Assessment of ensemble learning for object-based land cover mapping using multi-temporal Sentinel-1/2 images

References

• Almeida Cd, Coutinho AC, Esquerdo JCDM, AdamiI M, Venturieri A. 2016. High spatial resolution land use and land cover mapping of the Brazilian Legal Amazon in 2008 using Landsat-5/TM and MODIS data. Acta Amaz. 46:291–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman NS. 1992. An introduction to Kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. Am Stat. 46:175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban Y, Hu H, Rangel IM. 2010. Fusion of Quickbird MS and RADARSAT SAR data for urban land-cover mapping: object-based and knowledge-based approach. Int J Remote Sens. 31:1391–1410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning. 45:p. 5–32.
   Google Scholar
• Brown CF, Brumby SP, Guzder-Williams B, Birch T, Hyde SB, Mazzariello J, Czerwinski W, Pasquarella VJ, Haertel R, Ilyushchenko S, et al. 2022. Dynamic World, Near real-time global 10 m land use land cover mapping. Sci Data. 9:1–17. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-022-01307-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao B, Yu L, Naipal V, Ciais P, Li W, Zhao Y, Wei W, Chen D, Liu Z, Gong P. 2021. A 30 m terrace mapping in China using Landsat 8 imagery and digital elevation model based on the Google Earth Engine. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 13:2437–2456. English. https:// essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2437/2021/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro P d, Yin H, Teixera Junior PD, Lacerda E, Pedroso R, Lautenbach S, Vicens RS. 2022. Sugarcane abandonment mapping in Rio de Janeiro state Brazil. Remote Sens Environ. 280:113194. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425722003042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Chen J, Liao A, Cao X, Chen L, Chen X, He C, Han G, Peng S, Lu M, et al. 2015. Global land cover mapping at 30m resolution: a POK-based operational approach. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 103:7–27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271614002275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Tu Y, Song Y, Theobald DM, Zhang T, Ren Z, Li X, Yang J, Wang J, Wang X, et al. 2021. Mapping essential urban land use categories with open big data: results for five metropolitan areas in the United States of America. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 178:203–218. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271621001684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• China Statistical Yearbook. 2019. 2019. [S.l.]: CHINA STATISTICS PRESS. ISBN: 9787503788970.
   Google Scholar
• Conners RW, Trivedi MM, Harlow CA. 1984. Segmentation of a high-resolution urban scene using texture operators. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Process. 25:273–310.
   Google Scholar
• Corbane C, Faure J-F, Baghdadi N, Villeneuve N, Petit M. 2008. Rapid urban mapping using SAR/optical imagery synergy. Sensors (Basel). 8(11):7125–7143. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/8/11/7125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes C, Vapnik V. 1995. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 20:273–297. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00994018.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deus D. 2016. Integration of ALOS PALSAR and landsat data for land cover and forest mapping in Northern Tanzania. Land. 5:43. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/5/4/43.
   Google Scholar
• Drăguţ L, Csillik O, Eisank C, Tiede D. 2014. Automated parameterisation for multi-scale image segmentation on multiple layers. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 88(100):119–127. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271613002803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du P, Xia J, Zhang W, Tan K, Liu Y, Liu S. 2012. Multiple classifier system for remote sensing image classification: a review. Sensors (Basel). 12(4):4764–4792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Z, Yang J, Ou C, Zhang T. 2021. Agricultural land abandonment and retirement mapping in the Northern China crop-pasture band using temporal consistency check and trajectory-based change detection approach. IEEE Transact Geosci Remote Sens. 60(1):1-12.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin SE, Peddle DR. 1990. Classification of SPOT HRV imagery and texture features. Remote Sens. 11(3):551–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedl MA, Sulla-Menashe D, Tan B, Schneider A, Ramankutty N, Sibley A, Huang X. 2010. MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets. Remote Sens Environ. 114(1):168–182. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425709002673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao B-c. 1996. NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sens Environ. 58(3):257–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamedianfar A, Gibril MBA, Hosseinpoor M, Pellikka PKE. 2022. Synergistic use of particle swarm optimization, artificial neural network, and extreme gradient boosting algorithms for urban LULC mapping from WorldView-3 images. Geocarto Int. 37(3):773–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein IH. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Sys Man Cybernet. SMC-3(6):610–621.
   Google Scholar
• He Y, Lee E, Warner TA. 2017. A time series of annual land use and land cover maps of China from 1982 to 2013 generated using AVHRR GIMMS NDVI3g data. Remote Sens Environ. 199:201–217. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425717303255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Davis LS, Townshend JRG. 2002. An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. Int J Remote Sens. 23(4):725–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes G, G 1968. On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory. 14(1):55–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhonnerie R, Siregar VP, Nababan B, Prasetyo LB, Wouthuyzen S. 2015. Random forest classification for mangrove land cover mapping using landsat 5 TM and Alos Palsar imageries. Procedia Environ Sci. 24:215–221. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878029615000961.
   Google Scholar
• Kavzoglu T, Colkesen I. 2009. A kernel functions analysis for support vector machines for land cover classification. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 11(5):352–359. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303243409000464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna Karra C, Kontgis Z, Statman-Weil JC, Mazzariello M, Mathis S, Brumby. 2021. Global land use/land cover with Sentinel 2 and deep learning. 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Global-land-use-%2F-land-cover-with-Sentinel-2-and-Karra-Kontgis/0867e552c141208e6af89184fc61b9d0e494b965.
   Google Scholar
• Ma L, Fu T, Blaschke T, Li M, Tiede D, Zhou Z, Ma X, Chen D. 2017. Evaluation of feature selection methods for object-based land cover mapping of unmanned aerial vehicle imagery using random forest and support vector machine classifiers. IJGI. 6(2):51. https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/6/2/51/pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Liu Y, Zhang X, Ye Y, Yin G, Johnson BA. 2019. Deep learning in remote sensing applications: a meta-analysis and review. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 152:166–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maselli F, Chirici G, Bottai L, Corona P, Marchetti M. 2005. Estimation of Mediterranean forest attributes by the application of k‐NN procedures to multitemporal Landsat ETM + images. Int J Remote Sens. 26(17):3781–3796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myint SW, Gober P, Brazel A, Grossman-Clarke S, Weng Q. 2011. Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sens Environ;115:1145–1161. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425711000034.
   Google Scholar
• Pal M. 2005. Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification. Int J Remote Sens. 26(1):217–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal M, Foody GM. 2010. Feature selection for classification of hyperspectral data by SVM. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 48(5):2297–2307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal M, Mather PM. 2005. Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens. 26(5):1007–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul S, Kumar DN. 2019. Evaluation of feature selection and feature extraction techniques on multi-temporal landsat-8 images for crop classification. Remote Sens Earth Syst Sci. 2(4):197–207. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41976-019-00024-8.
   Google Scholar
• Pavanelli JAP, Santos J, Galvão LS, Xaud M, Xaud HAM. 2018. PALSAR-2/ALOS-2 and OLI/LANDSAT-8 data integration for land use and land cover mapping in Northern Brazilian Amazon. Bol Ciênc Geod. 24(2):250–269.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira LO, Freitas CC, SantaAnna SJS, Reis MS. 2018. Evaluation of optical and radar images integration methods for LULC classification in Amazon region. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens. 11(9):3062–3074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW. 1974. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. NASA Special Publication. 351:309.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz D, Yin H, Tischbein B, Verleysdonk S, Adamou R, Kumar N. 2021. Land use mapping using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 time series in a heterogeneous landscape in Niger, Sahel. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 178:97–111. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271621001635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentinel-1 - Missions - Sentinel Online. 2020. [place unknown]: [publisher unknown]; [updated 2020 May 14; accessed 2020 May 14]. https://sentinel.esa.int/web/sentinel/missions/sentinel-1.
   Google Scholar
• Sentinel-2 - Missions - Sentinel Online. 2020. [place unknown]: [publisher unknown]; [updated 2020 May 14; accessed 2020 May 14]. https://sentinel.esa.int/web/sentinel/missions/sentinel-2.
   Google Scholar
• Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Khazaei M, Alavipanah SK, Weng Q. 2021. Google Earth Engine for large-scale land use and land cover mapping: an object-based classification approach using spectral, textural and topographical factors. GISci Remote Sens. 58(6):914–928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromann O, Nascetti A, Yousif O, Ban Y. 2019. Dimensionality reduction and feature selection for object-based land cover classification based on Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 time series using Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens. 12(1):76. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/1/76/pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Torres R, Snoeij P, Geudtner D, Bibby D, Davidson M, Attema E, Potin P, Rommen B, Floury N, Brown M, et al. 2012. GMES Sentinel-1 mission. Remote Sens Environ. 120:9–24. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425712000600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venter ZS, Barton DN, Chakraborty T, Simensen T, Singh G. 2022. Global 10 m land use land cover datasets: A comparison of dynamic world, world cover and Esri land cover. Remote Sens. 14(16):4101. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/16/4101.
   Google Scholar
• Walter V. 2004. Object-based classification of remote sensing data for change detection. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 58(3–4):225–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolter PT, Mladenoff DJ, Host GE, Crow TR. 1995. Using multi-temporal landsat imagery. Photogramm Engin Remote Sens. 61:1129–1143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao W, Xu S, He T. 2021. Mapping paddy rice with Sentinel-1/2 and phenology-, object-based algorithm—A implementation in Hangjiahu Plain in China using GEE platform. Remote Sens. 13(5):990.
   Google Scholar
• Zanaga D, van de Kerchove R, Daems D, Keersmaecker W, de Brockmann C, Kirches G, Wevers J, Cartus O, Santoro M, Fritz S, et al. 2022. ESA WorldCover 10 m 2021 v200. Europe: Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/record/7254221#.Y8VM2HZBxdA.
   Google Scholar
• Zanaga D, van de Kerchove R, Keersmaecker W d, Souverijns N, Brockmann C, Quast R, Wevers J, Grosu A, Paccini A, Vergnaud S, et al. 2021. ESA WorldCover 10 m 2020 v100.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C. 2015. Applying data fusion techniques for benthic habitat mapping and monitoring in a coral reef ecosystem. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 104:213–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Liu L, Chen X, Gao Y, Xie S, Mi J. 2021. GLC_FCS30: global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30 m using time-series Landsat imagery. Earth Syst Sci Data. 13(6):2753–2776. https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/2753/2021/essd-13-2753-2021-discussion.html.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Selch D, Cooper H. 2016. A framework to combine three remotely sensed data sources for vegetation mapping in the Central Florida everglades. Wetlands. 36(2):201–213. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13157-015-0730-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Smith M, Fang C. 2018. Evaluation of Goddard’s LiDAR, hyperspectral, and thermal data products for mapping urban land-cover types. GISci Remote Sens. 55(1):90–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Woodcock CE, Rogan J, Kellndorfer J. 2012. Assessment of spectral, polarimetric, temporal, and spatial dimensions for urban and peri-urban land cover classification using Landsat and SAR data. Remote Sens Environ. 117:72–82. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425711002823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar