Developing groundwater potentiality models by coupling ensemble machine learning algorithms and statistical techniques for sustainable groundwater management

References

• Abdulkadir TS, Muhammad RUM, Wan Yusof K, Ahmad MH, Aremu SA, Gohari A, Abdurrasheed AS. 2019. Quantitative analysis of soil erosion causative factors for susceptibility assessment in a complex watershed. Cogent Eng. 6(1):1594506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achu AL, Reghunath R, Thomas J. 2020. Mapping of groundwater recharge potential zones and identification of suitable site-specific recharge mechanisms in a tropical river basin. Earth Syst Environ. 4(1):131–145.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad MUD, Kirby M, Islam MS, Hossain MJ, Islam MM. 2014. Groundwater use for irrigation and its productivity: status and opportunities for crop intensification for food security in Bangladesh. Water Resour Manag. 28(5):1415–1429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhter S, Eibek KU, Islam S, Islam ARMT, Chu R, Shuanghe S. 2019. Predicting spatiotemporal changes of channel morphology in the reach of Teesta River, Bangladesh using GIS and ARIMA modeling. Quat Int. 513:80–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldous D, Pitman J. 2000. Inhomogeneous continuum random trees and the entrance boundary of the additive coalescent. Probab Theory Relat Fields. 118(4):455–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Fugara AK, Ahmadlou M, Al-Shabeeb AR, AlAyyash S, Al-Amoush H, Al-Adamat R. 2020. Spatial mapping of groundwater springs potentiality using grid search-based and genetic algorithm-based support vector regression. Geocarto Int. :1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Quraishi KK, He Q, Kauppila W, Wang M, Yang Y. 2020. Mechanical testing of two-dimensional materials: a brief review. Int J Smart Nano Mater. 11(3):207–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anim-Gyampo M, Anornu GK, Agodzo SK, Appiah-Adjei EK. 2019. Groundwater risk assessment of shallow aquifers within the Atankwidi Basin of Northeastern Ghana. Earth Syst Environ. 3(1):59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Lee S, Tiefenbacher JP, Ngo PTT. 2020. Novel ensemble of MCDM-artificial intelligence techniques for groundwater-potential mapping in arid and semi-arid regions (Iran). Remote Sensing. 12(3):490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Pourghasemi HR. 2019. Spatial modeling of gully erosion using linear and quadratic discriminant analyses in GIS and R. In Spatial modeling in GIS and R for earth and environmental sciences. Elsevier; p. 299–321.
   Google Scholar
• Arulbalaji P, Padmalal D, Sreelash K. 2019. GIS and AHP techniques based delineation of groundwater potential zones: a case study from southern Western Ghats, India. Sci Rep. 9(1):1–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayalew L, Yamagishi H. 2005. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology. 65(1-2):15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batterman S. 1992. The use of singular value variance-decomposition proportions in FT-IR analysis of gases and vapors. Appl Spectrosc. 46(5):800–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics). 2017. Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh. Statistical Division, Ministry of Planning, Govt. People's Republic of Bangladesh.
   Google Scholar
• Benesty J, Chen J, Huang Y, Cohen I. 2009. Pearson correlation coefficient. In Noise reduction in speech processing. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S, Das S, Das S, Kalashetty M, Warghat SR. 2021. An integrated approach for mapping groundwater potential applying geospatial and MIF techniques in the semiarid region. Environ Dev Sustain. 23(1):495–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierkens MF, Reinhard S, de Bruijn JA, Veninga W, Wada Y. 2019. The shadow price of irrigation water in major groundwater‐depleting countries. Water Resour Res. 55(5):4266–4287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boori MS, Choudhary K, Kupriyanov A. 2019. Identification and Mapping of Groundwater Potential Zone through Remote Sensing and GIS Technology in Kalmykia, Russia. Int J Geoinform. 15(1):23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 1996. Bagging predictors. Environ Dev Sustain. 24(2):123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Khosravi K, Karimi M, Busico G, Khozani ZS, Nguyen H, Mastrocicco M, Tedesco D, Cuoco E, Kazakis N. 2020. Enhancing nitrate and strontium concentration prediction in groundwater by using new data mining algorithm. Sci Total Environ. 715:136836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui QT, Nguyen QH, Nguyen XL, Pham VD, Nguyen HD, Pham VM. 2020. Verification of novel integrations of swarm intelligence algorithms into deep learning neural network for flood susceptibility mapping. J Hydrol. 581:124379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Chen W, Chandra Pal S, Saha A, Chowdhuri I, Adeli B, Janizadeh S, Dineva AA, Wang X, Mosavi A. 2021. Evaluation efficiency of hybrid deep learning algorithms with neural network decision tree and boosting methods for predicting groundwater potential. Geocarto Int. :1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Li W, Chai H, Hou E, Li X, Ding X. 2016. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and certainty factor (CF) models for the Baozhong region of Baoji City, China. Environ Earth Sci. 75(1):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Li Y, Tsangaratos P, Shahabi H, Ilia I, Xue W, Bian H. 2020. Groundwater spring potential mapping using artificial intelligence approach based on kernel logistic regression, random forest, and alternating decision tree models. Appl Sci. 10(2):425.
   Google Scholar
• Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Panahi M, Kornejady A, Wang J, Xie X, Cao S. 2017. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system combined with frequency ratio, generalized additive model, and support vector machine techniques. Geomorphology. 297:69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Zhao Z. 2017. A GIS-based comparative study of Dempster-Shafer, logistic regression and artificial neural network models for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Int. 32(4):367–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Ahmad BB, Zhang S, Hong H, Zhang N. 2017. A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on the rotation forest ensemble and naïve Bayes tree classifiers for a landslide susceptibility assessment in Langao County, China. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 8(2):1955–1977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Xie X, Wang J, Pradhan B, Hong H, Bui DT, Duan Z, Ma J. 2017. A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility. Catena. 151:147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Xie W, Xu X. 2019. Changes of population, built-up land, and cropland exposure to natural hazards in China from 1995 to 2015. Int J Disaster Risk Sci. 10(4):557–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Zhang S, Li R, Shahabi H. 2018. Performance evaluation of the GIS-based data mining techniques of best-first decision tree, random forest, and naïve Bayes tree for landslide susceptibility modeling. Sci Total Environ. 644:1006–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Zhao X, Tsangaratos P, Shahabi H, Ilia I, Xue W, Wang X, Ahmad BB. 2020. Evaluating the usage of tree-based ensemble methods in groundwater spring potential mapping. J Hydrol. 583:124602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi YC, Murtala S, Jeong BC, Choi KS. 2021. Relief Extraction From a Rough Stele Surface Using SVM-Based Relief Segment Selection. IEEE Access. 9:4973–4982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choubin B, Moradi E, Golshan M, Adamowski J, Sajedi-Hosseini F, Mosavi A. 2019. An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines. Sci Total Environ. 651(Pt 2):2087–2096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das B, Pal SC. 2019. Combination of GIS and fuzzy-AHP for delineating groundwater recharge potential zones in the critical Goghat-II block of West Bengal, India. HydroResearch. 2:21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Das B, Pal SC. 2020. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to over-exploitation using MCDA, AHP, fuzzy logic and novel ensemble models: a case study of Goghat-I and II blocks of West Bengal, India. Environ Earth Sci. 79(5):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehnavi A, Aghdam IN, Pradhan B, Varzandeh MHM. 2015. A new hybrid model using step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) technique and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for regional landslide hazard assessment in Iran. Catena. 135:122–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietterich TG. 2000. An experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees: Bagging, boosting, and randomization. Mach Learn. 40(2):139–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou J, Oguchi T, Hayakawa YS, Uchiyama S, Saito H, Paudel U. 2014. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using a certainty factor model and its validation in the Chuetsu Area, Central Japan. In Landslide science for a safer geoenvironment. Cham: Springer; p. 419–424.
   Google Scholar
• Duque EL, Aquino PT. 2020. Anthropometric Analysis in Automotive Manual Transmission Gearshift Quality Perception. In CTI SYMPOSIUM 2018. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. 97–109
   Google Scholar
• Fan J, Wang X, Wu L, Zhou H, Zhang F, Yu X, Lu X, Xiang Y. 2018. Comparison of Support Vector Machine and Extreme Gradient Boosting for predicting daily global solar radiation using temperature and precipitation in humid subtropical climates: A case study in China. Energy Convers Manag. 164:102–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forkuor G, Hounkpatin OK, Welp G, Thiel M. 2017. High resolution mapping of soil properties using remote sensing variables in south-western Burkina Faso: a comparison of machine learning and multiple linear regression models. PloS One. 12(1):e0170478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani Nejad S, Falah F, Daneshfar M, Haghizadeh A, Rahmati O. 2016. Delineation of groundwater potential zones using remote sensing and GIS-based data-driven models. Geocarto Int. 32(2):1–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. 1982. Maximum attainable discrimination and the utilization of radiologic examinations. J Chronic Dis. 35(8):601–611.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho TK. 1998. The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 20(8):832–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Chen W, Xu C, Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Tien Bui D. 2016. Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment at the Chongren area (China) using frequency ratio, certainty factor, and index of entropy. Geocarto Int. 32(2):1–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Liu J, Bui DT, Pradhan B, Acharya TD, Pham BT, Zhu AX, Chen W, Ahmad BB. 2018. Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China). Catena. 163:399–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Liu J, Zhu AX. 2019. Landslide susceptibility evaluating using artificial intelligence method in the Youfang district (China). Environ Earth Sci. 78(15):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Pradhan B, Jebur MN, Bui DT, Xu C, Akgun A. 2016. Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the Luxi area (China) using support vector machines. Environ Earth Sci. 75(1):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Pradhan B, Xu C, Bui DT. 2015. Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the Yihuang area (China) using two-class kernel logistic regression, alternating decision tree and support vector machines. Catena. 133:266–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam ARMT, Talukdar S, Mahato S, Kundu S, Eibek KU, Pham QB, Kuriqi A, Linh NTT. 2021. Flood susceptibility modelling using advanced ensemble machine learning models. Geosci Front. 12(3):101075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaafari A, Najafi A, Pourghasemi HR, Rezaeian J, Sattarian A. 2014. GIS-based frequency ratio and index of entropy models for landslide susceptibility assessment in the Caspian forest, northern Iran. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 11(4):909–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javidan N, Kavian A, Pourghasemi HR, Conoscenti C, Jafarian Z. 2020. Data mining technique (maximum entropy model) for mapping gully erosion susceptibility in the gorganrood watershed, Iran. In Gully erosion studies from India and surrounding regions. Cham: Springer; p. 427–448.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson TM, Roback RC, McLing T L, Bullen T D, DePaolo DJ, Doughty C, Hunt RJ, Smith RW, Cecil LD, Murrell MT. 2000. Groundwater “fast paths” in the Snake River Plain aquifer: Radiogenic isotope ratios as natural groundwater tracers. Geology. 28(10):871–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Sarkar S, Gupta RP. 2006. A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedures for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas. Eng Geol. 85(3-4):347–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur L, Rishi MS, Singh G, Nath Thakur S. 2020. Groundwater potential assessment of an alluvial aquifer in Yamuna sub-basin (Panipat region) using remote sensing and GIS techniques in conjunction with analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and catastrophe theory (CT). Ecol Indic. 110:105850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsiantis S. 2011. Combining bagging, boosting, rotation forest and random subspace methods. Artif Intell Rev. 35(3):223–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Valle SM. 2017. Rapidly-exploring random trees a new tool for path planning, Oct. 1998, [online] Available: BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics). Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh. Statistical Division, Ministry of Planning, Govt. People's Republic of Bangladesh.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Dan NT. 2005. Probabilistic landslide susceptibility mapping in the Lai Chau province of Vietnam: focus on the relationship between tectonic fractures and landslides. Environ Geol. 48(6):778–787.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Chen W. 2019. Landslide susceptibility evaluation using hybrid integration of evidential belief function and machine learning techniques. Water. 12(1):113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Zhang L, Liu G. 2019. Estimation of thermal properties of soil and backfilling material from thermal response tests (TRTs) for exploiting shallow geothermal energy: sensitivity, identifiability, and uncertainty. Renew Energy. 132:1263–1270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Wu J, Zhang C, Zhang Y. 2020. Possible effect of submarine groundwater discharge on the pollution of coastal water: Occurrence, source, and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals in coastal groundwater and adjacent seawater influenced by reclaimed water irrigation. Chemosphere. 250:126323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo D, Wen X, Xu J, Zhang H, Vongphet S. 2021. Delineation of groundwater potential zones using modified weight standardization method and GIS in arid environments: case study of Ejina Oasis, Inner Mongolia, China. Arab J Geosci. 14(8):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnabosco R, Galvão P, de Carvalho AM. 2020. An approach to map karst groundwater potentiality in an urban area, Sete Lagoas, Brazil. Hydrol Sci J. 65(14):2482–2498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahato S, Pal S. 2019. Groundwater potential mapping in a rural river basin by union (OR) and intersection (AND) of four multi-criteria decision-making models. Nat Resour Res. 28(2):523–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick J, Alqadhi S, Talukdar S, AlSubih M, Ahmed M, Khan RA, Kahla NB, Abutayeh SM. 2021. Risk assessment of resources exposed to rainfall induced landslide with the development of GIS and RS based ensemble metaheuristic machine learning algorithms. Sustainability. 13(2):457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick J, Talukdar S, Alsubih M, Ahmed M, Islam ARMT, Shahfahad, Thanh NV. 2021. Proposing receiver operating characteristic-based sensitivity analysis with introducing swarm optimized ensemble learning algorithms for groundwater potentiality modelling in Asir region, Saudi Arabia. Geocarto Int. :1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick J, Talukdar S, Alsubih M, Almesfer MK, Shahfahad H, TH, Rahman A. 2021. Integration of statistical models and ensemble machine learning algorithms (MLAs) for developing the novel hybrid groundwater potentiality models: a case study of semi-arid watershed in Saudi Arabia. Geocarto Int. :1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick J, Talukdar S, Kahla NB, Ahmed M, Alsubih M, Almesfer MK, Islam ARMT. 2021. A Novel Hybrid Model for Developing Groundwater Potentiality Model Using High Resolution Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Derived Factors. Water. 13(19):2632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal KK, Ranjan A, Dharanirajan K. 2021. Delineation of groundwater potential zones (GWPZ) of Port Blair, Andaman Islands, India using the Multi Influencing Factors (MIF) method and geospatial techniques. Remote Sens Appl: Soc Environ. 24:100631.
   Google Scholar
• Maskooni EK, Naseri-Rad M, Berndtsson R, Nakagawa K. 2020. Use of heavy metal content and modified water quality index to assess groundwater quality in a semiarid area. Water. 12(4):1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mind'je R, Li L, Nsengiyumva JB, Mupenzi C, Nyesheja EM, Kayumba PM, Gasirabo A, Hakorimana E. 2019. Landslide susceptibility and influencing factors analysis in Rwanda. Environ Dev Sustain. 22(8):7985–8012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miraki S, Zanganeh SH, Chapi K, Singh VP, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Pham BT. 2019. Mapping groundwater potential using a novel hybrid intelligence approach. Water Resour Manag. 33(1):281–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirchooli F, Motevalli A, Pourghasemi HR, Mohammadi M, Bhattacharya P, Maghsood FF, Tiefenbacher JP. 2019. How do data-mining models consider arsenic contamination in sediments and variables importance? Environ Monit Assess. 191(12):1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moayedi H, Tien Bui D, Gör M, Pradhan B, Jaafari A. 2019. The feasibility of three prediction techniques of the artificial neural network, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, and hybrid particle swarm optimization for assessing the safety factor of cohesive slopes. IJGI. 8(9):391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghaddam HK, Moghaddam HK, Kivi ZR, Bahreinimotlagh M, Alizadeh MJ. 2019. Developing comparative mathematic models, BN and ANN for forecasting of groundwater levels. Groundwater Sustain Dev. 9:100237.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed WNHW, Salleh MNM, Omar AH. 2012. A comparative study of reduced error pruning method in decision tree algorithms. In 2012 IEEE International conference on control system, computing and engineering (pp. 392–397). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Mojid MA, Parvez MF, Mainuddin M, Hodgson G. 2019. Water table trend—a sustainability status of groundwater development in North-West Bangladesh. Water. 11(6):1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosavi A, Hosseini FS, Choubin B, Goodarzi M, Dineva AA, Sardooi ER. 2021. Ensemble boosting and bagging based machine learning models for groundwater potential prediction. Water Resour Manage. 35(1):23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosavi A, Hosseini FS, Choubin B, Taromideh F, Ghodsi M, Nazari B, Dineva AA. 2021. Susceptibility mapping of groundwater salinity using machine learning models. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 28(9):10804–10817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee I, Singh UK. 2020. Delineation of groundwater potential zones in a drought-prone semi-arid region of east India using GIS and analytical hierarchical process techniques. Catena. 194:104681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghibi SA, Pourghasemi HR. 2015. A comparative assessment between three machine learning models and their performance comparison by bivariate and multivariate statistical methods in groundwater potential mapping. Water Resour Manag. 29(14):5217–5236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nampak H, Pradhan B, Abd Manap M. 2014. Application of GIS based data driven evidential belief function model to predict groundwater potential zonation. J Hydrol. 513:283–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen PT, Ha DH, Avand M, Jaafari A, Nguyen HD, Al-Ansari N, Van Phong T, Sharma R, Kumar R, Le HV, et al. 2020. Soft computing ensemble models based on logistic regression for groundwater potential mapping. Appl Sci. 10(7):2469.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen PT, Ha DH, Jaafari A, Nguyen HD, Van Phong T, Al-Ansari N, Prakash I, Le HV, Pham BT. 2020. Groundwater potential mapping combining artificial neural network and real AdaBoost ensemble technique: the DakNong province case-study, Vietnam. IJERPH. 17(7):2473.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen PT, Ha DH, Nguyen HD, Van Phong T, Trinh PT, Al-Ansari N, Le HV, Pham BT, Ho LS, Prakash I, 2020. Improvement of credal decision trees using ensemble frameworks for groundwater potential modeling. Sustainability. 12(7):2622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nhu VH, Rahmati O, Falah F, Shojaei S, Al-Ansari N, Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Górski K, Nguyen H, Ahmad BB. 2020. Mapping of groundwater spring potential in karst aquifer system using novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate models. Water. 12(4):985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Kundu S, Mahato S. 2020. Groundwater potential zones for sustainable management plans in a river basin of India and Bangladesh. J Cleaner Prod. 257:120311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Sarda R. 2021. Modelling water richness in riparian flood plain wetland using bivariate statistics and machine learning algorithms and figuring out the role of damming. Geocarto Int. :1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Talukdar S. 2018. Application of frequency ratio and logistic regression models for assessing physical wetland vulnerability in Punarbhaba river basin of Indo-Bangladesh. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J. 24(5):1291–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panahi M, Sadhasivam N, Pourghasemi HR, Rezaie F, Lee S. 2020. Spatial prediction of groundwater potential mapping based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and support vector regression (SVR). J Hydrol. 588:125033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng L, Niu R, Huang B, Wu X, Zhao Y, Ye R. 2014. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on rough set theory and support vector machines: A case of the Three Gorges area, China. Geomorphology. 204:287–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Jaafari A, Van Phong T, Yen HPH, Tuyen TT, Van Luong V, Nguyen HD, Van Le H, Foong LK. 2021. Improved flood susceptibility mapping using a best first decision tree integrated with ensemble learning techniques. Geosci Front. 12(3):101105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polo JM, Liu S, Figueroa ME, Kulalert W, Eminli S, Tan KY, Apostolou E, Stadtfeld M, Li Y, Shioda T, et al. 2010. Cell type of origin influences the molecular and functional properties of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 28(8):848–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Beheshtirad M. 2015. Assessment of a data-driven evidential belief function model and GIS for groundwater potential mapping in the Koohrang Watershed, Iran. Geocarto Int. 30(6):662–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Rahmati O. 2018. Prediction of the landslide susceptibility: which algorithm, which precision? Catena. 162:177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Sadhasivam N, Yousefi S, Tavangar S, Nazarlou HG, Santosh M. 2020. Using machine learning algorithms to map the groundwater recharge potential zones. J Environ Manag. 265:110525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan AMS, Kim YT, Shrestha S, Huynh TC, Nguyen BP. 2021. Application of deep neural network to capture groundwater potential zone in mountainous terrain, Nepal Himalaya. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 28(15):18501–18517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan S, Kumar S, Kumar Y, Sharma HC. 2019. Assessment of groundwater utilization status and prediction of water table depth using different heuristic models in an Indian interbasin. Soft Comput. 23(20):10261–10285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Lee S. 2010. Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environ Earth Sci. 60(5):1037–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad P, Loveson VJ, Kotha M, Yadav R. 2020. Application of machine learning techniques in groundwater potential mapping along the west coast of India. GIScience Remote Sens. 57(6):735–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qadir J, Bhat MS, Alam A, Rashid I. 2020. Mapping groundwater potential zones using remote sensing and GIS approach in Jammu Himalaya, Jammu and Kashmir. GeoJournal. 85(2):487–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan JR. 1992. November. Learning with continuous classes. In 5th Australian joint conference on artificial intelligence (Vol. 92, pp. 343–348).
   Google Scholar
• Quinlan J. 1993. C4. 5: Program for machine learning morgan kaufmann. San Mateo, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Quinlan JR. 1996. Bagging, boosting, and C4. 5. In AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 1 (pp. 725–730).
   Google Scholar
• Rabbi F, Haque MN, Kadir ME, Siddik MS, Kabir A. 2020. An Ensemble Approach to Detect Code Comment Inconsistencies using Topic Modeling. In SEKE (pp. 392–395).
   Google Scholar
• Rahman AHMM, Akter S, Rani R, Islam AKMR. 2015. Taxonomic study of leafy vegetables at Santahar Pouroshova of District Bogra, Bangladesh with emphasis on medicinal plants. Int J Adv Res. 3(5):1019–1036.
   Google Scholar
• Rizeei HM, Pradhan B, Saharkhiz MA, Lee S. 2019. Groundwater aquifer potential modeling using an ensemble multi-adoptive boosting logistic regression technique. J Hydrol. 579:124172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy J, Saha S, Arabameri A, Blaschke T, Bui DT. 2019. A novel ensemble approach for landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) in Darjeeling and Kalimpong districts, West Bengal, India. Remote Sensing. 11(23):2866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachdeva S, Kumar B. 2021. Comparison of gradient boosted decision trees and random forest for groundwater potential mapping in Dholpur (Rajasthan), India. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 35(2):287–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha TK, Pal S, Talukdar S, Debanshi S, Khatun R, Singha P, Mandal I. 2021. How far spatial resolution affects the ensemble machine learning based flood susceptibility prediction in data sparse region. J Environ Manag. 297:113344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajedi-Hosseini F, Malekian A, Choubin B, Rahmati O, Cipullo S, Coulon F, Pradhan B. 2018. A novel machine learning-based approach for the risk assessment of nitrate groundwater contamination. Sci Total Environ. 644:954–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salam R, Ghose B, Shill BK, Islam MA, Islam ARMT, Sattar MA, Alam GM. Ahmed B., 2021. Perceived and actual risks of drought: household and expert views from the lower Teesta River Basin of northern Bangladesh. Nat Haz. 108:2569–2587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sameen MI, Pradhan B, Lee S. 2020. Application of convolutional neural networks featuring Bayesian optimization for landslide susceptibility assessment. Catena. 186:104249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumann GP, Vernieuwe H, De Baets B, Verhoest NEC. 2014. ROC‐based calibration of flood inundation models. Hydrol Process. 28(22):5495–5502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sihag P, Karimi SM, Angelaki A. 2019. Random forest, M5P and regression analysis to estimate the field unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Appl Water Sci. 9(5):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Mansor S, Ahmad N. 2015. Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types. Catena. 125:91–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Ho TC, Revhaug I, Pradhan B, Nguyen DB. 2014. Landslide susceptibility mapping along the national road 32 of Vietnam using GIS-based J48 decision tree classifier and its ensembles. In Cartography from pole to pole. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. 303–317.
   Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Khosravi K, Li S, Shahabi H, Panahi M, Singh VP, Chapi K, Shirzadi A, Panahi S, Chen W, et al. 2018. New hybrids of anfis with several optimization algorithms for flood susceptibility modeling. Water. 10(9):1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB. 2012. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Hoa Binh province (Vietnam) using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and GIS. Comput Geosci. 45:199–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Chapi K, Alizadeh M, Chen W, Mohammadi A, Ahmad BB, Panahi M, Hong H, et al. 2018. Landslide detection and susceptibility mapping by airsar data using support vector machine and index of entropy models in cameron highlands, malaysia. Remote Sens. 10(10):1527.
   Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Shirzadi A, Chapi K, Shahabi H, Pradhan B, Pham BT, Singh VP, Chen W, Khosravi K, Bin Ahmad B, Lee S. 2019. A hybrid computational intelligence approach to groundwater spring potential mapping. Water. 11(10):2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigila A, Iadanza C, Esposito C, Scarascia-Mugnozza G. 2015. Comparison of Logistic Regression and Random Forests techniques for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in Giampilieri (NE Sicily, Italy). Geomorphology. 249:119–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu JV. 1996. Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 49(11):1225–1231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellaikannu A, Palaniraj U, Karthikeyan S, Senapathi V, Viswanathan PM, Sekar S. 2021. Identification of groundwater potential zones using geospatial approach in Sivagangai district, South India. Arab J Geosci. 14(1):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Lei X, Chen W, Shahabi H, Shirzadi A. 2020. Hybrid computational intelligence methods for landslide susceptibility mapping. Symmetry. 12(3):325.
   Google Scholar
• Wu M, Feng Q, Wen X, Yin Z, Yang L, Sheng D. 2021. Deterministic Analysis and Uncertainty Analysis of Ensemble Forecasting Model Based on Variational Mode Decomposition for Estimation of Monthly Groundwater Level. Water. 13(2):139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Z, Chen G, Meng X, Zhang Y, Qiao L, Tan L. 2017. A comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping using weight of evidence, logistic regression and support vector machine and evaluated by SBAS-InSAR monitoring: Zhouqu to Wudu segment in Bailong River Basin, China. Environ Earth Sci. 76(8):313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu C, Xu X, Dai F, Xiao J, Tan X, Yuan R. 2012. Landslide hazard mapping using GIS and weight of evidence model in Qingshui river watershed of 2008 Wenchuan earthquake struck region. J Earth Sci. 23(1):97–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Cervone G. 2019. Analysis of remote sensing imagery for disaster assessment using deep learning: a case study of flooding event. Soft Comput. 23(24):13393–13408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yariyan P, Avand M, Omidvar E, Pham QB, Linh NTT, Tiefenbacher JP. 2021. Optimization of statistical and machine learning hybrid models for groundwater potential mapping. Geocarto Int. :1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen HPH, Pham BT, Van Phong T, Ha DH, Costache R, Van Le H, Nguyen HD, Amiri M, Van Tao N, Prakash I. 2021. Locally weighted learning based hybrid intelligence models for groundwater potential mapping and modeling: A case study at Gia Lai province, Vietnam. Geosci Front. 12(5):101154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Moraetis D, Nikolaidis NP, Li B, Duffy C, Liu B. 2019. A coupled surface-subsurface hydrologic model to assess groundwater flood risk spatially and temporally. Environ Model Softw. 114:129–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Abdelkareem M. 2021. Mapping groundwater potential zones using a knowledge-driven approach and GIS analysis. Water. 13(5):579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Ma S, Liu T, Deng X. 2018. Green synthesis of nano zero-valent iron/Cu by green tea to remove hexavalent chromium from groundwater. J Cleaner Prod. 174:184–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar