile): Universidad de Concepción. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Garrido J, Saunders WSA. 2019. Disaster risk reduction and land use planning: opportunities to improve practice. IAEG/AEG Annual Meeting Proceedings; Vol. 5; San Francisco, California: Springer, Cham. p. 161–165.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz J, Brenning A, Petschko H, Leopold P. 2015. Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling. Comput Geosci. 81:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz J, Guthrie R, Brenning A. 2011. Integrating physical and empirical landslide susceptibility models using generalized additive models. Geomorphology. 129(3–4):376–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P. 1999. Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology. 31(1–4):181–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M. 2006. Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models. Geomorphology. 81(1–2):166–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R. 1986. Generalized additive models. Stat Sci. 1(3):297–310.
   Google Scholar
• He Q, Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Li S, Chen W, Wang N, Chai H, Bian H, Ma J, Chen Y, et al. 2019. Landslide spatial modelling using novel bivariate statistical based Naïve Bayes, RBF Classifier, and RBF Network machine learning algorithms. Sci Total Environ. 663:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huabin W, Gangjun L, Weiya X, Gonghui W. 2005. GIS-based landslide hazard assessment: an overview. Prog Phys Geogr. 29(4):548–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IGM. 2005. Instituto Geográfico Militar [Geographic Military Institute]. Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• INE. 2019. Ciudades, Pueblos, Aldeas y Caseríos [Cities, Towns and Villages]. In: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas. Santiago, Chile. p. 1–171. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn M, Johnson K. 2013. Applied predictive modeling. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Li J. 2016. Assessing spatial predictive models in the environmental sciences: accuracy measures, data variation and variance explained. Environ Model Softw. 80:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J. 2019. A critical review of spatial predictive modeling process in environmental sciences with reproducible examples in R. Appl Sci. 9(10):2048.
   Google Scholar
• López P. 2015. Análisis de umbrales de precipitación de procesos de remoción en masa, en laderas urbanizadas de la costa de Chile centro-sur [An analysis of precipitation thresholds of landslide processes on urbanized slopes of the Central-Southern Chilean Coast. Cuad Geogr Rev Colomb Geogr. 24(2):93–112. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Mardones M. 1978. El sitio geomorfológico de las ciudades de Concepción y Talcahuano [The geomorphological site of the cities of Concepción and Talcahuano]. Concepción (Chile): Universidad de Concepción. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Mardones M, Echeverría F, Jara C. 2004. Una contribucion al estudio de los desastres naturales en Chile Centro Sur: efectos ambientales de las precipitaciones del 26 de junio del 2005 en el area Metropolitana de Concepcion [A contribution to the study of natural hazards in South Central Chile: environmental effects of the rainfall of June 26, 2005 in the Metropolitan area of Concepcion]. Invest Geogr Chile. 38:1–24. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez C, Moris R, Quense J. 2016. Valoración de las áreas de riesgo por Tsunami y potencial de evacuación: propuestas para la reducción del riesgo de desastres a escala local [Assessment of Tsunami risk areas and evacuation potential: proposals for disaster risk reduction at the local scale]. In: Concurso Políticas Públicas 2016. Propuestas para Chile. p. 243–278. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez C, Tamburini L, Moris R. 2017. Gestión del riesgo, descentralización y políticas públicas: se reduce el riesgo de desastres en Chile? [Risk management, decentralization and public policies: is disaster risk reduced in Chile?]. In: Vial C, Hernández J, editors. ¿Para qué Descentralizar? Centralismo y Políticas Públicas en Chile: Análisis y Evaluación por Sectores. Santiago, Chile: Universidad Autonoma de Chile. p. 153–179. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Mateos RM, López-Vinielles J, Poyiadji E, Tsagkas D, Sheehy M, Hadjicharalambous K, Liscák P, Podolski L, Laskowicz I, Iadanza C, et al. 2020. Integration of landslide hazard into urban planning across Europe. Landsc Urban Plan. 196:103740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Obras Públicas. 2019. Red Vial Nacional [National Road Network]. IDE Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Pellicani R, Van Westen CJ, Spilotro G. 2014. Assessing landslide exposure in areas with limited landslide information. Landslides. 11(3):463–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña-Cortéz F, Tavares C, Mardones M. 1993. Las condiciones climáticas como factor de riesgo natural en la comuna de Talcahuano(1965-1992) [Climatic conditions as a natural risk factor in the municipality of Talcahuano (1965-1992)]. Rev Geográfica Chile Terra Aust. 38:83–107. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira S, Santos PP, Zêzere JL, Tavares AO, Garcia RAC, Oliveira SC. 2020. A landslide risk index for municipal land use planning in Portugal. Sci Total Environ. 735:139463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persichillo MG, Bordoni M, Meisina C, Bartelletti C, Barsanti M, Giannecchini R, D'Amato Avanzi G, Galanti Y, Cevasco A, Brandolini P, et al. 2017. Shallow landslides susceptibility assessment in different environments. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 8(2):748–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petschko H, Brenning A, Bell R, Goetz J, Glade T. 2014. Assessing the quality of landslide susceptibility maps - case study Lower Austria. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 14(1):95–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Rahmati O. 2018. Prediction of the landslide susceptibility: which algorithm, which precision? Catena. 162:177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenbach P, Rossi M, Malamud BD, Mihir M, Guzzetti F. 2018. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models. Earth-Sci Rev. 180:60–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas C, Pino J, Basnou C, Vivanco M. 2013. Assessing land-use and -cover changes in relation to geographic factors and urban planning in the metropolitan area of Concepción (Chile). Implications for biodiversity conservation. Appl Geogr. 39:93–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shano L, Raghuvanshi TK, Meten M. 2020. Landslide susceptibility evaluation and hazard zonation techniques – a review. Geoenviron Disasters. 7(1):1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Süzen ML, Kaya BŞ. 2012. Evaluation of environmental parameters in logistic regression models for landslide susceptibility mapping. Int J Digit Earth. 5(4):338–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Westen CJ, Castellanos E, Kuriakose SL. 2008. Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment: an overview. Eng Geol. 102(3–4):112–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Westen CJ, van Asch TWJ, Soeters R. 2006. Landslide hazard and risk zonation - Why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Environ. 65(2):167–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorpahl P, Elsenbeer H, Märker M, Schröder B. 2012. How can statistical models help to determine driving factors of landslides? Ecol Modell. 239:27–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen L, Thorne C. 1987. Quantitative analysis of land surface topography. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 12(1):47–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweig MH, Campbell G. 1993. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem. 39(4):561–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar