Spatial-temporal dynamics of transboundary forest disturbance-recovery and its influencing factors in the central Himalayas

References

• Aldwaik SZ, Pontius RG. Jr., 2012. Intensity analysis to unify measurements of size and stationarity of land changes by interval, category, and transition. Landscape Urban Plann. 106(1):103–114. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen CD, Breshears DD, Mcdowell NG. 2015. On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die‐off from hotter drought in the anthropocene. Ecosphere. 6(8):art129. doi: 10.1890/ES15-00203.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryal RR, Wespestad C, Kennedy R, Dilger J, Dyson K, Bullock E, Khanal N, Kono M, Poortinga A, Saah D, et al. 2021. Lessons learned while implementing a time-series approach to forest canopy disturbance detection in nepal. Remote Sensing. 13(14):2666. doi: 10.3390/rs13142666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bański J, Janicki W. 2013. The influence of the eu’s eastern frontier on the socioeconomic situation of border areas. Eur Urban Reg Stud. 20(3):299–313. doi: 10.1177/0969776411432991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebi P, Kulakowski D, Rixen C. 2009. Snow avalanche disturbances in forest ecosystems—state of research and implications for management. For Ecol Manage. 257(9):1883–1892. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohner J. 2006. General climatic controls and topoclimatic variations in central and high asia. Boreas. 35(2):279–295. doi: 10.1080/03009480500456073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman DMJS, Kolden CA, Abatzoglou JT, Johnston FH, Van Der Werf GR, Flannigan M. 2020. Vegetation fires in the anthropocene. Nat Rev Earth Environ. 1(10):500–515. doi: 10.1038/s43017-020-0085-3.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd DS, Danson FM. 2005. Satellite remote sensing of forest resources: three decades of research development. Prog Phys Geogr. 29(1):1–26. doi: 10.1191/0309133305pp432ra.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45(1):5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock EL, Woodcock CE. 2021. Carbon loss and removal due to forest disturbance and regeneration in the amazon. Sci Total Environ. 764:142839. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell AL, Sun Q, Baxter R, Kukavskaya EA, Zhila S, Shestakova T, Rogers BM, Kaduk J, Barrett K. 2022. Climate change, fire return intervals and the growing risk of permanent forest loss in boreal eurasia. Sci Total Environ. 831:154885. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustamante MMC, Roitman I, Aide TM, Alencar A, Anderson LO, Aragão L, Asner GP, Barlow J, Berenguer E, Chambers J, et al. 2016. Toward an integrated monitoring framework to assess the effects of tropical forest degradation and recovery on carbon stocks and biodiversity. Glob Chang Biol. 22(1):92–109., doi: 10.1111/gcb.13087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty A, Ghosh A, Sachdeva K, Joshi PK. 2017. Characterizing fragmentation trends of the himalayan forests in the kumaon region of uttarakhand, india. Ecol Inf. 38:95–109. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2016.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlery L, Nielsen MR, Meilby H, Smith-Hall C. 2016. Effects of new roads on environmental resource use in the central himalaya. Sustainability. 8(4):363. doi: 10.3390/su8040363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhary RP. 2000. Forest conservation and environmental management in nepal: a review. Biodiversity & Conservation. 9(9):1235–1260. doi: 10.1023/A:1008900216876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Park T, Wang X, Piao S, Xu B, Chaturvedi RK, Fuchs R, Brovkin V, Ciais P, Fensholt R, et al. 2019. China and india lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nat Sustain. 2(2):122–129., doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0220-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane MA, Alencar A, Schulze MD, Souza CM, Jr., Nepstad DC, Lefebvre P, Davidson EA. 1999. Positive feedbacks in the fire dynamic of closed canopy tropical forests. Science. 284(5421):1832–1835. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5421.1832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen WB, Yang Z, Healey SP, Kennedy RE, Gorelick N. 2018. A landtrendr multispectral ensemble for forest disturbance detection. Remote Sens Environ. 205:131–140. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.11.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui B, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Gu C, Liu L, Wei B, Gong D, Rai MK. 2022. Ecological risk assessment of transboundary region based on land-cover change: a case study of gandaki river basin, himalayas. Land. 11(5):638. doi: 10.3390/land11050638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Cruz DC, Benayas JMR, Ferreira GC, Santos SR, Schwartz G. 2021. An overview of forest loss and restoration in the brazilian amazon. New For. 52(1):1–16. doi: 10.1007/s11056-020-09777-3.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Forest Research and Survey. 2015. State of Nepal’s Forests. Kathmandu: Department of Forest Research and Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Dhyani S, Dhyani D. 2020. Local socio-economic dynamics shaping Forest ecosystems in Central Himalayas. In: Roy N, Roychoudhury S, Nautiyal S, Agarwal S, Baksi S. editors. Socio-economic and eco-biological dimensions in resource use and conservation. Cham, CH: Springer; p. 31–60.
   Google Scholar
• Flood N. 2013. Seasonal composite landsat tm/etm + images using the medoid (a multi-dimensional median). Remote Sens. 5(12):6481–6500. doi: 10.3390/rs5126481.
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbanian A, Kakooei M, Amani M, Mahdavi S, Mohammadzadeh A, Hasanlou M. 2020. Improved land cover map of iran using sentinel imagery within google earth engine and a novel automatic workflow for land cover classification using migrated training samples. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 167:276–288. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson L, Lee TM, Koh LP, Brook BW, Gardner TA, Barlow J, Peres CA, Bradshaw CJA, Laurance WF, Lovejoy TE, et al. 2011. Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature. 478(7369):378–381. doi: 10.1038/nature10425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez C, White JC, Wulder MA. 2016. Optical remotely sensed time series data for land cover classification: a review. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 116:55–72. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, Ilyushchenko S, Thau D, Moore R. 2017. Google earth engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens Environ. 202:18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu C, Zhao P, Chen Q, Li S, Li L, Liu L, Zhang Y. 2020. Forest cover change and the effectiveness of protected areas in the himalaya since 1998. Sustainability. 12(15):6123. doi: 10.3390/su12156123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurung LJ, Miller KK, Venn S, Bryan BA. 2021. Climate change adaptation for managing non-timber forest products in the nepalese himalaya. Sci Total Environ. 796:148853. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamunyela E, Brandt P, Shirima D, Do HTT, Herold M, Roman-Cuesta RM. 2020. Space-time detection of deforestation, forest degradation and regeneration in montane forests of eastern tanzania. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 88:102063. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA, Tyukavina A, Thau D, Stehman SV, Goetz SJ, Loveland TR, et al. 2013. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science. 342(6160):850–853., doi: 10.1126/science.1244693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Hu Y. 2020. Detecting forest disturbance and recovery in primorsky krai, russia, using annual landsat time series and multi–source land cover products. Remote Sensing. 12(1):129. doi: 10.3390/rs12010129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Goward SN, Masek JG, Thomas N, Zhu Z, Vogelmann JE. 2010. An automated approach for reconstructing recent forest disturbance history using dense landsat time series stacks. Remote Sens Environ. 114(1):183–198. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2014. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press Cambridge; 1132.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy RE, Yang Z, Cohen WB. 2010. Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly landsat time series: 1. Landtrendr—temporal segmentation algorithms. Remote Sens Environ. 114(12):2897–2910. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy RE, Yang Z, Gorelick N, Braaten J, Cavalcante L, Cohen WB, Healey S. 2018. Implementation of the landtrendr algorithm on google earth engine. Remote Sens. 10(5):691. doi: 10.3390/rs10050691.
   Google Scholar
• Littell JS, Peterson DL, Riley KL, Liu Y, Luce CH. 2016. A review of the relationships between drought and forest fire in the United States. Glob Chang Biol. 22(7):2353–2369. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Rasul G. 2007. Climate change, the himalayan mountains, and ICIMOD. Sustain Moun Dev. 53:11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Wang WJ, Ballantyne A, He HS, Wang X, Liu S, Ciais P, Wimberly MC, Piao S, Yu K, et al. 2023. Forest disturbance decreased in china from 1986 to 2020 despite regional variations. Commun Earth Environ. 4(1):15. doi: 10.1038/s43247-023-00676-x.
   Google Scholar
• Liu S, Wei X, Li D, Lu D. 2017. Examining forest disturbance and recovery in the subtropical forest region of zhejiang province using landsat time-series data. Remote Sens. 9(5):479. doi: 10.3390/rs9050479.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Yong DL, Choi C-Y, Gibson L. 2020. Transboundary frontiers: an emerging priority for biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 35(8):679–690. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannan A, Liu J, Zhongke F, Khan TU, Saeed S, Mukete B, ChaoYong S, Yongxiang F, Ahmad A, Amir M, et al. 2019. Application of land-use/land cover changes in monitoring and projecting forest biomass carbon loss in pakistan. Global Ecol Conserv. 17:e00535. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masek JG, Goward SN, Kennedy RE, Cohen WB, Moisen GG, Schleeweis K, Huang C. 2013. United states forest disturbance trends observed using landsat time series. Ecosystems. 16(6):1087–1104. doi: 10.1007/s10021-013-9669-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matricardi E, Skole DL, Costa OB, Pedlowski MA, Samek JH, Miguel EP. 2020. Long-term forest degradation surpasses deforestation in the Brazilian amazon. Science. 369(6509):1378–1382. doi: 10.1126/science.abb3021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milodowski DT, Mitchard ETA, Williams M. 2017. Forest loss maps from regional satellite monitoring systematically underestimate deforestation in two rapidly changing parts of the amazon. Environ Res Lett. 12(9):094003. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7e1e.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittermeier RA, Turner WR, Larsen FW, Brooks TM, Gascon C. 2011. Global biodiversity conservation: the critical role of hotspots. In: Zachos FE, Habel JC, editors. Biodiversity hotspots. Berlin: Springer; 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Nandy S, Kushwaha SPS, Dadhwal VK. 2011. Forest degradation assessment in the upper catchment of the river tons using remote sensing and GIS. Ecol Indic. 11(2):509–513. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie Y, Sheng Y, Liu Q, Liu L, Liu S, Zhang Y, Song C. 2017. A regional-scale assessment of himalayan glacial lake changes using satellite observations from 1990 to 2015. Remote Sens Environ. 189:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris J, Carvalho L, Jones C, Cannon F. 2020. Warming and drying over the central himalaya caused by an amplification of local mountain circulation. Npj Clim Atmos Sci. 3(1):1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41612-019-0105-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldekop JA, Sims KRE, Karna BK, Whittingham MJ, Agrawal A. 2019. Reductions in deforestation and poverty from decentralized forest management in nepal. Nat Sustain. 2(5):421–428. doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0277-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panta M, Kim K, Joshi C. 2008. Temporal mapping of deforestation and forest degradation in Nepal: applications to forest conservation. For Ecol Manage. 256(9):1587–1595. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.07.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paudel B, Zhang Y-L, Li S-C, Liu L-S, Wu X, Khanal NR. 2016. Review of studies on land use and land cover change in Nepal. J Mt Sci. 13(4):643–660. doi: 10.1007/s11629-015-3604-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paudel B, Zhang Y, Yan J, Rai R, Li L. 2019. Farmers’ perceptions of agricultural land use changes in Nepal and their major drivers. J Environ Manage. 235:432–441. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel MC, Finlayson BL, Mcmahon TA. 2007. Updated world map of the köppen-geiger climate classification. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 11(5):1633–1644. doi: 10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao KS, Pant R. 2001. Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a typical micro watershed in the mid elevation zone of central Himalaya, India. Agricult Ecosyst Environ. 86(2):113–124. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00274-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed GF, Lynn F, Meade BD. 2002. Use of coefficient of variation in assessing variability of quantitative assays. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 9(6):1235–1239. doi: 10.1128/cdli.9.6.1235-1239.2002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roy DP, Kovalskyy V, Zhang HK, Vermote EF, Yan L, Kumar SS, Egorov A. 2016. Characterization of landsat-7 to landsat-8 reflective wavelength and normalized difference vegetation index continuity. Remote Sens Environ. 185:57–70. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahana M, Hong H, Sajjad H, Liu J, Zhu AX. 2018. Assessing deforestation susceptibility to forest ecosystem in Rudraprayag District, India using fragmentation approach and frequency ratio model. Sci Total Environ. 627:1264–1275. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl R, Thom D, Kautz M, Martin-Benito D, Peltoniemi M, Vacchiano G, Wild J, Ascoli D, Petr M, Honkaniemi J, et al. 2017. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat Clim Chang. 7(6):395–402. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen PK. 1968. Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J Am Stat Assoc. 63(324):1379–1389. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senf C, Seidl R. 2020. Mapping the forest disturbance regimes of Europe. Nat Sustain. 4(1):63–70. doi: 10.1038/s41893-020-00609-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senf C, Seidl R, Poulter B., 2022. Post‐disturbance canopy recovery and the resilience of Europe’s forests. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 31(1):25–36. doi: 10.1111/geb.13406.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma M, Areendran G, Raj K, Sharma A, Joshi PK. 2016. Multitemporal analysis of forest fragmentation in Hindu Kush Himalaya—a case study from khangchendzonga biosphere reserve, Sikkim, India. Environ Monit Assess. 188(10):596. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5577-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen J, Chen G, Hua J, Huang S, Ma J. 2022. Contrasting forest loss and gain patterns in subtropical china detected using an integrated Landtrendr and machine-learning method. Remote Sensing. 14(13):3238. doi: 10.3390/rs14133238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha BB, Shrestha UB, Sharma KP, Thapa-Parajuli RB, Devkota A, Siwakoti M. 2019. Community perception and prioritization of invasive alien plants in chitwan-annapurna landscape, Nepal. J Environ Manage. 229:38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigdel SR, Wang Y, Camarero JJ, Zhu H, Liang E, Peñuelas J. 2018. Moisture‐mediated responsiveness of treeline shifts to global warming in the Himalayas. Glob Chang Biol. 24(11):5549–5559. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan S, Sayer JA. 2015. Forest resources assessment of 2015 shows positive global trends but forest loss and degradation persist in poor tropical countries. For Ecol Manage. 352:134–145. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teegalapalli K, Datta A. 2016. Field to a forest: patterns of forest recovery following shifting cultivation in the eastern Himalaya. For Ecol Manage. 364:173–182. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thom D, Seidl R. 2016. Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 91(3):760–781. doi: 10.1111/brv.12193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP & FAO. 2020. The state of the world’s forests 2020. In: Andrea Perlis, editor. Forests, biodiversity and people. Rome. UNEP & FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Vancutsem C, Achard F, Pekel JF, Vieilledent G, Carboni S, Simonetti D, Gallego J, Aragao LEOC, Nasi R. 2021. Long-term (1990–2019) monitoring of forest cover changes in the humid tropics. Sci Adv. 7(10):eabe1603. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe1603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veblen TT, Hadley KS, Nel EM, Kitzberger T, Reid M, Villalba R. 1994. Disturbance regime and disturbance interactions in a rocky mountain subalpine forest. J Ecol. 82(1):125–135. doi: 10.2307/2261392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbesselt J, Hyndman R, Zeileis A, Culvenor D. 2010. Phenological change detection while accounting for abrupt and gradual trends in satellite image time series. Remote Sens Environ. 114(12):2970–2980. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma A, Schmidt-Vogt D, De Alban JDT, Lim CL, Webb EL. 2021. Drivers and mechanisms of forest change in the Himalayas. Global Environ Change. 68:102244. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Zhang T, Fu B. 2016. A measure of spatial stratified heterogeneity. Ecol Indic. 67:250–256. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimberly MC, Dwomoh FK, Numata I, Mensah F, Amoako J, Nekorchuk DM, Mcmahon A. 2022. Historical trends of degradation, loss, and recovery in the tropical forest reserves of Ghana. Int J Digital Earth. 15(1):30–51. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2021.2012533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Paudel B, Zhang Y, Liu L, Wang Z, Xie F, Gao J, Sun X. 2021. Vertical distribution changes in land cover between 1990 and 2015 within the Koshi river basin, central Himalayas. J Geogr Sci. 31(10):1419–1436. doi: 10.1007/s11442-021-1904-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulder MA, Hermosilla T, White JC, Coops NC. 2020. Biomass status and dynamics over Canada’s forests: disentangling disturbed area from associated aboveground biomass consequences. Environ Res Lett. 15(9):094093. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab8b11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie F, Wu X, Liu L, Zhang Y, Paudel B. 2021. Land use and land cover change within the koshi river basin of the central Himalayas since 1990. J Mt Sci. 18(1):159–177. doi: 10.1007/s11629-019-5944-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yatskov MA, Harmon ME, Barrett TM, Dobelbower KR. 2019. Carbon pools and biomass stores in the forests of coastal Alaska: uncertainty of estimates and impact of disturbance. For Ecol Manage. 434:303–317. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin H, Pflugmacher D, Li A, Li Z, Hostert P. 2018. Land use and land cover change in inner mongolia-understanding the effects of china’s re-vegetation programs. Remote Sens Environ. 204:918–930. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.08.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Li B, Liu L, Zheng D. 2021. Redetermine the region and boundaries of Tibetan plateau. Geograph Res. 40(6):1543–1553.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wu X, Zheng D. 2020. Vertical differentiation of land cover in the central himalayas. J Geogr Sci. 30(6):969–987. doi: 10.1007/s11442-020-1765-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Liu X, Wu L, Tang Y, Meng Y. 2019. Long-term monitoring of cropland change near Dongting Lake, china, using the Landtrendr algorithm with Landsat imagery. Remote Sens. 11(10):1234. doi: 10.3390/rs11101234.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Wang S, Woodcock CE. 2015. Improvement and expansion of the FMASK algorithm: cloud, cloud shadow, and snow detection for Landsats 4–7, 8, and sentinel 2 images. Remote Sens Environ. 159:269–277. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Woodcock CE. 2014. Continuous change detection and classification of land cover using all available Landsat data. Remote Sens Environ. 144:152–171. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar