Performing emotions through technology: towards a degree of agency tool (DoAT) for assessing and applying agency to operated performing objects

References

• Bell, J., 2015. Playing with the eternal uncanny: the persistent life of lifeless objects. In: D. N. Posner, C. Orenstein, and J. Bell, eds. The Routledge companion to puppetry and material performance. New York: Routledge, 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, J.M., 2020. Nonverbal communication: an applied approach. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Caboz, J., 2019. A cute South African robot is helping to teach the next generation of engineers. Available from: https://www.businessinsider.co.za/a-south-african-built-robot-is-teaching-children-to-build-robots-2019-7 [Accessed 13 May 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Di Paolo, E.A., Rohde, M., and De Jaegher, H., 2010. Horizons for the enactive mind: values, social interaction, and play. In: J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, and E. A. Di Paolo, eds. Enaction: toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press, 33–88.
   Google Scholar
• Drori, A., 2019. Amit Drori. Available from: https://amitdrori.com/ [Accessed 5 November 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, S. and Wood, K., 2011. Kinesthetic empathy: concepts and contexts, University of Manchester, England, April 22–23, 2010. Dance Research Journal, 43 (2), 113–118.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., 2016. Nonverbal messages: cracking the code. San Francisco: Paul Ekman Group.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J.A., 1991. Disambiguating anthropomorphism: an interdisciplinary review. Perspectives in Ethology, 9, 49–85.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, P., 2012. Puppetry: a reader in theatre practice. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, P., 2020. Puppetry: a reader in theatre practice. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, A., 2010. After affect: sympathy, synchrony, and mimetic communication. In: G. J. Seigworth, and M. Gregg, eds. The affect theory reader. Durham: Duke University Press, 186–205.
   Google Scholar
• Grossberg, L., 2010. Affect's future: rediscovering the virtual in the actual. In: G. J. Seigworth, and M. Gregg, eds. The affect theory reader. Durham: Duke University Press, 309–338.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, S., et al., 2019. A model for basic emotions using observations of behavior in drosophila. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon-Jones, C., Bastian, B., and Harmon-Jones, E., 2016. The discrete emotions questionnaire: a new tool for measuring state self-reported emotions. PLoS One, 11 (8), e0159915, 1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izard, C.E., 1991. The psychology of emotions: emotions, personality, and psychotherapy. Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Izard, C.E., 2013. Patterns of emotions: a new analysis of anxiety and depression. Cambridge: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Izard, C. E. & Ackerman, B. P., 2000. Chapter 16: Motivational, organizational, and regulatory functions of discrete emotions. In: M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones, eds. Handbook of Emotions. 2nd ed. London: Guilford Press, 253–264.
   Google Scholar
• Jack, R.E., Garrord, O.G., and Schyns, P.S., 2014. Dynamic facial expressions of emotion transmit an evolving hierarchy of signals over time. Current Biology, 24 (2), 117–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jochum, E.A., and Murphey, T., 2015. Programming play: puppets, robots and engineering. In: D. N. Posner, C. Orenstein, and J. Bell, eds. The Routledge companion to puppetry and material performance. New York: Routledge, 308–321.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R.G., 2013. Communication in the real world: an introduction to communication studies. Washington, DC: Saylor Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Jurkowski, H., 1988. Aspects of puppet theatre. London: Puppet Centre Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Kauschke, C., et al., 2019. The role of emotional valence for the processing of facial and verbal stimuli—positivity or negativity bias? Frontiers in Psychology: Developmental Pshychology, 26 July, 10, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B., 2015. Politics of affect. Cambridge & Malden: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neustetter, M., 2019. Lead the Way @ ZKM. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWHEPjAaCc4 [Accessed 1 May 2020].
   Google Scholar
• O'Toole, S. & Christian, S., 2019. William Kentridge Timeline: 1955-2019. In: S. Christian & A. McIlleron, eds. William Kentridge: Why should I hesitate; Putting drawings to work. London: Koenig Books, pp. 87–184.
   Google Scholar
• Perlovsky, L., 2012. Emotions of “higher” cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35 (3), 157–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlovsky, L., 2014. Aesthetic emotions, what are their cognitive functions? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plutchik, R., 1991. The emotions. Lanham: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Proschan, F., 1983. The semiotic study of puppets, masks and performing objects. Semiotica, 1/4(Special Issue: Puppets, Masks and Performing Objects), pp. 3–44.
   Google Scholar
• RD9 Solutions, 2022. RD9 solutions. Available from: https://www.rd-9.co.za/ [Accessed 13 May 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, D.O., 2016. It's not what you think: affect theory and power take to the stage. Available from: dukepress.wordpress.com [Accessed 22 August 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Schumann, P., 2001. What, at the end of this century, is the situation of puppets and performing objects? In: J. Bell, ed. Puppets, masks and performing objects. New York: University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Servais, V., 2018. Anthropomorphism in human-animal interactions: a pragmatist view. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 (2590), 1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shepard, B., 2004. Affect. Available from: https://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/mediatheory/keywords/affect/ [Accessed 22 August 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M.C., 2011. The robot theater: live and impersonal. Available from: https://www.thecrimson.com/column/contemporary-theater/article/2011/3/22/performance-technology-dinge-stifters/ [Accessed 5 April 2022].
   Google Scholar
• TenHouten, W. D., 2017a. Social dominance hierarchy and the pride-shame system. Journal of political power, 10(1), pp. 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TenHouten, W. D., 2017b. From primary emotions to the spectrum of affect: An evolutionary neurosociology of the emotions. In: A. Ibáñez, L. Sedeño & A. García, eds. Neuroscience and social science. Cham: Springer, 141–167.
   Google Scholar
• Tillis, S., 1992. Toward an aesthetics of the puppet: puppetry as a theatrical art. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, S., 2008. Affect imagery consciousness: the complete edition: two volumes. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Urquiza-Haas, E.G., and Kotrschal, K., 2015. The mind behind anthropomorphic thinking: attribution of mental states to other species. Animal Behaviour, 109, 167–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendel-Poray, D., 2016. Le Théâtre as son double. In: I. Blazwick, and S. Breitwieser, eds. William Kentridge: thick time. London: Whitechapel Art Gallery, 157–167.
   Google Scholar