Land cover classification using Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS) data and open source Eo-Learn library

References

• Aksever F, Eroğlu A. 2016. Çivril-baklan (Denizli) ovasında yeraltı suyuna iklim değişikliğinin etkisi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 7(1):11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Aleksandrov M, Visnjic J. 2020. Land cover monitoring system. Medium. [accessed 2021 Apr 13] https://medium.com/sentinel-hub/land-cover-monitoring-system-84406e3019ae.
   Google Scholar
• Bentéjac C, Csörgő A, Muñoz GM. 2021. A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms. Artif Intell Rev. 54(3):1937–1967. springer netherlands).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candido C, Blanco AC, Medina J, Gubatanga E, Santo A, Ana RS, Reyes RB. 2021. Improving the consistency of multi-temporal land cover mapping of Laguna lake watershed using light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) approach, change detection analysis, and Markov chain. Remote Sens Appl: Soc Environ. 23(5):100565.
   Google Scholar
• Crist EP, Cicone RC. 1984. A physically-based transformation of Thematic Mapper data the TM Tasseled Cap. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. GE-22(3):256–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efthimiou N, Psomiadis E, Papanikolaou I, Soulis KX, Borrelli P, Panagos P. 2022. Developing a high-resolution land use/land cover map by upgrading CORINE’s agricultural components using detailed national and pan-European datasets. Geocarto Int. 37(4):1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitel JH, Vierling LA, Litvak MA, Long DS, Schulthess U, Ager AA, Krofcheck DJ, Stoscheck L. 2011. Broadband, red-edge information from satellites improves early stress detection in a new mexico conifer woodland. Remote Sens Environ. 115(12):3640–3646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foerster S, Kaden K, Foerster M, Itzerott S. 2012. Crop type mapping using spectral-temporal profiles and phenological information. Comput Electron Agric. 89(4):30–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez C, White JC, Wulder MA. 2011. Characterizing the state and processes of change in a dynamic forest environment using hierarchical spatio-temporal segmentation. Remote Sens Environ. 115(7):1665–1679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guolin K, Men Q, Finley T, Wang T, Chen W, Ma W, Ye Q, Liu TY. 2017. LighGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), California; p. 3147–3155.
   Google Scholar
• Harvolk S, Kornatz P, Otte A, Simmering D. 2014. Using existing landscape data to assess the ecological potential of miscanthus cultivation in a marginal landscape. GCB Bioenergy. 6(3):227–241.
   Google Scholar
• Inan HB, Sagris V, Devos W, Milenov P, Oosterom PV, Zevenbergen J. 2010. Data model for the collaboration between land administration systems and agricultural land parcel ıdentification systems. J Environ Manage. 91(12):2440–2454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarray N, Abbes A, Rhif M, Chouikhi F, Farah IR. 2021. An open source platform to estimate soil moisture using machine learning methods based on eo-learn library. In: International Congress of Advanced Technology and Engineering, ICOTEN; p. 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kalkan K, Maktav D. 2016. Landsat-8 görüntülerinden gölge ve bulut belirleme. In: VI. Uzaktan Algılama ve Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Sempozyumu, Adana; p. 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen SR, Stendardi L, Tømmervik H, Nilsen L, Arntzen I, Cooper EJ. 2021. Time-series of cloud-free sentinel-2 ndvi data used in mapping the onset of growth of central spitsbergen, svalbard. Remote Sensing. 13(15):3031–3014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauth RJ, Thomas GS. 1976. The tasselled cap a graphic description of the spectral–temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat. In: Symposiumon Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data. Vol. 76; p. 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kohavi R. 1995. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: International Joint Conference of Artificial Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Kriegler FJ, Malila WA, Nalepka RF, Richardson W. 1969. Preprocessing transformations and their effect on multispectral recognition. Remote Sens Environ. 6:97–132.
   Google Scholar
• Li W, Ding S, Chen Y, Wang H, Yang S. 2019. Transfer learning-based default prediction model for consumer credit in China. J Supercomput. 75(2):862–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Du Z, Ling F, Zhou D, Wang H, Gui Y, Sun B, Zhang X. 2013. A comparison of land surface water mapping using the normalized difference water index from TM, ETM + and ALI. Remote Sens. 5(11):5530–5549.
   Google Scholar
• Lu D, Weng Q. 2007. A survey of ımage classification methods and techniques for ımproving classification performance. Int J Remote Sens. 28(5):823–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubej M, Aleksandrov M, Batic M, Kadunc M, Milcinski G, Peressutti D, Zupanc A. 2019. Spatio-temporal deep learning: an application to land cover classification. In: Living Planet Symposium. Milano; p. 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Lubej M. 2018. Land cover classification with eo-learn: part-1. Medium. [accessed 2021 May 20] https://medium.com/sentinel-hub/land-cover-classification-with-eo-learn-part-1-2471e8098195.
   Google Scholar
• Lüker-Jans N, Simmering D, Otte A. 2016. Analysing data of the ıntegrated administration and control system (ıacs) to detect patterns of agricultural land-use change at municipality level. Landscape Online. 48(1):1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Luketic N, Milenov P, Devos P. 2015. Management of layers in LPIS- JRC validated methods, reference, methods and measurements report, Joint Research Centre, DS-CDP-2015-10.
   Google Scholar
• Mcfeeters SK. 1996. The use of the normalized difference water ındex (ndwı) in the delineation of open water features. Int J Remote Sens. 17(7):1425–1432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadakis I, Papetheodorou I, Faria Viegas H, Milionis N, Szymura M, Huth J, Sniter K, Bortnowschi R, Resegotti R. 2016. The Land Parcel Identification System: a useful tool to determine the eligibility of agricultural land – but its management could be further improved. Eur Court Audıtors-Spec Rep. 25(59):35–38.
   Google Scholar
• Peressutti D. 2018. Introduction eo-learn. Medium [accessed 2021 Feb 15] https://medium.com/sentinel-hub/introducing-eo-learn-ab37f2869f5c.
   Google Scholar
• Račič M, Oštir K, Peressutti D, Zupanc A, Zajc LC. 2020. Application of temporal convolutional neural network for the classifıcation of crops on Sentınel-2 time series. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci- ISPRS Arch. 43(B2):1337–1342.
   Google Scholar
• Ron K. 1995. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: International Joint Conference of Artificial Intelligence, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Schowengerdt RA. 2007. Remote sensing: models and methods for image processing. 3rd ed., Elsevier; p. 250–254.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson SJ, Dragosits U, Levy PE, Thomson AM, Moxley J. 2018. Quantifying gross vs. net agricultural land use change in great britain using the ıntegrated administration and control system. Sci Total Environ. 628–629:1234–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üstüner M, Abdikan S, Bilgin G, Şanlı FB. 2020. Hafif gradyan artırma makineleri ile tarımsal ürünlerin sınıflandırılması. Türk Uzaktan Algılama ve CBS Dergisi. 1(2):97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Üstüner M, Şanlı FB, Abdikan S. 2015. Spektral band ve bitki indeksi seçiminin ürün deseni sınıflandırma doğruluğuna etkisi: karşılaştırmalı analiz. In: TUFUAB VIII. Teknik Sempozyumu, Konya; p. 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Viana CM, Girão I, Rocha J. 2019. Long-term satellite ımage time-series for land use/land cover change detection using refined open source data in a rural region. Remote Sens. 11(9):1104.
   Google Scholar
• Zha Y, Gao J, Ni S. 2003. Use of normalized difference built-up ındex in automatically mapping urban areas from tm ımagery. Int J Remote Sens. 24(3):583–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Du P, Chen J, Xia J, Li E, Xu Z, Li X, Yokoya N. 2017. Performance evaluation of downscaling sentinel-2 imagery for land use and land cover classification by spectral-spatial features. Remote Sens. 9(12):1274–1142.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Woodcock CE. 2012. Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 118:83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupanc A. 2017. Improving cloud detection with machine learning. Medium [accessed 2021 Sep 5]. https://medium.com/sentinel-hub/improving-cloud-detection-with-machine-learning-c09dc5d7cf13.
   Google Scholar