898
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Are public green spaces distributed fairly? A nationwide analysis based on remote sensing, OpenStreetMap and census data

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Article: 2286305 | Received 26 Jun 2023, Accepted 16 Nov 2023, Published online: 27 Nov 2023

References

  • Akpinar A, Barbosa-Leiker C, Brooks KR. 2016. Does green space matter? Exploring relationships between green space type and health indicators. Urban For Urban Green. 20:407–418. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.013.
  • Artmann M, Mueller C, Goetzlich L, Hof A. 2019. Supply and demand concerning urban green spaces for recreation by elderlies living in care facilities: the role of accessibility in an explorative case study in austria. Front Environ Sci. 7:12. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00136.
  • Barber A, Haase D, Wolff M. 2021. Permeability of the city – physical barriers of and in urban green spaces in the city of Halle, Germany. Ecol Indic. 125(107555):107555. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107555.
  • Barbosa O, Tratalos JA, Armsworth PR, Davies RG, Fuller RA, Johnson P, Gaston KJ. 2007. Who benefits from access to green space? a case study from Sheffield, UK. Landscape Urban Plann. 83(2-3):187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.04.004.
  • Berdejo-Espinola V, Suárez-Castro AF, Amano T, Fielding KS, Oh RRY, Fuller RA. 2021. Urban green space use during a time of stress: a case study during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brisbane, Australia. People Nat (Hoboken). 3(3):597–609. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10218.
  • Brown CF, Brumby SP, Guzder-Williams B, Birch T, Hyde SB, Mazzariello J, Czerwinski W, Pasquarella VJ, Haertel R, Ilyushchenko S, et al. 2022. Dynamic world, near real-time global 10 m land use land cover mapping. Sci Data. 9(1):17. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01307-4.
  • Castelli C, d’Hombres B, de Dominicis L, Dijkstra L, Montalto V, Pontarollo N. 2023. What makes cities happy? Factors contributing to life satisfaction in European cities. Eur Urban Reg Stud. 30(4):319–342. doi: 10.1177/09697764231155335.
  • de Voorde TV. 2017. Spatially explicit urban green indicators for characterizing vegetation cover and public green space proximity: a case study on Brussels, Belgium. Int J Digital Earth. 10(8):798–813.
  • Dewulf B, Neutens T, Van Dyck D, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Broekx S, Beckx C, Van de Weghe N. 2016. Associations between time spent in green areas and physical activity among late middle-aged adults. Geospat Health. 11(3):411. doi: 10.4081/gh.2016.411.
  • Dorn H, Törnros T, Zipf A. 2015. Quality evaluation of VGI using authoritative data—a comparison with land use data in southern Germany. IJGI. 4(3):1657–1671. doi: 10.3390/ijgi4031657.
  • Droin A, Wurm M, Taubenböck H. 2023. The individual walkable neighborhood - evaluating people-centered spatial units focusing on urban density. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 99:101893. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101893.
  • Enssle F, Kabisch N. 2020. Urban green spaces for the social interaction, health and well-being of older people—an integrated view of urban ecosystem services and socio-environmental justice. Environ Sci Policy. 109:36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.008.
  • Feltynowski M, Kronenberg J, Bergier T, Kabisch N, Łaszkiewicz E, Strohbach MW. 2018. Challenges of urban green space management in the face of using inadequate data. Urban For Urban Green. 31:56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.003.
  • Flacke J, Schüle SA, Köckler H, Bolte G. 2016. Mapping environmental inequalities relevant for health for informing urban planning interventions – a case study in the city of Dortmund, Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 13(7):711. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13070711.
  • Fukushima K. 1969. Visual feature extraction by a multilayered network of analog threshold elements. IEEE Trans Syst Sci Cyber. 5(4):322–333. doi: 10.1109/TSSC.1969.300225.
  • Georganos S, Hafner S, Kuffer M, Linard C, Ban Y. 2022. A census from heaven: unraveling the potential of deep learning and earth observation for intra-urban population mapping in data scarce environments. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 114:103013. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.103013.
  • Gómez-Baggethun E, Gren Å, Barton DN, Langemeyer J, McPhearson T, O’Farrell P, Andersson E, Hamstead Z, Kremer P. 2013. Urban ecosystem services. In Elmqvist, T., Fragkais, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P. J., McDonald, R. I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K. C., and Wilkinson, C., editors, Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities, 175–251. Dodrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  • Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. 2016. Deep learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Honold J, Lakes T, Beyer R, van der Meer E. 2016. Restoration in urban spaces: nature views from home, greenways, and public parks. Environ Behav. 48(6):796–825. doi: 10.1177/0013916514568556.
  • Hunter AJ, Luck GW. 2015. Defining and measuring the social-ecological quality of urban greenspace: a semi-systematic review. Urban Ecosyst. 18(4):1139–1163. doi: 10.1007/s11252-015-0456-6.
  • Ioffe S, Szegedy C. 2015. Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, p. 448–456. PMLR.
  • Ismayilova I, Timpf S. 2022. Towards an ontology of urban green spaces. GI_Forum. 2022(2):47–57.
  • Jarvis I, Gergel S, Koehoorn M, van den Bosch M. 2020. Greenspace access does not correspond to nature exposure: measures of urban natural space with implications for health research. Landscape Urban Plann. 194:103686. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103686.
  • Jennings V, Gaither CJ, Gragg RS. 2012. Promoting environmental justice through urban green space access: a synopsis. Environ Justice. 5(1):1–7. doi: 10.1089/env.2011.0007.
  • Jim CY, Chen WY. 2006. Perception and attitude of residents toward urban green spaces in Guangzhou (China). Environ Manage. 38(3):338–349. doi: 10.1007/s00267-005-0166-6.
  • Jimenez RB, Lane KJ, Hutyra LR, Fabian MP. 2022. Spatial resolution of normalized difference vegetation index and greenness exposure misclassification in an urban cohort. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 32(2):213–222. doi: 10.1038/s41370-022-00409-w.
  • Jünger S. 2021. Land use disadvantages in Germany: a matter of ethnic income inequalities? Urban Stud. 59(9):1819–1836. doi: 10.1177/00420980211023206.
  • Jorgensen A, Gobster PH. 2010. Shades of green: measuring the ecology of urban green space in the context of human health and well-being. Nat Cult. 5(3):338–363. doi: 10.3167/nc.2010.050307.
  • Kabisch N. 2019. The influence of socio-economic and socio-demographic factors in the association between urban green space and health. In Marselle, M. R., Stadler, J., Korn, H., Irvine, K. N., and Bonn, A., editors, Biodiversity and health in the face of climate change, p. 91–119. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Kabisch N, Haase D. 2014. Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany. Landscape Urban Plann. 122:129–139. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.016.
  • Kabisch N, Strohbach M, Haase D, Kronenberg J. 2016. Urban green space availability in European cities. Ecol Indic. 70:586–596. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.029.
  • Klompmaker JO, Hoek G, Bloemsma LD, Gehring U, Strak M, Wijga AH, van den Brink C, Brunekreef B, Lebret E, Janssen NA. 2018. Green space definition affects associations of green space with overweight and physical activity. Environ Res. 160:531–540. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.027.
  • Krekel C, Kolbe J, Wüstemann H. 2016. The greener, the happier? the effect of urban land use on residential well-being. Ecol Econ. 121:117–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.005.
  • Lee ACK, Maheswaran R. 2011. The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. J Public Health (Oxf). 33(2):212–222. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdq068.
  • Liao Y, Zhou Q, Jing X. 2021. A comparison of global and regional open datasets for urban greenspace mapping. Urban For Urban Green. 62:127132. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127132.
  • Lin BB, Fuller RA, Bush R, Gaston KJ, Shanahan DF. 2014. Opportunity or orientation? Who uses urban parks and why. PLoS One. 9(1):e87422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087422.
  • Long X, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Zhou Q. 2022. Visualizing green space accessibility for more than 4,000 cities across the globe. Environ Plann B: Urban Analyt City Sci. 49(5):1578–1581. doi: 10.1177/23998083221097110.
  • Ludwig C, Hecht R, Lautenbach S, Schorcht M, Zipf A. 2021. Mapping public urban green spaces based on OpenStreetMap and sentinel-2 imagery using belief functions. IJGI. 10(4):251. doi: 10.3390/ijgi10040251.
  • Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, De Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P. 2006. Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? J Epidemiol Community Health. 60(7):587–592. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.043125.
  • Mears M, Brindley P, Jorgensen A, Maheswaran R. 2020. Population-level linkages between urban greenspace and health inequality: the case for using multiple indicators of neighbourhood greenspace. Health Place. 62(:102284. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102284.
  • Middel A, Häb K, Brazel AJ, Martin CA, Guhathakurta S. 2014. Impact of urban form and design on mid-afternoon microclimate in Phoenix Local Climate Zones. Landscape Urban Plann. 122:16–28. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.004.
  • Openshaw S. 1983. The modifiable areal unit problem. Number 38 in Concepts and techniques in modern geography. Norwich, England: Geo Books.
  • Park J, Kim J-H, Lee DK, Park CY, Jeong SG. 2017. The influence of small green space type and structure at the street level on urban heat island mitigation. Urban For Urban Green. 21:203–212. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.12.005.
  • Pearce J, Witten K, Bartie P. 2006. Neighbourhoods and health: a GIS approach to measuring community resource accessibility. J Epidemiol Community Health. 60(5):389–395. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.043281.
  • Pflugmacher D, Rabe A, Peters M, Hostert P. 2019. Mapping pan-European land cover using Landsat spectral-temporal metrics and the European LUCAS survey. Remote Sens Environ. 221:583–595. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.001.
  • Poortinga W, Bird N, Hallingberg B, Phillips R, Williams D. 2021. The role of perceived public and private green space in subjective health and wellbeing during and after the first peak of the COVID-19 outbreak. Landsc Urban Plan. 211:104092. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104092.
  • Pope D, Tisdall R, Middleton J, Verma A, van Ameijden E, Birt C, Macherianakis A, Bruce N. 2015. Quality of and access to green space in relation to psychological distress: results from a population-based cross-sectional study as part of the EURO-URHIS 2 project. Eur J Public Health. 28(1):35–38. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv094.
  • Pugh TAM, MacKenzie AR, Whyatt JD, Hewitt CN. 2012. Effectiveness of green infrastructure for improvement of air quality in urban street canyons. Environ Sci Technol. 46(14):7692–7699. doi: 10.1021/es300826w.
  • Qiu C, Tong X, Schmitt M, Bechtel B, Zhu XX. 2020. Multilevel feature fusion-based CNN for local climate zone classification from sentinel-2 images: benchmark results on the so2sat LCZ42 dataset. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens. 13:2793–2806. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2020.2995711.
  • Rauch S, Taubenböck H, Knopp C, Rauh J. 2021. Risk and space: modelling the accessibility of stroke centers using day- & nighttime population distribution and different transportation scenarios. Int J Health Geogr. 20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12942-021-00284-y.
  • Rehling J, Bunge C, Waldhauer J, Conrad A. 2021. Socioeconomic differences in walking time of children and adolescents to public green spaces in urban areas—results of the german environmental survey (2014–2017). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18(5):2326. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052326.
  • Reid CE, Kubzansky LD, Li J, Shmool JL, Clougherty JE. 2018. It’s not easy assessing greenness: a comparison of NDVI datasets and neighborhood types and their associations with self-rated health in New York City. Health Place. 54:92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.09.005.
  • Richardson E, Pearce J, Mitchell R, Kingham S. 2013. Role of physical activity in the relationship between urban green space and health. Public Health. 127(4):318–324. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.01.004.
  • Rigolon A. 2016. A complex landscape of inequity in access to urban parks: a literature review. Landscape Urban Plann. 153:160–169. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.017.
  • Rosier JF, Taubenböck H, Verburg PH, van Vliet J. 2022. Fusing earth observation and socioeconomic data to increase the transferability of large-scale urban land use classification. Remote Sens Environ. 278:113076. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113076.
  • Russette H, Graham J, Holden Z, Semmens EO, Williams E, Landguth EL. 2021. Greenspace exposure and COVID-19 mortality in the United States: January–July 2020. Environ Res. 198:111195. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111195.
  • Santos T, Tenedório J, Gonçalves J. 2016. Quantifying the city’s green area potential gain using remote sensing data. Sustainability. 8(12):1247. doi: 10.3390/su8121247.
  • Sapena M, Wurm M, Taubenböck H, Tuia D, Ruiz LA. 2021. Estimating quality of life dimensions from urban spatial pattern metrics. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 85(:101549. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101549.
  • Schüle SA, Hilz LK, Dreger S, Bolte G. 2019. Social inequalities in environmental resources of green and blue spaces: a review of evidence in the WHO European region. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(7):1216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071216.
  • Su JG, Dadvand P, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Bartoll X, Jerrett M. 2019. Associations of green space metrics with health and behavior outcomes at different buffer sizes and remote sensing sensor resolutions. Environ Int. 126:162–170. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.008.
  • Swanwick C, Dunnett N, Woolley H. 2003. Nature, role and value of green space in towns and cities: an overview. Built Environ. 29(2):94–106. doi: 10.2148/benv.29.2.94.54467.
  • Tatem AJ. 2017. WorldPop, open data for spatial demography. Sci Data. 4(1):170004. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.4.
  • Taubenböck H, Droin A, Standfuß I, Dosch F, Sander N, Milbert A, Eichfuss S, Wurm M. 2022. To be, or not to be ‘urban’? A multi-modal method for the differentiated measurement of the degree of urbanization. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 95:101830. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101830.
  • Taubenböck H, Reiter M, Dosch F, Leichtle T, Weigand M, Wurm M. 2021. Which city is the greenest? A multi-dimensional deconstruction of city rankings. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 89:101687. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101687.
  • Taubenböck H, Weigand M, Esch T, Staab J, Wurm M, Mast J, Dech S. 2019. A new ranking of the world’s largest cities—Do administrative units obscure morphological realities? Remote Sens Environ. 232:111353 doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111353.
  • Taylor L, Hochuli DF. 2017. Defining greenspace: multiple uses across multiple disciplines. Landscape Urban Plann. 158:25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.024.
  • UN General Assembly. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Technical report, A/RES/70/1, 21 October 2015.
  • Vargas-Munoz JE, Srivastava S, Tuia D, Falcao AX. 2021. OpenStreetMap: challenges and opportunities in machine learning and remote sensing. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag. 9(1):184–199. doi: 10.1109/MGRS.2020.2994107.
  • Villeneuve PJ, Jerrett M, Su JG, Burnett RT, Chen H, Wheeler AJ, Goldberg MS. 2012. A cohort study relating urban green space with mortality in Ontario, Canada. Environ Res. 115:51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2012.03.003.
  • Weigand M, Staab J, Wurm M, Taubenböck H. 2020. Spatial and semantic effects of LUCAS samples on fully automated land use/land cover classification in high-resolution Sentinel-2 data. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 88(:102065. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102065.
  • Weigand M, Wurm M, Dech S, Taubenböck H. 2019. Remote sensing in environmental justice research – a review. IJGI. 8(1):20. doi: 10.3390/ijgi8010020.
  • Wheeler BW, Lovell R, Higgins SL, White MP, Alcock I, Osborne NJ, Husk K, Sabel CE, Depledge MH. 2015. Beyond greenspace: an ecological study of population general health and indicators of natural environment type and quality. Int J Health Geogr. 14(1):17. (doi: 10.1186/s12942-015-0009-5.
  • Wolff M, Haase D. 2019. Mediating sustainability and liveability—turning points of green space supply in European cities. Front Environ Sci. 7, 1–14. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00061.
  • World Health Organization. 2017. Urban green spaces: a brief for action. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.
  • World Health Organization. 2020. Mental health and psychosocial considerations during the covid-19 outbreak. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/mental-health-considerations.pdf.
  • Wüstemann H, Kalisch D, Kolbe J. 2017. Accessibility of urban blue in German major cities. Ecol Indic. 78:125–130. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.035.
  • Wurm M, Goebel J, Wagner GG, Weigand M, Dech S, Taubenböck H. 2019a. Inferring floor area ratio thresholds for the delineation of city centers based on cognitive perception. Environ Plann B: urban Analyt City Sci. 48(2):265–279. doi: 10.1177/2399808319869341.
  • Wurm M, Stark T, Zhu XX, Weigand M, Taubenböck H. 2019b. Semantic segmentation of slums in satellite images using transfer learning on fully convolutional neural networks. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 150:59–69. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.02.006.
  • Wurm M, Weigand M, Stark T, Goebel J, Wagner GG, Taubenböck H. 2019c. Modelling the impact of the urban spatial structure on the choice of residential location using ‘big earth data’ and machine learning. In 2019 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event (JURSE). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/JURSE.2019.8808942.
  • Wüstemann H, Kalisch D, Kolbe J. 2017. Access to urban green space and environmental inequalities in Germany. Landscape Urban Plann. 164:124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.002.
  • Xu C, Haase D, Pauleit S. 2018a. The impact of different urban dynamics on green space availability: a multiple scenario modeling approach for the region of Munich, Germany. Ecol Indic. 93:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.058.
  • Xu C, Haase D, Pribadi DO, Pauleit S. 2018b. Spatial variation of green space equity and its relation with urban dynamics: a case study in the region of Munich. Ecol Indic. 93:512–523. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.024.
  • Zepp H, Groß L, Inostroza L. 2020. And the winner is? Comparing urban green space provision and accessibility in eight European metropolitan areas using a spatially explicit approach. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 49(:126603. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126603.
  • Zhuang S, Bolte G, Lakes T. 2022. Exploring environmental health inequalities: a scientometric analysis of global research trends (1970–2020). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 19(12):7394. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127394.
  • Zuniga-Teran A, Gerlak A. 2019. A multidisciplinary approach to analyzing questions of justice issues in urban greenspace. Sustainability. 11(11):3055. doi: 10.3390/su11113055.