Deep learning to assess the effects of land use/land cover and climate change on landslide susceptibility in the Tra Khuc river basin of Vietnam

References

• Abdı A, Bouamrane A, Karech T, Dahri N, Kaouachi A. 2021. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based fuzzy logic and the analytical hierarchical processes approach: a case study in Constantine (North-East Algeria). Geotech Geol Eng. 39(8):5675–5691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achour Y, Boumezbeur A, Hadji R, Chouabbi A, Cavaleiro V, Bendaoud EA. 2017. Landslide susceptibility mapping using analytic hierarchy process and information value methods along a highway road section in Constantine, Algeria. Arabian J Geosci. 10(8):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghelpour P, Mohammadi B, Mehdizadeh S, Bahrami-Pichaghchi H, Duan Z. 2021. A novel hybrid dragonfly optimization algorithm for agricultural drought prediction. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 35(12):2459–2477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Najjar HA, Pradhan B. 2021. Spatial landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning techniques assisted by additional data created with generative adversarial networks. Geosci Front. 12(2):625–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali SA, Parvin F, Vojteková J, Costache R, Linh NTT, Pham QB, Vojtek M, Gigović L, Ahmad A, Ghorbani MA. 2021. GIS-based landslide susceptibility modeling: a comparison between fuzzy multi-criteria and machine learning algorithms. Geosci Front. 12(2):857–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aouissi HA, Petrişor A-I, Ababsa M, Boştenaru-Dan M, Tourki M, Bouslama Z. 2021. Influence of land use on avian diversity in North African urban environments. Land. 10(4):434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri A, Chandra Pal S, Rezaie F, Chakrabortty R, Saha A, Blaschke T, Di Napoli M, Ghorbanzadeh O, Thi P, Ngo T. 2021. Decision tree based ensemble machine learning approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Int. 37(16):1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avtar R, Singh C, Singh G, Verma R, Mukherjee S, Sawada H. 2011. Landslide susceptibility zonation study using remote sensing and GIS technology in the Ken-Betwa River Link area, India. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 70(4):595–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourenane H, Bouhadad Y. 2021. Impact of land use changes on landslides occurrence in urban area: the case of the Constantine city (Ne Algeria). Geotech Geol Eng. 39(6):1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braimoh A, Vlek P. 2004. The impact of land‐cover change on soil properties in northern Ghana. Land Degrad Dev. 15(1):65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui Q-T. 2019. Metaheuristic algorithms in optimizing neural network: a comparative study for forest fire susceptibility mapping in Dak Nong, Vietnam. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 10(1):136–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang F-J, Chen Y-C. 2003. Estuary water-stage forecasting by using radial basis function neural network. J Hydrol. 270(1–2):158–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang X, Zhang F, Cong K, Liu X. 2021. Scenario simulation of land use and land cover change in mining area. Sci Rep. 11(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang Z, Du Z, Zhang F, Huang F, Chen J, Li W, Guo Z. 2020. Landslide susceptibility prediction based on remote sensing images and GIS: comparisons of supervised and unsupervised machine learning models. Remote Sens. 12(3):502.
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan S, Sharma M, Arora MK. 2010. Landslide susceptibility zonation of the Chamoli region, Garhwal Himalayas, using logistic regression model. Landslides. 7(4):411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Guo Z, Yin K, Shrestha DP, Jin S. 2019. The influence of land use and land cover change on landslide susceptibility: a case study in Zhushan Town, Xuan’en County (Hubei, China). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 19(10):2207–2228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Chai H, Zhao Z, Wang Q, Hong H. 2016. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on GIS and support vector machine models for the Qianyang County, China. Environ Earth Sci. 75(6):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Peng J, Hong H, Shahabi H, Pradhan B, Liu J, Zhu A-X, Pei X, Duan Z. 2018a. Landslide susceptibility modelling using GIS-based machine learning techniques for Chongren County, Jiangxi Province, China. Sci Total Environ. 626:1121–1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Panahi M, Kornejady A, Wang J, Xie X, Cao S. 2017. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system combined with frequency ratio, generalized additive model, and support vector machine techniques. Geomorphology. 297:69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Hong H, Akgun A, Tian Y, Liu J, Zhu A, Li S. 2019. Novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach of bivariate statistical-methods-based kernel logistic regression classifier for landslide susceptibility modeling. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 78(6):4397–4419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Shahabi H, Zhang S, Khosravi K, Shirzadi A, Chapi K, Pham BT, Zhang T, Zhang L, Chai H. 2018b. Landslide susceptibility modeling based on GIS and novel bagging-based kernel logistic regression. Appl Sci. 8(12):2540.
   Google Scholar
• Chen W, Zhang S. 2021. GIS-based comparative study of Bayes network, Hoeffding tree and logistic model tree for landslide susceptibility modeling. Catena. 203:105344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Chen W. 2021. Gis-based landslide susceptibility assessment using optimized hybrid machine learning methods. Catena. 196:104833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhuri I, Pal SC, Chakrabortty R, Malik S, Das B, Roy P, Sen K. 2021. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using projected storm rainfall and land use in Himalayan region. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 80(7):5237–5258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerici A, Perego S, Tellini C, Vescovi P. 2002. A procedure for landslide susceptibility zonation by the conditional analysis method. Geomorphology. 48(4):349–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crozier MJ. 2010. Deciphering the effect of climate change on landslide activity: a review. Geomorphology. 124(3–4):260–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devara M, Tiwari A, Dwivedi R. 2021. Landslide susceptibility mapping using MT-INSAR and Ahp enabled GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 12(1):675–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias HC, Gramani MF, Grohmann CH, Bateira C, Vieira BC. 2021. Statistical-based shallow landslide susceptibility assessment for a tropical environment: a case study in the southeastern Brazilian coast. Nat Hazards. 108(1):205–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dymond JR, Ausseil A-G, Shepherd JD, Buettner L. 2006. Validation of a region-wide model of landslide susceptibility in the Manawatu–Wanganui region of New Zealand. Geomorphology. 74(1):70–79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X05002229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermini L, Catani F, Casagli N. 2005. Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology. 66(1–4):327–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Z, Wang Y, Peng L, Hong H. 2020. Integration of convolutional neural network and conventional machine learning classifiers for landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci. 139:104470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallart F, Llorens P. 2003. Catchment management under environmental change: impact of land cover change on water resources. Water Int. 28(3):334–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gameiro S, Riffel ES, De Oliveira GG, Guasselli LA. 2021. Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility: the effect of sampling areas on model capacity for generalization and extrapolation. Appl Geogr. 137:102598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Alvarez D, Olmedo MTC, Paegelow M. 2019. Sensitivity of a common land use cover change (LUCC) model to the minimum mapping unit (MMU) and minimum mapping width (MMW) of input maps. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 78:101389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo C, Montgomery DR, Zhang Y, Wang K, Yang Z. 2015. Quantitative assessment of landslide susceptibility along the Xianshuihe fault zone, Tibetan Plateau, China. Geomorphology. 248:93–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Thakur S, Gupta A. 2022. Optimized feature selection approach for smartphone based diabetic retinopathy detection. 2nd International Conference on Innovative Practices in Technology and Management (ICIPTM). IEEE. p. 350–355.
   Google Scholar
• He S, Pan P, Dai L, Wang H, Liu J. 2012. Application of kernel-based fisher discriminant analysis to map landslide susceptibility in the Qinggan River delta, Three Gorges, China. Geomorphology. 171:30–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques C, Zêzere JL, Marques F. 2015. The role of the lithological setting on the landslide pattern and distribution. Eng Geol. 189:17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Pradhan B, Jebur MN, Bui DT, Xu C, Akgun A. 2016. Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the Luxi area (China) using support vector machines. Environ Earth Sci. 75(1):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Chen W, Xu C, Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Tien Bui D. 2017. Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment at the Chongren area (China) using frequency ratio, certainty factor, and index of entropy. Geocarto Int. 32(2):139–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang F, Chen J, Du Z, Yao C, Huang J, Jiang Q, Chang Z, Li S. 2020. Landslide susceptibility prediction considering regional soil erosion based on machine-learning models. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 9(6):377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Ling S, Wu X, Deng R. 2022. GIS-based comparative study of the Bayesian network, decision table, radial basis function network and stochastic gradient descent for the spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility. Land. 11(3):436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hürlimann M, Guo Z, Puig-Polo C, Medina V. 2022. Impacts of future climate and land cover changes on landslide susceptibility: regional scale modelling in the Val d’Aran region (Pyrenees, Spain). Landslides. 19(1):99–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakob M, Lambert S. 2009. Climate change effects on landslides along the southwest coast of British Columbia. Geomorphology. 107(3–4):275–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakob M, Hungr O, Jakob DM. 2005. Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Karsli F, Atasoy M, Yalcin A, Reis S, Demir O, Gokceoglu C. 2009. Effects of land-use changes on landslides in a landslide-prone area (Ardesen, Rize, Ne Turkey). Environ Monit Assess. 156(1):241–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatri A, Gaba A, Rana K, Kumar V. 2020. A novel life choice-based optimizer. Soft Comput. 24(12):9121–9141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshnood Motlagh S, Sadoddin A, Haghnegahdar A, Razavi S, Salmanmahiny A, Ghorbani K. 2021. Analysis and prediction of land cover changes using the land change modeler (LCM) in a semiarid river basin, Iran. Land Degrad Dev. 32(10):3092–3105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari S, Chauhan A, Shankar V. 2021. Assessment of climate change implications on landslides in mid and high hills of Himachal Pradesh, India. Arabian J Geosci. 14(14):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Pradhan B. 2007. Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides. 4(1):33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Ryu JH, Min K, Won JS. 2003. Landslide susceptibility analysis using GIS and artificial neural network. Earth Surf Process Landf. 28(12):1361–1376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann P, Von Ruette J, Or D. 2019. Deforestation effects on rainfall‐induced shallow landslides: remote sensing and physically‐based modelling. Water Resour Res. 55(11):9962–9976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leta MK, Demissie TA, Tränckner J. 2021. Modeling and prediction of land use land cover change dynamics based on land change modeler (LCM) in Nashe watershed, upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Sustainability. 13(7):3740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Huang F, Yan L, Cao Z, Chen J, Ye Z. 2019. Landslide susceptibility prediction using particle-swarm-optimized multilayer perceptron: comparisons with multilayer-perceptron-only, BP neural network, and information value models. Appl Sci. 9(18):3664.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Lin F, Lou L, Li J, Xu Z, Zhu S, Luo X, Huo G, Zhao Q. 2021. Performance analysis of landslide susceptibility assessment under different factor-filtering models. Arabian J Geosci. 14(12):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Wu Z, Zhang H. 2021. Analysis of changes in landslide susceptibility according to land use over 38 years in Lixian County, China. Sustainability. 13(19):10858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malek Ž, Boerboom L, Glade T. 2015. Future forest cover change scenarios with implications for landslide risk: an example from Buzau Subcarpathians, Romania. Environ Manage. 56(5):1228–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal K, Saha S, Mandal S. 2021. Applying deep learning and benchmark machine learning algorithms for landslide susceptibility modelling in Rorachu river basin of Sikkim Himalaya, India. Geosci Front. 12(5):101203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marimuthu R, Thomas BA, Dcruz N, Hayar A. 2022. Choice-based recreation facility for smart cities. In: Rani, S., Sai, V., Maheswar, R. (eds) IOT and WSN based smart cities: a machine learning perspective. Switzerland: Springer. p. 257–273.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabi M. 2022. Landslide susceptibility zonation using statistical and machine learning approaches in northern Lecco, Italy. Nat Hazards. 111(1):901–937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabi M, Moayedi H. 2021. Landslide susceptibility mapping using artificial neural network tuned by metaheuristic algorithms. Environ Earth Sci. 80(24):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabi M, Pradhan B, Moayedi H, Alamri A. 2020. Optimizing an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using four state-of-the-art metaheuristic techniques. Sensors. 20(6):1723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirjalili S. 2016. Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Comput Appl. 27(4):1053–1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moayedi H, Mehrabi M, Bui DT, Pradhan B, Foong LK. 2020. Fuzzy-metaheuristic ensembles for spatial assessment of forest fire susceptibility. J Environ Manage. 260:109867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moayedi H, Osouli A, Nguyen H, Rashid ASA. 2021. A novel Harris hawks’ optimization and k-fold cross-validation predicting slope stability. Engineering with Computers. 37(1):369–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moharrami M, Naboureh A, Gudiyangada Nachappa T, Ghorbanzadeh O, Guan X, Blaschke T. 2020. National-scale landslide susceptibility mapping in Austria using fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 9(6):393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottet É, Roche Y. 2009. L’urbanisation de la ville de ninh binh dans le delta du fleuve rouge (Vietnam): mise en perspective des forces et faiblesses de la gestion du risque d’inondation. VertigO-la Revue Électronique en Sciences de L'environnement. 8(3). https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.7782
   Google Scholar
• Nagendra H, Reyers B, Lavorel S. 2013. Impacts of land change on biodiversity: making the link to ecosystem services. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 5(5):503–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näschen K, Diekkrüger B, Evers M, Höllermann B, Steinbach S, Thonfeld F. 2019. The impact of land use/land cover change (LULCC) on water resources in a tropical catchment in Tanzania under different climate change scenarios. Sustainability. 11(24):7083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo PTT, Panahi M, Khosravi K, Ghorbanzadeh O, Kariminejad N, Cerda A, Lee S. 2021. Evaluation of deep learning algorithms for national scale landslide susceptibility mapping of Iran. Geosci Front. 12(2):505–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen H-D, Pham V-D, Nguyen Q-H, Pham V-M, Pham MH, Vu VM, Bui Q-T. 2020. An optimal search for neural network parameters using the Salp swarm optimization algorithm: a landslide application. Remote Sens Lett. 11(4):353–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen HD, Ardillier-Carras F, Touchart L. 2018. Les paysages de rizières et leur évolution récente dans le delta du fleuve gianh. Cybergeo: Eur J Geogr. 876. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.29826
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen HD, Dang DK, Nguyen Q-H, Bui Q-T, Petrisor A-I. 2022a. Evaluating the effects of climate and land use change on the future flood susceptibility in the central region of Vietnam by integrating land change modeler, machine learning methods. Geocarto Int. 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2071477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen HD, Fox D, Dang DK, Pham LT, Viet Du QV, Nguyen THT, Dang TN, Tran VT, Vu PL, Nguyen Q-H. 2021. Predicting future urban flood risk using land change and hydraulic modeling in a river watershed in the central province of Vietnam. Remote Sens. 13(2):262.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen HD, Quang-Thanh B, Nguyen Q-H, Nguyen TG, Pham LT, Nguyen XL, Vu PL, Thanh Nguyen TH, Nguyen AT, Petrisor A-I. 2022b. A novel hybrid approach to flood susceptibility assessment based on machine learning and land use change. Case study: a river watershed in Vietnam. Hydrol Sci J. 67(7): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen Q-H, Chou T-Y, Yeh M-L, Hoang T-V, Nguyen H-D, Bui Q-T. 2021. Henry’s gas solubility optimization algorithm in formulating deep neural network for landslide susceptibility assessment in mountainous areas. Environ Earth Sci. 80(11):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen V-T, Tran TH, Ha NA, Ngo VL, Nadhir A-A, Tran VP, Duy Nguyen H, Ma M, Amini A, Prakash I. 2019. GIS based novel hybrid computational intelligence models for mapping landslide susceptibility: a case study at Da Lat City, Vietnam. Sustainability. 11(24):7118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojima D, Galvin K, Turner B. 1994. The global impact of land-use change. BioScience. 44(5):300–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr MJ. 1996. Introduction to radial basis function networks. Technical Report, center for cognitive science, University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Oyelade ON, Ezugwu AE. 2022. Characterization of abnormalities in breast cancer images using nature‐inspired metaheuristic optimized convolutional neural networks model. Concurr Comput: Pract Exp. 34(4):e6629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persichillo MG, Bordoni M, Meisina C. 2017. The role of land use changes in the distribution of shallow landslides. Sci Total Environ. 574:924–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrişor A-I, Sirodoev I, Ianoş I. 2020. Trends in the national and regional transitional dynamics of land cover and use changes in Romania. Remote Sens. 12(2):230.
   Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Jaafari A, Prakash I, Bui DT. 2019a. A novel hybrid intelligent model of support vector machines and the multiboost ensemble for landslide susceptibility modeling. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 78(4):2865–2886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Nguyen MD, Nguyen-Thoi T, Ho LS, Koopialipoor M, Quoc NK, Armaghani DJ, Van Le H. 2021. A novel approach for classification of soils based on laboratory tests using Adaboost, Tree and ANN modeling. Transp Geotech. 27:100508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Prakash I, Singh SK, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Bui DT. 2019b. Landslide susceptibility modeling using reduced error pruning trees and different ensemble techniques: hybrid machine learning approaches. Catena. 175:203–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Shirzadi A, Bui DT, Prakash I, Dholakia M. 2018. A hybrid machine learning ensemble approach based on a radial basis function neural network and rotation forest for landslide susceptibility modeling: a case study in the Himalayan area, India. Int J Sediment Res. 33(2):157–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham QB, Achour Y, Ali SA, Parvin F, Vojtek M, Vojteková J, Al-Ansari N, Achu A, Costache R, Khedher KM. 2021a. A comparison among fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 12(1):1741–1777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham QB, Chandra Pal S, Chakrabortty R, Saha A, Janizadeh S, Ahmadi K, Khedher KM, Anh DT, Tiefenbacher JP, Bannari A. 2021b. Predicting landslide susceptibility based on decision tree machine learning models under climate and land use changes. Geocarto Int.: 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham VD, Nguyen Q-H, Nguyen H-D, Pham V-M, Bui Q-T. 2020. Convolutional neural network—optimized moth flame algorithm for shallow landslide susceptible analysis. IEEE Access. 8:32727–32736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C. 2012. Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (Ahp) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz Watershed, Iran. Nat Hazards. 63(2):965–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Jirandeh AG, Pradhan B, Xu C, Gokceoglu C. 2013. Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS at the Golestan province, Iran. J Earth Syst Sci. 122(2):349–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Sadhasivam N, Amiri M, Eskandari S, Santosh M. 2021. Landslide susceptibility assessment and mapping using state-of-the art machine learning techniques. Nat Hazards. 108(1):1291–1316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B. 2013. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Comput Geosci. 51:350–365. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098300412003093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Sezer EA, Gokceoglu C, Buchroithner MF. 2010. Landslide susceptibility mapping by neuro-fuzzy approach in a landslide-prone area (Cameron Highlands, Malaysia). IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 48(12):4164–4177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabby YW, Li Y, Abedin J, Sabrina S. 2022. Impact of land use/land cover change on landslide susceptibility in Rangamati municipality of Rangamati district, Bangladesh. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 11(2):89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman CM, Rashid TA. 2019. Dragonfly algorithm and its applications in applied science survey. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2019:1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman CM, Rashid TA, Alsadoon A, Bacanin N, Fattah P, Mirjalili S. 2021. A survey on dragonfly algorithm and its applications in engineering. Evol Intell. 2021:1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenbach P, Busca C, Mondini AC, Rossi M., 2014. The influence of land use change on landslide susceptibility zonation: the Briga catchment test site (Messina, Italy). Environ Manage. 54(6):1372–1384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rianna G, Zollo A, Tommasi P, Paciucci M, Comegna L, Mercogliano P. 2014. Evaluation of the effects of climate changes on landslide activity of orvieto clayey slope. Procedia Earth Planet Sci. 9:54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Roccati A, Paliaga G, Luino F, Faccini F, Turconi L. 2021. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for land use planning and risk assessment. Land. 10(2):162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roose A, Kull A, Gauk M, Tali T. 2013. Land use policy shocks in the post-communist urban fringe: a case study of Estonia. Land Use Policy. 30(1):76–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Roy J, Pradhan B, Hembram TK. 2021. Hybrid ensemble machine learning approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping using different sampling ratios at east Sikkim Himalayan, India. Adv Space Res. 68(7):2819–2840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said M, Houssein EH, Deb S, Ghoniem RM, Elsayed AG. 2022. Economic load dispatch problem based on search and rescue optimization algorithm. IEEE Access. 10:47109–47123.
   Google Scholar
• Seki HA, Shirima DD, Courtney Mustaphi CJ, Marchant R, Munishi PK. 2018. The impact of land use and land cover change on biodiversity within and adjacent to Kibasira Swamp in Kilombero Valley, Tanzania. Afr J Ecol. 56(3):518–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabani A, Asgarian B, Gharebaghi SA, Salido MA, Giret A. 2019. A new optimization algorithm based on search and rescue operations. Math Probl Eng. 2019:2482543. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2482543
   Google Scholar
• Shahzad N, Ding X, Abbas S. 2022. A comparative assessment of machine learning models for landslide susceptibility mapping in the rugged terrain of northern Pakistan. Appl Sci. 12(5):2280.
   Google Scholar
• Shu H, Guo Z, Qi S, Song D, Pourghasemi HR, Ma J. 2021. Integrating landslide typology with weighted frequency ratio model for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study from Lanzhou city of northwestern China. Remote Sens. 13(18):3623.
   Google Scholar
• Shu H, Hürlimann M, Molowny-Horas R, González M, Pinyol J, Abancó C, Ma J. 2019. Relation between land cover and landslide susceptibility in Val d‘Aran, Pyrenees (Spain): historical aspects, present situation and forward prediction. Sci Total Environ. 693:133557. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969719334771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steger S, Mair V, Kofler C, Pittore M, Zebisch M, Schneiderbauer S. 2021. Correlation does not imply geomorphic causation in data-driven landslide susceptibility modelling–benefits of exploring landslide data collection effects. Sci Total Environ. 776:145935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun D, Xu J, Wen H, Wang D. 2021. Assessment of landslide susceptibility mapping based on Bayesian hyperparameter optimization: a comparison between logistic regression and random forest. Eng Geol. 281:105972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyagi A, Tiwari RK, James N. 2022. Mapping the landslide susceptibility considering future land-use land-cover scenario. Landslides. 20:65–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vapnik V, Guyon I, Hastie T. 1995. Support vector machines. Mach Learn. 20(3):273–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojteková J, Vojtek M. 2020. Assessment of landslide susceptibility at a local spatial scale applying the multi-criteria analysis and GIS: a case study from Slovakia. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 11(1):131–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Li W, Liu P, Bai H, Wang Q, He J, Liu Y, Sun S. 2016. Application of analytic hierarchy process model for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Gangu County, Gansu Province, China. Environ Earth Sci. 75(5):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao T, Yin K, Yao T, Liu S. 2019. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using GIS-based statistical and machine learning models in Wanzhou County, Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Acta Geochim. 38(5):654–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu K, Guo Q, Li Z, Xiao J, Qin Y, Chen D, Kong C. 2015. Landslide susceptibility evaluation based on BPNN and GIS: a case of Guojiaba in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 29(7):1111–1124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalcin A, Reis S, Aydinoglu A, Yomralioglu T. 2011. A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, Ne Turkey. Catena. 85(3):274–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao X, Tham L, Dai F. 2008. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: a case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China. Geomorphology. 101(4):572–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef AM, Pourghasemi HR. 2021. Landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning algorithms and comparison of their performance at Abha Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia. Geosci Front. 12(2):639–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef AM, Pourghasemi HR, Pourtaghi ZS, Al-Katheeri MM. 2016. Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest, boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and general linear models and comparison of their performance at Wadi Tayyah Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia. Landslides. 13(5):839–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Xiao M, Gao L, Pan Q. 2018. Queuing search algorithm: a novel metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Appl Math Modell. 63:464–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Fu Q, Wang H, Liu F, Wang H, Han L. 2021. Bagging-based machine learning algorithms for landslide susceptibility modeling. Nat Hazards. 110:823–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou S, Zhang Y, Tan X, Abbas SM. 2021. A comparative study of the bivariate, multivariate and machine-learning-based statistical models for landslide susceptibility mapping in a seismic-prone region in China. Arabian J Geosci. 14(6):1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Wen H, Zhang Y, Xu J, Zhang W. 2021. Landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid random forest with GeoDetector and RFE for factor optimization. Geosci Front. 12(5):101211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu D, Song K, Mu J, Huang H, Du H, Xiazhuang F, Sun C. 2021. Effect of climate change induced extreme precipitation on landslide activity in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 80(2):781–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar