Dynamic Calibration of the Transverse Elastic Modulus of Shredded Rubber for Use in Seismic Isolation

References

• Clemente P, Martelli A. Seismically isolated buildings in Italy: State-of-the-art review and applications. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2019; 119: 471–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann H. Seismic Upgrading of a Fire-Brigade Building by Base Isolation in Basel, Switzerland. Struct Eng IntStructural Engineering International. 2010; 20(3): 268–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giarlelis C, Koufalis D, Repapis C. Seismic Isolation: An Effective Technique for the Seismic Retrofitting of a Reinforced Concrete Building. Struct Eng IntStructural Engineering International. 2019; 30(1): 43–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang HH. Seismic isolation by rubber–soil mixtures for developing countries. Engng Struct. Dyn. 2007; 37: 283–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang HH, Lo SH, Xu X, Neaz Sheikh M. Seismic isolation for low-to-medium-rise buildings using granulated rubber–soil mixtures: numerical study. Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn. 2012; 41: 2009:2024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitilakis K, Karapetrou S, Tsagdi K. Numerical investigation of the seismic response of RC buildings on soil replaced with rubber–sand mixtures. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2015; 79: 237–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunet S, De la Llera JC, Kausel E. Non-linear modeling of seismic isolation systems made of recycled tire-rubber. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2015; 85: 134–145. 106187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang HH, Pitilakis K. Mechanism of geotechnical seismic isolation system: Analytical modeling. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2019; 122: 171–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanya JS, Boominathan A, Banerjee S. Response of low-rise building with geotechnical seismic isolation system. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2020; 136: 106187. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726119312680)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanya JS, Fouzul MA, Banerjee S, Boominathan A, Zhussupbekov A. Shaking table experiments on framed structure resting on geogrid reinforced geotechnical seismic isolation system. Bull Earthquake Eng. 2023; 21: 3823–3849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang HH. Analytical design models for geotechnical seismic isolation systems. Bull Earthquake Eng. 2023; 21: 3881–3904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaro G, Palermo A, Banasiak L, Tasalloti A, Granello G, Hernandez E. Seismic response of low–rise buildings with eco–rubber geotechnical seismic isolation (ERGSI) foundation system: numerical investigation. Bull Earthquake Eng. 2023; 21: 3797–3821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez E, Palermo A, Granello G, Chiaro G, Banasiak L. Eco-rubber Seismic-Isolation Foundation Systems: A Sustainable Solution for the New Zealand Context. Struct Eng IntStructural Engineering International. 2020; 30(2): 192–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vucetic M, Dobry R. Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (ASCE). 1991; 117(1): 89–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng ZY, Sutter KG. Dynamic properties of granulated rubber/sand mixtures. Geotech Test JGeotechnical Testing Journal. 2000; 23(3): 338–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatto MP, Lentini V, Montrasio L. Dynamic properties of polyurethane from resonant column tests for numerical GSI study. Bull Earthquake Eng. 2023; 21: 3991–4017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somma F, Flora A. SAP–sand mixtures as a geotechnical seismic isolation technology: from the dynamic characterization to a simple analytical design approach. Bull Earthquake Eng. 2023; 21: 4065–4089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikitas G, Batthacharya S. Experimental study on sand–tire chip mixture foundations acting as a soil liquefaction countermeasure. Bull Earthquake Eng. 2023; 21: 4037–4063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal-Sánchez J, Leak J, Barreto D. Rubber–soil mixtures: use of grading entropy theory to evaluate stifness and liquefaction susceptibility. Bull Earthquake Eng. 2023; 21: 3777–3796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarajpoor S, Kavand A, Peiman Z, Ghalandarzadeh A. Dynamic behavior of sand-rubber mixtures based on hollow cylinder tests. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020; 251: 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANSYS, 2021. User Manual, Version 21.0. USA: ANSYS, Inc, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Mei X, Sheng Q, Cui Z, Zhang M, Dias D. Experimental investigation on the mechanical and damping properties of rubber-sand-concrete prepared with recycled waste tires for aseismic isolation layer. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2023; 165: 107718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hunaity S, Karki D, Far H. Shear connection performance of cold-formed steel and plywood composite flooring systems: Experimental and numerical investigation. Structures. 2023; 48: 901–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arriaga-Martitegui F, Peraza-Sánchez F, García-Esteban L. Characteristic values of the mechanical properties of radiata pine plywood and the derivation of basic values of the layers for a calculation method. Biosystem Engineering. 2008; 99: 256–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar