Modeling riparian flood plain wetland water richness in pursuance of damming and linking it with a methane emission rate

References

• Aanderud ZT, Schoolmaster DR, Lennon JT. 2011. Plants mediate the sensitivity of soil respiration to rainfall variability. Ecosystems. 14(1):156–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi T, Abbasi T, Luithui C, Abbasi SA. 2020. Modelling methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddy wetlands in India using artificial neural networks (ANNs) (vol 11, 2169, 2019). Water. 12(3):751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Santosh M, Saha S, Ghorbanzadeh O, Roy J, Tiefenbacher JP, Moayedi H, Costache R. 2021a. Spatial prediction of shallow landslide: application of novel rotational forest-based reduced error pruning tree. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 12(1):1343–1370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Chandra Pal S, Rezaie F, Chakrabortty R, Saha A, Blaschke T, Di Napoli M, Ghorbanzadeh O, Thi Ngo PT. 2021b. Decision tree based ensemble machine learning approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Int. 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Garg JK. 2007. Methane emission modelling using MODIS thermal and optical data: a case study on Gujarat. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 35(4):323–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed K, Sachindra DA, Shahid S, Iqbal Z, Nawaz N, Khan N. 2020. Multi-model ensemble predictions of precipitation and temperature using machine learning algorithms. Atmos Res. 236:104806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akumu CE, Pathirana S, Baban S, Bucher D. 2010. Modeling methane emission from wetlands in North-Eastern New South Wales, Australia using Landsat ETM+. Remote Sens. 2(5):1378–1399.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett KB, Harriss RC. 1993. Review and assessment of methane emissions from wetlands. Chemosphere. 26(1–4):261–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal S, Chakrabort M, Katyal D, Garg JK. 2015. Assessment of methane variability from natural wetlands of Uttar Pradesh, India – implications for tropical countries. Res J Environ Sci. 9(3):101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Bansal S, Garg JK, Sharma CS, Katyal D. 2018. Spatial methane emission modelling from wetlands using geospatial tools. Int J Remote Sens. 39(18):5907–5933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal S, Johnson OF, Meier J, Zhu X. 2020. Vegetation affects timing and location of wetland methane emissions. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 125(9):p.e2020JG005777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulieu JJ, DelSontro T, Downing JA. 2019. Eutrophication will increase methane emissions from lakes and impoundments during the 21st century. Nat Commun. 10(1):1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Behnia P, Blais-Stevens A. 2018. Landslide susceptibility modelling using the quantitative random forest method along the northern portion of the Yukon Alaska Highway Corridor, Canada. Nat Hazards. 90(3):1407–1426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borro M, Morandeira N, Salvia M, Minotti P, Perna P, Kandus P. 2014. Mapping shallow lakes in a large South American floodplain: a frequency approach on multitemporal Landsat TM/ETM data. J Hydrol. 512:39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Ho TC, Revhaug I, Pradhan B, Nguyen DB. 2014. Landslide susceptibility mapping along the national road 32 of Vietnam using GIS-based J48 decision tree classifier and its ensembles. In Cartography from pole to pole. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. 303–317.
   Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Khosravi K, Tiefenbacher J, Nguyen H, Kazakis N. 2020. Improving prediction of water quality indices using novel hybrid machine-learning algorithms. Sci Tot Environ. 721:137612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgham SD, Richardson CJ. 1992. Mechanisms controlling soil respiration (CO2 and CH4) in southern peatlands. Soil Biol Biochem. 24(11):1089–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese S, Garcia A, Wilmoth JL, Zhang X, Porporato A. 2021. Critical inundation level for methane emissions from wetlands. Environ Res Lett. 16(4):044038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardinaux F, Enenkl M, Giron F, Kemp T, Uhlich S. 2020. Sony Corp. Method, system and artificial neural network. U.S. Patent. 10,564,923.
   Google Scholar
• Chen F, Yu B, Li B. 2018. A practical trial of landslide detection from single-temporal Landsat8 images using contour-based proposals and random forest: a case study of national Nepal. Landslides. 15(3):453–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Hong H, Li S, Shahabi H, Wang Y, Wang X, Ahmad BB. 2019. Flood susceptibility modelling using novel hybrid approach of reduced-error pruning trees with bagging and random subspace ensembles. J Hydrol. 575:864–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T, Zhu L, Niu RQ, Trinder CJ, Peng L, Lei T. 2020. Mapping landslide susceptibility at the Three Gorges Reservoir, China, using gradient boosting decision tree, random forest and information value models. J Mt Sci. 17(3):670–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Wu Y, Xu YJ, Zhang G. 2021. Alteration of flood pulses by damming the Nenjiang River, China – implication for the need to identify a hydrograph-based inundation threshold for protecting floodplain wetlands. Ecol Indic. 124:107406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chicco D, Jurman G. 2020. The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genomics. 21(1):6–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi C, Kim J, Han H, Han D, Kim HS. 2019. Development of water level prediction models using machine learning in wetlands: a case study of UPO wetland in South Korea. Water. 12(1):93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choubin B, Moradi E, Golshan M, Adamowski J, Sajedi-Hosseini F, Mosavi A. 2019. An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines. Sci Tot Environ. 651(Pt 2):2087–2096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciężkowski W, Szporak-Wasilewska S, Kleniewska M, Jóźwiak J, Gnatowski T, Dąbrowski P, Góraj M, Szatyłowicz J, Ignar S, Chormański J. 2020. Remotely sensed land surface temperature-based water stress index for wetland habitats. Remote Sens. 12(4):631.
   Google Scholar
• CLEAR 2002. Forest fragmentation in Connecticut: 1985–2006. USA: Center for Land Use Education and Research. University of Connecticut, Middlesex County Extension Centre; http://clear.uconn.edu/projects/landscape/forestfrag. Accessed September 7, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Cong P, Chen K, Qu L, Han J. 2019. Dynamic changes in the wetland landscape pattern of the Yellow River Delta from 1976 to 2016 based on satellite data. Chin Geogr Sci. 29(3):372–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang VH, Hoang ND, Nguyen LMD, Bui DT, Samui P. 2020. A novel GIS-based random forest machine algorithm for the spatial prediction of shallow landslide susceptibility. Forests. 11(1):118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson NC. 2014. How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Mar Freshwater Res. 65(10):934–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debanshi S, Pal S. 2020a. Modelling water richness and habitat suitability of the wetlands and measuring their spatial linkages in mature Ganges delta of India. J Environ Manage. 271:110956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debanshi S, Pal S. 2020b. Effects of water richness and seasonality on atmospheric methane emission from the wetlands of deltaic environment. Ecol Indic. 118:106767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donchyts G, Schellekens J, Winsemius H, Eisemann E, Van de Giesen N. 2016. A 30 m resolution surface water mask including estimation of positional and thematic differences using landsat 8, srtm and openstreetmap: a case study in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Remote Sens. 8(5):386.
   Google Scholar
• Du J, Song K, Yan B. 2019. Impact of the Zhalong wetland on neighboring land surface temperature based on remote sensing and GIS. Chin Geogr Sci. 29(5):798–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du J, Wu X, Wang Z, Li J, Chen X. 2020. Reservoir-induced hydrological alterations using ecologically related hydrologic metrics: case study in the Beijiang River, China. Water. 12(7):2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du L, McCarty GW, Zhang X, Lang MW, Vanderhoof MK, Li X, Huang C, Lee S, Zou Z. 2020. Mapping forested wetland inundation in the Delmarva Peninsula, USA using deep convolutional neural networks. Remote Sens. 12(4):644.
   Google Scholar
• Duan G, Niu R. 2018. Lake area analysis using exponential smoothing model and long time-series Landsat images in Wuhan, China. Sustainability. 10(2):149.
   Google Scholar
• El Naqa I, Ruan D, Valdes G, Dekker A, McNutt T, Ge Y, Wu QJ, Oh JH, Thor M, Smith W, et al. 2018. Machine learning and modeling: data, validation, communication challenges. Med Phys. 45(10):e834–e840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton BR, O’Neil GL, Robertson MM, Fitch GM, Goodall JL. 2019. Using random forest classification and nationally available geospatial data to screen for wetlands over large geographic regions. Water. 11(6):1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garosi Y, Sheklabadi M, Conoscenti C, Pourghasemi HR, Van Oost K. 2019. Assessing the performance of GIS-based machine learning models with different accuracy measures for determining susceptibility to gully erosion . Sci Tot Environ. 664:1117–1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemain B, Asl DT, Pham BT, Avand M, Nguyen HD, Janizadeh SJVJOES. 2020. Shallow landslide susceptibility mapping: A comparison between classification and regression tree and reduced error pruning tree algorithms. TCCKHVTD. 42(3):208–227.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Das A. 2020. Wetland conversion risk assessment of East Kolkata wetland: a Ramsar site using random forest and support vector machine model. J Cleaner Prod. 275:123475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Mathew A, Khandelwal S. 2019. Analysis of cooling effect of water bodies on land surface temperature in nearby region: a case study of Ahmedabad and Chandigarh cities in India. Egypt J. Remote Sens Space Sci. 22(1):81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han J, Park S, Kim S, Son S, Lee S, Kim J. 2019. Performance of logistic regression and support vector machines for seismic vulnerability assessment and mapping: a case study of the 12 September 2016 ML5. 8 Gyeongju Earthquake, South Korea. Sustainability. 11(24):7038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y, Ma D, Xiong J, Cheng W, Jia H, Wang N, Guo L, Duan Y, Liu J, Yang G. 2021. Flash flood vulnerability assessment of roads in China based on support vector machine. Geocarto Int. 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini FS, Choubin B, Mosavi A, Nabipour N, Shamshirband S, Darabi H, Haghighi AT. 2020. Flash-flood hazard assessment using ensembles and Bayesian-based machine learning models: application of the simulated annealing feature selection method. Sci Tot Environ. 711:135161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang GH, Li XZ, Hu YM, Shi Y, Xiao DN. 2005. Methane (CH4) emission from a natural wetland of Northern China. J Environ Sci Health. 40(6–7):1227–1238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Zhang P, Zhang Q, Wang J. 2021. Improving wetland cover classification using artificial neural networks with ensemble techniques. GIS Remote Sens. 58(4):603–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC and Core Writing Team. 2014. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 27:408.
   Google Scholar
• Islam ARMT, Talukdar S, Mahato S, Ziaul S, Eibek KU, Akhter S, Pham QB, Mohammadi B, Karimi F, Linh NTT. 2021. Machine learning algorithm-based risk assessment of Riparian wetlands in Padma River Basin of Northwest Bangladesh. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 28(26):34450–34422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali A. 2019. Evaluation and comparison of eight machine learning models in land use/land cover mapping using Landsat 8 OLI: a case study of the Northern region of Iran. SN Appl Sci. 1(11):1448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey LC, Maher DT, Johnston SG, Kelaher BP, Steven A, Tait DR. 2019. Wetland methane emissions dominated by plant‐mediated fluxes: contrasting emissions pathways and seasons within a shallow freshwater subtropical wetland. Limnol Oceanogr. 64(5):1895–1912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadavi PR, Lee CW, Lee S. 2018. Application of ensemble-based machine learning models to landslide susceptibility mapping. Remote Sens. 10(8):1252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan G, Avdan U. 2018. Monthly analysis of wetlands dynamics using remote sensing data. IJGI. 7(10):411.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan G, Avdan ZY, Avdan U. 2019. Mapping and monitoring wetland dynamics using thermal, optical, and SAR remote sensing data. Wetlands Manage Assess Risk Sustain Sol. 87–106.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi SS, Saintilan N, Wen L, Valavi R. 2019. Application of machine learning to model wetland inundation patterns across a large semiarid floodplain. Water Resour Res. 55(11):8765–8778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatun R, Talukdar S, Pal S, Kundu S. 2021. Measuring dam induced alteration in water richness and eco-hydrological deficit in flood plain wetland. J Environ Manage. 285:112157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu S, Pal S, Talukdar S, Mandal I. 2021. Impact of wetland fragmentation due to damming on the linkages between water richness and ecosystem services. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 28(36):50266–50220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong WC, Bahadori A, Zhang J, Ahmad Z. 2021. Prediction of water quality index (WQI) using support vector machine (SVM) and least square-support vector machine (LS-SVM). Int J River Basin Manage. 19(2):149–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Liu X, Han Z, Dou J. 2020. Spatial proximity-based geographically weighted regression model for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study of Qingchuan Area, China. Appl Sci. 10(3):1107.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Jiang W, Wang W, Chen Z, Ling Z, Lv J. 2020. Ecological risk assessment of the wetlands in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei urban agglomeration. Ecol Indic. 117:106677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y. 1996. Modeling the emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) from the terrestrial biosphere to the atmosphere [Doctoral dissertation]. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change.
   Google Scholar
• Liu T, Abd-Elrahman A, Morton J, Wilhelm VL. 2018. Comparing fully convolutional networks, random forest, support vector machine, and patch-based deep convolutional neural networks for object-based wetland mapping using images from small unmanned aircraft system. GIS Remote Sens. 55(2):243–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Zhang Q, Li Y, Tan Z, Werner AD. 2020. Satellite image-based investigation of the seasonal variations in the hydrological connectivity of a large floodplain (Poyang Lake, China). J Hydrol. 585:124810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Xu N, Sun J, Wang XH, Yang F, Li S. 2019. Estimating water levels and volumes of lakes dated back to the 1980s using Landsat imagery and photon-counting lidar datasets. Remote Sens Environ. 232:111287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallik S, Bhowmik T, Mishra U, Paul N. 2020. Mapping and prediction of soil organic carbon by an advanced geostatistical technique using remote sensing and terrain data. Geocarto Int. 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell AE, Warner TA, Fang F. 2018. Implementation of machine-learning classification in remote sensing: an applied review. Int J Remote Sens. 39(9):2784–2817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merghadi A, Yunus AP, Dou J, Whiteley J, ThaiPham B, Bui DT, Avtar R, Abderrahmane B. 2020. Machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility studies: a comparative overview of algorithm performance. Earth Sci Rev. 207:103225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsch WJ, Bernal B, Nahlik AM, Mander Ü, Zhang L, Anderson CJ, Jørgensen SE, Brix H. 2013. Wetlands, carbon, and climate change. Landscape Ecol. 28(4):583–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed WNHW, Salleh MNM, Omar AH. 2012, November. A comparative study of reduced error pruning method in decision tree algorithms. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering. IEEE; p. 392–397.
   Google Scholar
• Mohsenzadeh Karimi S, Kisi O, Porrajabali M, Rouhani-Nia F, Shiri J. 2020. Evaluation of the support vector machine, random forest and geo-statistical methodologies for predicting long-term air temperature. ISH J Hydraul Eng. 26(4):376–386.
   Google Scholar
• Moomaw WR, Chmura GL, Davies GT, Finlayson CM, Middleton BA, Natali SM, Perry JE, Roulet N, Sutton-Grier AE. 2018. Wetlands in a changing climate: science, policy and management. Wetlands. 38(2):183–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosavi A, Ozturk P, Chau KW. 2018. Flood prediction using machine learning models: literature review. Water. 10(11):1536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo L, Van Deventer H, Ramoelo A, Mathieu R, Nondlazi B, Gangat R. 2019. Estimating above ground biomass as an indicator of carbon storage in vegetated wetlands of the grassland biome of South Africa. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinform. 78:118–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen U, Glenn EP, Dang TD, Pham LT. 2019. Mapping vegetation types in semi-arid riparian regions using random forest and object-based image approach: a case study of the Colorado River Ecosystem, Grand Canyon, Arizona. Ecol Inform. 50:43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen H, Drebenstedt C, Bui XN, Bui DT. 2020. Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration in an open-pit mine by a novel hybrid model based on clustering and artificial neural network. Nat Resour Res. 29(2):691–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nhu V-H, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Singh SK, Al-Ansari N, Clague JJ, Jaafari A, Chen W, Miraki S, Dou J, et al. 2020. Shallow landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between logistic model tree, logistic regression, naïve bayes tree, artificial neural network, and support vector machine algorithms. IJERPH. 17(8):2749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohani E, Moharrami M, Sharafi S, Khosravi K, Pradhan B, Pham BT, Lee S, M Melesse A. 2019. Landslide susceptibility mapping using different GIS-based bivariate models. Water. 11(7):1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyarko BK. 2020. Wetland river flow interaction in a sedimentary formation of the White Volta Basin of Ghana. ESR. 9(1):15.
   Google Scholar
• Orhan O, Bilgilioglu SS, Kaya Z, Ozcan AK, Bilgilioglu H. 2020. Assessing and mapping landslide susceptibility using different machine learning methods. Geocarto Int. 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S. 2016. Impact of water diversion on hydrological regime of the Atreyee river of Indo-Bangladesh. Int J River Basin Manage. 14(4):459–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Saha TK. 2018. Identifying dam-induced wetland changes using an inundation frequency approach: the case of the Atreyee River basin of Indo-Bangladesh. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol. 18(1):66–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Paul S. 2020. Assessing wetland habitat vulnerability in moribund Ganges delta using bivariate models and machine learning algorithms. Ecol Indic. 119:106866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Sarda R. 2020. Damming effects on the degree of hydrological alteration and stability of wetland in lower Atreyee River basin. Ecol Indic. 116:106542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Talukdar S, Ghosh R. 2020. Damming effect on habitat quality of riparian corridor. Ecol Indic. 114:106300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Sarda R. 2021a. Measuring the degree of hydrological variability of riparian wetland using hydrological attributes integration (HAI) histogram comparison approach (HCA) and range of variability approach (RVA). Ecol Indic. 120:106966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Sarda R. 2021b. Modelling water richness in riparian flood plain wetland using bivariate statistics and machine learning algorithms and figuring out the role of damming. Geocarto Int. 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Singha P, Lepcha K, Debanshi S, Talukdar S, Saha TK. 2021. Proposing multicriteria decision based valuation of ecosystem services for fragmented landscape in mountainous environment. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ. 21:100454.
   Google Scholar
• Panahi M, Dodangeh E, Rezaie F, Khosravi K, Van Le H, Lee MJ, Lee S, Pham BT. 2021. Flood spatial prediction modeling using a hybrid of meta-optimization and support vector regression modeling. Catena. 199:105114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey PC, Sharma LK. 2021. Introduction to natural resource monitoring using remote sensing technology. Adv Remote Sens Nat Resour Monitor. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey S, Houweling S, Lorente A, Borsdorff T, Tsivlidou M, Bloom AA, Poulter B, Zhang Z, Aben I. 2021. Using satellite data to identify the methane emission controls of South Sudan's wetlands. Biogeosciences. 18(2):557–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Pradhan B, Bui DT, Prakash I, Dholakia MB. 2016. A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study of Uttarakhand area (India). Environ Model Softw. 84:240–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Nguyen MD, Bui KTT, Prakash I, Chapi K, Bui DT. 2019. A novel artificial intelligence approach based on multi-layer perceptron neural network and biogeography-based optimization for predicting coefficient of consolidation of soil. Catena. 173:302–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Prakash I, Dou J, Singh SK, Trinh PT, Tran HT, Le TM, Van Phong T, Khoi DK, Shirzadi A, et al. 2020. A novel hybrid approach of landslide susceptibility modelling using rotation forest ensemble and different base classifiers. Geocarto Int. 35(12):1267–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham LT, Luo L, Finley A. 2021. Evaluation of random forests for short-term daily streamflow forecasting in rainfall-and snowmelt-driven watersheds. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 25(6):2997–3015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Jaafari A, Nguyen-Thoi T, Van Phong T, Nguyen HD, Satyam N, Masroor M, Rehman S, Sajjad H, Sahana M, et al. 2021. Ensemble machine learning models based on Reduced Error Pruning Tree for prediction of rainfall-induced landslides. Int J Digital Earth. 14(5):575–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B. 2013. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Comput Geosci. 51:350–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin X, Haiming W, Jian L. 2014. Methane emissions from wetlands in China: effects of wetland type and climate zone. Carbon Manage. 5(5–6):535–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan JR. 1987, January. Decision trees as probabilistic classifiers. In: Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann; p. 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Rameshkumar S, Radhakrishnan K, Aanand S, Rajaram R. 2019. Influence of physicochemical water quality on aquatic macrophyte diversity in seasonal wetlands. Appl Water Sci. 9(1):12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid B, Islam SU, Badrul I. 2014. Drainage characteristics and evolution of the Barind Tract, Bangladesh. Am J Earth Sci. 1(1):86–98.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Galiano V, Sanchez-Castillo M, Chica-Olmo M, Chica-Rivas MJOGR. 2015. Machine learning predictive models for mineral prospectivity: an evaluation of neural networks, random forest, regression trees and support vector machines. Ore Geol Rev. 71:804–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelen C, Thorsen S, Heymans M, Twisk J, Bültmann U, Bjørner J. 2018. Development and validation of a prediction model for long-term sickness absence based on occupational health survey variables. Disabil Rehabil. 40(2):168–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha TK, Pal S. 2019a. Exploring physical wetland vulnerability of Atreyee river basin in India and Bangladesh using logistic regression and fuzzy logic approaches. Ecol Indic. 98:251–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha TK, Pal S. 2019b. Emerging conflict between agriculture extension and physical existence of wetland in post-dam period in Atreyee River basin of Indo-Bangladesh. Environ Dev Sustain. 21(3):1485–1505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santi E. 2016. Neural networks applications for the remote sensing of hydrological parameters. In Artificial neural networks – models and applications book. TechOpen; p. 309–334.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar UK, Borah BC. 2018. Flood plain wetland fisheries of India: with special reference to impact of climate change. Wetlands Ecol Manage. 26(1):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer TE, King GM. 1993. Glucose uptake and end product formation in an intertidal marine sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 59(1):120–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffer BA, Iiames J, Dwyer J, Urquhart E, Salls W, Rover J, Seegers B. 2018. An initial validation of Landsat 5 and 7 derived surface water temperature for US lakes, reservoirs, and estuaries. Int J Remote Sens. 39(22):7789–7805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert CJ, Wehrli B. 2019. Contribution of methane formation and methane oxidation to methane emission from freshwater systems. In: Biogenesis of hydrocarbons. Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. New York: Springer; p. 401–430.
   Google Scholar
• Sevgen E, Kocaman S, Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C. 2019. A novel performance assessment approach using photogrammetric techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping with logistic regression, ANN and random forest. Sensors. 19(18):3940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao R, Xu M, Li R, Dai X, Liu L, Yuan Y, Wang H, Yang F. 2017. Land use legacies and nitrogen fertilization affect methane emissions in the early years of rice field development. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 107(3):369–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard JC, Westberg H, Hopper JF, Ganesan K, Zimmerman P. 1982. Inventory of global methane sources and their production rates. J Geophys Res. 87(C2):1305–1312.
   Google Scholar
• Singha P, Das P, Talukdar S, Pal S. 2020. Modeling livelihood vulnerability in erosion and flooding induced river island in Ganges Riparian corridor, India. Ecol Indic. 119:106825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slagter B, Tsendbazar NE, Vollrath A, Reiche J. 2020. Mapping wetland characteristics using temporally dense Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data: a case study in the St. Lucia wetlands, South Africa. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinform. 86:102009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun M, Zhang Y, Ma J, Yuan W, Li X, Cheng X. 2017. Satellite data based estimation of methane emissions from rice paddies in the Sanjiang Plain in northeast China. PloS One. 12(6):e0176765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukdar S, Pal S. 2019. Effects of damming on the hydrological regime of Punarbhaba river basin wetlands. Ecol Eng. 135:61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukdar S, Pal S. 2020. Modeling flood plain wetland transformation in consequences of flow alteration in Punarbhaba River in India and Bangladesh. J Clean Prod. 261:120767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukdar S, Pal S, Chakraborty A, Mahato S. 2020. Damming effects on trophic and habitat state of riparian wetlands and their spatial relationship. Ecol Indic. 118:106757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Chapi K, Omidavr E, Pham BT, Talebpour Asl D, Khaledian H, Pradhan B, Panahi M, et al. 2019a. A novel ensemble artificial intelligence approach for gully erosion mapping in a semi-arid watershed (Iran). Sensors. 19(11):2444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Shahabi H, Omidvar E, Shirzadi A, Geertsema M, Clague J, Khosravi K, Pradhan B, Pham B, Chapi K, et al. 2019b. Shallow landslide prediction using a novel hybrid functional machine learning algorithm. Remote Sens. 11(8):931.
   Google Scholar
• Turetsky MR, Kotowska A, Bubier J, Dise NB, Crill P, Hornibrook ERC, Minkkinen K, Moore TR, Myers-Smith IH, Nykänen H, et al. 2014. A synthesis of methane emissions from 71 northern, temperate, and subtropical wetlands. Glob Chang Biol. 20(7):2183–2197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyay AK, Singh R, Singh, DP. editors. 2019. Restoration of wetland ecosystem: a trajectory towards a sustainable environment. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine DW, Holland EA, Schimel DS. 1994. Ecosystem and physiological controls over methane production in northern wetlands. J Geophys Res. 99(D1):1563–1571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Asselen S, Verburg PH, Vermaat JE, Janse JH. 2013. Drivers of wetland conversion: a global meta-analysis. PloS One. 8(11):e81292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt P, Riitters KH, Estreguil C, Kozak J, Wade TG, Wickham JD. 2007. Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing. Landscape Ecol. 22(2):171–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wali SU. 2018. Review of methane emissions and soil carbon in wetlands in dry landscapes, Macquarie Mashes, Australia. SF J Environ Earth Sci. 1(2):1024.
   Google Scholar
• Wan R, Wang P, Wang X, Yao X, Dai X. 2018. Modeling wetland aboveground biomass in the Poyang Lake National Nature Reserve using machine learning algorithms and Landsat-8 imagery. J Appl Rem Sens. 12(04):1.
   Google Scholar
• Wang D, Zhang S, Wang G, Han Q, Huang G, Wang H, Liu Y, Zhang Y. 2019. Quantitative assessment of the influences of three Gorges dam on the water level of Poyang Lake, China. Water. 11(7):1519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Chen B, Guan C, Zhang B. 2019. Evolution of methane emissions in global supply chains during 2000–2012. Resour Conserv Recycl. 150:104414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Wang S. 2020. Machine learning-based water level prediction in Lake Erie, Water. Water. 12(10):2654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardrop DH, Hamilton AT, Nassry MQ, West JM, Britson AJ. 2019. Assessing the relative vulnerabilities of Mid‐Atlantic freshwater wetlands to projected hydrologic changes. Ecosphere. 10(2):e02561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westermann P, Ahring BK, Mah RA. 1989. Temperature compensation in Methanosarcina barkeri by modulation of hydrogen and acetate affinity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 55(5):1262–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westermann P. 1994. The effect of incubation temperature on steady-state concentrations of hydrogen and volatile fatty acids during anaerobic degradation in slurries from wetland sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 13(4):295–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte A, Ferentinos KP, Petropoulos GP. 2018. A new synergistic approach for monitoring wetlands using Sentinels-1 and 2 data with object-based machine learning algorithms. Environ Model Softw. 104:40–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wondie A. 2018. Ecological conditions and ecosystem services of wetlands in the Lake Tana Area, Ethiopia. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol. 18(2):231–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Chen W. 2020. Indicator system construction and health assessment of wetland ecosystem – taking Hongze Lake Wetland, China as an example. Ecol Indic. 112:106164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Chen M, Yang G, Jiang B, Zhang J. 2020. Wetland ecosystem services research: a critical review. Global Ecol Conserv. 22:e01027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Li J, Zhou Z, Zeng L, Zhang C. 2019. Estimation of the value of ecosystem carbon sequestration services under different scenarios in the central China (the Qinling–Daba mountain area). Sustainability. 12(1):337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Zhu J, Ji H, Bai X, Lin Y, Zhang Y, Sha L, Liu Y, Song Q, Dörsch P, et al. 2021. Topography-related controls on N2O emission and CH4 uptake in a tropical rainforest catchment. Sci Tot Environ. 775:145616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziaul S, Pal S. 2017. Estimating wetland insecurity index for Chatra wetland adjacent English Bazar Municipality of West Bengal. Spat Inf Res. 25(6):813–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer C. 2010. The microbe factor and its role in our climate future. Yale Environ. 360.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Tian H, Lu C, Chen G, Pan S, Anderson C, Poulter B. 2017. Methane emissions from global wetlands: an assessment of the uncertainty associated with various wetland extent data sets. Atmos Environ. 165:310–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Comas X, Brodylo D. 2020. A remote sensing technique to upscale methane emission flux in a subtropical peatland. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 125(10):e2020JG006002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Wu X, Niu R, Wang Y, Zhang K. 2020. Using the rotation and random forest models of ensemble learning to predict landslide susceptibility. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 11(1):1542–1564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Zhang G, Wu Y, Xu YJ, Dai C. 2019. Dam effects on downstream riparian wetlands: the Nenjiang River, Northeast China. Water. 11(10):2038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar