Identification of sustainable urban settlement sites using interrelationship based multi-influencing factor technique and GIS

References

• Abdel-Malak FF, Issa UH, Miky YH, Osman EA. 2017. Applying decision-making techniques to civil engineering projects. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci. 6(4):326–331. doi: 10.1016/j.bjbas.2017.05.004.
   Google Scholar
• Ali T, Aghaloo K, Chiu YR, Ahmad M. 2022. Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic in planning the future energy systems of developing countries using an integrated MCDM approach in the off-grid areas of Bangladesh. Renew Energy. 189:25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.02.099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Shalabi MA, Mansor SB, Ahmed NB, Shiriff R. 2006. GIS based multicriteria approaches to housing site suitability assessment. In Proceedings, XXIII FIG Congress. Shaping the Change; October 8–13; Munich, Germany. p. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Alwan Z, Jones P, Holgate P. 2017. Strategic sustainable development in the UK construction industry, through the framework for strategic sustainable development, using Building Information Modelling. J Cleaner Prod. 140:349–358. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bait S, Lauria SM, Schiraldi MM. 2022. A risk-based hybrid multi-criteria approach to support managers in the industrial location selection in developing countries: a case study of textile sector in Africa. J Cleaner Prod. 335:130325. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barredo JI, Demicheli L. 2003. Urban sustainability in developing countries’ megacities: modelling and predicting future urban growth in Lagos. Cities. 20(5):297–310 doi: 10.1016/S0264-2751(03)00047-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bera K, Newcomer ME, Banik P. 2022. Groundwater recharge site suitability analysis through multi-influencing factors (MIF) in West Bengal dry-land areas, West Bengal, India. Acta Geochim. 41(6):1030–1048. doi: 10.1007/s11631-022-00559-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagat RB, Mohanty S. 2009. Emerging pattern of urbanization and the contribution of migration in urban growth in India. Asian Popul Stud. 5(1):5–20. doi: 10.1080/17441730902790024.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya RK, Chatterjee ND, Das K. 2020. Sub-basin prioritization for assessment of soil erosion susceptibility in Kangsabati, a plateau basin: a comparison between MCDM and SWAT models. Sci Total Environ. 734:139474. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchini L, Egidi G, Alhuseen A, Sateriano A, Cividino S, Clemente M, Imbrenda V. 2021. Toward a dualistic growth? Population increase and land-use change in Rome, Italy Land. Land. 10(7):749. doi: 10.3390/land10070749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockerhoff M. 1999. Urban growth in developing countries: a review of projections and predictions. Popul Dev Rev. 25(4):757–778. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.1999.00757.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butera FM. 2010. Climatic change and the built environment. Advances in building energy research. Vol. 4. Abingdon: Routledge; p. 45–75. doi: 10.3763/aber.2009.0403.
   Google Scholar
• Bulti DT, Assefa T. 2019. Analyzing ecological footprint of residential building construction in Adama City, Ethiopia. Environ Syst Res. 8(1):1–5. doi: 10.1186/s40068-019-0130-8.
   Google Scholar
• Caprioli C, Bottero M. 2021. Addressing complex challenges in transformations and planning: a fuzzy spatial multicriteria analysis for identifying suitable locations for urban infrastructures. Land Use Policy. 102:105147. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro J, Martinho D, Marreiros G, Novais P. 2016. Intelligent negotiation model for ubiquitous group decision scenarios. Front Inf Technol Electronic Eng. 17(4):296–308. doi: 10.1631/FITEE.1500344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter JV, Pan J, Rai SN, Galandiuk S. 2016. ROC-ing along: evaluation and interpretation of receiver operating characteristic curves. Surgery. 159(6):1638–1645. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Census. 2011. Census of India 2011, district census handbook, Nashik, directorate of census operation Maharashtra. https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/814.
   Google Scholar
• CGWB. 2014. Ground water information Nashik district Maharashtra, Govt of India, Ministry of water resources, central ground water board. [assessed on 20 December 2022]. http://cgwb.gov.in/district_profile/maharashtra/nashik.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chadchan J, Shankar R. 2012. An analysis of urban growth trends in the post-economic reforms period in India. Int J Sustain Built Environ. 1(1):36–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2012.05.001.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty S, Dadashpoor H, Novotný J, Maity I, Follmann A, Patel PP, Roy U, Pramanik S. 2022. In pursuit of sustainability–Spatio-temporal pathways of urban growth patterns in the world’s largest megacities. Cities. 131:103919. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang NB, Hossain U, Valencia A, Qiu J, Kapucu N. 2020. The role of food-energy-water nexus analyses in urban growth models for urban sustainability: a review of synergistic framework. Sustain Cities Soc. 63:102486. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng EW, Li H, Yu L. 2007. A GIS approach to shopping mall location selection. Build Environ. 42(2):884–892. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen VY, Lien HP, Liu CH, Liou JJ, Tzeng GH, Yang LS. 2011. Fuzzy MCDM approach for selecting the best environment-watershed plan. Appl Soft Comput. 11(1):265–275. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2009.11.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahake S. 2018. Taming Godavari River: navigating through religious, developmental, and environmental narratives. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water. 5(5):e1297. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai FC, Lee CF, Zhang XH. 2001. GIS-based geo-environmental evaluation for urban land-use planning: a case study. Eng Geol. 61(4):257–271. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00028-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doan DT, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Naismith N, Zhang T, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Tookey J. 2017. A critical comparison of green building rating systems. Build Environ. 123:243–260. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong J, Zhuang D, Xu X, Ying L. 2008. Integrated evaluation of urban development suitability based on remote sensing and GIS techniques–a case study in Jingjinji Area, China. Sensors (Basel). 8(9):5975–5986. doi: 10.3390/s8095975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper J, Dawson M, Casey E. 2011. An exploratory study of the importance of sustainable practices in the meeting and convention site selection process. J Convent Event Tourism. 12(3):153–178. doi: 10.1080/15470148.2011.598353.
   Google Scholar
• Emovon I, Oghenenyerovwho OS. 2020. Application of MCDM method in material selection for optimal design: a review. Results Mater. 7:100115. doi: 10.1016/j.rinma.2020.100115.
   Google Scholar
• Erbaş M, Kabak M, Özceylan E, Çetinkaya C. 2018. Optimal siting of electric vehicle charging stations: a GIS-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis. Energy. 163:1017–1031. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escamilla EZ, Habert G, Wohlmuth E. 2016. When CO2 counts: sustainability assessment of industrialized bamboo as an alternative for social housing programs in the Philippines. Build Environ. 103:44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadakh B, Jaybhaye R, Nalawade P. 2015. An assessment of tourism potential: a case sof Nashik City Maharashtra. Int J Res Geogr. 1(1):8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ghobarah A. 1987. Civil engineers’ role in site-selection studies. J Prof Issues in Eng. 113(4):351–359. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1987)113:4(351).
   Google Scholar
• Gou Z, Xie X. 2017. Evolving green building: triple bottom line or regenerative design? J Cleaner Prod. 153:600–607. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemizadeh A, Ju Y. 2019. Project portfolio selection for construction contractors by MCDM–GIS approach. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 16(12):8283–8296 doi: 10.1007/s13762-019-02248-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho KH, Rengarajan S, Lum YH. 2013. “Green” buildings and Real Estate Investment Trust’s (REIT) performance. J Property Invest Fin. 31(6):545–574. doi: 10.1108/JPIF-03-2013-0019.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang BG, Zhu L, Tan JS. 2017. Green business park project management: barriers and solutions for sustainable development. J Cleaner Prod. 153:209–219. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussaini MS, Farahmand A, Shrestha S, Neupane S, Abrunhosa M. 2022. Site selection for managed aquifer recharge in the city of Kabul, Afghanistan, using a multi-criteria decision analysis and geographic information system. Hydrogeol J. 30(1):59–78. doi: 10.1007/s10040-021-02408-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James H. 2019. Population, development, and the environment: challenges to achieving the sustainable development goals in the Asia Pacific. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jahangiri M, Shamsabadi AA, Mostafaeipour A, Rezaei M, Yousefi Y, Pomares LM. 2020. Using fuzzy MCDM technique to find the best location in Qatar for exploiting wind and solar energy to generate hydrogen and electricity. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 45(27):13862–13875. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarah SH, Zhou B, Abdullah RJ, Lu Y, Yu W. 2019. Urbanization and urban sprawl issues in city structure: a case of the Sulaymaniah Iraqi Kurdistan Region. Sustainability. 11(2):485. doi: 10.3390/su11020485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn AM. 1995. Sustainable development: The key concepts, issues and implications. Keynote paper given at the Proceedings of the 1995 International Sustainable Development Research Conference, 27–29 march; Manchester, England; p. 63–69. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Khan U, Faheem H, Jiang Z, Wajid M, Younas M, Zhang B. 2021. Integrating a GIS-based multi-influence factors model with hydro-geophysical exploration for groundwater potential and hydrogeological assessment: a case study in the Karak Watershed, Northern Pakistan. Water. 13(9):1255. doi: 10.3390/w13091255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer RW, Robbins ML. 1974. Computer-based land use suitability maps. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr. 11(8):A179. doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(74)91978-0.
   Google Scholar
• Kindie AT, Enku T, Moges MA, Geremew BS, Atinkut HB. 2018. Spatial analysis of groundwater potential using GIS based multi criteria decision analysis method in Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia. International conference on advances of science and technology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; p. 439–456.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Shaikh VR. 2013. Site suitability analysis for urban development using GIS based multicriteria evaluation technique. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 41(2):417–424. doi: 10.1007/s12524-012-0221-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar M. 2021. Evaluation of experimental research on black cotton soil stabilization using stone powder. Mater Today Proc. 37:3490–3493. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.389.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Sharma R, Bhaumik S. 2022. MCDA techniques used in optimization of weights and ratings of DRASTIC model for groundwater vulnerability assessment. Data Sci Manag. 5(1):28–41. doi: 10.1016/j.dsm.2022.03.004.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni PP, Pardeshi SD. 2019. Evaluation and interpolation of rainfall trends over the semi-arid upper Godavari basin. Meteorol Atmos Phys. 131(5):1565–1576. doi: 10.1007/s00703-018-0652-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuta AA, Opaluwa YD, Zitta N, Ojatah E, Ugolo EM. 2016. Application of GIS sieve mapping and overlay techniques for building site suitability analysis in part of FUT, Gidan Kwano, Minna, Nigeria. Indian J Sci Technol. 9(46):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann S. 2008. Sustainability on the urban scale: green urbanism–New models for urban growth and neighbourhoods. Urban energy transition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; p. 409–430.
   Google Scholar
• Lima L, Trindade E, Alencar L, Alencar M, Silva L. 2021. Sustainability in the construction industry: a systematic review of the literature. J Cleaner Prod. 289:125730. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Luo T, Liu Z, Kong X, Li J, Tan R. 2015. A comparative analysis of urban and rural construction land use change and driving forces: implications for urban–rural coordination development in Wuhan, Central China. Habitat Int. 47:113–125. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick J, Ibnatiq AA, Kahla NB, Alqadhi S, Singh VP, Hoa PV, Hang HT, Hong NV, Le HA. 2022. GIS-based decision support system for safe and sustainable building construction site in a mountainous region. Sustainability. 14(2):888. doi: 10.3390/su14020888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick SK, Rudra S, Maity B. 2022. Land suitability assessment for urban built-up development of a city in the Eastern Himalayan foothills: a study towards urban sustainability. Environ Dev Sustain. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02857-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malczewski J. 2004. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Prog Plann. 62(1):3–65. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2003.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malekmohammadi B, Ramezani Mehrian M, Jafari HR. 2012. Site selection for managed aquifer recharge using fuzzy rules: integrating geographical information system (GIS) tools and multi-criteria decision making. Hydrogeol J. 20(7):1393–1405. doi: 10.1007/s10040-012-0869-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal P, Saha J, Bhattacharya S, Paul S. 2021. Delineation of groundwater potential zones using the integration of geospatial and MIF techniques: a case study on Rarh region of West Bengal, India. Environ Challenge. 5:100396. doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100396.
   Google Scholar
• Marull J, Pino J, Mallarach JM, Cordobilla MJ. 2007. A land suitability index for strategic environmental assessment in metropolitan areas. Landscape Urban Plann. 81(3):200–212. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery B, Dragićević S. 2016. Comparison of GIS‐based logic scoring of preference and multicriteria evaluation methods: urban land use suitability. Geog Anal. 48(4):427–447. doi: 10.1111/gean.12103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossman D, Somoza E. 1991. ROC curves, test accuracy, and the description of diagnostic tests. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 3(3):330–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugiyo H, Chimonyo VG, Sibanda M, Kunz R, Masemola CR, Modi AT, Mabhaudhi T. 2021. Evaluation of land suitability methods with reference to neglected and underutilised crop species: a scoping review. Land. 10(2):125. doi: 10.3390/land10020125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray AT. 2001. Strategic analysis of public transport coverage. Socio-Econ Plann Sci. 35(3):175–188. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0121(01)00004-0.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhaya S. 2016. GIS-based site suitability analysis case study for professional college in Dehradun. J Civil Eng Environ Technol. 3(1):60–64.
   Google Scholar
• Nassereddine M, Eskandari H. 2017. An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation systems in Tehran. Transport Res A Policy Pract. 106:427–439. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.10.013.
   Google Scholar
• Nega W, Hunie Y, Tenaw M, Dires T, Kassaw S, Mansberger R. 2022. Demand-driven suitable sites for public toilets: a case study for GIS-Based site selection in Debre Markos Town, Ethiopia. GeoJournal. 87(3):2181–2194. doi: 10.1007/s10708-020-10360-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nzotcha U, Kenfack J, Manjia MB. 2019. Integrated multi-criteria decision making methodology for pumped hydro-energy storage plant site selection from a sustainable development perspective with an application. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 112:930–947. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oke SA. 2020. Regional aquifer vulnerability and pollution sensitivity analysis of drastic application to Dahomey Basin of Nigeria. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(7):2609. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande CB, Moharir KN, Singh SK, Varade AM, Ahmed Elbeltagie SFR, Khadri PC. 2021. Estimation of crop and forest biomass resources in a semi-arid region using satellite data and GIS. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 20(5):302–311.
   Google Scholar
• Pande CB, Moharir KN, Varade AM, Abdo HG, Mulla S, Yaseen ZM. 2023. Intertwined impacts of urbanization and land cover change on urban climate and agriculture in Aurangabad city (MS), India using google earth engine platform. J. Clean. Prod. 422:138541. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138541.
   Google Scholar
• Pawe CK, Saikia A. 2020. Decumbent development: urban sprawl in the Guwahati Metropolitan Area, India. Singap J Trop Geogr. 41(2):226–247. doi: 10.1111/sjtg.12317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius RG, Schneider LC. 2001. Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 85(1–3):239–248. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00187-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon ST. 2021. Reviewing whole building design sustainability challenges: perspectives on net zero energy and rainwater harvesting. Resilient and responsible smart cities. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; p. 209–218.
   Google Scholar
• Potbhare V, Syal M, Korkmaz S. 2009. Adoption of green building guidelines in developing countries based on US and India experiences. J Green Build. 4(2):158–174. doi: 10.3992/jgb.4.2.158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poyil RP, Misra AK. 2015. Urban agglomeration impact analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques in Malegaon city, India. Int J Sustain Built Environ. 4(1):136–144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.02.006.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu D, Zhang J. 2011. Urban residential land suitability index system and its comprehensive evaluation—a case study of Wenzhou. Procedia Eng. 21:439–445. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2036.
   Google Scholar
• Rajasekhar M, Raju GS, Raju RS, Basha UI. 2018. Data on artificial recharge sites identified by geospatial tools in semi-arid region of Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Data Brief. 19:462–474. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramkar P, Yadav SM. 2021. Flood risk index in data-scarce river basins using the AHP and GIS approach. Nat Hazards. 109(1):1119–1140. doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-04871-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rane N, Jayaraj GK. 2021. Stratigraphic modeling and hydraulic characterization of a typical basaltic aquifer system in the Kadva river basin, Nashik, India. Model Earth Syst Environ. 7(1):293–306. doi: 10.1007/s40808-020-01008-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rane NL, Jayaraj GK. 2022a. Comparison of multi-influence factor, weight of evidence and frequency ratio techniques to evaluate groundwater potential zones of basaltic aquifer systems. Environ Dev Sustain. 24(2):2315–2344. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01535-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rane NL, Jayaraj GK. 2022b. Enhancing SWAT model predictivity using multi-objective calibration: effects of integrating remotely sensed evapotranspiration and leaf area index. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 20(6):6449–6468. doi: 10.1007/s13762-022-04293-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao Y, Dai J, Dai D, He Q, Wang H. 2021. Effect of compactness of urban growth on regional landscape ecological security. Land. 10(8):848. doi: 10.3390/land10080848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rane NL, Achari A, Choudhary SP, Mallick SK, Pande CB, Srivastava A, Moharir KN. 2023. A decision framework for potential dam site selection using GIS, MIF and TOPSIS in Ulhas river basin, India. J Clean Prod. 15(423):138890.
   Google Scholar
• Raut RD, Kamble SS, Jha MK. 2016. An assessment of sustainable house using FST-QFD-AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach. Int J Procurement Manag. 9(1):86–122. doi: 10.1504/IJPM.2016.073390.
   Google Scholar
• Robson BT. 2006. Urban growth: an approach. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rolnick D, Donti PL, Kaack LH, Kochanski K, Lacoste A, Sankaran K, Ross AS, Milojevic-Dupont N, Jaques N, Waldman-Brown A, et al. 2023. Tackling climate change with machine learning. ACM Comput Surv. 55(2):1–96. doi: 10.1145/3485128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). J Oper Res Soc. 41(11):1073–1076.
   Google Scholar
• Saha A, Roy R. 2021. An integrated approach to identify suitable areas for built-up development using GIS-based multi-criteria analysis and AHP in Siliguri planning area, India. SN Appl Sci. 3(4):395. doi: 10.1007/s42452-021-04354-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar P, Kumar P, Vishwakarma DK, Ashok A, Elbeltagi A, Gupta S, Kuriqi A. 2022. Watershed prioritization using morphometric analysis by MCDM approaches. Ecol Inf. 70:101763. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma M. 2018. Development of a ‘Green building sustainability model’ for Green buildings in India. J Cleaner Prod. 190:538–551. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltelli A. 1999. Sensitivity analysis: could better methods be used? J Geophys Res. 104(D3):3789–3793. doi: 10.1029/1998JD100042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siksnelyte-Butkiene I, Zavadskas EK, Streimikiene D. 2020. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) for the assessment of renewable energy technologies in a household: a review. Energies. 13(5):1164. doi: 10.3390/en13051164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh KN. 1978. Urban development in India. Ajmer, Rajasthan: Abhinav Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Singh L, Saravanan S, Jennifer JJ, Abijith D. 2021. Application of multi-influence factor (MIF) technique for the identification of suitable sites for urban settlement in Tiruchirappalli City, Tamil Nadu, India. Asia-Pac J Reg Sci. 5(3):797–823. doi: 10.1007/s41685-021-00194-8.
   Google Scholar
• Singh RP, Raghubanshi AS. 2020. ‘Green building’movement in India: study on institutional support and regulatory support. Urban ecology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; p. 435–455.
   Google Scholar
• Sotoudeh-Anvari A. 2022. The applications of MCDM methods in COVID-19 pandemic: a state of the art review. Appl Soft Comput. 126:109238. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabari M, Kaboli A, Aryanezhad MB, Shahanaghi K, Siadat A. 2008. A new method for location selection: a hybrid analysis. Appl Math Comput. 206(2):598–606. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2008.05.111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TERI. 2006. In pursuit of sustainable development: mainstreaming environment in the construction sector. Delhi sustainable development summit, India habitat Center, Lodhi Road. New Delhi, India: The Energy and Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Terluin B, Griffiths P, van der Wouden JC, Ingelsrud LH, Terwee CB. 2020. Unlike ROC analysis, a new IRT method identified clinical thresholds unbiased by disease prevalence. J Clin Epidemiol. 124:118–125. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapa RB, Murayama Y. 2010. Drivers of urban growth in the Kathmandu valley, Nepal: examining the efficacy of the analytic hierarchy process. Appl Geogr. 30(1):70–83. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi AK, Agrawal S, Gupta RD. 2022. Comparison of GIS-based AHP and fuzzy AHP methods for hospital site selection: a case study for Prayagraj City, India. GeoJournal. 87(5):3507–3528. doi: 10.1007/s10708-021-10445-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2005. United Nations decade of education for sustainable development 2005–2014. Framework for the international implementation scheme. Vol. 32. Paris, France: UNESCO. [assessed on 25 Dec 2022]. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000148654
   Google Scholar
• Vasu D, Srivastava R, Patil NG, Tiwary P, Chandran P, Singh SK. 2018. A comparative assessment of land suitability evaluation methods for agricultural land use planning at village level. Land Use Policy. 79:146–163. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanegas P, Cattrysse D, Wijffels A, Van Orshoven J. 2010. Finding sites meeting compactness and on- and off-site suitability criteria in raster maps. 2nd International Conference on Advanced Geographic Information Systems, Applications, and Services, GEO Processing 2010, p. 15–20. doi: 10.1109/GEOProcessing.2010.10.
   Google Scholar
• Villacreses G, Gaona G, Martínez-Gómez J, Jijón DJ. 2017. Wind farms suitability location using geographical information system (GIS), based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods: the case of continental Ecuador. Renew Energy. 109:275–286. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YC, Shen JK, Xiang WN. 2018. Ecosystem service of green infrastructure for adaptation to urban growth: function and configuration. Ecosyst Health Sustain. 4(5):132–143. doi: 10.1080/20964129.2018.1474721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedley WC, Choo EU, Schoner B. 2001. Magnitude adjustment for AHP benefit/cost ratios. Eur J Oper Res. 133(2):342–351. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00302-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav V, Karmakar S, Dikshit AK, Vanjari S. 2016. A feasibility study for the locations of waste transfer stations in urban centers: a case study on the city of Nashik, India. J Cleaner Prod. 126:191–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav V, Karmakar S. 2021. Multi criteria decision making for sustainable municipal solid waste management systems. Computational management. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; p. 587–598.
   Google Scholar
• Yoris-Nobile AI, Lizasoain-Arteaga E, Slebi-Acevedo CJ, Blanco-Fernandez E, Alonso-Cañon S, Indacoechea-Vega I, Castro-Fresno D. 2023. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) analysis to determine the performance of 3D printed cement mortars and geopolymers. J Sustain Cement-Based Mater. 12(5):609–626. doi: 10.1080/21650373.2022.2099479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar