References
- Albertyn C (2011) ‘Gendered transformation in South African jurisprudence: Poor women and the Constitutional Court,’ in Stellenbosch Law Review, 3, 591–613.
- Bronstein V (1998) ‘Reconceptualising the Customary law debate in South Africa’, in South African Journal on Human Rights, 14, 388–410. doi: 10.1080/02587203.1998.11834984
- Brooks K (2015) ‘Why feminism matters to the law’, in Canadian Law Journal, 27, 2, 207–223. doi: 10.3138/cjwl.27.2.207
- De Vos P (2013) ‘Between a rock and a hard place for wives in polygynous marriages’, available at: https://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/between-a-rock-and-a-hard-place-for-wives-in-polygynous-marriages/, site accessed March 31, 2019.
- Heaton J (2005) ‘Striving for substantive gender equality in family law: Selected issues’, in South African Journal on Human Rights, 21, 4, 547–574. doi: 10.1080/19962126.2005.11865148
- Himonga C (2013) ‘Mayelane v Ngwenyama and Minister for Home Affairs: A reflection on wider implications’, available at: http://www.customcontested.co.za/mayelane-v-ngwenyama-and-minister-for-home-affairs-a-reflection-on-wider-implications/, site accessed March 31, 2019.
- Jezile v S (A 127/2014) [2015] ZAWCHC 31; 2015 (2) SACR 452 (WCC); 2016 (2) SA 62 (WCC); [2015] 3 All SA 201 (WCC) (23 March 2015).
- Juda-Chembe PK (2018) ‘The Ingonyama Trust and its implications for rural women regarding land acquisition: Sizani Ngubane responds to Kedibone Chembe’, in Agenda, 32, 4, 90–95. doi: 10.1080/10130950.2018.1545362
- Khumalo Z (2017) ‘The role of customary law in women’s access to law’, LLM dissertation, available at: https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/65667/Khumalo_Role_2018.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, site accessed March 31, 2019.
- Kruuse H and Sloth-Nielsen J (2014) ‘Sailing between Scyllia and Charybdis: Mayelane v Ngwenyama’, in PER/PLJ, 17, 14, 1709–1738.
- Mailula D (2008) ‘Abdication of judicial responsibility, cultural self-determination and the development of customary law: lessons from Shilubana’, in SA Public Law, 23, 2, 215–235.
- Mbatha L (2002) ‘Reforming the customary law of succession’, in South African Journal on Human Rights, 18, 259–286.
- Manganara J (2017) ‘Sizani Ngubane - Woman of Distinction Awardee’, available at: https://womenalliance.org/sizani-ngubane-woman-of-distinction-awardee, site accessed March 31, 2019.
- Mayelane v Ngwenyama (CCT 57/12) [2013] ZACC 14; 2013 (4) SA 415 (CC); 2013 (8) BCLR 918 (CC) (30 May 2013).
- Moshenberg D (2014) ‘Traditional Courts Bill is dead. Long live Sizani Ngubane!’, available at: http://www.womeninandbeyond.org/?p = 9171, site accessed March 31, 2019.
- Mireku O (2010) ‘Customary law and the promotion of gender equality: An appraisal of the Shilubana decision’, in African Human Rights Law Journal, 10, 2, 515–523.
- Mmusinyane B (2009) ‘The role of the Traditional Authorities in developing customary law in accordance with the Constitution: Shilubana and others v Nwamitwa 2008 (9) BCLR 914 CC’, in PER/PLJ, 12, 136–161.
- Mwambene L and Sloth-Nielsen J (2011) ‘Benign accommodation? Ukuthwala, ‘forced marriage’ and the South African Children’s Act’, in Journal of Family Law and Practice, 2, 1, 5–16.
- Mwambene L and Kruuse H (2017) ‘The thin edge of the wedge: Ukuthwala, alienation and consent’, in South African Journal on Human Rights, 33, 1, 25–45. doi: 10.1080/02587203.2017.1303902
- Nkomo S (2013) ‘Excavating the archive: Centring women’s experiences and voices in the South African Transformation Discourse’, in Agenda, 27, 4, 126–135. doi: 10.1080/10130950.2013.868194
- Ntlama N (2009) ‘“Equality” misplaced in the development of customary law of succession: Lessons from Shilubana v Nwamitwa 2009 2 SA 66 (CC)’, in Stellenbosch Law Review, 20, 2, 333–356.
- Notice of Application to Intervene as Amicus Curiae, Founding Affidavit deposed by Likhapa Mbatha, case No. CCT03/07 available at: https://collections.concourt.org.za/handle/20.500.12144/3179?show=full, site accessed March 31, 2019.
- Notice of Application to Intervene as Amicus Curiae, case No. CCT 57/12), available at: https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3682/Founding%20Affidavit%20Application%20for%20Admission%20as%20Amici%20Curiae%20Commission%20for%20Gender%20Equality%20and%20Rural%20Women%27s%20Movement-19904.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y, site accessed March 31, 2019.
- Prinsloo J and Ovens M (2015) ‘Ukuthwala as an aberrant traditional practice: the State versus Nvumeleni Jezile 2014 WCD’, in Acta Criminologica, 4, 169–181.
- Rahube v Rahube (CCT319/17) [2018] ZACC 42; 2019 (1) BCLR 125 (CC); 2019 (2) SA 54 (CC) (30 October 2018).
- Republic of South Africa. Children’s Act 38 of 2005.
- Republic of South Africa. Upgrading of Land Tenure Rights Act 112 of 1992.
- Rice K (2018) ‘Understanding ukuthwala: Bride abduction in the rural Eastern Cape, South Africa’, in African Studies, 77, 3, 394–411. doi: 10.1080/00020184.2018.1464752
- Shilubana v Nwamitwa (CCT 03/07) [2008] ZACC 9; 2008 (9) BCLR 914 (CC); 2009 (2) SA 66 (CC) (4 June 2008).
- Spies A (2014) ‘Amicus curiae participation, gender equality and the South African constitutional court’, LLD thesis, available at: http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/15186, site accessed March 31, 2019.
- Spies A (2015) ‘Considering the impact of the Amicus curiae participation on feminist litigation strategy’, in South African Journal on Human Rights, 31, 136–150. doi: 10.1080/19962126.2015.11865238