References
- Archakis, A. and V. Tsakona. 2009. Parliamentary discourse in newspaper articles: The integration of a critical approach to media discourse into a literacy-based language teaching programme. Journal of Language and Politics 8(3): 359–385. doi: 10.1075/jlp.8.3.02arc
- Archakis, A. and V. Tsakona. 2010. The wolf wakes up inside them, grows wolf hair and reveals all their bullying: The representation of parliamentary discourse in Greek newspapers. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 912–923. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.015
- Arresse, J. and B. Perucha. 2006. Evaluation and engagement in journalistic commentary and news reportage. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 19: 225–248. doi: 10.14198/raei.2006.19.13
- Bednarek, M. 2006. Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. London: Continuum International Publishing Company.
- Bednarek, M. 2008. Emotion talk across corpora. Palgrave: Macmillan Press.
- Bell, A. 1991.The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
- Bickenbach, J. 2012. Argumentation and informed consent in the doctor-patient relationship. Journal of Argumentation in context 1(1): 5–18. doi: 10.1075/jaic.1.1.02bic
- Cohen-Almagor, R. 2008. The limits of objective reporting. Journal of Language and Politics 7(1): 138–157. doi: 10.1075/jlp.7.1.07alm
- Dascal, M. 2001. How rational can a polemic across the analytic-continental ‘divide’ be? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9(3): 313–339. doi: 10.1080/09672550110058849
- Dascal, M. 2008. Dichotomies and types of debate. In Controversy and confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory, ed. F. van Eemeren and B. Garssen, 27–50. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Fairclough, N. 1995. Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
- Ferreira, A. 2008. On the role of pragmatics, rhetoric and dialectic in scientific controversies. In Controversy and confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory, ed. F. van Eemeren and B. Garssen, 125–134. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Fritz, G. 2008. Communication principles for controversies: A historical perspective. In Controversy and confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory, ed. F. van Eemeren and B. Garssen, 109–124. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Hunston, S. and G. Thompson, eds. 2000. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ilie, C. 2003a. Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates. Journal of language and politics1 (2): 269–291.
- Ilie, C. 2003b. Histrionic and agonistic features of parliamentary discourse. Studies in Communication Sciences 3: 25–53.
- Ilie, C. 2009. Argumentative functions of parentheticals in parliamentary debates. In Discourse and politics, ed. G. Álvarez-Benito, G. Fernández-Díaz,and I. ĺñigo-Moira, 61–79. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Ilie, C. 2010. Introduction: European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices. In European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices, ed. C. Ilie, 1–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Jakaza, E. 2012. Appraisal and evaluation in Zimbabwean parliamentary discourse and its representation in newspaper articles. PhD thesis, Stellenbosch University.
- Jakaza, E. 2013. Gricean implicatures and election predictions: A case of the Zimbabwean 2008 election campaign. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 31(3): 311–323. doi: 10.2989/16073614.2013.837607
- Johnson, S. and A. Ensslin, eds. 2007. Language in the media: Representations, identities, ideologies. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
- Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Martin, J. and D. Rose. 2003. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum International Publishing Company.
- Martin, J. and P. White.2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Van Eemeren, F. 2010. Strategic manoeuvering in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Van Eemeren, F. and B. Garssen. 2008. Controversy and confrontation in argumentative discourse. In Controversy and confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory, ed. F. van Eemeren and B. Garssen, 1–26. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- White, P. 2005a. Appraisal: An overview. Manuscript (word processor version) . Available at www.grammatics.com/appraisal(accessed 11 June 2009).
- White, P. 2005b. The language of attitude, arguability and interpersonal positioning. Manuscript. (Printout version). Available at www.grammatics.com/appraisal (accessed 10 June 2009).
- White, P. 2006. Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse: A new framework for analysis. In Mediating ideology in text and image, ed. I. Lassen, J. Strunck and T. Vestergaard, 37–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
NEWSPAPER REPORTS
- The Herald, 22 October 2009. ‘ZANU-PF MPs walk out in protest. ‘Available at http://www.herald.co.zw.
- The Herald, 17 March 2010. Harare Bureau. ‘ZANU-PF MPs walk out of Parly.’ Available at http://www.herald.co.zw.
- The Herald, 5 November 2010. ‘Chombo, wife fight over assets. ‘Available at http://www.herald. co.zw.
- Kwayedza, 19–25 November 2010. Munyori weKwayedza. ‘Nhubu musenate dzicharangwa.’ [Crooks in Senate to be punished.]Available at http://www.kwayedza.co.zw.
- Newsday, 10 November 2010, Langa, V. ‘MDC-T forces Senate adjournment.’
- Newsday, 12 November 2010. Mafirakureva, M. ‘Corrupt ministers must resign.’
- The Standard, 28 November - 4 December 2010. Marwizi, W. ‘Chombo must quit over wealth - TIZ.’
PARLIAMENTARY REPORTS
- ‘Condemnation of Corrupt Practices’, National Assembly Hansard, 36 (8), 10 November
- 2009. Available at http://www.parlzim.gov.zw/national-assembly-hansard/national-assembly-hansard-10-november-2009-vol-36-no-8.