- Kim Kyungwon, “Bukhan-ui Seontaek [North Korea's Choice],” Chosun Ilbo, August 30, 2000.
- 1997 . Nambukhan Tongil Waegyo-ui Kujo-wa Jeonryak [The Structure and Strategy of North and South Korean Unification Diplomacy] Seoul : Sejong Institute Press . For a good analysis of North-South unification strategies and historical context, written with contemporary political sensibilities by younger South Korean scholars, see Paik Hak Soon, ed., (especially pp.97–153.
- Snyder , Scott . 1997 . The Two Koreas: A Contemporary History Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley . On this, see, among others, Negotiating on the Edge (Washington DC: USIP Press, 1999); Chuck Downs, Over the Line (Washington DC: AEI Press, 1999); Leon Sigal, Disarming Strangers (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998); and, Don Oberdorfer, (
- On this point, see: Nicholas Eberstadt, “The Most Dangerous Country,” National Interest. Fall 1999.
- Blackwill , Robert D. and Paul , Dibb , eds. 2000 . America's Asian Alliances Cambridge, MA : Harvard JFK School of Government . Although Allison defines the Asia-Pacific region to include Northeast, Southeast, and South Asia along with Australasia and the Pacific Islands, for our purposes we can probably substitute and narrow the Asia-Pacific region to the core East Asian region (Northeast and Southeast Asia) without too much loss of geographic or strategic meaning. See Graham T. Allison's comments in the preface to, eds., (p. ix.
- Ibid.
- A thoughtful argument on this point is to be found in Richard H. Solomon and William M. Drennan, “The United States and Asia in 2000: Forward to the Past?,” Asian Survey, Vol. XLI, No. 1, Jan/Feb 2001, pp. 1–11.
- John Pomfret, “U.S. Now a 'Threat' in China's Eyes,” Washington Post, November 15, 2000; and Li Cheng, “China in 2000: A Year of Strategic Rethinking,” Asian Survey, Vol. XLI, No. 1, Jan/Feb 2001, especially pp. 78–79.
- Wilkening , Dean A. 2000 . Ballistic-Missile Defence and Strategic Stability, Adelphi Paper 334 London : IISS . A good study of missile defense, national and theater, and threat perceptions by China and Russia is found in (especially pp. 37–41, pp. 53–58 and pp. 67–74.
- David Shambaugh, “China's Military Views the World,” International Security, Vol. 24, No. 3 (Winter 1999/2000), p. 79
- The scope of this paper does not provide for a detailed elaboration of the possible ways in which Korean unification could come about. An excellent study on this subject can be found in Jonathan Pollack and Chung Min Lee, Preparing for Korean Unification: Scenarios and Implications (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1999). Another is William Taylor, Jr. et al, Great Power Interests in Korea Reunification (Washington DC: CSIS, 1998). Also, Kyongsoo Lho and Kay Moller, eds., Northeast Asia Toward 2000: Interdependence and Conflict? (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft,1999), especially pp. 77–92; and for a particular Chinese perspective, Tang Shiping, “A Neutral Reunified Korea: A Chinese View,” The Journal of East Asian Affairs, Vol. 13, No. 2 (Fall/Winter 1999), pp. 464–483.
- 1998 . Great Power Interests in Korean Reunification Washington DC : CSIS . See, for instance, William Taylor et al, (
- More on unified Korea's non-nuclear status in Kyongsoo Lho, The Endgame in Korea: From “Soft Landing” to Reunification, Occasional Paper, No. 122, Free University of Berlin, 1997, pp. 15–18.
- Pollack , Jonathan and Min Lee , Chung . 1999 . Preparing for Korean Unification: Scenarios and Implications Santa Monica, CA : RAND . There are two very good earlier analyses on this subject. See (also, Robert Manning and James Przystup “Korean Unification: Shaping the Future of Northeast Asia” in Managing Change on the Korean Peninsula (Seoul: Seoul Forum, 1998).
Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
Volume 13, 2001 - Issue 1