A critical survey of GEOBIA methods for forest image detection and classification

References

• Adelabu S, Mutanga O, Adam E. 2014. Evaluating the impact of red-edge band from rapideye image for classifying insect defoliation levels. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 95:34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander C, Tansey K, Kaduk J, Holland D, Tate NJ. 2010. Backscatter coefficient as an attribute for the classification of full-waveform airborne laser scanning data in urban areas. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 65(5):423–432. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrés S, Arvor D, Mougenot I, Libourel T, Durieux L. 2017. Ontology-based classification of remote sensing images using spectral rules. Computers Geosci. 102:158–166. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2017.02.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbiol R, Zhang Y, I Comellas VP. 2007. Advanced classification techniques: a review. Revista Catalana de Geografia.
   Google Scholar
• Arvor D, Belgiu M, Falomir Z, Mougenot I, Durieux L. 2019. Ontologies to interpret remote sensing images: why do we need them? GIScience Remote Sens. 56(6):911–939. doi: 10.1080/15481603.2019.1587890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvor D, Durieux L, Andrés S, Laporte MA. 2013. Advances in geographic object-based image analysis with ontologies: a review of main contributions and limitations from a remote sensing perspective. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 82:125–137. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asma SB, Abdelhamid D. 2020. An object-based approach to VHR image classification. In 2020 Mediterranean and Middle-East Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (M2GARSS), Tunis, in Tunisia; IEEE. p. 93–96. doi: 10.1109/M2GARSS47143.2020.9105140.
   Google Scholar
• Audebert N, Le Saux B, Lefèvre S. 2018. Beyond RGB: very high resolution urban remote sensing with multimodal deep networks. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 140:20–32. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baraldi A, Tiede D, Sudmanns M, Belgiu M, Lang S. 2017. Systematic ESA EO level 2 product generation as pre-condition to semantic content-based image retrieval and information/knowledge discovery in EO image databases. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Big Data from Space; Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg. p. 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Barrington-Leigh C, Millard-Ball A. 2017. The world’s user-generated road map is more than 80% complete. PLOS One. 12(8):e0180698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazi Y, Alajlan N, Melgani F. 2012. Improved estimation of water chlorophyll concentration with semisupervised gaussian process regression. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 50(7):2733–2743. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2174246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz UC, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M. 2004. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 58(3–4):239–258. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2003.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beveridge JR, Griffith J, Kohler RR, Hanson AR, Riseman EM. 1989. Segmenting images using localized histograms and region merging. Int J Comput Vision. 2(3):311–347. doi: 10.1007/BF00158168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian L. 2007. Object-oriented representation of environmental phenomena: is everything best represented as an object? Ann Assoc Am Geograph 97(2):267–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00535.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bins LS, Fonseca LG, Erthal GJ, Ii FM. 1996. Satellite imagery segmentation: a region growing approach. Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto. 8(1996):677–680.
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke T. 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 65(1):2–16. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke T, Hay GJ, Kelly M, Lang S, Hofmann P, Addink E, Feitosa RQ, Van der Meer F, Van der Werff H, Van Coillie F, et al. 2014. Geographic object-based image analysis–towards a new paradigm. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 87(100):180–191. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.09.014.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blaschke T, Lang S, Hay G. 2008. Object-based image analysis: spatial concepts for knowledge-driven remote sensing applications. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke T, Strobl J. 2001. What’s wrong with pixels? Some recent developments interfacing remote sensing and gis. Zeitschrift für Geoinformationssysteme. 14(6):12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45(1):5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett C, Blaschke T. 2003. A multi-scale segmentation/object relationship modelling methodology for landscape analysis. Ecol Modell. 168(3):233–249. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00139-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai S, Liu D, Sulla-Menashe D, Friedl MA. 2014. Enhancing Modis land cover product with a spatial–temporal modeling algorithm. Remote Sens Environ. 147:243–255. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao W, Li J, Liu J, Zhang P. 2016. Two improved segmentation algorithms for whole cardiac ct sequence images. In 2016 9th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI), Datong, China; IEEE. p. 346–351. doi: 10.1109/CISP-BMEI.2016.7852734.
   Google Scholar
• Castilla G, Hay G. 2008. Image objects and geographic objects. In: Blaschke T, Lang S, Hay GJ, editors. Object-based image analysis. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. 91–110.
   Google Scholar
• Chaib S, Mansouri DEK, Omara I, Hagag A, Dhelim S, Bensaber DA. 2022. On the co-selection of vision transformer features and images for very high-resolution image scene classification. Remote Sensing. 14(22):5817. doi: 10.3390/rs14225817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chansanam W, Tuamsuk K. 2016. Development of imaginary beings ontology. In International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries, Tsukuba, Japan; Springer. p. 231–242.
   Google Scholar
• Chen G, Hay GJ, Castilla G, St-Onge B, Powers R. 2011. A multiscale geographic object-based image analysis to estimate Lidar-measured forest canopy height using quickbird imagery. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 25(6):877–893. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2010.496729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Weng Q, Hay G, He Y. 2018. Geographic object-based image analysis (Geobia): emerging trends and future opportunities. Giscience Remote Sens. 55(2):159–182. doi: 10.1080/15481603.2018.1426092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K, Fu K, Yan M, Gao X, Sun X, Wei X. 2018. Semantic segmentation of aerial images with shuffling convolutional neural networks. IEEE Geosci Remote Sensing Lett. 15(2):173–177. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2778181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Song L, Hou Y, Shao G. 2016. Efficient semi-supervised feature selection for VHR remote sensing images. In 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Beijing, China. IEEE. p. 1500–1503.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Zhao Z, Gong P, Zeng B. 2006. A new process for the segmentation of high resolution remote sensing imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 27(22):4991–5001. doi: 10.1080/01431160600658131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng HD, Jiang XH, Sun Y, Wang J. 2001. Color image segmentation: advances and prospects. Pattern Recognit. 34(12):2259–2281. doi: 10.1016/S0031-3203(00)00149-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu KY, Lin SF. 2005. Lane detection using color-based segmentation. In: IEEE Proceedings. Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA; 2005; IEEE. p. 706–711.
   Google Scholar
• Chu CC, Aggarwal JK. 1993. The integration of image segmentation maps using region and edge information.IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell. 15(12):1241–1252. doi: 10.1109/34.250843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubey MS, Franklin SE, Wulder MA. 2006. Object-based analysis of ikonos-2 imagery for extraction of forest inventory parameters. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 72(4):383–394. doi: 10.14358/PERS.72.4.383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong M, Xi J, Han L, Gu J, Yang L, Tao Y, Xu M. 2022. Multi-resolution classification network for high-resolution UAV remote sensing images. Geocarto Int. 37(11):3116–3140. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2020.1852614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes C, Vapnik V. 1995. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 20(3):273–297. doi: 10.1007/BF00994018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuypers S, Nascetti A, Vergauwen M. 2023. Land use and land cover mapping with VHR and multi-temporal sentinel-2 imagery. Remote Sens. 15(10):2501. doi: 10.3390/rs15102501.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong SM, Van der Meer FD. 2007. Remote sensing image analysis: including the spatial domain. vol. 5. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Demir I, Koperski K, Lindenbaum D, Pang G, Huang J, Basu S, Hughes F, Tuia D, Raskar R. 2018. Deepglobe 2018: a challenge to parse the earth through satellite images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. p. 172–181.
   Google Scholar
• Dong S, Zhuang Y, Yang Z, Pang L, Chen H, Long T. 2020. Land cover classification from VHR optical remote sensing images by feature ensemble deep learning network. IEEE Geosci Remote Sensing Lett. 17(8):1396–1400. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2019.2947022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dornik A, Drăguţ L, Urdea P. 2018. Classification of soil types using geographic object-based image analysis and random forests. Pedosphere. 28(6):913–925. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60377-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drăguţ L, Csillik O, Eisank C, Tiede D. 2014. Automated parameterisation for multi-scale image segmentation on multiple layers. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 88(100):119–127. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.11.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drăguţ L, Eisank C, Strasser T. 2011. Local variance for multi-scale analysis in geomorphometry. Geomorphology. 130(3–4):162–172. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte D, Nex F, Kerle N, Vosselman G. 2018. Multi-resolution feature fusion for image classification of building damages with convolutional neural networks. Remote Sens. 10(10):1636. doi: 10.3390/rs10101636.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert S, Ghebremicael ST, Hurni H, Kohler T. 2017. Identification and classification of structural soil conservation measures based on very high resolution stereo satellite data. J Environ Manage. 193:592–606. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards AW, Cavalli-Sforza LL. 1965. A method for cluster analysis. Biometrics. 21(2):362–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekanayake E, Ekanayake E, Rathnayake A, Vithana S, Herath H, Godaliyadda G, Ekanayake M. 2018. A semi-supervised algorithm to map major vegetation zones using satellite hyperspectral data. In 2018 9th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS), Amsterdam, Netherlands; IEEE. p. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/WHISPERS.2018.8747025.
   Google Scholar
• Ekaputra F, Sabou M, Serral Asensio E, Kiesling E, Biffl S. 2017. Ontology-based data integration in multi-disciplinary engineering environments: a review. Open J InformSyst. 4(1):1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Fan J, Zeng G, Body M, Hacid MS. 2005. Seeded region growing: an extensive and comparative study. Pattern Recog Lett. 26(8):1139–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2004.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan R, Feng R, Wang L, Yan J, Zhang X. 2020. Semi-MCNN: a semisupervised multi-CNN ensemble learning method for urban land cover classification using submeter HRRS images. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observations Remote Sensing. 13:4973–4987. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3019410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang B, Kou R, Pan L, Chen P. 2019. Category-sensitive domain adaptation for land cover mapping in aerial scenes. Remote Sens. 11(22):2631. doi: 10.3390/rs11222631.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher P. 1997. The pixel: a snare and a delusion. Int J Remote Sens. 18(3):679–685. doi: 10.1080/014311697219015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foody GM, Mathur A. 2004. A relative evaluation of multiclass image classification by support vector machines. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 42(6):1335–1343. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2004.827257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin S, Hall R, Moskal L, Maudie A, Lavigne M. 2000. Incorporating texture into classification of forest species composition from airborne multispectral images. Int J Remote Sens. 21(1):61–79. doi: 10.1080/014311600210993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedl MA, Brodley CE, Strahler AH. 1999. Maximizing land cover classification accuracies produced by decision trees at continental to global scales. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 37(2):969–977. doi: 10.1109/36.752215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu G, Liu C, Zhou R, Sun T, Zhang Q. 2017. Classification for high resolution remote sensing imagery using a fully convolutional network. Remote Sens. 9(5):498. doi: 10.3390/rs9050498.
   Google Scholar
• Ghamisi P, Dalla Mura M, Benediktsson JA. 2015. A survey on spectral–spatial classification techniques based on attribute profiles. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 53(5):2335–2353. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2358934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghita O, Whelan PF. 2002. Computational approach for edge linking. J Electron Imag. 11(4):479–485. doi: 10.1117/1.1501574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin C, Chen G, Singh KK. 2015. The impact of urban residential development patterns on forest carbon density: an integration of lidar, aerial photography and field mensuration. Landscape Urban Plann. 136:97–109. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber TR. 1995. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? Int J Hum Comput Stud. 43(5–6):907–928. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu H, Han Y, Yang Y, Li H, Liu Z, Soergel U, Blaschke T, Cui S. 2018. An efficient parallel multi-scale segmentation method for remote sensing imagery. Remote Sens. 10(4):590. doi: 10.3390/rs10040590.
   Google Scholar
• Guindon B. 1997. Computer-based aerial image understanding: a review and assessment of its application to planimetric information extraction from very high resolution satellite images. Can J Remote Sens. 23(1):38–47. doi: 10.1080/07038992.1997.10874676.
   Google Scholar
• Guo J, Zhou H, Zhu C. 2013. Cascaded classification of high resolution remote sensing images using multiple contexts. Inf Sci. 221:84–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.09.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay M, Weber P. 2008. Openstreetmap: user-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 7(4):12–18. doi: 10.1109/MPRV.2008.80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay G, Niemann K, McLean G. 1996. An object-specific image-texture analysis of h-resolution forest imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 55(2):108–122. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(95)00189-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He H, Liang T, Hu D, Yu X. 2016a. Remote sensing clustering analysis based on object-based interval modeling. Comput Geosci. 94:131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2016.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. p. 770–778.
   Google Scholar
• Hegyi A, Vernica MM, Drăguţ L. 2020. An object-based approach to support the automatic delineation of magnetic anomalies. Archaeological Prospection. 27(1):3–12. doi: 10.1002/arp.1752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann P, Blaschke T, Strobl J. 2011. Quantifying the robustness of fuzzy rule sets in object-based image analysis. Int J Remote Sens. 32(22):7359–7381. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2010.523727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer CH, Fry JA, Barnes CA. 2012. The national land cover database. US Geological Survey Fact Sheet. 3020(4):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain MD, Chen D. 2019. Segmentation for object-based image analysis (Obia): a review of algorithms and challenges from remote sensing perspective. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 150:115–134. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, Weinberger KQ. 2017. Densely connected convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. p. 4700–4708.
   Google Scholar
• Huang X, Zhang L. 2013. An svm ensemble approach combining spectral, structural, and semantic features for the classification of high-resolution remotely sensed imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 51(1):257–272. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2202912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imaging D. 2002. Recognition, version 2.1. Germany: Definiens Imaging GmbH, München.
   Google Scholar
• Jain R, Kasturi R, Schunck BG. 1995. Machine vision. vol. 5. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Jin Q, Xu E, Zhang X. 2022. A fusion method for multisource land cover products based on superpixels and statistical extraction for enhancing resolution and improving accuracy. Remote Sensing. 14(7):1676. doi: 10.3390/rs14071676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson B, Xie Z. 2011. Unsupervised image segmentation evaluation and refinement using a multi-scale approach. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 66(4):473–483. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal M, Phinn S. 2011. Hyperspectral data for mangrove species mapping: a comparison of pixel-based and object-based approach. Remote Sens. 3(10):2222–2242. doi: 10.3390/rs3102222.
   Google Scholar
• Kettig RL, Landgrebe D. 1976. Classification of multispectral image data by extraction and classification of homogeneous objects. IEEE Trans Geosci Electron. 14(1):19–26. doi: 10.1109/TGE.1976.294460.
   Google Scholar
• Khatami R, Mountrakis G, Stehman SV. 2016. A meta-analysis of remote sensing research on supervised pixel-based land-cover image classification processes: general guidelines for practitioners and future research. Remote Sens Environ. 177:89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiryati N, Eldar Y, Bruckstein AM. 1991. A probabilistic hough transform. Pattern Recognit. 24(4):303–316. doi: 10.1016/0031-3203(91)90073-E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv Neur Inform Process Syst. 25.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn W, Raubal M, Gärdenfors P. 2007. Cognitive semantics and spatio-temporal ontologies. Spat Cognit Comput. 7(1):3–12. doi: 10.1080/13875860701337835.
   Google Scholar
• Kundu R. 2022. Image processing: techniques, types, and applications; 2023. [accessed 2023 Aug 12]. https://www.v7labs.com/blog/image-processing-guide.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak T, Kim Y. 2023. Semi-supervised land cover classification of remote sensing imagery using cyclegan and efficientnet. KSCE J Civ Eng. 27(4):1760–1773. doi: 10.1007/s12205-023-2285-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwenda C, Gwetu M, Fonou-Dombeu JV. 2023. Ontology with deep learning for forest image classification. Applied Sciences. 13(8):5060. doi: 10.3390/app13085060.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte AS, Rango A. 2009. Texture and scale in object-based analysis of subdecimeter resolution unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 47(3):761–770. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2008.2009355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang S. 2008. Object-based image analysis for remote sensing applications: modeling reality–dealing with complexity. Object Based Image Anal. :3–27. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lang S, Blaschke T. 2006. Bridging remote sensing and GIS–what are the main supportive pillars. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Object-Based Image Analysis, Salzburg, Austria. p. 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Lang S, Hay GJ, Baraldi A, Tiede D, Blaschke T. 2019. Geobia achievements and spatial opportunities in the era of big earth observation data. IJGI. 8(11):474. doi: 10.3390/ijgi8110474.
   Google Scholar
• Lang S, Kienberger S, Tiede D, Hagenlocher M, Pernkopf L. 2014. Geons–domain-specific regionalization of space. Cartograph Geograph Inform Sci. 41(3):214–226. doi: 10.1080/15230406.2014.902755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang S, Zeil P, Kienberger S, Tiede D. 2008. Geons–policy-relevant geo-objects for monitoring high-level indicators. In: Car A, Griesebner G, Strobl J. editors. Geospatial Crossroads@ GI_Forum. Proceedings of the Second Geoinformatics Forum. Salzburg, Heidelberg: Wichmannn.
   Google Scholar
• Larochelle H. 2020. Few-shot learning. Computer vision: a reference guide. p. 1–4. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lasaponara R, Leucci G, Masini N, Persico R, Scardozzi G. 2016. Towards an operative use of remote sensing for exploring the past using satellite data: the case study of Hierapolis (Turkey). Remote Sens Environ. 174:148–164. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei T, Li L, Lv Z, Zhu M, Du X, Nandi AK. 2021. Multi-modality and multi-scale attention fusion network for land cover classification from VHR remote sensing images. Remote Sensing. 13(18):3771. doi: 10.3390/rs13183771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li A, Lu Z, Wang L, Xiang T, Wen JR. 2017. Zero-shot scene classification for high spatial resolution remote sensing images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 55(7):4157–4167. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2689071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Ouyang S, Zhang Y. 2022. Combining deep learning and ontology reasoning for remote sensing image semantic segmentation. Knowledge Based Syst. 243:108469. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Snavely N. 2018. Megadepth: learning single-view depth prediction from internet photos. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. p. 2041–2050.
   Google Scholar
• Littlestone N. 1988. Learning quickly when irrelevant attributes abound: a new linear-threshold algorithm. Mach Learn. 2(4):285–318. doi: 10.1007/BF00116827.
   Google Scholar
• Liu D, Kelly M, Gong P. 2006. A spatial–temporal approach to monitoring forest disease spread using multi-temporal high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 101(2):167–180. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu D, Li G, Moran E, Hetrick S. 2013. Spatiotemporal analysis of land-use and land-cover change in the brazilian amazon. Int J Remote Sens. 34(16):5953–5978. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2013.802825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucchese L, Mitra SK. 2001. Colour image segmentation: a state-of-the-art survey. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad Part A. 67(2):207–222.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann T, Robson S, Kyle S, Boehm J. 2019. Close-range photogrammetry and 3d imaging. In: Luhmann T, Robson S, Kyle S, Boehm J, editors. Close-range photogrammetry and 3D imaging. Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Martin DR, Fowlkes CC, Malik J. 2004. Learning to detect natural image boundaries using local brightness, color, and texture cues. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 26(5):530–549. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2004.1273918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merciol F, Faucqueur L, Damodaran BB, Rémy PY, Desclée B, Dazin F, Lefèvre S, Sannier C. 2018. Geobia at the terapixel scale: from VHR satellite images to small woody features at the pan-European level. In: GEOBIA 2018-From Pixels to Ecosystems and Global Sustainability; Montpellier, France.
   Google Scholar
• Ming D, Li J, Wang J, Zhang M. 2015. Scale parameter selection by spatial statistics for geobia: using mean-shift based multi-scale segmentation as an example. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 106:28–41. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirghasemi S, Rayudu R, Zhang M. 2013. A new image segmentation algorithm based on modified seeded region growing and particle swarm optimization. In 2013 28th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ 2013), Wellington, New Zealand. IEEE. p. 382–387.
   Google Scholar
• Mowrer HT, Congalton RG. 2000. Quantifying spatial uncertainty in natural resources: theory and applications for GIS and remote sensing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nock R, Nielsen F. 2004. Statistical region merging. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 26(11):1452–1458. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2004.110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noy NF, McGuinness DL. 2001. Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880.
   Google Scholar
• Osio A, Lefèvre S, Ogao P, Ayugi S. 2018. Obia-based monitoring of riparian vegetation applied to the identification of degraded acacia Xanthophloea along Lake Nakuru, Kenya. In: GEOBIA 2018-From Pixels to Ecosystems and Global Sustainability, Montpellier, France. p. 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Pal M, Mather PM. 2003. An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Remote Sens Environ. 86(4):554–565. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00132-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan J, Hu X, Li P, Li H, He W, Zhang Y, Lin Y. 2016. Domain adaptation via multi-layer transfer learning. Neurocomputing. 190:10–24. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panawong J, Kaewboonma N, Chansanam W. 2018. Building an ontology of flora of Thailand for developing semantic electronic dictionary. In AIP Conference Proceedings; Maharashtra, India: AIP Publishing LLC. p. 020118, vol. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Pati C, Panda AK, Tripathy AK, Pradhan SK, Patnaik S. 2020. A novel hybrid machine learning approach for change detection in remote sensing images. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 23(5):973–981. doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2020.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Pekkarinen A. 2002. Image segment-based spectral features in the estimation of timber volume. Remote Sens Environ. 82(2–3):349–359. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00052-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng H, Long F, Ding C. 2005. Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 27(8):1226–1238. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pipaud I, Lehmkuhl F. 2017. Object-based delineation and classification of alluvial fans by application of mean-shift segmentation and support vector machines. Geomorphology. 293:178–200. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers RP, Hermosilla T, Coops NC, Chen G. 2015. Remote sensing and object-based techniques for mapping fine-scale industrial disturbances. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 34:51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2014.06.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin R. 2015. A mean shift vector-based shape feature for classification of high spatial resolution remotely sensed imagery. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observations Remote Sensing. 8(5):1974–1985. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2357832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin R, Liu T. 2022. A review of landcover classification with very-high resolution remotely sensed optical images—analysis unit, model scalability and transferability. Remote Sensing. 14(3):646. doi: 10.3390/rs14030646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radoux J, Defourny P. 2008. Quality assessment of segmentation results devoted to object-based classification. In: Blaschke T, Lang S, Hay GJ, editors. Object-based image analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. 257–271.
   Google Scholar
• Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, Farhadi A. 2016. You only look once: unified, real-time object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. p. 779–788.
   Google Scholar
• Sahin K, Ulusoy I. 2013. Automatic multi-scale segmentation of high spatial resolution satellite images using watersheds. In 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium-IGARSS, Melbourne, Australia; IEEE. p. 2505–2508.
   Google Scholar
• Sarker IH. 2021. Deep learning: a comprehensive overview on techniques, taxonomy, applications and research directions. SN Comput Sci. 2(6):420. doi: 10.1007/s42979-021-00815-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schäfer E, Heiskanen J, Heikinheimo V, Pellikka P. 2016. Mapping tree species diversity of a tropical montane forest by unsupervised clustering of airborne imaging spectroscopy data. Ecol Indic. 64:49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.12.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt M, Ahmadi SA, Hänsch R. 2021. There is no data like more data-current status of machine learning datasets in remote sensing. In 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS, Brussels, Belgium; IEEE. p. 1206–1209.
   Google Scholar
• Sertel E, Ekim B, Ettehadi Osgouei P, Kabadayi ME. 2022. Land use and land cover mapping using deep learning based segmentation approaches and VHR worldview-3 images. Remote Sen. 14(18):4558. doi: 10.3390/rs14184558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith G, Hazeu G. 2015. Review and follow-up alignment of technical outputs (report task 5-3). assistance to the EEA in the production of the new corine land cover (CLC) inventory including the support to the harmonisation of national monitoring for integration at pan-European level. EEA-European Environment Agency. Report No:.
   Google Scholar
• Souza-Filho PWM, Nascimento WR, Jr., Santos DC, Weber EJ, Silva Jr RO, Siqueira JO. 2018. A geobia approach for multitemporal land-cover and land-use change analysis in a tropical watershed in the southeastern Amazon. Remote Sens. 10(11):1683. doi: 10.3390/rs10111683.
   Google Scholar
• Su T. 2017. A novel region-merging approach guided by priority for high resolution image segmentation. Remote Sens Lett. 8(8):771–780. doi: 10.1080/2150704X.2017.1320441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui L, Kang J, Yang X, Wang Z, Wang J. 2020. Inconsistency distribution patterns of different remote sensing land-cover data from the perspective of ecological zoning. Open Geosci. 12(1):324–341. doi: 10.1515/geo-2020-0014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun F, Fang F, Wang R, Wan B, Guo Q, Li H, Wu X. 2020. An impartial semi-supervised learning strategy for imbalanced classification on VHR images. Sensors. 20(22):6699. doi: 10.3390/s20226699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szegedy C, Ioffe S, Vanhoucke V, Alemi A. 2017. Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, California, USA; vol. 31. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11231.
   Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebuv MN. 2014. A comparative assessment between object and pixel-based classification approaches for land use/land cover mapping using spot 5 imagery. Geocarto Int. 29(4):351–369. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2013.768300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teruggi S, Grilli E, Russo M, Fassi F, Remondino F. 2020. A hierarchical machine learning approach for multi-level and multi-resolution 3d point cloud classification. Remote Sens. 12(16):2598. doi: 10.3390/rs12162598.
   Google Scholar
• Theodoridou I, Karteris M, Mallinis G, Tsiros E, Karteris A. 2017. Assessing the benefits from retrofitting green roofs in Mediterranean, using environmental modelling, GIS and very high spatial resolution remote sensing data: the example of Thessaloniki, Greece. Procedia Environ Sci. 38:530–537. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.117.
   Google Scholar
• Tompoulidou M, Gitas I, Polychronaki A, Mallinis G. 2016. A geobia framework for the implementation of national and international forest definitions using very high spatial resolution optical satellite data. Geocarto Int. 31(3):342–354. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2015.1047470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Too J, Abdullah AR. 2021. A new and fast rival genetic algorithm for feature selection. J Supercomput. 77(3):2844–2874. doi: 10.1007/s11227-020-03378-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Beijma S, Comber A, Lamb A. 2014. Random forest classification of salt marsh vegetation habitats using quad-polarimetric airborne SAR, elevation and optical RS data. Remote Sens Environ. 149:118–129. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Linden S, Hostert P. 2009. The influence of urban structures on impervious surface maps from airborne hyperspectral data. Remote Sens Environ. 113(11):2298–2305. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaz DA, Sarmento PT, Barata MT, Fenton LK, Michaels TI. 2015. Object-based dune analysis: automated dune mapping and pattern characterization for Ganges Chasma and gale crater, mars. Geomorphology. 250:128–139. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.08.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkataramanan A, Laviale M, Figus C, Usseglio-Polatera P, Pradalier C. 2021. Tackling inter-class similarity and intra-class variance for microscopic image-based classification. In International Conference on Computer Vision Systems; Springer. p. 93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Verma OP, Hanmandlu M, Susan S, Kulkarni M, Jain PK. 2011. A simple single seeded region growing algorithm for color image segmentation using adaptive thresholding. In 2011 International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, Katra, Jammu and Kashmir, India; IEEE. p. 500–503.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeulen D, van Niekerk A. 2016. Evaluation of a worldview-2 image for soil salinity monitoring in a moderately affected irrigated area. J Appl Remote Sens. 10(2):026025. doi: 10.1117/1.JRS.10.026025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers NJ. 2017. Animal communication: when I’m calling you, will you answer too? Curr Biol. 27(14):R713–R715. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent L, Soille P. 1991. Watersheds in digital spaces: an efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell. 13(6):583–598. doi: 10.1109/34.87344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogels MF, de Jong SM, Sterk G, Addink EA. 2017. Agricultural cropland mapping using black-and-white aerial photography, object-based image analysis and random forests. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 54:114–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2016.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Xiang S, Pan C. 2017. Gated convolutional neural network for semantic segmentation in high-resolution images. Remote Sens. 9(5):446. doi: 10.3390/rs9050446.
   Google Scholar
• Wang M, Li R. 2014. Segmentation of high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery based on hard-boundary constraint and two-stage merging. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 52(9):5712–5725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Jensen JR, Im J. 2010. An automatic region-based image segmentation algorithm for remote sensing applications. Environment Model Software. 25(10):1149–1165. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Nasrabadi NM, Huang TS. 2015. Semisupervised hyperspectral classification using task-driven dictionary learning with Laplacian regularization. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 53(3):1161–1173. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2335177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb AR. 2003. Statistical pattern recognition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wu L, Wang Y, Long J, Liu Z. 2015. A non-seed-based region growing algorithm for high resolution remote sensing image segmentation. In International Conference on Image and Graphics, Tianjin, China; Springer. p. 263–277.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Zhang Z, Wang G. 2019. Unsupervised deep feature transfer for low resolution image classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, Seoul, South Korea. p. 0–0.
   Google Scholar
• Xiang S, Nie F, Zhang C. 2008. Learning a Mahalanobis distance metric for data clustering and classification. Pattern Recognit. 41(12):3600–3612. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2008.05.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Z, Roberts C, Johnson B. 2008. Object-based target search using remotely sensed data: a case study in detecting invasive exotic Australian pine in south Florida. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 63(6):647–660. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2008.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin X, Yang W, Xia GS, Dong L. 2014. Semi-supervised feature learning for remote sensing image classification. In 2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Quebec City, Canada; IEEE. p. 1261–1264.
   Google Scholar
• Yosinski J, Clune J, Bengio Y, Lipson H. 2014. How transferable are features in deep neural networks? Adv Neur Inform Process Syst. :27.
   Google Scholar
• Yu Q, Gong P, Clinton N, Biging G, Kelly M, Schirokauer D. 2006. Object-based detailed vegetation classification with airborne high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing. 72(7):799–811. doi: 10.14358/PERS.72.7.799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan X, Shi J, Gu L. 2021. A review of deep learning methods for semantic segmentation of remote sensing imagery. Expert Syst Appl. 169:114417. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang AZ, Sun GY, Liu SH, Wang ZJ, Wang P, Ma JS. 2017. Multi-scale segmentation of very high resolution remote sensing image based on gravitational field and optimized region merging. Multimed Tools Appl. 76(13):15105–15122. doi: 10.1007/s11042-017-4558-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Xie Z, Selch D. 2013. Fusing Lidar and digital aerial photography for object-based forest mapping in the Florida everglades. GIScience Remote Sens. 50(5):562–573. doi: 10.1080/15481603.2013.836807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Yang X. 2020. Improving land cover classification in an urbanized coastal area by random forests: the role of variable selection. Remote Sens Environ. 251:112105. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Zhang L, Du B. 2016. Deep learning for remote sensing data: a technical tutorial on the state of the art. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag. 4(2):22–40. doi: 10.1109/MGRS.2016.2540798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Han L, Han L, Zhu L. 2020. How well do deep learning-based methods for land cover classification and object detection perform on high resolution remote sensing imagery? Remote Sens. 12(3):417. doi: 10.3390/rs12030417.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zhou X, Lin M, Sun J. 2018. Shufflenet: An extremely efficient convolutional neural network for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. p. 6848–6856.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Luo C, Wu H, Chen Y, Wang N, Song C. 2022. From individual to whole: reducing intra-class variance by feature aggregation. Int J Comput Vis. 130(3):800–819. doi: 10.1007/s11263-021-01569-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou G, Xu J, Chen W, Li X, Li J, Wang L. 2023. Deep feature enhancement method for land cover with irregular and sparse spatial distribution features: a case study on open-pit mining. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 61:1–20. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3241331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Jin G, Gao D. 2021. Integrating land-cover products based on ontologies and local accuracy. Information. 12(6):236. doi: 10.3390/info12060236.
   Google Scholar