Urban wetland fragmentation and ecosystem service assessment using integrated machine learning algorithm and spatial landscape analysis

References

• Bianchi AJJF, Schellhorn AN, Buckley MY, Possingham PH. 2010. Spatial variability in ecosystem services: simple rules for predator-mediated pest suppression. Ecol Appl. 20(8):2322–2333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Mü Ller F. 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic. 21:17–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter SR, DeFries R, Dietz T, Mooney HA, Polasky S, Reid WV, Scholes RJ. 2006. Ecology. Millennium ecosystem assessment: research needs. Science. 314(5797):257–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill RV, Paruelo J, et al. 1997. The value of the World’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387(6630):253–260.,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey D, Banerjee S. 2013. Ecosystem and livelihood support: The story of East Kolkata wetlands. Environ Urbanization. 4(2):325–337.
   Google Scholar
• Elkhrachy I. 2015. Flash flood hazard mapping using satellite image and GIS tools: a case study of Najran city, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia KSA, Egypt. J Remote Sens Space Sci. 18(2):261–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everard M, Kangabam R, Tiwari MK, McInnes R, Kumar R, Talukdar GH, Dixon H, Joshi P, Allan R, Joshi D, et al. 2019. Ecosystem service assessment of selected wetlands of Kolkata and the Indian Gangetic Delta: multi-beneficial systems under differentiated management stress. Wetlands Ecol Manage. 27(2–3):405–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festus OO, Ji W, Zubair AO. 2020. Characterizing the landscape structure of urban wetlands using terrain and landscape indices. Land. 9(1):29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers B, Huang TK, Aldana OG. 2020. Analysis of the habitat fragmentation of ecosystems in Belize using landscape metrics. Sustainability. 12(7):3024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank S, FüRs C, Koschke L, Makeschin F. 2012. A contribution towards a transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics. Ecol Indic. 21:30–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Das A. 2020. Wetland conversion risk assessment of East Kolkata Wetland: A Ramsar site using random forest and support vector machine model. J Cleaner Prod. 275:123475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Dinda S, Chatterjee DN, Das K. 2018. Analyzing risk factors for shrinkage and transformation of East Kolkata Wetland, India. Spat Inf Res. 26(6):661–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadley SA, Betts GM. 2012. The effects of landscape fragmentation on pollination dynamics: Absence of evidence not evidence of absence. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 87(3):526–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding JS, Benfield EF, Bolstad PV, Helfman GS, Jones EBD. 1998. Stream biodiversity: The ghost of land use past. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 95(25):14843–14847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger AGJ. 2000. Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Landscape Ecol. 15(2):115–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji W. 2016. Remotely-sensed urban wet-landscapes: An indicator of coupled e_ects of human impact and climate change. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. XLI-B8:915–918.
   Google Scholar
• Jones KB, Zurlini G, Kienast F, Petrosillo I, Edwards T, Wade TG, Li BL, Zaccarelli N. 2013. Informing landscape planning and design for sustaining ecosystem services from existing spatial patterns and knowledge. Landscape Ecol. 28(6):1175–1192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozak K, Lant C, Shaikh S, Wang GX. 2011. The geography of ecosystem service value: the case of the Des Plaines and Cache River wetlands, Illinois. Appl Geogr. 31(1):303–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Spies TA. 1993. Developing alternative forest cutting patterns: A simulation approach. Landscape Ecol. 8(1):63–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin W, Xu D, Guo P, Wang D, Li L, Gao J. 2019. Exploring variations of ecosystem service value in Hangzhou Bay Wetland, Eastern China. Ecosyst Serv. 37:100944–100949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Zhu Z, Vogelmann JE, Xu D, Wen W, Liu A. 2011. Characterizing fragmentation of the collective forests in southern China from multitemporal Landsat imagery: a case study from Kecheng district of Zhejiang province. Appl Geogr. 31(3):1026–1035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margosian LM, Garrett AK, Hutchinson SMJ, With AK. 2009. Connectivity of the American agricultural landscape: Assessing the national risk of crop pest and disease spread. BioScience. 59(2):141–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E. 2002. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats/html.
   Google Scholar
• McGarigal K, Marks BJ. 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Corvallis: Forest Science Department, Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar
• McGarigal K, McComb WC. 1999. Forest fragmentation effects on breeding birds in the Oregon coast range. In: Rochelle JA, Lehman LA, Wisniewski J, editors. Forest fragmentation: Wildlife and management implications. Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV; p. 223–246.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell MGE, Bennett EM, Gonzalez A. 2013. Linking landscape connectivity and ecosystem service provision: current knowledge and research gaps. Ecosystems. 16(5):894–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell MGE, Bennett EM, Gonzalez A. 2014. Agricultural landscape structure affects arthropod diversity and arthropod derived ecosystem services. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 192:144–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell MGE, Suarez-Castro AF, Martinez-Harms M, Maron M, McAlpine C, Gaston KJ, Johansen K, Rhodes JR. 2015. Reframing landscape fragmentation's effects on ecosystem services. Trends Ecol Evol. 30(4):190–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalepa J, Kawulok M. 2019. Selecting training sets for support vector machines: a review. Artif Intell Rev. 52(2):857–900. volume.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neel MC, McGarigal K, Cushman SA. 2004. Behavior of class-level landscape metrics across gradients of class aggregation and area. Landsc Ecol. 19(4):435–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opdam P, SteingröVer E, Van Rooij S. 2006. Ecological networks: a spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan. 75(3–4):322–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomo I, Martin-Lopez B, Alcorlo P, Montes C. 2014. Limitations of protected areas zoning in Mediterranean cultural landscapes under the ecosystem services approach. Ecosystems. 17(7):1202–1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paudyal K, Baral H, Bhandari PS, Bhandari A, Keenan JR. 2019. Spatial assessment of the impact of land use and land cover change on supply of ecosystem services in Phewa watershed, Nepal. Ecosyst Serv. 36:100895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pethicj J. 1996. The sustainable use of coasts: Monitoring, modelling and management. In: Jones PS, Healy MG, Williams AT, editors. Studies in European coastal management. Cardigan, UK: Samara; p. 83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Rahaman M, Dutta S, Sahana M, Das ND. 2018. Analysing urban sprawl and spatial expansion of Kolkata urban agglomeration using geospatial approach. In: Applications and challenges of geospatial technology: Potential and future trends. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99882-4_12.
   Google Scholar
• Rwanga SS, Ndambuki JM. 2017. Accuracy assessment of land use/land cover classification using remote sensing and GIS. IJG. 08(04):611–622.
   Google Scholar
• Sahana M, Hong H, Sajjad H. 2018. Analyzing urban spatial patterns and trend of urban growth using urban sprawl matrix: A study on Kolkata urban agglomeration, India. Sci Total Environ. 628–629:1557–1566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha MK, York AM, Boone CG, Zhang S. 2012. Land fragmentation due to rapid urbanization in the Phoenix metropolitan area: analyzing the spatiotemporal patterns and drivers. Appl Geogr. 32(2):522–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehman VS. 1997. Estimating standard errors of accuracy assessment statistics under cluster sampling. Remote Sens Environ. 60(3):258–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su SL, Li DL, Hu YN, Xiao R, Zhang Y. 2014. Spatially nonstationary response of ecosystem service value changes to urbanization in Shanghai, China. Ecol Indic. 45:332–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su SL, Xiao R, Jiang ZL, Zhang Y. 2012. Characterizing landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes for urbanization impacts at an eco-regional scale. Appl Geogr. 34:295–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G. 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos. 68(3):571–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaselli V, Tenerelli P, Sciandrello S. 2012. Mapping and quantifying habitat fragmentation in small coastal areas: A case study of three protected wetlands in Apulia (Italy). Environ Monit Assess. 184(2):693–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C. 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett. 8(8):857–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner MG, O'Neill RV, Gardner RH, Milne BT. 1989. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol. 3(3–4):153–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vapnik VN. 1998. Statistical learning theory. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Wainger LA, King DM, Mack RN, Price EW, Maslin T. 2010. Can the concept of ecosystem services be practically applied to improve natural resource management decisions? Ecol Econ. 69(5):978–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Blanchet FG, Koper N. 2014. Measuring habitat fragmentation: An evaluation of landscape pattern metrics. Methods Ecol Evol. 5(7):634–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Dong X, Liu H, Wei H, Fan W, Lu N, Xu Z, Ren J, Xing K. 2017. Linking land use change, ecosystem services and human well-being: a case study of the Manas River Basin of Xinjiang, China. Ecosyst Serv. 27:113–123..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijaya A, Marpu PR, Gloaguen R. 2008. Geostatistics texture classification of tropical rainforest in Indonesia. In: Stein S, Shi W, Bijker W, editors. Quality aspects in spatial data mining. Boca Raton: CRC; p. 199–210.
   Google Scholar
• Xie GD, Lu CX, Leng YF. 2003. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. J Nat Res. 18:189–196.
   Google Scholar
• Xie GD, Xiao Y, Zhen L, Lu CX. 2005. Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China. Chinese J Eco Agr. 13:10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Xie DG, Zhen L, Lu XC, Xiao Y. 2008. Expert knowledge-based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. J Nat Res. 23:911–919.
   Google Scholar
• Yu M, Huang Y, Cheng X, Tian J. 2019. An ArcMap plug-in for calculating landscape metrics of vector data. Ecol Inf. 50:207–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaragozí B, Belda A, Linares J, Martínez-Pérez JE, Navarro JT, Esparza J. 2012. A free and open source-programming library for landscape metrics calculations. Environ Model Softw. 31:131–140..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan W, Cheng H, Shen S. 2020. Evaluation of urban wetland ecosystem service value in Zhuzhou City. NEPT. 19(2):453–467.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Gao J. 2016. Linking landscape structures and ecosystem service value using multivariate regression analysis: a case study of the Chaohu Lake Basin, China. Environ Earth Sci. 75(1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZM, Gao JF, Gao YN. 2015. The influences of land use changes on the value of ecosystem services in Chaohu Lake Basin. Environ Earth Sci. 74(1):385–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubair O, Ji W, Weilert T. 2017. Modeling the impact of urban landscape change on urban wetlands using similarity weighted instance-based machine learning and Markov model. Sustainability. 9(12):2223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar