A heuristic DEM generalization by combining catchments

References

• Ai T. 2007. The drainage network extraction from contour lines for contour line generalization. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 62(2):93–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ai T, Li JZ. 2010. A DEM generalization by minor valley branch detection and grid filling. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 65(2):198–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreea Z, Daniel S. 2011. Automatic delineation of a watershed using a DEM. Case study – The Oltet watershed. GEOREVIEW: Sci Ann Stefan Cel Mare Univ Suceava. Geogr Ser. 20(1):83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Band LE, Tague CL, Brun SE, Tenenbaum DE, Fernandes RA. 2000. Modeling watershed as spatial object hierarchies: structure and dynamics. Trans GIS. 4(3):181–196.
   Google Scholar
• Bühler Y, Marty M, Ginzler C. 2012. High resolution DEM generation in high-Alpine Terrain using airborne remote sensing techniques. Trans GIS. 16(5):635–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Li Y. 2013. An orthogonal least-square-based method for DEM generalization. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. 27(1):154–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zhou Q. 2013. A scale-adaptive DEM for multi-scale terrain analysis. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. 27(7):1329–1348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YG, Ma TW, Chen XY, Chen ZD, Yang CJ, Lin CZ, Shan LG. 2016. A new DEM generalization method based on watershed and tree structure. PLoS One. 11(8):e0159798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YM, Wilson JP, Zhu QS, Zhou QM. 2012. Comparison of drainage-constrained methods for DEM generalization. Comput Geosci. 48:41–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Gueyara JA. 1987. Systematic selection of very important points (VIP) from digital terrain model for constructing triangular irregular networks[C]. Baltimore, USA: Auto-Carto 8.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Ma X, Yu W, Wu L. 2020. An integrated graph Laplacian downsample (IGLD)-based method for DEM generalization. Earth Sci Inform. 13(4):973–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danovaro E, De Floriani L, Papaleo L, Vitali M. 2006. A multi-resolution representation for terrain morphology. In: Raubal M, Miller H, Goodchild MF, editors. GIScience 2006, lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 4197. Germany: Munster; p. 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• DeFloriani L, Puppo E. 1992. A Hierarchical triangle-based model for terrain description. In: Frank AU, Campari I, Formentini U, editors. Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space, lecturing notes in computer science Vol. 639, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; p. 236–251.
   Google Scholar
• Fei LF, He J. 2009. A three Douglas-Peucher algorithm and its application to automated generalization of DEMs. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. 23(6):703–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fimland M, Skogan D. 2000. A Multi-resolution approach for simplification of an integrated network and terrain model. In: Forer, editor. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Beijing, pp:p. 26–39.
   Google Scholar
• Franke R. 1982. Smooth interpolation of scattered data by local thin plate splines. Comput Math Appl. 8(4):273–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gökgöz T. 2005. Generalization of contours using deviation angles and error bands. Cartogr J. 42(2):145–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib A, Khoshelham K, Akdim N, El Ghandour F-e, Labbassi K, Menenti M. 2018. Impact of spatial resolution, interpolation and filtering algorithms on DEM accuracy for geomorphometric research: a case study from Sahel-Doukkala, Morocco. Model Earth Syst Environ. 4(4):1537–1554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hack J. 1957. Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, p. 294. B
   Google Scholar
• Heller M. 1990. Triangulation Algorithms for Adaptive Terrain Modeling. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Zurich, Switzerland, p. 163–174.
   Google Scholar
• Horton RE. 1945. Erosion development of streams and drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol Soc America Bull. 56(3):275–370.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones R. 2002. Algorithms for using a DEM for mapping catchment areas of stream sediment samples. Comput Geosci. 28(9):1051–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K, Shan J. 2011. Adaptive morphological filtering for DEM generation. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2011 IEEE International, 2539–2542.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert D. 1998. The field guide to geology. New York, NY: Checkmark Books, p. 130–113.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Sui H. 2000. An integrated technique for automated generalization of contour maps. Cartogr J. 37 (1):29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Lu B. 2008. Accuracy assessment of DEM slope algorithms related to spatial autocorrelation of DEM errors. In: Zhou Q, Lees B, Tang G, editors. Advances in digital terrain analysis. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee S, Mukherjee S, Bhardwaj A, Mukhopadhyay A, Garg RD, Hazra S. 2015. Accuracy of Cartosat-1 DEM and its derived attribute at multiple scale representation. J Earth Syst Sci. 124(3):487–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller JC. 1991. Generalization of spatial databases. In: Maguire DJ, Goodchild MF, Rhind DW, editors. Geographical information systems: principles and applications, Vol. I. London: Longman; p. 457–475.
   Google Scholar
• O'Callaghan JF, Mark DM. 1984. The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data, computer vision. Graph Image Process. 28(3):323–344.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver MA, Webster R. 1990. Kriging: A method of interpolation for geographical information systems. Int J Geogr Inform Syst. 4(3):313–332.
   Google Scholar
• Rusak ME, Castner HW. 1990. Horton’s ordering scheme and the generalization of river networks. Cartograp J. 27 (2):104–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid-Mcgibbon G. 1995. Generalization of digital terrain models for use in landform mapping. Cartographica. 32(3):26–38.
   Google Scholar
• Shirzaei M. 2013. A wavelet-based multitemporal DInSAR algorithm for monitoring ground surface motion. IEEE Geosci Remote Sensing Lett. 10(3):456–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shreve RL. 1966. Statistical law of stream numbers. J Geol. 74(1):17–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibson R. 1981. A brief description of natural neighbor interpolation, Chapter 2 in interpolating multivariate data. New York: John Wiley & Sons; p. 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Strahler AN. 1952. Dynamic basis of geomorphology. Geol Soc America Bull. 63(9):923–938.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töpfer F, Pillewizer W. 1966. The principles of selection: a means of cartographic generalization. Cartogr J. 3(1):10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Wälder O, Buchroithner MF. 2006. Statistical relief modelling with locally adaptive sequential wavelet-splines. Cartographica. 41 (3):267–274.
   Google Scholar
• Weibel R. 1992. Concepts and experiments for adaptive computer-assisted terrain generalization. Cartogr Geogr Inform Syst. 19(3):133–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibel R, Heller M. 1991. Digital terrain modeling. In: Maguire DJ, Goodchild MF, Rhind DW, editors. Geographical information systems: principles and applications, Vol. I. London: Longman; p. 269–297.
   Google Scholar
• Wu H. 1997. Structured approach to implementing automatic cartographic generalization. Proceedings of the 18th ICC, Vol. 1, pp: p. 349–356.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Chen Y, Wilson J, Liu X, Li H. 2019. An effective parallelization algorithm for DEM generalization based on CUDA. Environ Modell Software. 114(2019):64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Yang B, Shi W, Li Q. 2005. An integrated TIN and Grid method for constructing multi-resolution digital terrain models. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. 19(10):1019–1038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson DF, Philip GM. 1985. A refinement of inverse distance weighted interpolation. Geoprocessing. 2:315–327.
   Google Scholar
• Zakšek K, Podobnikar T. 2005. An effective DEM generalization with basic GIS operations. Proceedings 8th Ica Workshop on Generalization and Multiple Representation, a Coruńa.
   Google Scholar