Numeric Study on the Critical Angle of Seismic Incidence for High-Speed Railway Bridges with Round-Ended Piers Based on the Fragility Method

References

• Penzien J, Watabe M. Characteristics of 3-dimensional earthquake ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1974;3(4):365–373.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie KR, Cronin KJ, Nielson BG. Response sensitivity of highway bridges to randomly oriented multi-component earthquake excitation. J Earthquake Eng. 2011;15(6):850–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson EL, Suharwardy I, Habibullah A. A clarification of the orthogonal effects in a three-dimensional seismic analysis. Earthq Spectra. 1995;11(4):659–666.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar UR, Banerjee S. Fragility of skewed bridges under orthogonal seismic ground motions. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2015;11(9):1113–1130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez OA, Chopra AK, Hernandez JJ. Evaluation of combination rules for maximum response calculation in multicomponent seismic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2001;30(9):1379–1398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez OA, Chopra AK, Hernandez JJ. Critical response of structures to multicomponent earthquake excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2000;29(12):1759–1778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moschonas I, Kappos A. Assessment of concrete bridges subjected to ground motion with an arbitrary angle of incidence: static and dynamic approach. Bull Earthquake Eng. 2013;11(2):581–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeby W, Kiureghian AD. Modal combination rules for multicomponent earthquake excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1985;13(1):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariri-Ardebili MA, Saouma VE. Seismic fragility analysis of concrete dams: a state-of-the-art review. Eng Struct. 2016;128(dec.1):374–399.
   Google Scholar
• Muntasir-Billah AHM, Shahria-Alam M. Seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges: a state-of-the-art review. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2015;11(6):804–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafali C, Grigoriu M. Seismic fragility analysis: application to simple linear and nonlinear systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2007;36(13):1885–1900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang H, Liu JB, Chiu YH. Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges[R]. Mid-America Earthquake Center Technical Report. MAEC RR-4 Project: Center for Earthquake Research and Information, University of Memphis, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Karim KR, Yamazaki F. Effect of earthquake ground motions on fragility curves of highway bridge piers based on numerical simulation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2001;30(12):1839–1856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan D, Qu F, Deng X. Seismic fragility analysis of irregular bridges with non-circular tall piers considering ground motion directionality. Bull Earthquake Eng. 2020;18(4):1723–1753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang YT, Dang XZ, Yuan WC. An artificial neural network based method for seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges. Advances in Structural Engineering. 2014;17(3):413–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deepu SP, Kanta P, Samit RC. Seismic vulnerability of skew bridges under bi-directional ground motions. Eng Struct. 2014;71:150–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon JS, Eunsoo C, Noh MH. Fragility characteristics of skewed concrete bridges accounting for earthquake directionality[J]. Struct Eng Mech. 2017;63(5):647–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Ibarra L, Pantelides C. Effects of earthquake incidence angles in a reinforced concrete skewed bridge retrofitted with bucking restrained braces[J]. In Structures Congress. 2017:481–493.
   Google Scholar
• Noori HR, Memarpour MM, Yakhchalian M, et al. Effects of ground motion directionality on seismic behavior of skewed bridges considering SSI. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2019;127(7):105820.
   Google Scholar
• Feng RW, Wang XW, Yuan WC, et al. Impact of seismic excitation direction on the fragility analysis of horizontally curved concrete bridges. Bull Earthquake Eng. 2018;16(10):4705–4733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangalathu S, Choi E, Park HC, et al. Probabilistic seismic vulnerability assessment of tall horizontally curved concrete bridges in California. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 2018;32(6):4018080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon JS, Mangalathu S, Song J, et al. Parameterized seismic fragility curves for curved multi-frame concrete box-girder bridges using Bayesian parameter estimation[J]. J Earthquake Eng. 2017:13632469.2017.1342291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marco T, Masanobu S. Effect of the angle of seismic incidence on the fragility curves of bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2012;41(14):2111–2124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marco T, Masanobu S. The directionality effect in the seismic risk assessment of highway networks. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2014;10(2):175–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taskari O, Anastasios S. Multi-angle, multi-damage fragility curves for seismic assessment of bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2015;44(13):2281–2301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, et al. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2002;128(4):526–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mander JB, Dhakal RP, Mashi N, et al. Incremental dynamic analysis applied to seismic financial risk assessment of bridges. Eng Struct. 2007;29(10):2662–2672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal TK, Ghosh S, Pujari NN. Seismic fragility analysis of a typical Indian PHWR containment: comparison of fragility models. Structural Safety. 2016;58:11–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielson BG, Desroches R. Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2007;36(6):823–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aman K, Paolo B. Computation of bridge seismic fragility by large-scale simulation for probabilistic resilience analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2015;44:1959–1978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang YT, Wu X, Shen GY, et al. Seismic fragility analysis of cable-stayed bridges considering different sources of uncertainties. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2014, 19(4):04013015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Agrawal AK, Ghosn M. Seismic fragility of continuous steel highway bridges in New York state. Journal of Bridge Engineering. 2007;12(6):689–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu CF, He HW, Zheng J, et al. Code for Design of High Speed Railway[S]. National Railway Administration of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Yan B, Dai GL, Hu N. Recent development of design and construction of short span high-speed railway bridges in China. Eng Struct. 2015;100:707–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu N, Dai GL, Yan B, et al. Recent development of design and construction of medium and long span high-speed railway bridges in China. Eng Struct. 2014;74:233–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He XH, Wu T, Zou YF, et al. Recent developments of high-speed railway bridges in China[J]. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2017:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Hao H, Li HN, et al. Seismic fragility analysis of reinforced concrete bridges with chloride induced corrosion subjected to spatially varying ground motions. Int J Struct Stab Dyn. 2016;16:1550010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng WZ, Wang H, Tan P, et al. Numerical modeling and experimental validation of sliding-LRBs considering hysteretic strength degradation. Eng Struct. 2022;262:114374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei B, Yang TH, Jiang LZ, et al. Effects of uncertain characteristic periods of ground motions on seismic vulnerabilities of a continuous track–bridge system of high-speed railway. Bull Earthquake Eng. 2018;16:3739–3769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang GW, Li JZ, Tao XX. Guidelines for Seismic Design of Highway Bridges[S]. Beijing: Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Lee J, et al. Statistical analysis of fragility curves. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. 2000;126(12):1224–1231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang XQ, Song SC, Jin FH. Spherical bearings for railway bridges[S]. National Railway Administration of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Baker J, Lin T, Shahi S, et al. New ground motion selection procedures and selected motions for the PEER transportation research program. Berkeley (CA): Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie KR, Stojadinovic B. Performance-based seismic bridge design for damage and loss limit states. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2007;36:1953–1971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research). PEER strong motion database; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Huo YL. Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method. Eng Struct. 2009;31(8):1648–1660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie KR, Stojadinovic B. Fragility basis for california highway overpass bridge seismic decision making[R]. PEER Report 2005/02. Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Padgett JE, Nielson BG, DesRoches R. Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2008;37(5):711–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng WZ, Tan P, Li J, et al. Seismic performance upgrading of bridges using superelastic pendulum isolators with variable stiffness considering temperature effects. Eng Struct. 2023;275:115244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng WZ, Tan P, Zhang Z, et al. Damping enhanced novel re-centering seismic isolator incorporating superelastic SMA for response control of bridges under near-fault earthquakes. Smart Mater Struct. 2022;31(6):0065015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar