Spatial-Land use planning system data model proposal for edition II of LADM

References

• Aien A, Rajabifard A, Kalantari M, Shojaei D. 2015. Integrating legal and physical dimensions of urban environments. IJGI. 4(3):1442–1479. doi: 10.3390/ijgi4031442.
   Google Scholar
• Alkan M, Polat ZA. 2017. Design and development of LADM-based infrastructure for Turkey. Survey Review. 49(356):370–385. doi: 10.1080/00396265.2016.1180777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bank TW. 2020. The World Bank: population density. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.POP.DNST?most_recent_value_desc=true.
   Google Scholar
• Besse M. 2021. The cadastre of public-law restrictions on landownership in Switzerland. In Smart surveyors for land and water management – challenges in a new reality.
   Google Scholar
• Biot V, Colard A. 2000. Challenges and issues of spatial planning in the European Union: European vision and supraregional co-operation. belgeo. 1-2-3–4(1-2-3-4):143–162. doi: 10.4000/belgeo.13962.
   Google Scholar
• Bydłosz J, Bieda A, Parzych P. 2018. The implementation of spatial planning objects in a 3D cadastral model. IJGI. 7(4):153. doi: 10.3390/ijgi7040153.
   Google Scholar
• Çağdaş V, Stubkjær E. 2011. Design research for cadastral systems. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 35(1):77–87. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carsjens GJ, Ligtenberg A. 2007. A GIS-based support tool for sustainable spatial planning in metropolitan areas. Landscape Urban Plann. 80(1-2):72–83. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Turkstra J, Peng M, Du N, Ho P. 2006. Urban land administration and planning in China: opportunities and constraints of spatial data models. Land Use Policy. 23(4):604–616. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douvere F, Ehler CN. 2009. New perspectives on sea use management: initial findings from European experience with marine spatial planning. J Environ Manage. 90(1):77–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eidgenossenschaft S, Svizzera C. 2015. The cadastre of public-law restrictions on landownership (PLR-cadastre). https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/en/knowledge-facts/swiss-cadastral-surveying/plr-cadastre.html.
   Google Scholar
• Enemark S. 2004. Building land information policies. UN, FIG, PC IDEA inter-regional special forum on the building of land information policies in the Americas.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. INSPIRE infrastructure for spatial information in Europe D2.8.III.4 data specification on land use – technical guidelines. December.
   Google Scholar
• Gielen DM, Tasan-Kok T. 2010. Flexibility in planning and the consequences for public-value capturing in UK, Spain and the Netherlands. European Planning Studies. 18(7):1097–1131. doi: 10.1080/09654311003744191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govedarica M, Radulović A, Sladić D. 2021. Designing and implementing a LADM-based cadastral information system in Serbia, Montenegro and Republic of Srpska. Land Use Policy. 109(June 2020):105732. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall P, Tewdwr-Jones M. 2019. Urban and regional planning. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey P. 2020. Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley M, Inch A. 2020. International encyclopedia of human geography: urban planning. In: A. Kobayashi, editor. International encyclopedia of human geography. 2nd ed. Elsevier; p. 87–92. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10228-8.
   Google Scholar
• Indrajit A, Jaya VE, Loenen BV, Lemmen C, Oosterom PV, Ploeger H, Theodore R. 2020. The role of the revised land administration domain model and spatial data infrastructure in improving ease of doing business in Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Indrajit, Agung, van Loenen, Bastiaan, Jaya, Virgo Eresta, Ploeger, Hendrik, Lemmen, Christiaan, van Oosterom, Peter, Suprajaka,. (2021). Implementation of the spatial plan information package for improving ease of doing business in Indonesian cities. Land Use Policy, 105:105338. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indrajit A, van Loenen B, Ploeger H, van Oosterom P. 2020. Developing a spatial planning information package in ISO 19152 land administration domain model. Land Use Policy. 98(July 2019):104111. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indrajit A, Jaya VE, Loenen B v 2019. Implementation of spatial planning package for construction of an LADM country profile: reducing asymmetric access to information of RRRs in Indonesia. https://pure.tudelft.nl/portal/files/67728995/LADM2019_Paper_D3_F.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2012. ISO 19152 international standard geographic information—land administration domain model (LADM). Int Organ Standard. 2012:397.
   Google Scholar
• Kalogianni E, Janečka K, Kalantari M, Dimopoulou E, Bydłosz J, Radulović A, Vučić N, Sladić D, Govedarica M, Lemmen C, et al. 2021. Methodology for the development of LADM country profiles. Land Use Policy. 105(March):105380. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilinc N, Turk SS. 2021. Plan changes in Istanbul (Turkey) as project-led practices in a plan-led planning system. Eur Plann Stud. 29(8):1393–1418. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2020.1865276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzmann KR. 2016. Planning for states and nation-states in the US and Europe. disP Plann Rev. 52(3):121–124. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2016.1235903.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmen C. 2012. A Domain Model for Land Administration. Delft. NCG.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmen C, van Oosterom P, Bennett R. 2015. The land administration domain model. Land Use Policy. 49(September 2013):535–545. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmen C, Van Oosterom P, Kara A, Kalogianni E, Shnaidman A, Indrajit A, Alattas A. 2019. The scope of LADM revision is shaping-up. Paper presented at 8th International FIG Workshop on the Land Administration Domain Model, October, p. 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmen C, van Oosterom PJM, Uitermark HT, Zevenbergen JA, Cooper AK. 2011. Interoperable domain models: the ISO land administration domain model LADM and its external classes. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. XXXVIII-4/C21:31–40. doi: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-4-C21-31-2011.
   Google Scholar
• Levkovich O, Rouwendal J, Brugman L. 2018. Spatial planning and segmentation of the land market: the case of the Netherlands. Land Econ. 94(1):137–154. doi: 10.3368/le.94.1.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayors C. 2019. Spatial planning and development in the USA: economic growth is of paramount importance. City Mayors. http://www.citymayors.com/development/usa-planning-development.html.
   Google Scholar
• MLIT. 2017. An overview of spatial policy in Asian and European countries. Ministry of Land Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. https://www.mlit.go.jp/kokudokeikaku/international/spw/general/indonesia/index_e.html.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. Land-use governance survey. https://www.oecd.org/gov/governance-of-land-use.htm.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017a. Land-use planning systems in the OECD country fact sheets. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/urban-rural-and-regional-development/land-use-planning-systems-in-the-oecd_9789264268579-en#page7.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017b. The governance of land use in OECD countries policy analysis and recommendations. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/urban-rural-and-regional-development/the-governance-of-land-use-in-oecd-countries_9789264268609-en#page3.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterom PVAN, Kara A, Kalogianni E, Shnaidman A, Indrajit A, Alattas A, Lemmen C. 2019. Joint ISO/TC211 and OGC Revision of the LADM : valuation information, spatial planning information, SDG land indicators, refined survey model, links to BIM, support of LA processes, technical encodings, and much more on their way!. FIG Working Week 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Paasch JM, van Oosterom P, Lemmen C, Paulsson J. 2015. Further modelling of LADM’s rights, restrictions and responsibilities (RRRs). Land Use Policy. 49:680–689. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S. 2007. A design science research methodology for information systems research. J Manage Inf Syst. 24(3):45–77. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat ZA. 2017. Arazi̇ yöneti̇mi̇ni̇n tapu ve kadastro işlemleri̇ne yöneli̇k hari̇ci̇ veri̇ modeli̇ tasarimi ve uygulamasi [Yıldız Technical University, Institute of Science, PhD Thesis].
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt S, Buehler R. 2007. The planning process in the US and Germany: a comparative analysis. Int Plann Stud. 12(1):55–75. doi: 10.1080/13563470701346592.
   Google Scholar
• Shnaidman A, van Oosterom P. 2019. LADM-based Israeli country profile : toward implementation of 3D cadastre registration. Paper presented at 8th International FIG Workshop on the Land Administration Domain Model, October, p. 331–344.
   Google Scholar
• Tija D. 2012. Land administration domain model: application to the City of Johannesburg land information system, South Africa. GISSA Ukubuzana 2012: Academic paper.
   Google Scholar
• UN-GGIM. 2019. Framework for effective land administration. December. http://ggim.un.org/meetings/2018-Deqing-Expert-Group/documents/Concept_Note.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2008. Spatial planning: key instrument for development and effective governance with special reference to countries in transition. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations General Assembly. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341375.
   Google Scholar
• van Oosterom P, Stoter J. 2010. 5D data modelling: full integration of 2D/3D space, time and scale dimensions. In: Fabrikant SI, Reichenbacher T, van Kreveld M, Schlieder C, editors. Geographic Information Science (GIScience). Vol. 6292, (June). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. 310–324. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15300-6_22.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Zhuo Y, Li G, Bennett RM, Liao R, Wu C, Wu Y. 2022. An LADM–based model to facilitate land tenure reform of rural homesteads in China. Land Use Policy. 120(June 2019):106271. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yılmaz O, Alkan M. 2022. Arazi idaresi temel modeli planlama paketi geliştirilmesi için Türkiye mekânsal planlama sisteminin incelenmesi. J Geod Geoinf. 9(2):150–165. doi: 10.9733/JGG.2022R0011.T.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz O, Alkan M. 2023. The joint spatial planning data model. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. :387–390. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W6-2022-387-2023.
   Google Scholar