Chaotic attractors of discrete dynamical systems used in the core of evolutionary algorithms: state of art and perspectives

References

• T. Alexeeva, Q. Diep, N. Kuznetsov, T. Mokaev, and I. Zelinka, Forecasting and control in overlapping generations model: Chaos stabilization via artificial intelligence, preprint (2022). Available at arXiv, 2208.06345.
   Google Scholar
• J. Alvarez-Ramirez, H. Puebla, and I. Cervantes, Stability of observer-based chaotic communications for a class of lur'e systems, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 12 (2002), pp. 1605–1618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Arnold and V. Wihstutz, Lyapunov exponents: A survey, in Lyapunov Exponents: Proceedings of a Workshop held in Bremen, November 12–15, 1984, Springer, 2006, pp. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• A.T. Azar and S. Vaidyanathan, Advances in Chaos Theory and Intelligent Control, Vol. 337, Springer, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• T. Bäck and H.P. Schwefel, An overview of evolutionary algorithms for parameter optimization, Evol. Comput. 1 (1993), pp. 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.G. Beyer and H.P. Schwefel, Evolution strategies–a comprehensive introduction, Nat. Comput. 1 (2002), pp. 3–52.
   Google Scholar
• A. Byrski, E. Świderska, J. Łasisz, M. Kisiel-Dorohinicki, T. Lenaerts, D. Samson, B. Indurkhya, and A. Nowé, Socio-cognitively inspired ant colony optimization, J. Comput. Sci. 21 (2017), pp. 397–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Chen, Controlling Chaos and Bifurcations in Engineering Systems, CRC press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• G. Chen and T. Ueta, Yet another chaotic attractor, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 9 (1999), pp. 1465–1466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.M. Cuomo, Synthesizing self-synchronizing chaotic systems, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 3 (1993), pp. 1327–1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Das, S.S. Mullick, and P.N. Suganthan, Recent advances in differential evolution–an updated survey, Swarm. Evol. Comput. 27 (2016), pp. 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Dmitriev, A. Panas, and S. Starkov, Ring oscillating systems and their application to the synthesis of chaos generators, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 6 (1996), pp. 851–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Dmitriev, E. Efremova, L. Kuzmin, and A. Anagnostopoulos, High dimensional RC–oscillators of chaos, in Proc. of Int. Symp. NOLTA, Miyagi, Japan, Oct 28–Nov 1, 2001, pp. 139–142.
   Google Scholar
• M. Dorigo, V. Maniezzo, and A. Colorni, Ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B (Cybern.) 26 (1996), pp. 29–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. dos Santos Coelho and D.L. de Andrade Bernert, An improved harmony search algorithm for synchronization of discrete-time chaotic systems, Chaos Solitons Fractals 41 (2009), pp. 2526–2532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Dudkowski, S. Jafari, T. Kapitaniak, N.V. Kuznetsov, G.A. Leonov, and A. Prasad, Hidden attractors in dynamical systems, Phys. Rep. 637 (2016), pp. 1–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Dumitrescu, B. Lazzerini, L.C. Jain, and A. Dumitrescu, Evolutionary Computation, CRC press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• R. Eberhart and J. Kennedy, A new optimizer using particle swarm theory, in MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, IEEE, 1995, pp. 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• K. Eguchi, T. Inoue, and A. Tsuneda, Synthesis and analysis of a digital chaos circuit generating multiple-scroll strange attractors, IEICE T. Fund. Electr. Commun. Comput. Sci. 82 (1999), pp. 965–972.
   Google Scholar
• B.I. Epureanu and E.H. Dowell, On the optimality of the ott-grebogi-yorke control scheme, Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenomena 116 (1998), pp. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• A.E. Ezugwu, A.K. Shukla, R. Nath, A.A. Akinyelu, J.O. Agushaka, H. Chiroma, and P.K. Muhuri, Metaheuristics: A comprehensive overview and classification along with bibliometric analysis, Artif. Intell. Rev. 54 (2021), pp. 4237–4316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Feng and G. Chen, Adaptive control of discrete-time chaotic systems: A fuzzy control approach, Chaos Solitons Fractals 23 (2005), pp. 459–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Glover, Future paths for integer programming and links to artificial intelligence, Comput. Oper. Res. 13 (1986), pp. 533–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.H. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence, MIT press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• F. Hutter, H.H. Hoos, and K. Leyton-Brown, Sequential model-based optimization for general algorithm configuration, in International Conference on Learning and Intelligent optimization, Springer, 2011, pp. 507–523.
   Google Scholar
• D. Karaboga, An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization, Tech. Rep., Technical report-tr06, Erciyes university, engineering faculty, computer …, 2005
   Google Scholar
• J.R. Koza, Genetic programming as a means for programming computers by natural selection, Stat. Comput. 4 (1994), pp. 87–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kuznetsov, G. Leonov, and M. Shumafov, A short survey on pyragas time-delay feedback stabilization and odd number limitation, IFAC-PapersOnLine 48 (2015), pp. 706–709.
   Google Scholar
• M. López-Ibáñez, J. Dubois-Lacoste, L.P. Cáceres, M. Birattari, and T. Stützle, The irace package: Iterated racing for automatic algorithm configuration, Oper. Res. Perspect. 3 (2016), pp. 43–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Lukoševičius, A practical guide to applying echo state networks, in Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, 2012, pp. 659–686.
   Google Scholar
• R. Matousek and T. Hulka, Stabilization of higher periodic orbits of the chaotic logistic and hénon maps using meta-evolutionary approaches, in 2019 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1758–1765.
   Google Scholar
• R. Matousek, L. Dobrovsky, P. Minar, and K. Mouralova, A note about robust stabilization of chaotic hénon system using grammatical evolution, in Proceedings of the 2014 International Nostradamus conference on modern methods of prediction, modeling and analysis of nonlinear systems, June 23–25, 2014, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• L. Medsker and L.C. Jain, Recurrent Neural Networks: Design and Applications, CRC press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• M. Metlicka and D. Davendra, Chaos driven discrete artificial bee algorithm for location and assignment optimisation problems, Swarm. Evol. Comput. 25 (2015), pp. 15–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mirjalili, S.M. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis, Grey wolf optimizer, Adv. Eng. Softw. 69 (2014), pp. 46–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Nolle, I. Zelinka, A.A. Hopgood, and A. Goodyear, Comparison of an self-organizing migration algorithm with simulated annealing and differential evolution for automated waveform tuning, Adv. Eng. Softw. 36 (2005), pp. 645–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.K. Oplatkova, R. Senkerik, I. Zelinka, and M. Pluhacek, Analytic programming in the task of evolutionary synthesis of a controller for high order oscillations stabilization of discrete chaotic systems, Comput. Math. Appl. 66 (2013), pp. 177–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Ott, C. Grebogi, and J.A. Yorke, Controlling chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (1990), pp. 1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Poincaré, On the problem of three bodies and equations of dynamics, Acta Math. 13 (1890), pp. A3–A270.
   Google Scholar
• K. Pyragas, Delayed feedback control of chaos, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 364 (2006), pp. 2309–2334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Rashedi, H. Nezamabadi-Pour, and S. Saryazdi, Gsa: A gravitational search algorithm, Inf. Sci. (Ny) 179 (2009), pp. 2232–2248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Richter and K.J. Reinschke, Optimization of local control of chaos by an evolutionary algorithm, Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. 144 (2000), pp. 309–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Richter, An evolutionary algorithm for controlling chaos: The use of multi–objective fitness functions, in International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, Springer, 2002, pp. 308–317.
   Google Scholar
• C. Ryan, J.J. Collins, and M.O. Neill, Grammatical evolution: Evolving programs for an arbitrary language, in European Conference on Genetic Programming, Springer, 1998, pp. 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• E. Schöll and H.G. Schuster (eds.), Handbook of Chaos Control, 2nd ed., WILEY-VCH, Weinheim, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• R. Senkerik, I. Zelinka, D. Davendra, and Z. Oplatkova, Evolutionary optimisation of hénon map control: A black box approach, Int. J. Oper. Res. 13 (2012), pp. 129–146.
   Google Scholar
• R. Senkerik, Z. Oplatkova, I. Zelinka, and D. Davendra, Synthesis of feedback controller for three selected chaotic systems by means of evolutionary techniques: Analytic programming, Math. Comput. Model. 57 (2013), pp. 57–67.
   Google Scholar
• R. Senkerik, Z. Kominkova Oplatkova, I. Zelinka, B. Chramcov, D.D. Davendra, and M. Pluhacek, Utilization of analytic programming for the evolutionary synthesis of the robust multi-chaotic controller for selected sets of discrete chaotic systems, Soft. Comput. 18 (2014), pp. 651–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Senkerik, M. Pluhacek, I. Zelinka, D. Davendra, and Z. Kominkova Oplatkova, Comparison of chaos driven PSO and differential evolution on the selected PID tuning problem, in IFIP International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management, Springer, 2015, pp. 67–76.
   Google Scholar
• R. Senkerik, A. Viktorin, M. Pluhacek, and T. Kadavy, On the population diversity for the chaotic differential evolution, in 2018 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• R. Storn and K. Price, Differential evolution–a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces, J. Global Optim. 11 (1997), pp. 341–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Thom, tabilité structurelle et morphogénèse: essai d'une théorie générale des modèles, Mathematical physics monograph series 17 (1972), p. 362.
   Google Scholar
• T. Ueta and G. Chen, Bifurcation analysis of chen's equation, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 10 (2000), pp. 1917–1931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Ushio, Synthesis of synchronized chaotic systems based on observers, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 9 (1999), pp. 541–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Vaněček and S. Čelikovskỳ, Control Systems: From Linear Analysis to Synthesis of Chaos, Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd., 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Vasicek and L. Sekanina, On area minimization of complex combinational circuits using cartesian genetic programming, in 2012 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE, 2012, pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• A. Viktorin, M. Pluhacek, and R. Senkerik, Success-history based adaptive differential evolution algorithm with multi-chaotic framework for parent selection performance on CEC2014 benchmark set, in 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), IEEE, 2016, pp. 4797–4803.
   Google Scholar
• M.D. Vose, The Simple Genetic Algorithm: Foundations and Theory, MIT press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• M.D. Vose and G.E. Liepins, Punctuated equilibria in genetic search, Complex Syst. 5 (1991), pp. 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• M.D. Vose and A.H. Wright, Simple genetic algorithms with linear fitness, Evol. Comput. 2 (1994), pp. 347–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.H. Wright and A. Agapie, Cyclic and chaotic behavior in genetic algorithms, in Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Citeseer, 2001, pp. 718–724.
   Google Scholar
• S.K. Yang, C.L. Chen, and H.T. Yau, Control of chaos in lorenz system, Chaos Solitons Fractals 13 (2002), pp. 767–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Zelinka, Investigation on evolutionary deterministic chaos control, IFAC Proc. Vol. 38 (2005), pp. 1101–1106.
   Google Scholar
• I. Zelinka, Real-time deterministic chaos control by means of selected evolutionary techniques, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 22 (2009), pp. 283–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Zelinka, Soma–self-organizing migrating algorithm, in Self-Organizing Migrating Algorithm, Springer, Cham, 2016, pp. 3–49.
   Google Scholar
• I. Zelinka, G. Chen, and S. Celikovsky, Chaos synthesis by means of evolutionary algorithms, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 18 (2008), pp. 911–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Zelinka, R. Senkerik, and E. Navratil, Investigation on evolutionary optimization of chaos control, Chaos Solitons Fractals 40 (2009), pp. 111–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Zelinka, S. Celikovskỳ, H. Richter, and G. Chen, Evolutionary Algorithms and Chaotic Systems, Vol. 267, Springer, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• I. Zelinka, D. Davendra, R. Senkerik, R. Jasek, and Z. Oplatkova,Analytical Programming - a Novel Approach for Evolutionary Synthesis of Symbolic Structures, in Evolutionary Algorithms, E. Kita (ed.), InTech, 2011. ISBN: 978-953-307-171-8.
   Google Scholar
• I. Zelinka, M. Chadli, D. Davendra, R. Senkerik, and R. Jasek, An investigation on evolutionary reconstruction of continuous chaotic systems, Math. Comput. Model. 57 (2013), pp. 2–15.
   Google Scholar
• I. Zelinka, Q.B. Diep, V. Snášel, S. Das, G. Innocenti, A. Tesi, F. Schoen, and N.V. Kuznetsov, Impact of chaotic dynamics on the performance of metaheuristic optimization algorithms: An experimental analysis, Inf. Sci. (Ny) 587 (2022), pp. 692–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Zhou, G. Chen, and S. Čelikovskỳ, An algorithm for computing heteroclinic orbits and its application to chaos synthesis in the generalized lorenz system, IFAC Proc. Vol. 38 (2005), pp. 1079–1084.
   Google Scholar