Deep semantic segmentation for detecting eucalyptus planted forests in the Brazilian territory using sentinel-2 imagery

References

• Associação Brasileira de Árvores 2019. Brazilian Tree Industry Annual Report 2019. Brasília, Federal District, Brazil. https://www.iba.org/datafiles/publicacoes/relatorios/iba-relatorioanual2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Associação Brasileira de Árvores 2020. Brazilian Tree Industry Annual Report 2020. Brasília, Federal District, Brazil. https://iba.org/datafiles/publicacoes/relatorios/relatorio-iba-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Baranowski K, Taylor T, Lambert B, Bharti N. 2020. Application of reflectance ratios on high-resolution satellite imagery to remotely identify eucalypt vegetation. Remote Sens. 12(24):4079.
   Google Scholar
• Binkley D, Campoe OC, Alvares CA, Carneiro RL, Stape JL. 2020. Variation in whole-rotation yield among Eucalyptus genotypes in response to water and heat stresses: the TECHS project. For Ecol Manage. 462:117953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodrick PG, Davies AB, Asner GP. 2019. Uncovering ecological patterns with convolutional neural networks. Trends Ecol Evol. 34(8):734–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho O. d, de Carvalho Júnior OAA, Albuquerque AO, de Bem PP, de Silva CR, Ferreira PHG, de Moura RdS, Gomes RAT, Guimarães RF, Borges DL. 2020. Instance segmentation for large, multi-channel remote sensing imagery using Mask-RCNN and a mosaicking approach. Remote Sens. 13(1):39.
   Google Scholar
• Cerqueria Neto SPG. 2012. Três décadas de eucalipto no extremo sul da Bahia. GEOUSP – Espaço e Tempo. 31:55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Chaurasia A, Culurciello E. 2017. LinkNet: Exploiting encoder representations for efficient semantic segmentation. In: 2017 IEEE Vis Commun Image Process. Vol. 2018 [place unknown]. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; p. 1–4. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8305148/.
   Google Scholar
• Chen LC, Papandreou G, Kokkinos I, Murphy K, Yuille AL. 2018. DeepLab: semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional Nets, Atrous convolution, and fully connected CRFs. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 40(4):834–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Costa MVCV, de Carvalho OLF, Orlandi AG, Hirata I, De Albuquerque AO, e Silva FV, Guimarães RF, Gomes RAT, de Júnior OAC. 2021. Remote sensing for monitoring photovoltaic solar plants in Brazil using deep semantic segmentation. Energies. 14(10):2960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Albuquerque AO, de Carvalho OLF, e Silva CR, de Bem PP, Trancoso Gomes RA, Borges DL, Guimarães RF, Pimentel CMM, de Carvalho Júnior OA. 2021. Instance segmentation of center pivot irrigation systems using multi-temporal SENTINEL-1 SAR images. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ. 23:100537.
   Google Scholar
• de Albuquerque AO, de Carvalho Júnior OA, Carvalho OLF, de de Bem PP, Ferreira PHG, de Moura RdS, Silva CR, Trancoso Gomes RA, Fontes Guimarães R. 2020. Deep semantic segmentation of center pivot irrigation systems from remotely sensed data. Remote Sens. 12(13):2159.
   Google Scholar
• de Bem PP, de Carvalho Júnior OAA, de Carvalho OLF, Gomes RAT, Fontes Guimarães R, Guimarães RF. 2020. Performance analysis of deep convolutional autoencoders with different patch sizes for change detection from burnt areas. Remote Sens. 12(16):2576.
   Google Scholar
• Drusch M, Del Bello U, Carlier S, Colin O, Fernandez V, Gascon F, Hoersch B, Isola C, Laberinti P, Martimort P, et al. 2012. Sentinel-2: ESA’s optical high-resolution mission for GMES operational services. Remote Sens Environ. 120:25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan T, Wang G, Li Y, Wang H. 2020. Ma-net: a multi-scale attention network for liver and tumor segmentation. IEEE Access. 8:179656–179665.
   Google Scholar
• Forstmaier A, Shekhar A, Chen J. 2020. Mapping of eucalyptus in Natura 2000 areas using Sentinel 2 imagery and artificial neural networks. Remote Sens. 12(14):2176.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin N, Turner R, Merton R. 2005. Classifying Eucalyptus forests with high spatial and spectral resolution imagery: an investigation of individual species and vegetation communities. Aust J Bot. 53(4):337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. 2016. deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. Vol. 45. Las Vegas, NV, USA. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; p. 770–778. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7780459/.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeser T, Kuenzer C. 2020. Object detection and image segmentation with deep learning on earth observation data: a review-part I: evolution and recent trends. Remote Sens. 12(10):1667.
   Google Scholar
• [IBGE] Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 2002. Mapa de clima do Brasil. [accessed 2021 Mar 24]. http://mapas.ibge.gov.br/tematicos.html.
   Google Scholar
• [IBGE] Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 2006. Unidades de Relevo 1:5.000.000 | 2006. [accessed 2021 Mar 24]. https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias/informacoes-ambientais/geomorfologia/15827-unidades-de-relevo.html?=&t=downloads.
   Google Scholar
• Kattenborn T, Leitloff J, Schiefer F, Hinz S. 2021. Review on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) in vegetation remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 173:24–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Haffner P. 1998. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc IEEE. 86(11):2278–2324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin T-Y, Dollar P, Girshick R, He K, Hariharan B, Belongie S. 2017. Feature pyramid networks for object detection. In: 2017 IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. Honolulu, HI, USA. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; p. 936–944. http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.03144.
   Google Scholar
• Liu L, Ouyang W, Wang X, Fieguth P, Chen J, Liu X, Pietikäinen M. 2020. Deep learning for generic object detection: a survey. Int J Comput Vis. 128(2):261–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T. 2015. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). p. 3431–3440.
   Google Scholar
• Ma L, Liu Y, Zhang X, Ye Y, Yin G, Johnson BA. 2019. Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 152:166–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon DE, Jackson RB. 2019. Management intensification maintains wood production over multiple harvests in tropical Eucalyptus plantations. Ecol Appl. 29(4):e01879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokochinski JB, Mazzafera P, Sawaya ACHF, Mumm R, de Vos RCH, Hall RD. 2018. Metabolic responses of Eucalyptus species to different temperature regimes. J Integr Plant Biol. 60(5):397–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nogueira K, Penatti OAB, dos Santos JA. 2017. Towards better exploiting convolutional neural networks for remote sensing scene classification. Pattern Recognit. 61:539–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payn T, Carnus JM, Freer-Smith P, Kimberley M, Kollert W, Liu S, Orazio C, Rodriguez L, Silva LN, Wingfield MJ. 2015. Changes in planted forests and future global implications. For Ecol Manage. 352:57–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penín L, López M, Santos V, Alonso JL, Parajó JC. 2020. Technologies for Eucalyptus wood processing in the scope of biorefineries: a comprehensive review. Bioresour Technol. 311:123528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. 2015. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells W, Frangi A, editors. Lect Notes Comput Sci (including Subser Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinformatics). Vol. 9351. Cham: Springer; p. 234–241. .
   Google Scholar
• Shang X, Chisholm LA. 2014. Classification of Australian native forest species using hyperspectral remote sensing and machine-learning classification algorithms. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens. 7(6):2481–2489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibanda M, Buthelezi S, Ndlovu HS, Mothapo MC, Mutanga O. 2021. Mapping the Eucalyptus spp. woodlots in communal areas of Southern Africa using Sentinel-2 Multi-Spectral Imager data for hydrological applications. Phys Chem Earth. 122:102999.
   Google Scholar
• Simonyan K, Zisserman A. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. .
   Google Scholar
• Szegedy C. Wei L, Yangqing J, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V, Rabinovich A. 2015. Going deeper with convolutions. In: 2015 IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. Vol. 91. [place unknown]. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; p. 1–9. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7298594/.
   Google Scholar
• Tan M, Le QV. 2019. EfficientNet: rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. arXiv. arxiv:1905.11946
   Google Scholar
• Trisasongko BH, Paull D. 2020. A review of remote sensing applications in tropical forestry with a particular emphasis in the plantation sector. Geocarto Int. 35(3):317–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie S, Girshick R, Dollar P, Tu Z, He K. 2017. Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networks. In: 2017 IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. Honolulu, HI, USA. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; p. 5987–5995. https://github.com/facebookresearch/ResNeXt%0Ahttp://arxiv.org/abs/1611.05431v2.
   Google Scholar
• Yakubovskiy P. 2020. Segmentation Models Pytorch. GitHub Repos.
   Google Scholar
• Yi Y, Zhang Z, Zhang W, Zhang C, Li W, Zhao T. 2019. Semantic segmentation of urban buildings from VHR remote sensing imagery using a deep convolutional neural network. Remote Sens. 11(15):1774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Qiu Z, Yao T, Liu D, Mei T. 2018. Fully Convolutional adaptation networks for semantic segmentation. Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. 6810–6818.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Zhang L, Du B. 2016. Deep learning for remote sensing data: a technical tutorial on the state of the art. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag. 4(2):22–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu XX, Tuia D, Mou L, Xia G, Zhang L, Xu F, Fraundorfer F. 2017. Deep Learning in Remote Sensing: A Comprehensive Review and List of Resources. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag. 5(4):8–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar