Prediction of flood risk zone of Ghaggar river basin, India using graph theory technique

References

• Anand J, Gosain AK, Khosa R. 2018. Prediction of land use changes based on Land Change Modeler and attribution of changes in the water balance of Ganga basin to land use change using the SWAT model. Sci Total Environ. 644:503–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Rezaei K, Cerdà A, Conoscenti C, Kalantari Z. 2019. A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran. Sci Total Environ. 660:443–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asare-Kyei D, Forkuor G, Venus V. 2015. Modeling flood hazard zones at the sub-district level with the rational model integrated with GIS and remote sensing approaches. Water. 7(12):3531–3564.
   Google Scholar
• Bahremand A, De Smedt F, Corluy J, Liu YB, Poorova J, Velcicka L, Kunikova E. 2007. WetSpa model application for assessing reforestation impacts on floods in Margecany–Hornad Watershed, Slovakia. Water Resour Manage. 21(8):1373–1391..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caloiero T, Coscarelli R, Ferrari E. 2018. Application of the innovative trend analysis method for the trend analysis of rainfall anomalies in Southern Italy. Water Resour Manage. 32(15):4971–4983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao C, Xu P, Wang Y, Chen J, Zheng L, Niu C. 2016. Flash flood hazard susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and statistical index methods in Coalmine subsidence areas. Sustain. 8(9):948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty S, Mukhopadhyay S. 2019. Assessing flood risk using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and geographical information system (GIS): application in Coochbehar district of West Bengal, India. Nat Hazards. 99(1):247–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y-R, Yeh C-H, Yu B. 2011. Integrated application of the analytic hierarchy process and the geographic information system for flood risk assessment and flood plain management in Taiwan. Nat Hazards. 59(3):1261–1276..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache R, Tien Bui D. 2020. Identification of areas prone to flash-flood phenomena using multiple-criteria decision-making, bivariate statistics, machine learning and their ensembles. Sci Total Environ. 712:136492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CWC. 2014. River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation, Annual Report 2013–14 India.
   Google Scholar
• Dahri N, Abida H. 2017. Monte Carlo simulation-aided analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for flood susceptibility mapping in Gabes Basin (southeastern Tunisia). Environ Earth Sci. 76(7):302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darabi H, Choubin B, Rahmati O, Torabi Haghighi A, Pradhan B, Kløve B. 2019. Urban flood risk mapping using the GARP and QUEST models: a comparative study of machine learning techniques. J Hydrol. 569:142–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das S. 2018. Geographic information system and AHP-based flood hazard zonation of Vaitarna basin, Maharashtra, India. Arab J Geosci. 11(19):576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Brito MM, Evers M. 2016. Multi-criteria decision-making for flood risk management: A survey of the current state of the art. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 16(4):1019–1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekmekcioğlu Ö, Koc K, Özger M. 2021. District based flood risk assessment in Istanbul using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 35(3):617–637..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortini M, Bragalli C, Artina S. 2014. Identifying the high-level flow model of water distribution networks using graph theory. Procedia Eng. 89:1192–1199.
   Google Scholar
• Fotovatikhah F, Herrera M, Shamshirband S, Chau K, Faizollahzadeh Ardabili S, Piran MJ. 2018. Survey of computational intelligence as basis to big flood management: challenges, research directions and future work. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech. 12(1):411–437..
   Google Scholar
• Fu M, Fan T, Ding Z, Salih SQ, Al-Ansari N, Yaseen ZM. 2020. Deep learning data-intelligence model based on adjusted forecasting window scale: application in daily streamflow simulation. IEEE Access. 8:32632–32651. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9007531/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Kar SK. 2018. Application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for flood risk assessment: a case study in Malda district of West Bengal, India. Nat Hazards. 94(1):349–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorai S, Ratha D, Dhir A. 2021. Adapting rainfall variability to flood risk: a case study of the Ghaggar river basin. J Geol Soc India. 97:1347–1354.
   Google Scholar
• Haghizadeh A, Siahkamari S, Haghiabi AH, Rahmati O. 2017. Forecasting flood-prone areas using Shannon’s entropy model. J Earth Syst Sci. 126(3):39. 10.1007/s12040-017-0819-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajebi S, Roshani E, Cardozo N, Barrett S, Clarke A, Clarke S. 2016. Water distribution network sectorisation using graph theory and many-objective optimisation. J Hydroinformatics. 18(1):77–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammami S, Zouhri L, Souissi D, Souei A, Zghibi A, Marzougui A, Dlala M. 2019. Application of the GIS based multi-criteria decision analysis and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the flood susceptibility mapping (Tunisia). Arab J Geosci. 12(21):653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidinger H, Carvalho L, Jones C, Posadas A, Quiroz R. 2018. A new assessment in total and extreme rainfall trends over central and southern Peruvian Andes during 1965–2010. Int J Climatol. 38:e998–e1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Panahi M, Shirzadi A, Ma T, Liu J, Zhu A-X, Chen W, Kougias I, Kazakis N. 2018. Flood susceptibility assessment in Hengfeng area coupling adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with genetic algorithm and differential evolution. Sci Total Environ. 621:1124–1141. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969717328176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantari Z, Cavalli M, Cantone C, Crema S, Destouni G. 2017. Flood probability quantification for road infrastructure: Data-driven spatial-statistical approach and case study applications. Sci Total Environ. 581–582:386–398. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716328376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya CM, Tayfur G, Gungor O. 2019. Predicting flood plain inundation for natural channels having no upstream gauged stations. J Water Clim Chang. 10(2):360–372. https://iwaponline.com/jwcc/article/10/2/360/38950/Predicting-flood-plain-inundation-for-natural.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittipongvises S, Phetrak A, Rattanapun P, Brundiers K, Buizer JL, Melnick R. 2020. AHP-GIS analysis for flood hazard assessment of the communities nearby the world heritage site on Ayutthaya Island, Thailand. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 48:101612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourgialas NN, Karatzas GP. 2017. A national scale flood hazard mapping methodology: The case of Greece—protection and adaptation policy approaches. Sci Total Environ. 601–602:441–452. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969717313049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee M, Kang J, Jeon S. 2012. Application of frequency ratio model and validation for predictive flooded area susceptibility mapping using GIS. In: 2012 IEEE Int Geosci Remote Sens Symp. p. 895–898.
   Google Scholar
• Levy JK. 2005. Multiple criteria decision making and decision support systems for flood risk management. Stoch Environ Res Ris Assess. 19(6):438–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu K, Li Z, Yao C, Chen J, Zhang K, Saifullah M. 2016. Coupling the k-nearest neighbor procedure with the Kalman filter for real-time updating of the hydraulic model in flood forecasting. Int J Sediment Res. 31(2):149–158. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001627916300117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luu C, Von Meding J, Kanjanabootra S. 2018. Assessing flood hazard using flood marks and analytic hierarchy process approach: a case study for the 2013 flood event in Quang Nam, Vietnam. Nat Hazards. 90(3):1031–1050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyu H-M, Zhou W-H, Shen S-L, Zhou A-N. 2020. Inundation risk assessment of metro system using AHP and TFN-AHP in Shenzhen. Sustain Cities Soc. 56:102103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masood M, Takeuchi K. 2012. Assessment of flood hazard, vulnerability and risk of mid-eastern Dhaka using DEM and 1D hydrodynamic model. Nat Hazards. 61(2):757–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao S, Chen F, Li Q, Fan S. 2011. Impacts of urban processes and urbanization on summer precipitation: a case study of heavy rainfall in Beijing on 1 August 2006. J Appl Meteorol Climatol. 50(4):806–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan KS, Shankar N, Murty BS. 2008. State estimation in water distribution networks using graph-theoretic reduction strategy. J Water Resour Plan Manag. 134(5):395–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal A, Khare D, Kundu S. 2015. Spatial and temporal analysis of rainfall and temperature trend of India. Theor Appl Climatol. 122(1–2):143–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosavi A, Ozturk P, Chau K. 2018. Flood prediction using machine learning models: literature review. Water. 10(11):1536. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/11/1536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oeurng C, Sauvage S, Sánchez-Pérez J-M. 2011. Assessment of hydrology, sediment and particulate organic carbon yield in a large agricultural catchment using the SWAT model. J Hydrol. 401(3–4):145–153. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169411001247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagano A, Sweetapple C, Farmani R, Giordano R, Butler D. 2019. Water distribution networks resilience analysis: a comparison between graph theory-based approaches and global resilience analysis. Water Resour Manage. 33(8):2925–2940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B. 2010. Flood susceptible mapping and risk area delineation using logistic regression, GIS and remote sensing. J Spat Hydrol. 9(2):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Praveen B, Talukdar S, Shahfahad Mahato S, Mondal J, Sharma P, Islam ARMT, Rahman A. 2020. Analyzing trend and forecasting of rainfall changes in India using non-parametrical and machine learning approaches. Sci Rep. 10(1):10342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radwan F, Alazba AA, Mossad A. 2019. Flood risk assessment and mapping using AHP in arid and semi-arid regions. Acta Geophys. 67(1):215–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman M, Ningsheng C, Islam MM, Dewan A, Iqbal J, Washakh RMA, Shufeng T. 2019. Flood susceptibility assessment in Bangladesh using machine learning and multi-criteria decision analysis. Earth Syst Environ. 3(3):585–601.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR, Zeinivand H. 2016. Flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models in the Golastan Province, Iran. Geocarto Int. 31(1):42–70..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratha D, Agrawal VP. 2014. Structural modeling and analysis of water resources development and management system: a graph theoretic approach. Water Resour Manage. 28(10):2981–2997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratha D, Agrawal VP. 2015. A digraph permanent approach to evaluation and analysis of integrated watershed management system. J Hydrol. 525:188–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rincón D, Khan UT, Armenakis C. 2018. Flood risk mapping using GIS and multi-criteria analysis: a greater Toronto area case study. Geosci. 8(8):275.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol. 15(3):234–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahiri Tabarestani E, Afzalimehr H. 2021. A comparative assessment of multi-criteria decision analysis for flood susceptibility modelling. Geocarto Int. 2021:1–24..
   Google Scholar
• Shamshirband S, Hashemi S, Salimi H, Samadianfard S, Asadi E, Shadkani S, Kargar K, Mosavi A, Nabipour N, Chau K-W. 2020. Predicting standardized streamflow index for hydrological drought using machine learning models. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech. 14(1):339–350..
   Google Scholar
• Souissi D, Zouhri L, Hammami S, Msaddek MH, Zghibi A, Dlala M. 2020. GIS-based MCDM—AHP modeling for flood susceptibility mapping of arid areas, southeastern Tunisia. Geocarto Int. 35(9):991–1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talwar AR. 2011. State Disaster Management Plan Punjab. Punjab, India.
   Google Scholar
• Tang Z, Zhang H, Yi S, Xiao Y. 2018. Assessment of flood susceptible areas using spatially explicit, probabilistic multi-criteria decision analysis. J Hydrol. 558:144–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taormina R, Chau K-W. 2015. ANN-based interval forecasting of streamflow discharges using the LUBE method and MOFIPS. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 45:429–440. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0952197615001748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN. 2013. Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS. J Hydrol. 504:69–79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169413006872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Mansor S, Ahmad N. 2015. Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types. CATENA. 125:91–101. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S034181621400294X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanh Son N, Thi Thu Trang N, Bui XT, Thi Da C. 2021. Remote sensing and GIS for urbanization and flood risk assessment in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Geocarto Int. 2021:1–18..
   Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Pradhan B, Nampak H, Bui Q-T, Tran Q-A, Nguyen Q-P. 2016. Hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on neural fuzzy inference model and metaheuristic optimization for flood susceptibilitgy modeling in a high-frequency tropical cyclone area using GIS. J Hydrol. 540:317–330. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002216941630378X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Xu Y, Tabari H, Wang J, Wang Q, Song S, Hu Z. 2020. Innovative trend analysis of annual and seasonal rainfall in the Yangtze River Delta, eastern China. Atmos Res. 231:104673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson KJ. 2017. An investigation of dependence in expert judgement studies with multiple experts. Int J Forecast. 33(1):325–336. 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I. 2004. At risk, natural hazard, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Second. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao G, Pang B, Xu Z, Yue J, Tu T. 2018. Mapping flood susceptibility in mountainous areas on a national scale in China. Sci Total Environ. 615:1133–1142. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969717327419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou Q, Zhou J, Zhou C, Song L, Guo J. 2013. Comprehensive flood risk assessment based on set pair analysis-variable fuzzy sets model and fuzzy AHP. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 27(2):525–546..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar