Multimodal Flutter of a Long-span Suspension Bridge in Service and During Construction

References

• Borri C, Bartoli G, Mannini C. The Longway from Teddington (1963) to Cambridge (2013) through 50 years of bridge aerodynamics. Fifty Years of Wind Engineering – Prestige Lectures from the 6th European and African Conference on Wind Engineering. Cambridge, UK: The University of Nottingham Press; 2013; p. 103–149.
   Google Scholar
• Jain A, Jones NP, Scanlan RH. Coupled flutter and buffeting analysis of long-span bridges. J Struct Eng. 1996; 122: 716–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoli G, Mannini C. From multimodal to bimodal approach to flutter. 6th European Conference on Structural Dynamics, Paris, France. Rotterdam/Paris: Millpress; 2005; p. 349–354.
   Google Scholar
• Dyrbye C, Hansen SO. Wind effects on structures. New York (NY): Wiley, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Gimsing NJ, Georgakis CT. Cable supported bridges: Concept and design. Chichester (UK): Wiley, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Zhang L, Ding Q, Ge Y. Flutter performance and improvement for a suspension bridge with central-slotted box girder during erection. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 2018; 179: 118–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka H, Gimsing NJ. Aerodynamic stability of non-symmetrically erected suspension bridge girders. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 1999; 80(1–2): 85–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge Y, Tanaka H. Aerodynamic stability of long-span suspension bridges under erection. J Struct Eng. 2000; 126(12): 1404–1412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh DE. A résumé of the aerodynamic investigations for the Forth Road and the Severn bridges. P I Civil Eng. 1967; 37(1): 87–108.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport AG, Isyumov N, Fader DJ, Bowen CFP. A study of wind action on a suspension bridge during erection and on completion: The Narrows Bridge, Halifax, Nova Scotia. London, Canada: University of Western Ontario, 1969. (Rep. BLWT-3-69).
   Google Scholar
• Iwegbue IE, Brotton DM. A numerical integration method for computing the flutter speeds of suspension bridges in erection conditions. P I Civil Eng. 1977; 63(4): 785–802.
   Google Scholar
• Brancaleoni F, Brotton DM. Analysis and prevention of suspension bridge flutter in construction. Earthq Eng Struct D. 1981; 9(5): 489–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancaleoni F, Cheli F, Diana G. Behaviour of long span suspension bridge construction. 13th IABSE Congress, Helsinki, Finland. Kirjapaino: Jyväskylä, 1988; p. 905–910.
   Google Scholar
• Brancaleoni F. The construction phase and its aerodynamic issues. Aerodynamics of Large Bridges, Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Aerodynamics of Large Bridges, Copenhagen, Denmark. Balkema: Rotterdam, 1992; p. 147–158.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen A. Prediction of aeroelastic stability of suspension bridges during erection. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 1997; 72: 265–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arco DCD, Aparicio AC. Improving the wind stability of suspension bridges during construction. J Struct Eng. 2001; 127(8): 869–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honda A, Miyata H, Shibata H. Aerodynamic stability of narrow decked suspension bridge (Aki-nada Ohashi Bridge). J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 1998; 77–78(1–2): 409–420.
   Google Scholar
• Han Y, Liu S, Cai CS, Li C. Flutter stability of a long-span suspension bridge during erection. Wind Struct. 2015; 21(1): 41–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakis KN, Limebeer DJN, Williams MS, Graham JMR. Passive aeroelastic control of a suspension bridge during erection. J Fluids Struct. 2016; 6: 543–570.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X. Investigation on aerodynamic stability of long-span suspension bridges under erection. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 2004; 92(1): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunham KK. Coastal Highway Route E39 – extreme crossings. Transp Res Proc. 2016; 14: 494–498.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlan RH. The action of flexible bridges under wind, I: Flutter theory. J Sound Vib. 1978; 60(2): 187–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øiseth OA, Rönnquist A, Sigbjörnsson R. Simplified prediction of wind-induced response and stability limit of slender long-span suspension bridges, based on modified quasi-steady theory: A case study. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 2010; 98: 730–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsuchi H, Jones NP, Scanlan RH. Multimode coupled flutter and buffeting analysis of the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge. J Struct Eng. 1999; 125(1): 60–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoli G, Mannini C. A simplified approach to bridge deck flutter. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 2008; 96(2): 229–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyaw NNM, That KL, Khaing SY. Investigation on the behaviours of long-span suspension bridge with self anchorage system. Int J Sci Eng Technol Res. 2014; 3(6): 1697–1700.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1991-1-6. Eurocode 1 – Actions on Structures. Part 1-6: General Actions – Actions during Execution, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Barni N. Progettazione preliminare e analisi aeroelastica del ponte sospeso sullo Julsundet [M.Sc. thesis]. Florence, Italy: University of Florence (in Italian) 2018.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1993-1-3. Eurocode 3 – Design of Steel Structures – Part 1-3: General Rules – Supplementary Rules for Cold-Formed Members and Sheeting, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1991-1-4. Eurocode 1 – Actions on Structures – General Actions – Wind Actions, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen MS, Johansson J, Brandt A, Hansen SO. Aerodynamic stability of long span suspension bridges with low torsional natural frequencies. Eng Struct. 2016; 120: 82–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argentini T, Pagani A, Rocchi D, Zasso A. Monte Carlo analysis of total damping and flutter speed of a long span bridge: effects of structural and aerodynamic uncertainties. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 2014; 128: 90–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X. Improved understanding of bimodal coupled bridge flutter based on closed-form solutions. J Struct Eng. 2007; 133(1): 22–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhold TA, Brinch M, Damsgaard A. Wind tunnel tests for the Great Belt Link. Aerodynamics of Large Bridges. Aerodynamics of Large Bridges, Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Aerodynamics of Large Bridges, Copenhagen, Denmark. Balkema: Rotterdam, 1992; p. 255–267.
   Google Scholar
• Poulsen NK, Damsgaard A, Reinhold TA. Determination of flutter derivatives for the Great Belt Bridge. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 1992; 41(1-3): 153–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barni N, Øiseth OA, Mannini C. Time-variant self-excited force model based on 2D rational function approximation. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 2021; 211: 104523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diana G, Fiammenghi G, Belloli M, Rocchi D. Wind tunnel tests and numerical approach for long span bridges: The Messina Bridge. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 2013; 122: 38–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma C, Pei C, Liao H, Liu M, Li M. Field measurement and wind tunnel study of aerodynamic characteristics of twin-box girder. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 2020; 202: 104209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusano I, Cid Montoya M, Baldomir A, Nieto F, Jurado JA, Hernández S. Reliability based design optimization for bridge girder shape and plate thicknesses of long-span suspension bridges considering aeroelastic constraint. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 2020; 202: 104176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodorsen T. General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter. Washington, US: NACA Technical Report 496, 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Barni N, Øiseth OA, Mannini C. Buffeting response of a suspension bridge based on the 2D rational function approximation model for self-excited forces. Eng Struct. 2022; 261: 114267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar