Publication Cover
Agenda
Empowering women for gender equity
Volume 30, 2016 - Issue 1
485
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLE

Two decades of jurisprudence on substantive gender equality: What the Constitutional Court got right and wrong

References

  • African Union (2003) Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, adopted by the Assembly of the African Union in Maputo, July 11 2003.
  • Albertyn C & Goldblatt B (1998) ‘Facing the challenge of transformation: Difficulties in the development of an indigenous jurisprudence of equality’, in South African Journal of Human Rights, 14, 2, 248–76.
  • Albertyn C & Goldblatt B (2014) ‘Chapter 35: Equality’ in S Woolman & M Bishop (eds) Constitutional Law of South Africa 2nd Edition, Cape Town: Juta.
  • Choudhry S (2009) ‘“He had a mandate”: The South African Constitutional Court and the African National Congress in a dominant party democracy’, in Constitutional Court Review, 2, 1–86.
  • Commission for Africa (2005) Our Common Interest: Report of the Commission for Africa, available at: www.commissionforafrica.info/2005-report, site accessed 16 January 2016.
  • CEDAW Committee (1987) Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women General Recommendation Adopted by the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, Sixth Session 1987, General Recommendation No. 4: Reservations.
  • Cowen S (2001) ‘Can dignity guide our equality jurisprudence?’ in South African Journal of Human Rights, 17, 34–58.
  • Davis D & le Roux M (2009) Precedent & Possibility: The (Ab)use of Law in South Africa, Cape Town: Double Storey.
  • De Vos P, Freedman W, Brand D, Gevers C, Govender K, Lenaghan P, Mailula D, Ntlama N, Sibanda S & Stone L (2014) South African Constitutional Law in Context, Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
  • Dyzenhaus D (2007) ‘The pasts and future of the rule of law in South Africa’ in South African Law Journal, 124, 4, 734–61.
  • Klare K (1998) ‘Legal culture and transformative constitutionalism’, in South African Journal on Human Rights, 14, 1, 146–88.
  • Langa P (2006) ‘Transformative constitutionalism’, in Stellenbosch Law Review, 17, 3, 351–60.
  • MacKinnon CA (2005) Women’s Lives, Men’s Laws, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Malherbe R (2007) ‘Some thoughts on unity, diversity and human dignity in the new South Africa’, in Journal of South African Law, 70, 1, 127–33.
  • Michealman F (2008) ‘The Rule of law, legality and the supremacy of the Constitution’ in S Woolman, T Roux, J Klaaren, A Stein, M Chaskalson & M Bishop (eds) Constitutional Law of South Africa, 2nded, Cape Town: Juta.
  • Mokgoro YM (1998) ‘Ubuntu and the Law in South Africa’, in Buffalo Human Rights Law Review, 4, 15–23.
  • Narayan D, Chambers R, Shah M & Petesch P (2001) Voices of the Poor: Crying Out for Change, Washington DC: Oxford University Press.
  • Pound R (1912) ‘The scope and purpose of socio-logical jurisprudence’, in Harvard Law Review, 25, 6, 489–516. doi: 10.2307/1324775
  • Southern African Development Community (SADC) (2003) Charter of Fundamental Social Rights in SADC 2003, signed 1 August 2003.
  • Statistics SA (2014) Poverty Report-03-10-06 - Poverty trends in South Africa: An examination of absolute poverty between 2006 and 2011, available at: http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/Report-03-10-06/Report-03-10-06March2014.pdf, site accessed 20 January 2016.
  • Sweetman C (ed) (2005) Gender and the Millennium Development Goals, London: Oxfam.
  • United Nations (UN) (1979) Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), United Nations, adopted by United Nations General Assembly 18 December 1979.
  • UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) (1999) International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights General Comment No.4: The Right to Adequate Housing, (art. 11 (1) of the Covenant), Sixth Session.
  • UN Habitat Agenda (1996) Istanbul Declaration on Human Settlements, available at: http:www.unhabitat/org/downloads/docs/2072_61331_ist-dec.pdf, site accessed 14 January 2016.
  • Visser DL (2014) ‘“Choice” and the Constitutional Court: A feminist critique of S v Jordan and Volks NO v Robinson’, available at: https://derrynonhumanrights.wordpress.com, site accessed 28 November 2015.

Laws

  • Republic of South Africa (1990) Maintenance of the Surviving Spouses, Act 27 of 1990, Government Gazette (GG) No 12390 of 4 April 1990.
  • Republic of South Africa (1995) Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation, Act 34 of 1995, GG 16579 of 26 July 1995.
  • Republic of South Africa (1996) Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, Date of Commencement 17 February 1997, Government Printers, Pretoria.
  • Republic of South Africa (1998) The Recognition of Customary Marriages, Act 120 of 1998, GG No. 19539 of 2 December 1998.

Case law

  • Azanian Peoples Organisation (AZAPO) and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others 1996 (8) BCLR 1015 (CC).
  • Bhe and Others v Khayelitsha Magistrate and Others 2005 (1) SA 580 (CC).
  • Brink v Kitshoff NO 1996 (4) SA 197.(CC)
  • Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (4) SA 938 (CC).
  • Glenister v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (Glenister II) 2011 (3) SA 347 (CC).
  • Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v Grootboom and Others 2001 (1) SA 46 (CC).
  • Gumede v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others 2009 (3) BCLR 243 (CC).
  • Mazibuko and Others v City of Johannesburg and Others 2010 (3) BCLR 239 (CC).
  • Minister of Finance v van Heerden 2004 (6) SA 121 (CC).
  • Minister of Health and Others v Treatment Action Campaign and Others (No 2) 2002 (5) SA 721 (CC).
  • Minister of Home Affairs and Another v Fourie and Another 2006 (1) SA 524 (CC).
  • National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Justice 1999 (1) SA 6 (CC).
  • NK v Minister of Safety and Security 2005 (6) SA 419 (CC).
  • Port Elizabeth Municipality v Various Occupiers 2005 (1) SA 217 (CC).
  • President of the Republic of South Africa and Another v Hugo 1997 (6) BCLR 708 (CC).
  • S v Jordan and Others (Sex Workers Education and Advocacy Task force and Others as Amici Curiae) 2002 (6) SA 642 (CC).
  • Shilubana and Others v Nwamitwa 2008 (9) BCLR 914 (CC).
  • South African Police Service v Solidarity OBO Barnard 2014 (6) SA 123 (CC).
  • Volks NO v Robinson and Others 2005 (5) BCLR 446 (CC).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.