Preferred genres and rhetorical modes in the humanities and social sciences

References

• Bhatia , V. K. 2002 . “ A generic view of academic discourse ” . In Academic discourse , Edited by: Flowerdew , J. 21 – 39 . London : Pearson Education .
   Google Scholar
• Biber , D. 1988 . Variation across speech and language , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Braine , G. 1995 . “ Writing in the natural sciences and engineering ” . In Academic writing in a second language. Essays on research and pedagogy , Edited by: Belcher , D. and Braine , G. 113 – 134 . Norwood, NJ : Ablex .
   Google Scholar
• Canseco , G. and Byrd , P. 1989 . Writing requirements in graduate courses in business administration . TESOL Quarterly , 23 : 305 – 316 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffin , C. , Curry , M. , Goodman , S. , Hewings , A. , Lillis , T. and Swann , J. 2003 . Teaching academic writing: A toolkit for higher education , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Cope , B . and M. Kalantzis 1993 . Powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing . London : Falmer Press .
   Google Scholar
• Department of Historical and Heritage Studies. 2006 . Study manual , University of Pretoria .
   Google Scholar
• Drury , H. 2006 . “ Short answers in first-year undergraduate science writing. What kind of genres are they? ” . In Academic writing in context , Edited by: Hewings , M. 104 – 121 . London : Continuum .
   Google Scholar
• Dudley-Evans , T. 2002 . “ The teaching of the academic essay: Is a genre approach possible? ” . In Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives , Edited by: Johns , A. M. London : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Hale , G. , C. Taylor , B. Bridgeman , J. Carson , B. Kroll and R. Kantor . 1996 . A study of writing tasks assigned in academic degree programs . TOEFL. Research Report No. 54 . Princeton, NJ : Educational Testing Service .
   Google Scholar
• Hewings , A. and Hewings , M. 2006 . “ Anticipatory ‘it’ in academic writing: An indicator of disciplinary difference and developing disciplinary knowledge ” . In Academic writing in context , Edited by: Hewings , M. 199 – 214 . London : Continuum .
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz , D. 1986a . Essay examination prompts and the teaching of academic writing . English for Specific Purposes , 5 : 107 – 120 .
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz , D. 1986b . What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom . TESOL Quarterly , 20 : 445 – 482 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounsell , D. 1987 . “ Essay writing and the quality of feedback ” . In Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology , Edited by: Richardson , J. T. E. , Eysinck , M. W. and Piper , D. W. Milton Keynes : Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hyland , K. 1994 . Hedging in academic textbooks and EAP . English for Specific Purposes , 3 ( 3 ) : 239 – 256 .
   Google Scholar
• Hyland , K. 2004 . Genre and second language writing , Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hyland , K. 2006 . English for academic purposes , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Johns , A. M. 2002 . “ Introduction ” . In Genre in the classroom. Multiple perspectives , Edited by: Johns , A. M. 3 – 13 . London : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Kumaravadivelu , B. 2003 . Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching , New Haven, CT : Yale University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kumaravadivelu , B. 2006 . Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod , Mahwah, New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Lillis , T. 2001 . Student writing: Access, regulation and desire , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Macken-Horarik , M. 2002 . “ ‘Something to shoot for’: A systemic functional approach to teaching genre in secondary school science ” . In Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives , Edited by: Johns , A. M. 43 – 72 . London : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Marius , R. and Page , M. E. 2005 . A Short guide to writing about history , 5th edition , New York : Pearson Education .
   Google Scholar
• Melzer , D . 2003 . Assignments across the curriculum. A survey of college writing . Language across the disciplines . http://wac.colostate.edu ( accessed 6 February 2007 ).
   Google Scholar
• Moore , T . and J. Morton . 1998 . Contrasting rhetorics: Academic writing and the IELTS test . Paper presented at the Australian Council of TESOL Associations, Victorian Association for TESOL and Multicultural Education National Conference , Melbourne .
   Google Scholar
• Paltridge , B. 1996 . Genre, text type and the language learning classroom . ELT Journal , 50 ( 3 ) : 237 – 243 .
   Google Scholar
• Paltridge , B. 2001 . Genre and the language learning classroom , Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press .
   Google Scholar
• Paltridge , B. 2002 . “ Genre, text type, and the English for Academic Purposes (EAP) classroom ” . In Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives , Edited by: Johns , A. M. 73 – 90 . London : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Rose , M. 1983 . Remedial writing courses: A critique and a proposal . College English , 45 : 109 – 126 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swales , J. 1990 . Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Tribble , C. 1996 . Writing , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Weideman , A. 2003 . Justifying course and task design in language teaching . Acta Academica , 35 ( 3 ) : 26 – 48 .
   Google Scholar
• Weissberg , R. and Buker , S. 1990 . Writing up research , Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar