Predicting spatio-temporal land use / land cover changes and their drivers forces based on a cellular automated Markov model in Ibb City, Yemen

References

• Abijith D, Saravanan S. 2022. Assessment of land use and land cover change detection and prediction using remote sensing and CA Markov in the northern coastal districts of Tamil Nadu, India. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 29(57):86055–86067. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15782-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Darwish Y, Ayad H, Taha D, Saadallah D. 2018. Predicting the future urban growth and it’s impacts on the surrounding environment using urban simulation models: case study of Ibb city – Yemen. Alexandr Eng J. 57(4):2887–2895. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2017.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hameedi WMM, Chen J, Faichia C, Al-Shaibah B, Nath B, Kafy AA, Hu G, Al-Aizari A. 2021. Remote sensing-based urban sprawl modeling using multilayer perceptron neural network Markov chain in Baghdad, Iraq. Rem Sens. 13(20):4034. doi: 10.3390/rs13204034.
   Google Scholar
• Aljenaid SS, Kadhem GR, AlKhuzaei MF, Alam JB. 2022. Detecting and assessing the spatio-temporal land use land cover changes of Bahrain Island During 1986–2020 using remote sensing and GIS. Earth Syst Environ. 6(4):787–802. doi: 10.1007/s41748-022-00315-z.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mashreki MH, Akhir JBM, Rahim SA, Desa KM, Rahman ZA. 2010. Remote sensing and GIS application for assessment of land suitability potential for agriculture in the IBB governorate, the Republic of Yemen. Pak J Biol Sci. 13(23):1116–1128. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2010.1116.1128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al-Shalabi M, Billa L, Pradhan B, Mansor S, Al-Sharif AAAA. 2013. Modelling urban growth evolution and land-use changes using GIS based cellular automata and SLEUTH models: the case of Sana’a metropolitan city, Yemen. Environ Earth Sci. 70(1):425–437. doi: 10.1007/s12665-012-2137-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alukah S, Islamic T, Magazine F, Visits AH, Ghanem N, Committee E, Parliament Y, Parliament Y, Yemeni T, Council GC. 2008. A bill banning khat in Yemen. p. 22–23.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez AC. 2023. Monitoring land cover changes using Landsat data and maximum likelihood classification: a case study of Hanoi, Vietnam.
   Google Scholar
• Arfasa GF, Owusu-Sekyere E, Doke DA. 2023. Predictions of land use/land cover change, drivers, and their implications on water availability for irrigation in the Vea catchment, Ghana. Geocarto Int. 38(1):1–24. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2023.2243093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnous MO, El-Rayes AE, Geriesh MH, Ghodeif KO, Al-Oshari FA. 2020. Groundwater potentiality mapping of tertiary volcanic aquifer in IBB basin, Yemen by using remote sensing and GIS tools. J Coast Conserv. 24(3):1–20. doi: 10.1007/s11852-020-00744-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asif M, Kazmi JH, Tariq A, Zhao N, Guluzade R, Soufan W, Almutairi KF, Sabagh AE, Aslam M. 2023. Modelling of land use and land cover changes and prediction using CA-Markov and Random Forest. Geocarto Int. 38(1):1–18. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2023.2210532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asokan A, Anitha J. 2019. Change detection techniques for remote sensing applications: a survey. Earth Sci Inform. 12(2):143–160. doi: 10.1007/s12145-019-00380-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avtar R, Tripathi S, Aggarwal AK. 2019. Population – urbanization – energy nexus: a review. p. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Berndes G. 2011. Bioenergy, land use change and climate change mitigation – background technical report. Report for Policy Advisors and Policy Makers IEA Bioenergy: ExCo. 3:1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas M, Banerji S, Mitra D. 2020. Land-use–land-cover change detection and application of Markov model: a case study of eastern part of Kolkata. Environ Dev Sustain. 22(5):4341–4360. doi: 10.1007/s10668-019-00387-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capolupo A, Monterisi C, Tarantino E. 2020. Landsat Images Classification Algorithm (LICA) to automatically extract land cover information in Google Earth Engine environment. Rem Sens. 12(7):1201. doi: 10.3390/rs12071201.
   Google Scholar
• Cui J, Ji W, Wang P, Zhu M, Liu Y. 2023. Spatial–temporal changes in land use and their driving forces in the circum-Bohai coastal zone of China from 2000 to 2020. Rem Sens. 15(9):2372. doi: 10.3390/rs15092372.
   Google Scholar
• Dammag AQ, Dai J, Cao S, Alabsi AA, Derhem BQ, Latif HZ. 2023. Sustainable planning strategies for rural land use using a hybridized technique and GIS: application to an Nijād Village in Ibb City, Yemen. J Urban Plann Dev. 149(1):5022052. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darem AA, Alhashmi AA, Almadani AM, Alanazi AK, Sutantra GA. 2023. Development of a map for land use and land cover classification of the Northern Border Region using remote sensing and GIS. Egypt J Rem Sens Space Sci. 26(2):341–350. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrs.2023.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza JM, Morgado P, da Costa EM, de Novaes Vianna LF. 2022. Modeling of LAND USE AND LAND COVER (LULC) change based on artificial neural networks for the Chapecó River Ecological Corridor, Santa Catarina/Brazil. Sustainability. 14(7):4038. doi: 10.3390/su14074038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dede M, Asdak C, Setiawan I. 2021. Spatial dynamics model of land use and land cover changes: a comparison of CA, ANN, and ANN-CA. Regist J Ilm Teknol Sist Inf. 8(1):38–49. doi: 10.26594/register.v8i1.2339.
   Google Scholar
• Dey NN, Al Rakib A, Kafy AA, Raikwar V. 2021. Geospatial modelling of changes in land use/land cover dynamics using multi-layer perception Markov chain model in Rajshahi City, Bangladesh. Environ Chall. 4(May):100148. doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100148.
   Google Scholar
• Edan MH, Maarouf RM, Hasson J. 2021. Predicting the impacts of land use/land cover change on land surface temperature using remote sensing approach in Al Kut, Iraq. Phys Chem Earth. 123(April):103012. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2021.103012.
   Google Scholar
• Faichia C, Tong Z, Zhang J, Liu X, Kazuva E, Ullah K, Al-Shaibah B. 2020. Using RS data-based CA–Markov model for dynamic simulation of historical and future luck in Vientiane, Laos. Sustainability. 12(20):8410. doi: 10.3390/su12208410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonte CC, See L, Laso-Bayas JC, Lesiv M, Fritz S. 2020. Assessing the accuracy of land use land cover (LULC) maps using class proportions in the reference data. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Rem Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 3(3):669–674. doi: 10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-669-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Gebeyehu AK, Snelder D, Sonneveld B. 2023. Land use-land cover dynamics, and local perceptions of change drivers among Nyangatom agro-pastoralists, Southwest Ethiopia. Land Use Policy. 131(May):106745. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106745.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez C, White JC, Wulder MA. 2016. Optical remotely sensed time series data for land cover classification: a review. ISPRS J Photogramm Rem Sens. 116:55–72. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gondwe JF, Lin S, Munthali RM. 2021. Analysis of land use and land cover changes in urban areas using remote sensing: case of Blantyre City. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc. 2021:1–17. doi: 10.1155/2021/8011565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarderas P, Smith F, Dufrene M. 2022. Land use and land cover change in a tropical mountain landscape of northern Ecuador: altitudinal patterns and driving forces. PLOS One. 17(7):e0260191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamad R, Balzter H, Kolo K. 2018. Predicting land use/land cover changes using a CA-Markov model under two different scenarios. Sustainability. 10(10):3421. doi: 10.3390/su10103421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• http://www.cso.gov.ye. 2020. No title.
   Google Scholar
• https://weatherspark.com. 2020. Average-weather-in-Ibb-Yemen-year-round.
   Google Scholar
• Jamal J, Zaki NAM, Talib N, Saad NM, Mokhtar ES, Omar H, Latif ZA, Suratman MN. 2022. Dominant tree species classification using remote sensing data and object-based image analysis. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 1019(1):012018. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1019/1/012018.
   Google Scholar
• Kafy AA, Naim MNH, Subramanyam G, Faisal AA, Ahmed NU, Rakib AA, Kona MA, Sattar GS. 2021. Cellular automata approach in dynamic modelling of land cover changes using RapidEye images in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Environ Chall. 4(January):100084. doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100084.
   Google Scholar
• Kafy AA, Saha M, Faisal AA, Rahaman ZA, Rahman MT, Liu D, Fattah MA, Al Rakib A, AlDousari AE, Rahaman SN, et al. 2022. Predicting the impacts of land use/land cover changes on seasonal urban thermal characteristics using machine learning algorithms. Build Environ. 217(March):109066. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109066.
   Google Scholar
• Khwarahm NR, Najmaddin PM, Ararat K, Qader S. 2021. Past and future prediction of land cover land use change based on earth observation data by the CA–Markov model: a case study from Duhok governorate, Iraq. Arab J Geosci. 14(15):1–14. doi: 10.1007/s12517-021-07984-6.
   Google Scholar
• Khwarahm NR. 2021. Spatial modeling of land use and land cover change in Sulaimani, Iraq, using multitemporal satellite data. Environ Monit Assess. 193(3):148. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-08959-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koko AF, Yue W, Abubakar GA, Hamed R, Alabsi AAN. 2020. Monitoring and predicting spatio-temporal land use/land cover changes in Zaria City, Nigeria, through an integrated cellular automata and Markov chain model (CA-Markov). Sustainability. 12(24):10452. doi: 10.3390/su122410452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar KS, Bhaskar PU, Padmakumari K. 2012. Estimation of land surface temperature to study urban heat island effect using Landsat Etm + Image. Int J Eng Sci Technol. 4(02):771–778.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Arya S. 2021. Change detection techniques for land cover change analysis using spatial datasets: a review. Rem Sens Earth Syst Sci. 4(3):172–185. doi: 10.1007/s41976-021-00056-z.
   Google Scholar
• Lamichhane S, Shakya NM. 2021. Land use land cover (LULC) change projection in Kathmandu Valley using the CLUE-S model. J Adv Coll Engin Mgt. 6:221–233. doi: 10.3126/jacem.v6i0.38361.
   Google Scholar
• Lu X, Zhang Y, Lin C, Wu F. 2021. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of sustainable land use in China: based on sustainable development goals framework. J Clean Prod. 310(April):127205. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127205.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadpour P, Viegas C. 2022. Applications of multi‐source and multi‐sensor data fusion of remote sensing for forest species mapping. Advances in Remote Sensing for Forest Monitoring; p. 255–287.
   Google Scholar
• MohanRajan SN, Loganathan A, Manoharan P. 2020. Survey on land use/land cover (LU/LC) change analysis in remote sensing and GIS environment: techniques and challenges. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 27(24):29900–29926. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09091-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Msofe NK, Sheng L, Lyimo J. 2019. Land use change trends and their driving forces in the Kilombero Valley Floodplain, Southeastern Tanzania. Sustainability. 11(2):505. doi: 10.3390/su11020505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mushore TD, Mutanga O, Odindi J, Sadza V, Dube T. 2022. Pansharpened Landsat 8 thermal-infrared data for improved land surface temperature characterization in a heterogeneous urban landscape. Rem Sens Appl Soc Environ. 26(March):100728. doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2022.100728.
   Google Scholar
• Nath B, Niu Z, Singh RP. 2018. Land use and land cover changes, and environment and risk evaluation of Dujiangyan city (SW China) using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Sustainability. 10(12):4631. doi: 10.3390/su10124631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath B, Wang Z, Ge Y, Islam K, Singh RP, Niu Z. 2020. Land use and land cover change modeling and future potential landscape risk assessment using Markov-CA model and analytical hierarchy process. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inform. 9(2):134. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9020134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray R, Das A, Hasan MSU, Aldrees A, Islam S, Khan MA, Lama GFC. 2023. Quantitative analysis of land use and land cover dynamics using geoinformatics techniques: a case study on Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority (KMDA) in West Bengal, India. Rem Sens. 15(4):959. doi: 10.3390/rs15040959.
   Google Scholar
• Rendana M, Rahim SA, Idris WMR, Lihan T, Rahman ZA.,. 2015. CA-Markov for predicting land use changes in tropical catchment area: a case study in Cameron Highland, Malaysia. J Appl Sci. 15(4):689–695. doi: 10.3923/jas.2015.689.695.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of Yemen. 2016. National Report Habitat III. Third United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development – HABITAT III; p. 1–67.
   Google Scholar
• Rigo R, Martin P, Verburg PH, Houet T. 2022. Contributions of local LUCC spatially explicit scenarios for water management: lessons learned from an ex-post evaluation. Futures. 139(November 2021):102937. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2022.102937.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson P, Hestler A, As J. 2018. Yemen. Cavendish Square Publishing, LLC. books.google.com
   Google Scholar
• Sajan B, Mishra VN, Kanga S, Meraj G, Singh SK, Kumar P. 2022. Cellular automata-based artificial neural network model for assessing past, present, and future land use/land cover dynamics. Agronomy. 12(11):2772. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12112772.
   Google Scholar
• Singh B, Venkatramanan V, Deshmukh B. 2022. Monitoring of land use land cover dynamics and prediction of urban growth using land change modeler in Delhi and its environs, India. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 29(47):71534–71554. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20900-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Som-Ard J, Atzberger C, Izquierdo-Verdiguier E, Vuolo F, Immitzer M. 2021. Remote sensing applications in sugarcane cultivation: a review. Rem Sens. 13(20):4040. doi: 10.3390/rs13204040.
   Google Scholar
• Tadese S, Soromessa T, Bekele T. 2021. Analysis of the current and future prediction. Sci World J. 2021:1–18. doi: 10.1155/2021/6685045.
   Google Scholar
• Tariq A, Mumtaz F, Majeed M, Zeng X. 2023. Spatio-temporal assessment of land use land cover based on trajectories and cellular automata Markov modelling and its impact on land surface temperature of Lahore district Pakistan. Environ Monit Assess. 195(1):114. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10738-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tariq A, Mumtaz F. 2023a. Modeling spatio-temporal assessment of land use land cover of Lahore and its impact on land surface temperature using multi-spectral remote sensing data. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 30(9):23908–23924. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23928-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tariq A, Mumtaz F. 2023b. A series of spatio-temporal analyses and predicting modeling of land use and land cover changes using an integrated Markov chain and cellular automata models. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 30(16):47470–47484. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25722-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tariq A, Shu H. 2020. CA-Markov chain analysis of seasonal land surface temperature and land use landcover change using optical multi-temporal satellite data of Faisalabad, Pakistan. Rem Sens. 12(20):3402. doi: 10.3390/rs12203402.
   Google Scholar
• Tariq A, Yan J, Mumtaz F. 2022. Land change modeler and CA-Markov chain analysis for land use land cover change using satellite data of Peshawar, Pakistan. Phys Chem Earth. 128(March):103286. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2022.103286.
   Google Scholar
• Tilahun F. 2022. Impact of land use land cover change on soil erosion, watershed prioritization and farmer erception: The case of Mitka Watershed in Ethiopia [doctoral dissertation].
   Google Scholar
• Tuan NT. 2022. Urbanization and land use change: a study in Vietnam. Environ Socio-Econ Stud. 10(2):19–29. doi: 10.2478/environ-2022-0008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Wang H, Chang R, Zeng H, Bai X. 2022. Dynamic simulation patterns and spatiotemporal analysis of land-use/land-cover changes in the Wuhan metropolitan area, China. Ecol Modell. 464(November 2021):109850. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109850.
   Google Scholar
• Yesuph AY, Dagnew AB. 2019. Land use/cover spatiotemporal dynamics, driving forces and implications at the Beshillo catchment of the Blue Nile Basin, North Eastern Highlands of Ethiopia. Environ Syst Res. 8(1):1–30. doi: 10.1186/s40068-019-0148-y.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Feng R, Han J, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Liu K. 2023. Temporal and spatial differentiation characteristics of ecosystem service values based on the ecogeographical division of China: a case study in the Yellow River Basin, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 30(3):8317–8337.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Zhang X, Shao Z, Jiang W, Gao H. 2023. Integrating Sentinel-1 and 2 with LiDAR data to estimate aboveground biomass of subtropical forests in northeast Guangdong, China. Int J Digit Earth. 16(1):158–182. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2023.2165180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Yang P, Xia J, Wang W, Cai W, Chen N, Hu S, Luo X, Li J, Zhan C. 2022. Land use/land cover prediction and analysis of the middle reaches of the Yangtze River under different scenarios. Sci Total Environ. 833(April):155238. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155238.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhong X, Jiang X, Li L, Xu J, Xu H. 2020. The impact of socio-economic factors on sediment load: a case study of the Yanhe river watershed. Sustainability. 12(6):2457. doi: 10.3390/su12062457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Guo X, Deng W, Shi S, Guan Q, Zhong Y, Zhang L, Li D. 2022. Land-use/land-cover change detection based on a Siamese global learning framework for high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery. ISPRS J Photogramm Rem Sens. 184(June 2021):63–78. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.12.005.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Mei Z, Xu X, Feng Y, Ren G. 2022. Landscape ecological risk assessment based on land use change in the Yellow River Basin of Shaanxi, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 19(15):9547. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar