Urban land use land cover classification based on GF-6 satellite imagery and multi-feature optimization

References

• Abdi AMJG, Sensing R. 2020. Land cover and land use classification performance of machine learning algorithms in a boreal landscape using Sentinel-2 data. GISci Remote Sens. 57(1):1–20. doi: 10.1080/15481603.2019.1650447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelabu S, Mutanga O, Adam EJI. 2014. Evaluating the impact of red-edge band from Rapideye image for classifying insect defoliation levels. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 95:34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahamed T, Tian L, Zhang Y, Ting KJB. 2011. A review of remote sensing methods for biomass feedstock production. Biomass Bioenerg. 35(7):2455–2469. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai Y, Sun G, Li Y, Ma P, Li G, Zhang YJI. 2021. Comprehensively analyzing optical and polarimetric SAR features for land-use/land-cover classification and urban vegetation extraction in highly-dense urban area. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 103:102496. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgiu M, Drăguţ LJIJOP. 2016. Random forest in remote sensing: a review of applications and future directions. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 114:24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman LJM. 2001. Random forests. J Clin Microbiol. 45:5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Google Scholar
• Brewster CC, Allen JC, Kopp DDJAE. 1999. IPM from space: using satellite imagery to construct regional crop maps for studying crop—insect interaction. Am Entomol. 45:105–117. doi: 10.1093/ae/45.2.105.
   Google Scholar
• Cai B, Wang S, Wang L, Shao ZJ. 2019. Extraction of urban impervious surface from high-resolution remote sensing imagery based on deep learning. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 21:1420–1429.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson TN, Ripley DAJ. 1997. On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index. Remote Sens Environ. 62(3):241–252. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00104-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T, Guestrin C. 2016. Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, p. 785–794.
   Google Scholar
• Chen B, Huang B, Xu BJI. 2017. Multi-source remotely sensed data fusion for improving land cover classification. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 124:27–39. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi M, Feng R, Bruzzone LJ. 2008. Classification of hyperspectral remote-sensing data with primal SVM for small-sized training dataset problem. Adv Space Res. 41(11):1793–1799. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2008.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadashpoor H, Azizi P, Moghadasi MJ. 2019. Land use change, urbanization, and change in landscape pattern in a metropolitan area. Sci Total Environ. 655:707–719. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duveiller G, Weiss M, Baret F, Defourny PJR. 2011. Retrieving wheat Green Area Index during the growing season from optical time series measurements based on neural network radiative transfer inversion. Remote Sens Environ. 115(3):887–896. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehammer A, Fritsch S, Conrad C, Lamers J, Dech S. 2010. Statistical derivation of fPAR and LAI for irrigated cotton and rice in arid Uzbekistan by combining multi-temporal RapidEye data and ground measurements. In Remote sensing for agriculture, ecosystems, and hydrology XII, 66–75. SPIE. doi: 10.1117/12.864796.
   Google Scholar
• Eisavi V, Homayouni S, Yazdi AM, Alimohammadi AJE. 2015. Land cover mapping based on random forest classification of multitemporal spectral and thermal images. Environ Monit Assess. 187:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Fu P, Weng QJRE 2016. A time series analysis of urbanization induced land use and land cover change and its impact on land surface temperature with Landsat imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 175:205–214. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao B-CJR. 1996. NDWI—a normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sens Environ. 58(3):257–266. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00067-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georganos S, Grippa T, Vanhuysse S, Lennert M, Shimoni M, Kalogirou S, Wolff EJG. 2018. Less is more: optimizing classification performance through feature selection in a very-high-resolution remote sensing object-based urban application. GISci Remote Sens. 55(2):221–242. doi: 10.1080/15481603.2017.1408892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Sharma R, Joshi PJAG. 2014. Random forest classification of urban landscape using Landsat archive and ancillary data: combining seasonal maps with decision level fusion. Appl Geogr. 48:31–41. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo L, Chehata N, Mallet C, Boukir SJIJP. 2011. Relevance of airborne lidar and multispectral image data for urban scene classification using Random Forests. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 66(1):56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall-Beyer MJIJRS. 2017. Practical guidelines for choosing GLCM textures to use in landscape classification tasks over a range of moderate spatial scales. Int J Remote Sens. 38(5):1312–1338. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2016.1278314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houborg R, McCabe MFJRSE 2018. A cubesat enabled spatio-temporal enhancement method (CESTEM) utilizing planet, Landsat and MODIS data. Remote Sens Environ. 209:211–226. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huete ARJR. 1988. A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sens Environ. 25(3):295–309. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hütt C, Koppe W, Miao Y, Bareth GJR 2016. Best accuracy land use/land cover (LULC) classification to derive crop types using multitemporal, multisensor, and multi-polarization SAR satellite images. Remote Sens. 8(8):684. doi: 10.3390/rs8080684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozdani SE, Johnson BA, Chen DJRS. 2019. Comparing deep neural networks, ensemble classifiers, and support vector machine algorithms for object-based urban land use/land cover classification. Remote Sens. 11(14):1713. doi: 10.3390/rs11141713.
   Google Scholar
• Jun C, Ban Y, Li SJN. 2014. Open access to Earth land-cover map. Nature. 514(7523):434–434. doi: 10.1038/514434c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiala Z, Mutanga O, Odindi J, Peerbhay KJRS. 2019. Feature selection on sentinel-2 multispectral imagery for mapping a landscape infested by parthenium weed. Remote Sens. 11(16):1892. doi: 10.3390/rs11161892.
   Google Scholar
• Knight JF, Lunetta RS, Ediriwickrema J, Khorram SJG. 2006. Regional scale land cover characterization using MODIS-NDVI 250 m multi-temporal imagery: a phenology-based approach. GISci Remote Sens. 43(1):1–23. doi: 10.2747/1548-1603.43.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowe P, Mutanga O, Odindi J, Dube TJI. 2020. A quantitative framework for analysing long term spatial clustering and vegetation fragmentation in an urban landscape using multi-temporal landsat data. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 88:102057. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Jiang Q, Ma Y, Xiao Y, Cui YL. 2017. Object-oriented wetland classification based on hybrid feature selection method combining with relief F, multi-objective genetic algorithm and random forest. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach. 48:119–127.
   Google Scholar
• Lv ZY, Zhang P, Benediktsson JA, Shi WZJIJ. 2014. Morphological profiles based on differently shaped structuring elements for classification of images with very high spatial resolution. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens. 7(12):4644–4652. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2328618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Fu T, Blaschke T, Li M, Tiede D, Zhou Z, Ma X, Chen DJIIJG. 2017. Evaluation of feature selection methods for object-based land cover mapping of unmanned aerial vehicle imagery using random forest and support vector machine classifiers. IJGI. 6(2):51. doi: 10.3390/ijgi6020051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil MB, Desai CG, Umrikar BNJIJG. 2012. Image classification tool for land use/land cover analysis: a comparative study of maximum likelihood and minimum distance method. Int J Geol, Earth Environ Sci. 2:189–196.
   Google Scholar
• Peng H, Long F, Ding CJIT. 2005. Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 27(8):1226–1238. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflugmacher D, Rabe A, Peters M, Hostert PJR. 2019. Mapping pan-European land cover using Landsat spectral-temporal metrics and the European LUCAS survey. Remote Sens Environ. 221:583–595. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Galiano V, Chica-Olmo M, Abarca-Hernandez F, Atkinson PM, Jeganathan CJRSE. 2012a. Random Forest classification of Mediterranean land cover using multi-seasonal imagery and multi-seasonal texture. Remote Sens Environ. 121:93–107. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Galiano VF, Ghimire B, Rogan J, Chica-Olmo M, Rigol-Sanchez JPJI. 2012b. An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 67:93–104. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini R, Ghosh SKJJ. 2019. Analyzing the impact of red-edge band on land use land cover classification using multispectral RapidEye imagery and machine learning techniques. J Appl Rem Sens. 13(4):1. doi: 10.1117/1.JRS.13.044511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samat A, Li E, Wang W, Liu S, Lin C, Abuduwaili JJRS. 2020. Meta-XGBoost for hyperspectral image classification using extended MSER-guided morphological profiles. Remote Sens. 12(12):1973. doi: 10.3390/rs12121973.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler D, Hollstein A, Diedrich H, Segl K, Hostert PJR. 2017. AROSICS: an automated and robust open-source image co-registration software for multi-sensor satellite data. Remote Sens. 9(7):676. doi: 10.3390/rs9070676.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz D, Yin H, Tischbein B, Verleysdonk S, Adamou R, Kumar NJIJP. 2021. Land use mapping using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 time series in a heterogeneous landscape in Niger, Sahel. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 178:97–111. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senf C, Leitão PJ, Pflugmacher D, van der Linden S, Hostert PJRSE. 2015. Mapping land cover in complex Mediterranean landscapes using Landsat: improved classification accuracies from integrating multi-seasonal and synthetic imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 156:527–536. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao Z, Zhang Y, Zhou W. 2016. Long-term monitoring of the urban impervious surface mapping using time series Landsat imagery: a 23-year case study of the city of Wuhan in China. In 2016 4th International Workshop on Earth Observation and Remote Sensing Applications (EORSA), 212–216. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Ghosh A, Joshi PJJ. 2013. Decision tree approach for classification of remotely sensed satellite data using open source support. J Earth Syst Sci. 122(5):1237–1247. doi: 10.1007/s12040-013-0339-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromann O, Nascetti A, Yousif O, Ban YJRS. 2019. Dimensionality reduction and feature selection for object-based land cover classification based on Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 time series using Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens. 12(1):76. doi: 10.3390/rs12010076.
   Google Scholar
• Vadrevu K, Heinimann A, Gutman G, Justice CJI. 2019. Remote sensing of land use/cover changes in South and Southeast Asian Countries. Int J Digital Earth. 12(10):1099–1102. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2019.1654274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Huang J, Wang XJJ. 2008. Effects of band position and bandwidth on NDVI measurements of rice at different growth stages. Int J Remote Sens. 12:626–632.
   Google Scholar
• Xia T, He Z, Cai Z, Wang C, Wang W, Wang J, Hu Q, Song QJIJ. 2022. Exploring the potential of Chinese GF-6 images for crop mapping in regions with complex agricultural landscapes. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 107:102702. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanan S, Xianyue L, Haibin SJT. 2021. Classification of land use in Hetao Irrigation District of Inner Mongolia using feature optimal decision trees. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng. 37:242–251.
   Google Scholar
• Yang S, Li Y, Feng G, Zhang LJI. 2014. A method aimed at automatic landslide extraction based on background values of satellite imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 35(6):2247–2266. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2014.890760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Zhan Y, Tian Q, Gu X, Yu T, Wang LJT. 2015. Crop classification based on GF-1/WFV NDVI time series. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng. 31:155–161.
   Google Scholar
• Yang F, Piao P, Lai Y, Pei L. 2017. Margin based permutation variable importance: a stable importance measure for random forest. In 2017 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE), 1–8. IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ISKE.2017.8258842.
   Google Scholar
• Zanaga D, Van De Kerchove R, Daems D, De Keersmaecker W, Brockmann C, Kirches G, Wevers J, Cartus O, Santoro M, Fritz S. 2022. ESA WorldCover 10 m 2021 v200.
   Google Scholar
• Zarco-Tejada PJ, Rueda C, Ustin SJR. 2003. Water content estimation in vegetation with MODIS reflectance data and model inversion methods. Remote Sens Environ. 85(1):109–124. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00197-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai Y, Yao Y, Guan Q, Liang X, Li X, Pan Y, Yue H, Yuan Z, Zhou JJI. 2020. Simulating urban land use change by integrating a convolutional neural network with vector-based cellular automata. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 34(7):1475–1499. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2020.1711915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Gong Z, Wang Q, Jin D, Wang XJJRS. 2019. Wetland mapping of Yellow River Delta wetlands based on multi-feature optimization of Sentinel-2 images. Int J Remote Sens. 23:313–326. doi: 10.11834/jrs.20198083.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Li R, Mu X, Ren HJT. 2021. Extraction of paddy rice planting areas based on multi-temporal GF-6 remote sensing images. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng. 37:189–196.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liu L, Zhao PJJ. 2018. WZ5 water index and validation of its effectiveness in a coastal wetland water extraction. J Zhejiang A&F University. 35:735–742.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Tang X, You S, Duan K, Xiang H, Luo HJAS. 2020. A novel feature-level fusion framework using optical and SAR remote sensing images for land use/land cover (LULC) classification in cloudy mountainous area. Appl Sci. 10(8):2928. doi: 10.3390/app10082928.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Xu BJI. 2015. Spatiotemporal analysis of land use/cover changes in Nanchang area, China. Int J Digital Earth. 8(4):312–333. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2014.894145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhang H, Lin HJR. 2014. Improving the impervious surface estimation with combined use of optical and SAR remote sensing images. Remote Sens Environ. 141:155–167. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.10.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Feng D, Yu L, Wang X, Chen Y, Bai Y, Hernández HJ, Galleguillos M, Estades C, Biging GS, et al. 2016. Detailed dynamic land cover mapping of Chile: accuracy improvement by integrating multi-temporal data. Remote Sens Environ. 183:170–185. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Qingyun HJS. 2021. Spatio-temporal evaluation of the urban agglomeration expansion in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River and its impact on ecological lands. Sci Total Environ. 790:148150. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar