Assessing the accuracy of sensitivity analysis: an application for a cellular automata model of Bogota’s urban wetland changes

References

• Azari M, Billa L, Chan A. 2022. Multi-temporal analysis of past and future land cover change in the highly urbanized state of Selangor, Malaysia. Ecol Process [Internet]. 11(1):1–15. [accessed 2022 December 11].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks A, Castle C, Batty M. 2008. Key challenges in agent-based modelling for geo-spatial simulation. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 32(6):417–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPENVURBSYS.2008.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Crosetto M, Tarantola S, Saltelli A. 2000. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in spatial modelling based on GIS. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 81(1):71–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Pacheco J, Delden H v, Hewitt R. 2018. The importance of scale in land use models: experiments in data conversion, data resampling, resolution and neighborhood extent. In: geomatic approaches for modeling land change scenarios lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography [Internet]. Cham: Springer; p. 163–186. [accessed 2022 February 19].
   Google Scholar
• Eastman JR. 2020. TerrSet 2020 Tutorial [Internet]. Clark University; p. 449. [email protected]
   Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2020. ArcGIS Pro. CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett T. 2006. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett. 27(8):861–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Gao C, Wang R, Li P, Xi M, Jin Y, Tong X. 2022. A moving window-based spatial assessment method for dynamic urban growth simulations. Geocarto International, 37-27, 15282-15301.
   Google Scholar
• Gaudreau J, Perez L, Drapeau P. 2016. BorealFireSim: a GIS-based cellular automata model of wildfires for the boreal forest of Quebec in a climate change paradigm. Ecol Inform [Internet]. 32:12–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen-Zanker A. 2009. An improved Fuzzy Kappa statistic that accounts for spatial autocorrelation. Int J Geograph Inform Sci [Internet]. 23(1):61–73. [accessed 2022 February 7].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijmans RJ. 2022. raster: geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 3.5-15; CRAN.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Humboldt Colombia. 2018. Transiciones socioecológicas hacia la sostenibilidad. Gestión de la biodiversidad en los procesos de cambio en el territorio continental colombiano. Bogotá: Instituto Humboldt Colombia.
   Google Scholar
• Islam K, Rahman MF, Jashimuddin M. 2018. Modeling land use change using cellular automata and artificial neural network: the case of Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh. Ecol Indic. 88:439–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Wang W, Chen Y, Liu J, Tang H, Hou P, Yang Y. 2012. Quantifying driving forces of urban wetlands change in Beijing City. J Geograph Sci [Internet]. 22(2):301–314. [accessed 2022 May 30].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantakumar LN, Kumar S, Schneider K. 2020. What drives urban growth in Pune? A logistic regression and relative importance analysis perspective. Sustain Cities Soc. 60(102269):102269.
   Google Scholar
• Kocabas V, Dragicevic S. 2006. Assessing cellular automata model behaviour using a sensitivity analysis approach. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 30(6):921–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhu X, Sun X, Wang F. 2010. Landscape effects of environmental impact on bay-area wetlands under rapid urban expansion and development policy: a case study of Lianyungang, China. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 94(3–4):218–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang X, Liu X, Li X, Chen Y, Tian H, Yao Y. 2018. Delineating multi-scenario urban growth boundaries with a CA-based FLUS model and morphological method. Landsc Urban Plan. 177:47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Liang X, Li X, Xu X, Ou J, Chen Y, Li S, Wang S, Pei F. 2017. A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 168:94–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarigal L, Marks BJ. 1994. FRAGSTATS manual: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. [accessed 2022 February 7]. http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/gtr_351.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Misión Humedales de Bogotá. 2021. Misión para la gestión integral de los humedales Bogotá [Internet]. Secretaria de Ambiente. Bogota. https://ambientebogota.gov.co/documents/10184/2565901/Recomendaciones+POT.pdf/44c91c0e-0c08-4659-bfad-8d328aacf849.
   Google Scholar
• Pontius R, Boersma W, Jean-Christophe C, Keith C, De T, Nijs D, Charles D, Zengqiang F, Eric G, Noah K, et al. 2008. Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. Ann Reg Sci. 42(1):11–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius RG, Millones M. 2011a. Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. Int J Remote Sens [Internet]. 32(15):4407–4429. [accessed 2020 November 26].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius RG, Millones M. 2011b. Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. Int J Remote Sens. 32(15):4407–4429. [accessed 2020 November 23].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius RG, Si K. 2014. The total operating characteristic to measure diagnostic ability for multiple thresholds. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 28(3):570–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2020. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Internet]. https://www.r-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention Secretariat. 2019. La Colombie inscrit deux nouvelles Zones humides d’importance internationale [Internet]. https://www.ramsar.org/fr/news/la-colombie-inscrit-deux-nouvelles-zones-humides-dimportance-internationale.
   Google Scholar
• Roodposhti MS, Hewitt RJ, Bryan BA. 2020. Towards automatic calibration of neighbourhood influence in cellular automata land-use models. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 79(101416):101416.
   Google Scholar
• Saha TK, Pal S, Sarkar R. 2021. Prediction of wetland area and depth using linear regression model and artificial neural network based cellular automata. Ecol Inform [Internet]. 62:101272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secretaria Distrital de Ambiente. 2019. Corredor Ecológico Ronda | Ideca [Internet]
   Google Scholar
• Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Asghari A, Taleai M, Helbich M, Tayyebi A. 2017. Sensitivity analysis and accuracy assessment of the land transformation model using cellular automata. GIsci Remote Sens [Internet]. 54(5):639–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaohui Y, Zhongping Z. 2013. Spatial-temporal changes of urban wetlands shape and driving force analysis using fractal dimension in Wuhan City, China. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering [Internet]. Paris, France: Atlantis Press; p. 540–543.
   Google Scholar
• Tian Y, Li J, Wang S, Ai B, Cai H, Wen Z. 2021. Spatio-temporal changes and driving force analysis of wetlands in Jiaozhou Bay. J Coast Res. 38(2):328–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiné M, Perez L, Molowny-Horas R, Darveau M. 2019. Hybrid spatiotemporal simulation of future changes in open wetlands: a study of the Abitibi-Témiscamingue region, Québec, Canada. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform. 74(September 2018):302–313.
   Google Scholar
• Tong X, Feng Y. 2019. A review of assessment methods for cellular automata models of land-use change and urban growth. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 34(5):866–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2019.1684499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga OG, Pontius RG, Singh SK, Szabó S. 2019. Intensity analysis and the figure of merit’s components for assessment of a cellular automata – Markov simulation model. Ecol Indic [Internet]. 101:933–942. [accessed 2021 December 20].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser H, Nijs T. 2006. The map comparison next term kit. Environ Modell Software. 21(3):346–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallentin G, Neuwirth C. 2017. Dynamic hybrid modelling: Switching between AB and SD designs of a predator-prey model. Ecol Modell. 345:165–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Guo J, Zhang B, Zeng H. 2021. Simulating urban land growth by incorporating historical information into a cellular automata model. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 214(June):104168.
   Google Scholar
• Xu T, Gao J, Coco G. 2019. Simulation of urban expansion via integrating artificial neural network with Markov chain–cellular automata. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 33(10):1960–1983. [accessed 2020 December 6]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Wang P, Xiong P, Li C, Quan B. 2021. Spatial pattern simulation of land use based on flus model under ecological protection: A case study of hengyang city. Sustainability (Switzerland). 13(18):10458. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810458.
   Google Scholar