951
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Identification of ecological security pattern based on ecosystem service supply and demand in the Yangtze River Delta, China

, , &
Article: 2252787 | Received 13 Jul 2023, Accepted 23 Aug 2023, Published online: 07 Sep 2023

References

  • Ahmad M, Jiang P, Majeed A, Umar M, Khan Z, Muhammad S. 2020. The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: an advanced panel data estimation. Resour Policy. 69:101817. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101817.
  • Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F. 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic. 21:17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.
  • Castillo-Eguskitza N, Martín-López B, Onaindia M. 2018. A comprehensive assessment of ecosystem services: integrating supply, demand and interest in the Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve. Ecol Indic. 93(OCT):1176–1189. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.004.
  • Cheng X, Long RY, Chen H, Li QW. 2019. Coupling coordination degree and spatial dynamic evolution of a regional green competitiveness system – a case study from China. Ecol Indic. 104(SEP):489–500. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.003.
  • Chetkiewicz CLB, Clair CCS, Boyce MS. 2006. Corridors for conservation: integrating pattern and process. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 37(1):317–342. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110050.
  • Cook BI, Mankin JS, Marvel K, Williams AP, Smerdon JE, Anchukaitis KJ. 2020. Twenty-first century drought projections in the CMIP6 forcing scenarios. Earth’s Future. 8(6):e2019EF001461. doi: 10.1029/2019EF001461.
  • Cueva J, Yakouchenkova IA, Fröhlich K, Dermann AF, Dermann F, Köhler M, Grossmann J, Meier W, Bauhus J, Schröder D, et al. 2022. Synergies and trade-offs in ecosystem services from urban and peri-urban forests and their implication to sustainable city design and planning. Sustain Cities Soc. 82:103903. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103903.
  • Cumming GS, Buerkert A, Hoffmann EM, Schlecht E, von Cramon-Taubadel S, Tscharntke T. 2014. Implications of agricultural transitions and urbanization for ecosystem services. Nature. 515(7525):50–57. doi: 10.1038/nature13945.
  • Fang Y, Wang J, Huang LY, Zhai TL. 2020. Determining and identifying key areas of ecosystem preservation and restoration for territorial spatial planning based on ecological security patterns: a case study of Yantai city. J Nat Res. 35(1):190–203.
  • Fick S, Hijmans R. 2017. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 37(12):4302–4315. doi: 10.1002/joc.5086.
  • Gao JB, Du FJ, Zuo LY, Jiang Y. 2021. Integrating ecosystem services and rocky desertification into identification of karst ecological security pattern. Landscape Ecol. 36(7):2113–2133. doi: 10.1007/s10980-020-01100-x.
  • Gomez-Baggethun E, Barton DN. 2013. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol Econ. 86:235–245. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019.
  • Gou M, Li L, Ouyang S, Shu C, Xiao W, Wang N, Hu J, Liu C. 2022. Integrating ecosystem service trade-offs and rocky desertification into ecological security pattern construction in the Daning river basin of southwest China. Ecol Indic. 138:108845. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108845.
  • Hamlet AF, Lee SY, Mickelson KEB, Elsner MM. 2010. Effects of projected climate change on energy supply and demand in the Pacific Northwest and Washington State. Clim Change. 102(1–2):103–128. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9857-y.
  • Han YN, Peng J, Meersmans J, Liu YX, Zhao ZQ, Mao Q. 2018. Integrating spatial continuous wavelet transform and normalized difference vegetation index to map the agro-pastoral transitional zone in Northern China. Remote Sens. 10(12):1928. doi: 10.3390/rs10121928.
  • He Q, Dai XA, Chen SQ. 2020. Assessing the effects of vegetation and precipitation on soil erosion in the three-river headwaters region of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. J Arid Land. 12(5):865–886. doi: 10.1007/s40333-020-0075-9.
  • Hu QY, Chen SL. 2021. Optimizing the ecological networks based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services in Xiamen-Zhangzhou-Quanzhou region. J Nat Res. 36(2):342–355. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210206.
  • Huang JM, Hu YC, Zheng FY. 2020. Research on recognition and protection of ecological security patterns based on circuit theory: a case study of Jinan City. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 27(11):12414–12427. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07764-x.
  • Jia Q, Jiao L, Lian X, Wang W. 2023. Linking supply-demand balance of ecosystem services to identify ecological security patterns in urban agglomerations. Sustain Cities Soc. 92:104497. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104497.
  • Jiang H, Peng J, Dong JQ, Zhang ZM, Xu ZH, Meersmans J. 2021. Linking ecological background and demand to identify ecological security patterns across the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in China. Landscape Ecol. 36(7):2135–2150. doi: 10.1007/s10980-021-01234-6.
  • Kang J, Zhang X, Zhu X, Zhang B. 2021. Ecological security pattern: a new idea for balancing regional development and ecological protection. A case study of the Jiaodong Peninsula, China. Global Ecol Conserv. 26:e01472. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01472.
  • Knaapen JP, Scheffer M, Harms B. 1992. Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning. Landscape Urban Plann. 23(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(92)90060-D.
  • Kong F, Yin H, Nakagoshi N, Zong Y. 2010. Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation: identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling. Landsc Urban Plann. 95(1–2):16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.11.001.
  • Kroll F, Müller F, Haase D, Fohrer N. 2012. Rural–urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy. 29(3):521–535. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008.
  • Lambin EF, Geist HJ, Lepers E. 2003. Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 28(1):205–241. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105459.
  • Liao WL, Liu XP, Xu XY, Chen GZ, Liang X, Zhang HH, Li X. 2020. Projections of land use changes under the plant functional type classification in different SSP-RCP scenarios in China. Sci Bull (Beijing). 65(22):1935–1947. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2020.07.014.
  • Li J, Jiang H, Bai Y, Alatalo JM, Li X, Jiang H, Liu G, Xu J. 2016. Indicators for spatial–temporal comparisons of ecosystem service status between regions: a case study of the Taihu River Basin, China. Ecol Indic. 60:1008–1016. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.002.
  • Li J, Li L, Guo L, Du S. 2016. Assessment on the ecological suitability in Zhuhai City, Guangdong, China, based on minimum cumulative resistance model. Chin J Appl Ecol. 27(1):8.
  • Liu XY, Zeng J, Jia MY, Zhang S. 2020. Construction of ecological security pattern and simulation of urban sprawl in the Urban Agglomeration of Min Delta. Acta Ecol Sinica. 40(21):7873–7885.
  • Lu HT, Stringer LC, Yan Y, Wang CX, Zhao CL, Rong YJ, Zhu JY, Wu G, Dallmer M. 2023. Mapping ecosystem service supply and demand:historical changes and projections under SSP-RCP scenarios. Acta Ecol Sinica. 43(04):1309–1325.
  • McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, Shah VB. 2008. Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology. 89(10):2712–2724. doi: 10.1890/07-1861.1.
  • Meng ST, Huang QX, Zhang L, He CY, Inostroza L, Bai YS, Yin D. 2020. Matches and mismatches between the supply of and demand for cultural ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing watersheds: a case study in the Guanting Reservoir basin, China. Ecosyst Serv. 45:101156. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101156.
  • Mouratiadou I, Biewald A, Pehl M, Bonsch M, Baumstark L, Klein D, Popp A, Luderer G, Kriegler E. 2016. The impact of climate change mitigation on water demand for energy and food: an integrated analysis based on the shared socioeconomic pathways. Environ Sci Policy. 64:48–58. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.007.
  • Musyoki KG, Ko JH. 2020. Climate change on agriculture in 2050: a CGE approach. J Int Trade Commerce. 16(4):1–19.
  • Peng J, Li HL, Liu YX, Hu YN, Yang Y. 2018. Identification and optimization of ecological security pattern in Xiong’an New Area. Acta Geograph Sinica. 73(4):701–710.
  • Peng J, Zhao SQ, Dong JQ, Liu YX, Meersmans J, Li HL, Wu JS. 2019. Applying ant colony algorithm to identify ecological security patterns in megacities. Environ Model Softw. 117:214–222. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.03.017.
  • Peng J, Zhao HJ, Liu YX, Wu JS. 2017. Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction. Geograph Res. 36(3):407–419.
  • Pham HV, Sperotto A, Torresan S, Acuña V, Jorda-Capdevila D, Rianna G, Marcomini A, Critto A. 2019. Coupling scenarios of climate and land-use change with assessments of potential ecosystem services at the river basin scale. Ecosyst Serv. 40:101045. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101045.
  • Pierik ME, Dell’Acqua M, Confalonieri R, Bocchi S, Gomarasca S. 2016. Designing ecological corridors in a fragmented landscape: a fuzzy approach to circuit connectivity analysis. Ecol Indic. 67:807–820. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.032.
  • Rao S, Klimont Z, Smith SJ, Van Dingenen R, Dentener F, Bouwman L, Riahi K, Amann M, Bodirsky BL, van Vuuren DP, et al. 2017. Future air pollution in the shared socio-economic pathways. Global Environ Change Human Policy Dimens. 42:346–358. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.012.
  • Rogelj J, Popp A, Calvin KV, Luderer G, Emmerling J, Gernaat D, Fujimori S, Strefler J, Hasegawa T, Marangoni G, et al. 2018. Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C. Nature Clim Change. 8(4):325–332. doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3.
  • Salimi S, Scholz M. 2021. Impact of future climate scenarios on peatland and constructed wetland water quality: a mesocosm experiment within climate chambers. J Environ Manage. 289:112459. eng. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112459.
  • Schröter M, Remme R, Hein L. 2012. How and where to map supply and demand of ecosystem services for policy-relevant outcomes? Letter to the Editor. Ecol Indic. 23:220–221. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.025.
  • Su Y, Chen X, Liao J, Zhang H, Wang C, Ye Y, Wang Y. 2016. Modeling the optimal ecological security pattern for guiding the urban constructed land expansions. Urban for. Urban Greening. 19:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.013.
  • Sun YY, Liu DF, Wang P. 2022. Urban simulation incorporating coordination relationships of multiple ecosystem services. Sustain Cities Soc. 76:103432. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103432.
  • Tong H-l, Shi P-j 2020. Using ecosystem service supply and ecosystem sensitivity to identify landscape ecology security patterns in the Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration, China. J Mt Sci. 17(11):2758–2773. doi: 10.1007/s11629-020-6283-0.
  • Underwood EC, Hollander AD, Safford HD, Kim JB, Srivastava L, Drapek RJ. 2019. The impacts of climate change on ecosystem services in southern California. Ecosyst Serv. 39:101008. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101008.
  • Vergnes A, Kerbiriou C, Clergeau P. 2013. Ecological corridors also operate in an urban matrix: a test case with garden shrews. Urban Ecosyst. 16(3):511–525. doi: 10.1007/s11252-013-0289-0.
  • Wang Z, Li X, Mao Y, Li L, Wang X, Lin Q. 2022. Dynamic simulation of land use change and assessment of carbon storage based on climate change scenarios at the city level: A case study of Bortala, China. Ecol. Indic. 134:108499. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108499.
  • Wang Y, Pan J. 2019. Building ecological security patterns based on ecosystem services value reconstruction in an arid inland basin: A case study in Ganzhou District, NW China. J. Cleaner Prod. 241:118337 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118337.
  • Wang T, Li HB, Huang Y. 2021. The complex ecological network’s resilience of the Wuhan metropolitan area. Ecol Indic. 130:108101. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108101.
  • Wang J, Zhai TL, Lin YF, Kong XS, He T. 2019. Spatial imbalance and changes in supply and demand of ecosystem services in China. Sci Total Environ. 657:781–791. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.080.
  • Wei JX, Zhang YZ, Lian ZX, Yin M, Ou WX. 2022. Research on regional ecological security pattern construction based on ecological supply and demand space: a case study of Southern Jiangsu urban agglomeration. Res Environ Yangtze Basin. 31(2):387–397.
  • Wickham JD, Riitters KH, Wade TG, Vogt P. 2010. A national assessment of green infrastructure and change for the conterminous United States using morphological image processing. Landscape Urban Plann. 94(3-4):186–195. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.003.
  • Yi L, Sun Y, Yin SH, Wei X. 2022. Construction of ecological security pattern: concept, framework and prospect. Ecol Environ Sci. 31(04):845–856.
  • Zhang M, Liu JP, Zhao DD. 2021. Construction of ecological security pattern in western Jilin Province. Arid Land Geograph. 44(06):1676–1685.
  • Zhang PT, Liu SJ, Zhou Z, Liu CJ, Xu L, Gao X. 2021. Supply and demand measurement and spatio-temporal evolution of ecosystem services in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. Acta Ecol Sinica. 41(09):3354–3367.
  • Zhang LQ, Peng J, Liu YX, Wu JS. 2017. Coupling ecosystem services supply and human ecological demand to identify landscape ecological security pattern: a case study in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Urban Ecosyst. 20(3):701–714. doi: 10.1007/s11252-016-0629-y.