172
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
General

Fatigue Assessment of Continuous Composite Bridges Accounting for Slab Casting Sequences

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • AASHTO. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. Washington: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2005.
  • EN1993-1-9. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures – Part 1.9: Fatigue. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2005.
  • Brozzetti J, Bui V, Calgaro JA, Chabrolin B, Kretz T, Nussbaumer A, Plu B, Ramondenc P, Raoul J, Roche J. Ponts Metalliques et Mixtes – Resistance a la fatigue, guide de conception et de justification. Service d’Études Techniques des Routes et Autoroutes, Bagneux Cedex, France, 1996.
  • Nussbaumer A, Borges L, Davaine L. Fatigue Design of Steel and Composite Structures. ECCS Eurocode design manuals. ECCS – European Convention for Constructional Steelwork, Wiley-Blackwell, Mem Martins, Portugal, 2011.
  • Li ZX, Chan THT, Ko JM. Determination of effective stress range and its application on fatigue stress assessment of existing bridges. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2002; 39: 2401–2417. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00120-8
  • SETRA. Recommandations pour maîtriser la fissuration des dalles. Bagneux: SETRA, 1995.
  • Krauss PD, Rogalla EA. Transverse Cracking in Newly Constructed Bridge Decks. Washington: National Academy Press, 1996.
  • Ducret JM, Lebet JP. Behaviour of composite bridges during construction. Struct. Eng. Int. 1999; 9: 212–218. doi: 10.2749/101686699780481907
  • Kwak H-G, Seo Y-J, Jung C-M. Effects of the slab casting sequences and the drying shrinkage of concrete slabs on the short-term and long-term behavior of composite steel box girder bridges. Part 1. Eng. Struct. 2000; 22: 1453–1466. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00095-4
  • Marì AR. Numerical simulation of the segmental construction of three dimensional concrete frames. Eng. Struct. 2000; 22: 585–596. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00009-7
  • Dezi L, Gara F, Leoni G. Construction sequence modelling for continuous steel-concrete composite decks. J. Steel Composite Struct. 2006; 6(2): 123–138. doi: 10.12989/scs.2006.6.2.123
  • Amadio C, Fragiacomo M. A finite element model for the study of creep and shrinkage effects in composite beams with deformable shear connections. Constr. Met. 1993; 4: 213–228.
  • Dezi L, Tarantino AM. Creep in composite continuous beams. Part I: Theoretical treatment. J. Struct. Eng., ASCE. 1993; 119(7): 2095–2109. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:7(2095)
  • Gilbert RI, Ranzi G. Time-dependent Behaviour of Concrete Structures. Spon Press, London, 2011.
  • Ranzi G, Leoni G, Zandonini R. State of the art on the time-dependent behaviour of composite steel–concrete structures. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2013; 80: 252–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.08.005
  • Dezi L, Leoni G, Tarantino AM. Algebraic methods for creep analysis of continuous composite beams. J. Struct. Engrg. ASCE. 1996; 122(4): 423–430. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:4(423)
  • EN1994-1-1. Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures – Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2004.
  • EN1994-2. Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures – Part 2: Rules for Bridges. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2005.
  • Gara F, Leoni G, Dezi L. Slab cracking control in continuous steel-concrete bridge decks. J. Bridge Eng., ASCE. 2013; 18(12): 1319–1327. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000459
  • Gattesco N, Giuriani E. Experimental study on stud shear connectors subjected to cyclic loading. J. Construct. Steel Res. 1996; 38(1): 1–21. doi: 10.1016/0143-974X(96)00007-7
  • Johnson RP. Resistance of stud shear connectors to fatigue. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2000; 56: 101–116. doi: 10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00082-6
  • Lee PG, Shim CS, Chang SP. Static and fatigue behavior of large stud shearconnectors for steel–concrete composite bridges. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2005; 61: 1270–1285. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.01.007
  • Hanswille G, Porsche M, Ustungag C. Resistance of headed studs subjected to fatigue loading Part I: Experimental study. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2007; 63: 475–484. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.035
  • Pipinato A, Pellegrino C, Bursi OS, Modena C. High-cycle fatigue behavior of riveted connections for railway metal bridges. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2009; 65: 2167–2175. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.06.019
  • Zhao Y, Roddis WMK. Fatigue crack investigation for the Arkansas River Bridge in Hutchinson. Kansas. Constr. Build. Mater. 2000; 14: 287–295. doi: 10.1016/S0950-0618(00)00028-3
  • Kwon K, Frangopol DM. Bridge fatigue reliability assessment using probability density functions of equivalent stress range based on field monitoring data. Int. J. Fatigue. 2010; 32: 1221–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.002
  • Salane HJ, Duffield RC, McBean RP. Fatigue test of a three-span composite bridge. Exp. Mech. 1976; 16: 468–474. doi: 10.1007/BF02324104
  • Kim HY, Jeong YJ. Experimental investigation on behaviour of steel–concrete composite bridge decks with perfobond ribs. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2006; 62: 463–471. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.08.010
  • Ahn JH, Sim C, Jeong YJ, Kim SH. Fatigue behavior and statistical evaluation of the stress category for a steel-concrete composite bridge deck. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2009; 65: 373–385. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.04.007
  • Leitão FN, da Silva JGS, da S. Vellasco PCG, de Andrade SAL, de Lima LRO. Composite (steel-concrete) highway bridge fatigue assessment. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2011; 67: 14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.07.013
  • EN1992-1-1. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures – Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2004.
  • Computer and Structures, Inc. CSI Analysis Reference Manual. SAP2000. Berkeley, CA: Computer and Structures, Inc., 2005.
  • EN1993-2. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures – Part 2: Steel Bridges. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2007.
  • EN1991-2. Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures – Part 2: Traffic Loads on Bridges. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2005.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.