Obstetric violence within students’ rite of passage: The reproduction of the obstetric subject and its racialised (m)other

References

• Beck, CT 2004, ‘Birth trauma, in the eye of the beholder’, Nursing Research, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 28–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betron, ML, McClair, TL, Currie, S & Banerjee, J 2018, ‘Expanding the agenda for addressing mistreatment in maternity care: A mapping review and gender analysis’, Reproductive Health, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0584-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohren MA, Mehrtash H, Fawole B, Maung TM, Balde MD et al., 2019, ‘How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: A cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys’, Lancet, vol. 394, no. 10210, pp. 1750–1763. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31992-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohren, MA, Vogel, JP, Hunter, EC, Lutsiv, O, Makh, SK, Souza, JP & Gülmezoglu, EM 2015, ‘The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: A mixed-methods systematic review’, PLOS Medicine, vol. 12, no. 6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brana-Shute, R, 1985, The Manumission of Slaves in Suriname, 1750–1828, PhD dissertation, University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Brison, S 2003, Aftermath. Violence and the Remaking of the Self, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, KM 2011, Reproducing Race. An Ethnography of Pregnancy as a Site of Racialization, University of California Press, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen-Shabot, S 2016, ‘Making loud bodies “feminine”: A feminist-phenomenological analysis of obstetric violence’, Human Studies, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 231–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Shabot, S & Keshet K 2018, ‘Domesticating bodies through shame: understanding the role of shame in obstetric violence’, Hypatia vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 384–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Shabot, S 2019, ‘Amiga’s, Sisters, we’re being gaslighted’, in C Pickles & J Herring (eds), Childbirth, Vulnerability and the Law, Routledge, New York. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429443718)
   Google Scholar
• Cohen-Shabot, S 2020, ‘Why “normal” feels so bad: violence and vaginal examinations during labour – a (feminist) phenomenology’, Feminist Theory, pp. 1–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700120920764
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, R 2020, ‘Practices of silencing Birth, marginality and epistemic violence’, in C Pickles & J Herring, Childbirth, Vulnerability and the Law, Routledge, New York. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429443718)
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, R 2018, Bodies that birth. Vitalizing Birth Politics, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R,1987, ‘The technological model of birth’, The Journal of American Folklore, vol.100, no. 398, pp. 479–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D 2019a, ‘Obstetric racism: The racial politics of pregnancy, labor, and birthing’, Medical Anthropology, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 560–573. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2018.1549389.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis, D 2019b, Reproductive Injustice. Racism, Pregnancy, and Premature Birth, New York University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Dyrbye, L & Shanafelt, T, 2012, ‘Nurturing resiliency in medical trainees’, Medical Education, vol. 46, no. 4, p. 343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici, S 2004 The Caliban and the Witch. Women, the Body, and Primitive Accumulation, Autonomedia, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M2003, Society Must Be Defended. Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–1976, D Macey (trans.), Picador, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gieles, NC, Tankink, JB, Van Midde, M, Düker, J, Van der Lans, P, Wessels, C et al. 2019, ‘Maternal and perinatal outcomes of asylum seekers and undocumented migrants in Europe: a systematic review’, The European Journal of Public Health, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 714–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, RW 2007, Golden Gulag. Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California, University of California Press, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Graaf, J de, Ravelli, ACJ, De Haan, MAM, Steegers, EAP, & Bonsel, GJ 2013, ‘Living in deprived urban districts increases perinatal health inequalities’ The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 473–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedva, J 2016, ‘Sick women theory’, http://www.maskmagazine.com/not-again/struggle/sick-woman-theory. accessed 22 February 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, MH, van Hastenberg, E, van Dillen, J, van Pampus, MG, de Miranda, E, & Stramrood, CAI 2017, ‘Preventing traumatic childbirth experiences: 2192 women’s perceptions and views’, Archives of Women’s Mental Health, vol. 20, pp. 515–523. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-017-0729-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesselink, L 2009, Inheemse dokters en vroedvrouwen in Nederlands Oost-Indië 1850–1915, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Kingma, E 2021 ‘Harming one to benefit another: The paradox of autonomy and consent in maternity care’, Bioethics, forthcoming.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kom, A de 2020 1934, Wij slaven van Suriname, Atlas Contact, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Lugones, M 2007, ‘Heterosexualism and the colonial/modern gender system’, Hypatia, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 186–209.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M 2013, ‘Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 658–667.
   Google Scholar
• Marland, H 2003, ‘Midwives, missions, and reform: colonizing Dutch childbirth services at home and abroad ca. 1900’ in M Sutphen & B Andrews, Medicine and Colonial Identity, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A 2015, Apartheid futures and the limits of racial reconciliation, Wits Institute for Social and Economic Research, Johannesburg.
   Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A 2019, Necropolitics, S Corcoran (trans.), Duke University Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A 2001, On the Postcolony, University of Wits Press, Johannesburg.
   Google Scholar
• Mhlange, D & Garidzirai, R 2020, ‘The influence of racial differences in the demand for healthcare in South Africa: A case of public healthcare’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 14, p. 5043. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W & Welsh, C 2018, On Decoloniality, Duke University Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Miltenburg, AS, van Pelt, S, Meguid, T, & Sundby, J 2018, ‘Disrespect and abuse in maternity care: individual consequences of structural violence’, Reproductive Health Matters, vol. 26, no. 53, pp. 88–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1502023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, DC 2018, Medical Bondage. Race, Gender and the Origins of American Gynecology, Georgia University Press, Athens.
   Google Scholar
• Pickles, C 2015, ‘Eliminating abusive “care”: A criminal law response to obstetric violence in South Africa’, South African Crime Quarterly, vol. 54. doi: https://doi.org/10.4314/sacq.v54i1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Pickles, C & Herring, J 2020, Women’s Birthing Bodies and the Law. Unauthorised Intimate Examinations, Power and Vulnerability, Hart, London.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J 2007, Terrorist Assemblages, Duke University Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, A 2007, ‘Coloniality and modernity/rationality’, Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 168–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, LJ & Solinger, R 2017, Reproductive Justice. An Introduction, University of California Press, Oakland.
   Google Scholar
• Rucell, J, Chadwick, R, Mohlakoana-Motopi, L & Odada, KE 2019, ‘Submission on: Obstetric Violence in South Africa. Violence against women in reproductive health & childbirth’, in D Šimonović (ed.), A human rights-based approach to mistreatment and violence against women in reproductive health services with a focus on childbirth and obstetric violence, UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, M, Santos, MJ, Ruiz-Berdún, D, Leiva Rojas, G, Skoko, E, Gillen, P & Clausen, JA 2016, ‘Moving beyond disrespect and abuse: Addressing the structural dimensions of obstetric violence’, Reproductive Health Matters, vol. 24, no. 47, pp. 47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scully, JAM 2015, ‘Black Women and International Law’, in JI Levitt (ed.) Deliberate Interactions, Movements and Actions, pp. 225–249, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139108751.013.
   Google Scholar
• Schutte, JM, Steegers, EAP, Schuitemaker, NWE, Santema, JG, De Boer, K & Pel, M 2010, ‘Rise in maternal mortality in the Netherlands’, BJOG, vol. 117, pp. 399–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, G, Reddy, B & Iyer, A 2018, ‘Beyond measurement: the drivers of disrespect and abuse in obstetric care’, Reproductive Health Matters, vol. 26, no. 53, pp. 6–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1508173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šimonović, D 2019, A human rights-based approach to mistreatment and violence against women in reproductive health services with a focus on childbirth and obstetric violence, Vote by the Secretary-General, United Nations Report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, DF de 2007, Toward a Global Idea of Race, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Richland, S, 2008, ‘Birth rape: Another midwife’s story’, Midwifery Today, vol. 85, Spring, pp. 42–43.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, LJ & Sollinger, R 2017, Reproductive Justice. An Introduction, University of California Press, Oakland.
   Google Scholar
• Seijmonsbergen-Schermers, A 2020, Intervene or Interfere? Variations in Childbirth Interventions and Episiotomy in Particular, PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Pijl, MSG, Hollander, MH, Van der Linden, T, Verweij, R, Holten, L, Kingma, E, et al. 2020, ‘Left powerless: a qualitative social media content analysis of the Dutch #breakthesilence campaign on negative and traumatic experiences of labour and birth’, PLOS One, vol. 15, no. 5, e0233114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Waal, R, 2021, Understanding obstetric violence as necropolitics. Playing the “dead baby card”, maternal subjectivity, and the matricidal logic of separation. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Villarmea, S & Guillén, 2011, ‘Fully entitled subjects: Birth as a philosophical topic’, in Ontology Studies, vol. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Villarmea, S, 2015, ‘On obstetrical controversies: Refocalization as conceptual innovation’, in A Perona (ed.), Normativity and Praxis. Remarks on Controversies – Philosophy 13, Mimesis International.
   Google Scholar
• Villarmea, S, 2021, ‘Reasoning from the uterus: Casanova, women's agency, and philosophy of birth’, Hypatia, vol. 36, p. 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarmea, S, 2020, ‘When a uterus enters the room, reason goes out the window’, in C Pickles & J Herring (eds.), Women’s Birthing Bodies and the Law: Unauthorised Medical Examinations, Power and Vulnerability, Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp. 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Villarmea, S & Kelly, B 2020, ‘Barriers to establishing shared decision-making in childbirth: Unveiling epistemic stereotypes about women in labour’, Journal of Evaluation of Clinical Practice, vol. 26, pp. 515–519. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington, HA, 2006, Medical Apartheid. The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present, Harlem Moon, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wekker, G, 2016, White Innocence. Paradoxes on Colonialism and Race, Duke University Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, CR, Jerez, C, Klein, K, Correa, M, Belizán, JM & Cormick, G 2018, ‘Obstetric Violence: A Latin American legal response to mistreatment during childbirth’, BJOG: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 125, no. 10, pp. 1208–1211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinbaum, AE, 2004, Wayward Reproductions. Genealogies of Race and Nation in Transatlantic Modern Thought, Duke University Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Weinbaum, AE 2019, The Afterlife of Reproductive Slavery. Biocapitalism and Black Feminism’s Philosophy of History, Duke University Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Wynter, S 2015, ‘Unparalleled Catastrophe for Our Species? Or, to Give Humanness a Different Future: Conversations’, in K McKrittick (ed) Sylvia Wynter, on Being Human as Praxis, Duke University Press, London.
   Google Scholar