Police Written Discourse: Analysing Notable Glitches in Police Reports

References

• Ahmed, H. 2021. “The Role of Forensic Linguistics in Crime Investigation: Uses in Legal Proceedings.” Anglisticum Journal 10 (2): 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Karaki, E. 2005. “An Analysis of Spelling Errors made by School Students in Al-Karak Directorate of Education.” MA diss., Mutah University.
   Google Scholar
• Arend, A. 2002. “Constructing the Gap between Past and Present Literacy Practices in the South African Police Service.” MA diss., University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P., and A. Coffey. 1997. Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Designs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Babili, G. L. 2022. “An Analysis of Common Linguistic Errors in a Corpus Produced by Non-Native English-Speaking Police Constables.” PhD diss., University of Johannesburg.
   Google Scholar
• Bertram, C., and I. Christiansen. 2014. Understanding Research: An Introduction to Reading Research. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, N., and S. K. Grove. 1998. The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique and Utilisation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Calderon, J. 2006. Methods of Research and Thesis Writing. 2nd ed. Mandaluyong City: National Bookstore.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, T. R. 2021. “Understanding One’s Rights when Arrested and Detained: An Assessment of Language Barriers that Affect Comprehension.” South African Journal of Criminal Justice 34 (1): 1–39. https://doi.org/10.47348/SACJ/v34/i1a1
   Google Scholar
• Ćetković, S. 2017. “The Language of Police Reports: A Quest for Precision or a Bureaucratic Exercise of Language Degradation.“ The Linguistic Application of Communication 7 (1): 151–76. https://doi.org/10.5209/CLAC.57308
   Google Scholar
• Chafe, W. 1986. Evidentially in English Conversation and Academic Writing: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., and V. Braun. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Corder, S. P. 1967. “The Significance of Learners’ Errors.” In Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition, edited by J. C. Richards, 158–71. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A., and P. Atkinson. 1996. Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Correa, M. 2013. “Forensic Linguistics: An Overview of the Intersection and Interaction of Language and Law.” Studies about Languages 23. http://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.0.23.5020
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., and Y. Lincoln. 2013. “The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research.” In Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, 4th ed., edited by N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 358–62. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. 1970. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. 1978. Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Djiwandono, P. I. 2017. “Comprehensibility of English Written Sentences Made by Non-Language University Students.” New English Teacher 11 (1): 181.
   Google Scholar
• Dulay, H., M. Burt, and S. Krashen. 1982. Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 1997. SLA Research and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., and G. Barkhuizen. 2005. Analysing Learner Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan, V. 2005. “Contribution of Error Analysis to Foreign Language Teaching.” Mersin University Journal of Faculty of Education 2: 261–70.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 1998. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Flusk, S. T. 2023. “An Analysis of Linguistic Errors in Translations of Complainants’ Sworn Statements” MA diss., University of the Western Cape. https://hdl.handle.net/11394/10435
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S., and L. Selinker. 2001. “Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. 2nd ed. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604651
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, J., and M. T. Turrel, eds. 2008. Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.5
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 2008. “Police-speak.” In Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics, edited by J. Gibbons and T. M. Turrel, 67–148. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and Z. L. James. 1993. “A Quantitative Study of Polarity and Primary Tense in the English Finite Clause.” In Techniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse, edited by J. M. Sinclair, M. Hoey. and G. Fox, 32–66. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 1995. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, T. 2013. “Obtaining Introspective Acceptability Judgments.” In Research Methods in Language Variation and Change, edited by M. Krug and J. Schluter, 99–118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511792519.008
   Google Scholar
• James, C. 1998. Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Kaschula, R. H., and M. K. Ralarala. 2004. “Language Rights, Intercultural Communication and the Law in South Africa.” South African Journal of African Languages 24 (4): 252–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2004.10587242
   Google Scholar
• Kekana, T. J. 2015. “Workplace English Writing Needs. A Case Study of Perceptions and Experiences of Police Constables at Selected Police Clusters in the Gauteng Province, South Africa.” PhD diss., University of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Khansir, A. K. 2012. “Error Analysis and Second Language Acquisition.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2 (5): 1027–32. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.5.1027-1032
   Google Scholar
• Lado, R. 1957. Linguistics Across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. 1997. “Some Further Steps in Narrative Analysis.” Journal of Narrative and Life History 7: 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.49som
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leininger, M. M. 1985. “Ethnography and Ethno-Nursing: Models and Modes of Qualitative Data Analysis.” In Qualitative Methods in Nursing, edited by M. M. Leininger, 33–72. Orlando: Stratton Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
   Google Scholar
• Maree, K. 2016. First Steps in Research. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., and G. Rossman. 1989. Designing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• May, T. 2001. Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process. 3rd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M., and P. Pomerenke. 1989. “Police Reports Must Be Reader-Based.” Law and Order 37 (9): 66–69.
   Google Scholar
• Mungungu, S. S. 2010. “Error Analysis: Investigating the Writing of ESL Namibian Learners.” MA diss., University of South Africa. Accessed November 21, 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4893
   Google Scholar
• Mvabaza, A. 2018. “A Critique of Translated isiXhosa to English Sworn Statement by the South African Police Service.” MA diss., Rhodes University.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, J. 2004. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language, Crime and Law. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Pandit, N. R. 1996. “The Creation of Theory: A Recent Application of the Grounded Theory Method.” The Qualitative Report 2 (4). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/1996.2054
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Punch, K. F. 2014. Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ralarala, M. K. 2014. “Transpreters’ Translations of Complainants’ Narratives as Evidence: Whose Version Goes to Court?” Translator 20 (3), 377–95. http://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2014.934002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., and R. Schmidt. 2002. Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. 3rd ed. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• SAPS. 2008. Annual Report: Education, Training, and Development. Pretoria. South African Police Service.
   Google Scholar
• Sarantakos, S. 2005. Social Research. 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20901-5_1
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, J., and M. Celce-Murcia. 1977. “Some Reservations Concerning Error Analysis.” TESOL Quarterly 11 (4): 441–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/3585740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 1990. A Matter of Record. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selinker, L. 1972. “Interlanguage.” International Review of Applied Linguistics 10: 209–31. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezer, S. 2004. “An Investigation of the Occupational English Language Needs of Turkish Police Officers.” MA diss., Bilkent University.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, J. E. 1998. “Planning Ethically Responsible Research.” In Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, edited by L. Bickman and D. J. Rog, 127–56. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics South Africa. 2011. Census Data: Statistical Release South Africa. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. A. 1983. “The Use of Grounded Theory for Qualitative Analysis of Organisational Behaviour.” Journal of Management Studies 20 (3): 333–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1983.tb00211.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar