Intravascular catheter-related infection guidelines

References

• Smith RL, Meixler SM, Simberkoff MS. Excess mortality in critically ill patients with nosocomial bloodstream infections. Chest 1991; 100: 164–167
   Google Scholar
• Martin MA, Pfaller MA, Wenzel RP. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia. Mortality and hospital stay. Ann Intern Med 1989; 110: 9–16
   Google Scholar
• Haley RW, Schaberg DR, Von Allmen SD, McGowenJE Jr. Estimating the extra charges and prolongation of hospitalization due to nosocomial infections: a comparison of methods. J Infect Dis 1990; 141: 248–257
   Google Scholar
• Pittet D, Tarara D, Wenzel RP. Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients: excess length of stay, extra costs and attributable mortality. JAMA 1994; 271: 1598–1601
   Google Scholar
• Arrow PM, Quirnosing EM, Brech M. Consequences of intravascular catheter sepsis. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 16:778–784
   Google Scholar
• Heiselman D. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in the critically ill. JAMA 1994; 272: 1819–1820
   Google Scholar
• Maki DG. Infections due to infusion therapy. In: Bennett JV, Brachmann PS, eds. Hospital Infections. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co; 1992
   Google Scholar
• National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report, data summary from October 1986-April 1998, issued June 1998. Am J Infect Contro11998; 26:522–533
   Google Scholar
• Pearson ML. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for prevention of intravascular device related infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemio11996; 17:438–473
   Google Scholar
• Mermel MA, McCormick RD, Springman SR, Maki DG. The pathogenesis and epidemiology of catheter-related infection with pulmonary artery Swan-Ganz catheters: a prospective study utilizing molecular subtyping. Am J Med 1991; 9: 197–205
   Google Scholar
• Raad I. Intravascular-catheter related infections. Lancet 1998; 351: 893–898
   Google Scholar
• Maki DG, Stolz SM, Wheeler S, Mermel LA. Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127:257–266
   Google Scholar
• Salzman MB, Isenberg HD, Shapiro JF, Lipsitz PJ, Rubin LG. A prospective study of the catheter hub as the portal of entry for microorganisms causing catheter-related sepsis in neonates. J Infect Dis 1993; 167: 487–490
   Google Scholar
• Linares J, Sitges-Serra A, Garrall J, Perez JL, Martin R. Pathogenesis of catheter sepsis: a prospective study with quantitative and semiquantitative cultures of catheter hub and segments. J Clin Microbio11985; 21:357–360
   Google Scholar
• Sitges-Serra A, Linares J, Perez JL, Jaunieta E, Lorente L. A randomized trial on the effect of tubing changes on hub contamination and catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1985; 9:322–325
   Google Scholar
• Maki DG, Martin WT. Nationwide epidemic of septicemia caused by contaminated infusion products. J Infect Dis 1975; 131:267–272
   Google Scholar
• Maki DG, Anderson RL, Shulman JA. In-use contamination of intravenous infusion fluid. Appl Microbiol1974; 28:778–784
   Google Scholar
• Raad II, Darouiche RO. Catheter related septicemia: risk reduction. Infect Med 1996; 807–812, 815–816, 823
   Google Scholar
• Sherertz RJ, Raad II, Balani A, Koo L, Rand K. Three-year experience with sonicated vascular catheter cultures in a clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbio11990; 28:76–82
   Google Scholar
• Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafm HW. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous catheter infection. N Engl J Med 1977; 296: 1305–1309
   Google Scholar
• Kiehn TE, Armstrong D. Changes in the spectrum of organisms causing bacteremia and fungemia in immunocompromised patients due to venous access devices. Eur J Clin Micro biol Infect Dis 1990; 9: 869–872
   Google Scholar
• Raad I. CVC-associated fungemia in cancer patients. Clinical Guide of Fungal Infection 1995; 6:5–8
   Google Scholar
• Cleri DJ, Corrado ML, Seligman SJ. Quantitative culture of intravenous catheters and other intravascular inserts. J Infect Dis 1987; 141:781–786
   Google Scholar
• Raad II, Sabbagh MF, Rand KH, Sherertz RJ. Quantitative tip culture methods and the diagnosis of central venous catheter related infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1992; 15: 13–20
   Google Scholar
• Sherertz R, Heard S, Raad I. Diagnosis of triple-lumen catheter infection: comparison of roll plate, sonication and flushing methodologies. J Clin Microbio11997; 35:641–646
   Google Scholar
• Kite P, Dobbins BM, Wilcox MH, et al. Evaluations of a novel endohuninal brush method for an in situ diagnosis of catheter-related sepsis. J Clin Pathol 1997; 50:278–272
   Google Scholar
• Tighe MJ, Kite P, Fawley WN, Thomas D, McMahon MJ. An endohuninal brush to detect the infected central venous catheter in situ: a pilot study. Br Med J1996; 313: 1528–1529
   Google Scholar
• Kite P, Dobbins BM, Wilcox MH, McMahon MJ. Rapid diagnosis of central-venous-catheter-related bloodstream infection without catheter removal. Lancet 1999; 354: 1504–1507
   Google Scholar
• Bong JJ, Kite P, Wilco MH, McMahon MJ. The use of a rapid in situ test in the detection of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection: a randomised controlled trial. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2003; 27: 146–150
   Google Scholar
• Faubion WC, Wesley JR, Khaldi N, Silva J. Total parenteral nutrition catheter sepsis: impact of the team approach. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1986; 10:642–645
   Google Scholar
• Maki DG. Yes, Virginia, aseptic technique is very important: maximal barrier precautions during insertion reduce the risk of central venous catheter-related bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994; 15: 227–230
   Google Scholar
• Mer M. Intravascular catheter sepsis. SAJCC 1999; 15:30–35
   Google Scholar
• Mer M. Vascular catheter related infection. Clinical Intensive Care 2001; 12:53–60
   Google Scholar
• Raad II, Hohn DC, Gibreath BJ, et al. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections using maximal sterile barrier precautions during infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemio11994; 15:231–238
   Google Scholar
• Maki DG, Ringer M, Alvarado CJ. Prospective randomized trial of povodine-iodine, alcohol and chlorhexidine for prevention of infections associated with central venous catheters. Lancet 1991; 338: 339–343
   Google Scholar
• Timsit J-F, Sebille V, Farkas J-C, et al. Effect of subcutaneous tunneling on internal jugular catheter-related sepsis in critically ill patients: a prospective randomized multicenter study. JAMA 1996; 276: 1416–1420
   Google Scholar
• Maki DG, Cobb L, Garman JK, Shapiro JM, Ringer M, Helgerson RB. An attachable silver-impregnated cuff for prevention of infection with central venous catheters: a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Am J Med 1988; 85:307–314
   Google Scholar
• Flowers RH, Schwenzer KJ, Kopel RF, et al. Efficacy of an attachable subcutaneous cuff for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infection. JAMA 1989; 261:878–883
   Google Scholar
• Segura M, Alvarez-Lerma F, Tellado JIM, et al. Advances in surgical technique: a clinical trial on the prevention of catheter-related sepsis using a new hub model. Ann Surg 1996; 223:363–369
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman KK, Weber DJ, Samsa GP, Rutala WA. Transparent polyurethane film as an intravenous catheter dressing: a meta-analysis of the infection risks. JAMA 1992; 267:2072–2076
   Google Scholar
• Raad II, Sabbagh MF. Optimal duration of therapy for cathter-related Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a study of 55 cases and review. Rev Infect Dis 1992; 14:75–82
   Google Scholar
• Malanoski GJ, Samore MH, Pefanis A, Karcmer AW. Staphylococcus aureus catheter-associated bacteremia: minimal effective therapy and unusual infectious complications associated with arterial sheath catheters. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155:1161–1166
   Google Scholar
• Rose HD. Venous catheter-associated candidemia. Am J Med Sci 1978; 275:265–269
   Google Scholar
• Rex JH, Bennett JE, Sugar AM, et al. A randomized trial comparing fluconazole with amphotericin B for the treatment of candidemia in patients without neutropenia. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1325–1330
   Google Scholar
• Collin J, Collin C, Constable FK, Johnston ID. Infusion thrombophlebitis and infection with various cannulas. Lancet 1975; 2: 150–153
   Google Scholar
• O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Patchen Dellinger E, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 35: 1281–1307
   Google Scholar
• Gardner RM, Schwartz R, Wong HC, Bruke JP. Percutaneous indwelling radial-artery catheters for monitoring cardiovascular function. Prospective study of the risk of thrombosis and infection. N Eng1J Med 1974; 290: 1227–1231
   Google Scholar
• Samsoondar W, Freeman JB, Coultish I, Oxley C. Colonization of intravascular catheters in an intensive care unit. Am J Surg 1985; 149: 730–732
   Google Scholar
• Richet H, Hubert B, Nitemberg G, et al. Prospective multicenter study of vascular catheter-related in intensive care unit patients. J Clin Microbio11990; 28:2520–2525
   Google Scholar
• Gil RT, Kruse JA, Thill-Baharozian MC, Carlson RW. Triple vs single-lumen central venous catheters. A prospective study in a critically ill population. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149:1139–1143
   Google Scholar
• Miller JJ, Venus B, Mathru M. Comparison of the sterility of long-term central venous catheterization using single-lumen, triple-lumen and pulmonary artery catheters. Grit Care Med 1984; 12:634–637
   Google Scholar
• Ullman RF, Gurevich I, Schoch PE, Cunha BA. Colonization and bacteremia related to duration of triple-lumen intravascular catheter placement. Am J Infect Control1990; 18:201–207
   Google Scholar
• Polderman KH, Girbes ARJ. Central venous catheter use. Part 2 : infectious complications. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 18–28
   Google Scholar
• Safdar N, Kluger DM, Maki DG. A review of risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by percutaneous inserted, noncuffed central venous catheters: implications for preventive strategies. Medicine (Baltimore) 2002; 81:466–479
   Google Scholar
• Cyna AM, Hovenden JL, Lehmann A, Rajaseker K, Kalla P. Routine replacement of central venous catheters: telephone survey of intensive care units in Mainland Britain. Br MedJ1998; 316: 1944–1945
   Google Scholar
• Veenstra DL, Saint S, Sana S, Lumley T, Sullivan SD. Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1999; 281:261–267
   Google Scholar
• Mer M, Duse AG, Galpin J, Taylor R, Richards GA. Central venous catheter-related infection. (Abstract). Critical Care 2002; 6(S1): S44
   Google Scholar
• Cohen Y, Fosse JP, Karoubi P, et al. The “ Hands-Off ” catheter and the prevention of systemic infections associated with pulmonary artery catheter. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 1998; 157:284–287
   Google Scholar
• Mermel LA, Stolz SM, Maki DG. Surface antimicrobial activity of heparin-bonded and antiseptic impregnated vascular catheters. J Infect Dis 1993; 167:920–924
   Google Scholar